簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 賴俐安
Lily Lai
論文名稱: 國中青少年霸凌旁觀行為與相關社會心理特性的探討
Associations of Psychosocial Characteristics and Bystander Behaviors during Bullying among Adolescents: A person Centered Approach
指導教授: 程景琳
Cheng, Ching-Ling
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 67
中文關鍵詞: 旁觀者行為個人中心分析取向社會心理特性校園霸凌
英文關鍵詞: Bystander behaviors, Person-centered approach, Psychosocial characteristic, School bullying
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000328
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:245下載:17
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究之目的乃針對國中青少年對校園霸凌之旁觀行為反應(即:協助罷凌者行為、強化罷凌者行為、捍衛受害者行為、安慰受害者行為),使用個人中心分析取向(person-centered approach)之群集分析(cluster analysis)進行分組;並進一步探討,分析所得之群集在社交地位(社交計量受歡迎度及同儕知覺受歡迎度)、社會目標(受歡迎及親密感目標)與社會行為(支配傾向及利社會傾向)等指標上,是否具有顯著的差異性。研究參與者為261名國中學生(包含133名男孩,平均年齡為14.6歲),以同儕提名問卷收集旁觀者行為反應、社交地位、社會行為等資料,並以自陳量表收集社會目標的資料。分析結果顯示,本研究可得三組不同的旁觀者群集:(一)利受害者團體(pro-victim group):此群集成員的行為特性乃具有高度捍衛及安慰受害同儕之行為反應;(二)局外者團體(outsider group):此群集成員在四項旁觀行為反應的傾向都相對較低;(三)利霸凌者團體(pro-bully group):此群體成員相對具有較高程度之協助和強化罷凌者的行為反應。此外,利受害者團體之青少年具有較高的社交地位、以及希望獲得親密關係的社會目標;利霸凌者團體之青少年則具有較高的支配傾向、且相對最低的同儕接受度;而局外者團體在本研究所探討之相關社會心理特性中,並未表現出相對較高或較低之傾向。研究結果顯示,藉由區分出不同旁觀者群集在社會心理特性上的差異,將有助於更進一步地了解國中校園中之霸凌旁觀者特性,從而協助促進對於霸凌旁觀者之正向介入。

    This study adopts a person-centered approach to categorize a sample of adolescents into clusters based on their similarities on the dimensions of bystander’s reactions (i.e., assisting, reinforcing, upstanding, comforting) to bullying situation. This study further examines whether and how these cluster profiles would differ from each other with respect to the social statuses (i.e., peer-acceptance, popularity), social goals (i.e., popularity, intimacy) and social behaviors (i.e., dominancy, pro-sociality). Total of 261 middle school students (133 boys, Mage=14.6) completed the peer-nomination surveys for collecting the bystander behavior, social status and social behavior, in addition to a self-report for social goal. The results demonstrated three different bystander clusters: (1) the pro-victim group, participant with high upstanding and high comforting behaviors; (2) the outsider group, participants with low in all the bystander behaviors; and (3) the pro-bully group, participants with high assisting and high reinforcing behaviors. Additionally, the pro-victim group consisted of adolescents who had high social statuses in class and those who desired for intimacy goal. The outsider group represented by adolescents who did not demonstrate relatively higher of lower tendencies in all the studied psychosocial characteristics. The pro-bully group consisted of adolescents who had high dominancy and least accepted among peers. These findings suggested that the bystander clusters were able to be differentiated from the aspects of psychosocial characteristics and could be beneficial for a better understanding of the bystander groups in school bullying in order to boost positive bystander interventions.

    Acknowledgements i Chinese Abstract ii Abstract iii Table of Contents v List of Tables viii List of Figures ix Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Background of School Bullying 1 1.2 The roles of Bystanders 1 1.3 Social Characteristics in Adolescents 2 1.4 Purpose of the Study 3 Chapter 2: Literature Review 5 2.1 School Bullying 5 2.1.1 Prevalence of School Bullying and Why They Bully 6 2.1.2 Bullying Types and Bullying Roles 7 2.2 Bystanders 8 2.2.1 Bystander Roles 8 2.2.2 Importance of Bystanders 10 2.3 Social Status 12 2.3.1 Defining Social Status 12 2.3.2 Sociometric Popularity and Bystander Reactions 14 2.3.3 Peer-Perceived Popularity and Bystander Reactions 15 2.4 Social Goals 16 2.4.1 Social Goals in School Adjustment 16 2.4.2 Two Important Social Goals in Adolescences 17 2.5 Social Behavior 19 2.5.1 Dominant Tendency in Adolescents and Their Bystander Reactions 19 2.5.2 Prosocial Tendency in Adolescents and Their Bystander Behaviors 20 2.6 The Current Study 22 Chapter 3: Method 26 3.1 Participants 26 3.2 Measures 26 3.3 Procedures 27 3.4 Data Analysis 28 Chapter 4: Results 29 4.1 Descriptive analyses 29 4.1.1 Bystander Reactions and Social Statuses 29 4.1.2 Bystander Reactions and Social Goals 29 4.1.3 Bystander Reactions and Social Behaviors 30 4.2 Classification of Bystander reactions 32 4.3 MANOVA and post-hoc comparisons 34 Chapter 5 Discussion 37 5.1 Discussion of the Findings 37 5.1.1 Bystander Reactions and the Studied Psychosocial Characteristics 37 5.1.2 Bystander Behavior Clusters 39 5.1.3 Profiles of Bystander Behavior Clusters: Associations with Studied Variables 40 5.1.4 The Social Dimension and the Bystander Clusters 42 5.2 Limitations 43 5.3 Future Direction 44 5.4 Implications 45 References 48

    Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1995). Dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in preadolescent cliques. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(3), 145-145.
    Adler, P. A., Kless, S. J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65(3), 169-187.
    Arseneault, L., Bowes, L., & Shakoor, S. (2010). Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: ‘Much ado about nothing’?. Psychological Medicine, 40(5), 717-729.
    Batsche, G. M., & Knoff, H. M. (1994). Bullies and their victims: Understanding a pervasive problem in the schools. School Psychology Review, 23(2), 165-174.
    Batson, C.D., Van Lange, P. A. M., Ahmad, N., & Lishner, D. A. (2003). Altruism and helping behavior. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 279-295). London: Sage Publications.
    Beale, A. V. (2001). " Bullybusters": Using drama to empower students to take a stand against bullying behavior. Professional School Counseling, 4(4), 300.
    Bean, S. A. (2019). Bullying and Resilience in Elementary School Children and Mitigating Pro-Social Behaviors (Doctoral dissertation) Walden University, Minneapolis, America. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/ dissertations/ 6878/
    Bergman, L. R., & Lundh, L. G. (2015). The person-oriented approach: Roots and roads to the future. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 1(1-2), 1-6.
    Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9(2), 291-319.
    Bergman, L. R. & Maagnusson, D (2001), “Person-centered research”. In Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Logic of Inquiry and Research Design (pp. 11333-11339). New York, NY: Elsevier.
    Berndt, T. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Development, 53(6), 1447-1460.
    Bogat, G. A., Levendosky, A. A., & Eye, A. V. (2005). The future of research on intimate partner violence: Person‐oriented and variable‐oriented perspectives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1-2), 49-70.
    Bosacki, S. L., Marini, Z. A., & Dane, A. V. (2006). Voices from the classroom: Pictorial and narrative representations of children’s bullying experiences. Journal of Moral Education, 35(2), 231-245.
    Breckenridge, J. N. (2000). Validating cluster analysis: Consistent replication and symmetry. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35(2), 261-285.
    Buhrmester, D. (1998). Need fulfillment, interpersonal competence, and the developmental contexts of early adolescent friendship. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence; the company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 158-185) New York. NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Bukowski, W.M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of The Friendship Qualities Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(3), 471-484.
    Caravita, S. C., & Cillessen, A. H. (2012). Agentic or communal? Associations between interpersonal goals, popularity, and bullying in middle childhood and early adolescence. Social Development, 21(2), 376-395.
    Caravita, S. C., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 140-163.
    Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31-44.
    Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., McGinley, M. M., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Sandman, D. (2012). The interplay of emotional instability, empathy, and coping on prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 675-680.
    Cheng, C. L. (2010). Sociometric and perceived popularity in adolescents: Links to relational aggression and loneliness. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 42(1), 143-162.
    Cheng, Y-Y., Chen, L-M., Ho, H-C., & Cheng, C-L. (2011). Definitions of School Bullying in Taiwan: A Comparison of Multiple Perspectives. School Psychology International, 32(3), 227-243.
    Cheng, H. C., Siu, A. M., & Leung, M. C. (2006). Prosocial involvement as a positive youth development construct: Conceptual bases and implications for curriculum development. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 18(3), 393-400.
    Child Welfare League Foundation (2014). The 2014 report on school bullying in Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.children.org.tw/ news/ advocacy _detail /1174
    Child Welfare League Foundation (2019).The 2018 report on school bullying preventions. Retrieved from https://www.children.org.tw/research/detail/69/1458
    Child Welfare League Foundation (2019). A 2019 survey of Taiwanese parents’ cognitive and attitudes in school bullying. Retrieved from https://www.children.org.tw /research/detail/69/1550
    Chung, T. Y., & Asher, S. R. (1996). Children's goals and strategies in peer conflict situations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42(1), 125-147.
    Chung, H., Elias, M., & Schneider, K. (1998). Patterns of individual adjustment changes during middle school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 36(1), 83-101.
    Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147-163.
    Cillessen, A., & Marks, P. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In A. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25-56). New York, NY: Guilford.
    Cillessen, A. H., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102-105.
    Clatworthy, J., Buick, D., Hankins, M., Weinman, J., & Horne, R. (2005). The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10(3), 329-358.
    Craig, W. M., Pepler, D. J., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21(1), 22-36.
    Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children's future social adjustment. Child Development, 67(5), 2317-2327.
    Davis, S., & Nixon, C. (2011). What Students Say about Bullying. Educational Leadership, 69(1), 18-23.
    Dawes, M. (2017). Early adolescents’ social goals and school adjustment. Social Psychology of Education, 20(2), 299-328.
    Dawes, M., & Xie, H. (2014). The role of popularity goal in early adolescents’ behaviors and popularity status. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 489.
    de Bruyn, E. H., Cillessen, A. H., & Wissink, I. B. (2010). Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(4), 543-566.
    Demaray, M. K., Summers, K. H., Jenkins, L. N., & Becker, L. D. (2016). Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ): Establishing a reliable and valid measure. Journal of School Violence, 15(2), 158-188.
    Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2003). What do students say about their motivational goals?: Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(1), 91-113.
    Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58(3), 154-165.
    Edwards, D. H., & Kravitz, E. A. (1997). Serotonin, social status and aggression. Current opinion in neurobiology, 7(6), 812-819.
    Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 131-149.
    Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. New York. NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Eslea, M., Menesini, E., Morita, Y., O'Moore, M., Mora‐Merchán, J. A., Pereira, B., & Smith, P. K. (2003). Friendship and loneliness among bullies and victims: Data from seven countries. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 30(1), 71-83.
    Eslea, M., & Rees, J. (2001). At what age are children most likely to be bullied at school?. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 27(6), 419-429.
    Espelage, D., Green H. D., & Wasserman, S. (2007). Statistical analysis of friendship patterns and bullying behaviors among youth. New Directions for Child & Adolescent Development, 118, 61-75.
    Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003) Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365-383.
    Evans, C. B., & Smokowski, P. R. (2015). Prosocial bystander behavior in bullying dynamics: Assessing the impact of social capital. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2289-2307.
    Fishbach, A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2007). The goal construct in social psychology. In Kruglanski, A. W., Higgens, T. E. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 334- 352). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Forsberg, C., Wood, L., Smith, J., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Jungert, T., & Thornberg, R. (2018). Students’ views of factors affecting their bystander behaviors in response to school bullying: A cross-collaborative conceptual qualitative analysis. Research Papers in Education, 33(1), 127-142.
    Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents' bullying and defending behavior?. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 33(5), 467-476.
    Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 93-105.
    Glew, G., Rivara, F., & Feudtner, C. (2000). Bullying: children hurting children. Pediatrics in Review, 21(6), 183-190.
    Gómez-Ortiz, O., Romera-Felix, E. M., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2017). Multidimensionality of social competence: Measurement of the construct and its relationship with bullying roles. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.), 22(1), 37-44.
    Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Rittenour, C. E. (2016). Bullying as a display of social dominance orientation. Communication Research Reports, 33(2), 159-165.
    Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., & Dekker, P. H. (2006). New participant role scales: Comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 32(4), 343-357.
    Hamarus, P., & Kaikkonen, P. (2008). School bullying as a creator of pupil pressure. Educational Research, 50(4), 333-345.
    Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19(1), 97-132.
    Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 49(3), 279-309.
    Heinrichs, R. R. (2003). A whole-school approach to pullying: Special considerations for children with exceptionalities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38(4), 195-204.
    Hutchinson, M. (2012). Exploring the impact of bullying on young bystanders. Educational Psychology in Practice, 28(4), 425-442.
    Jalon, M. J. (2006). Peer violence in adolescents and its prevention from the school. Psychology in Spain, 10(1), 75-87.
    Jarvinen, D. W., & Nicholls, J. G. (1996). Adolescents’ social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 435-441.
    Jeffrey, L. R. (2004). Bullying Bystanders. Prevention Researcher, 11(3), 7-8.
    Jeffrey, L. R., Miller, D., & Linn, M. (2001). Middle school bullying as a context for the development of passive observers to the victimization of others. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(2-3), 143-156.
    Jimerson S.R., Swearer S.M., & Espelage D.L. (Eds.), (2010). Handbook of Bullying in Schools: An International Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 32(6), 540-550.
    Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: Bystanders' behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(3), 261-282.
    Kendra C. (2018). The basic of prosocial behavior. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-prosocial-behavior-2795479
    Kidsdata.org. Summary: Bullying and Harassment at School. Retrieved from https://www.kidsdata.org/topic/71/bullying-and-harassment-at-school/summary
    Kiefer, S. M., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Striving for social dominance over peers: The implications for academic adjustment during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 417.
    Kiefer, S. M., & Wang, J. H. (2016). Associations of coolness and social goals with aggression and engagement during adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 52-62.
    Kim, Y. S., Koh, Y. J., & Leventhal, B. L. (2004). Prevalence of school bullying in Korean middle school students. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158(8), 737-741.
    Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1997). Classroom peer acceptance, friendship, and victimization: Destinct relation systems that contribute uniquely to children's school adjustment?. Child Development, 68(6), 1181-1197.
    LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. (1998). The nature of children’s stereotypes of popularity. Social Development, 7(3), 301-320.
    LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130-147.
    Lam, C. M. (2013). Prosocial involvement as positive youth development construct: A conceptual review. Journal of Alternative Medical Research, 5(1), 9-18.
    Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215.
    Li, Y., & Wright, M. F. (2014). Adolescents’ social status goals: Relationships to social status insecurity, aggression, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(1), 146-160.
    Liu, Z. J., & Tung, Y. Y., (2018). The Impact of Peer Relationships, Conformity, and Cognitive Empathy of Bystander Behavioral Intentions for Cyberbullying. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 60(2), 101-124
    Locke, K. D. (2015). Agentic and communal social motives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(10), 525-538.
    Longobardi, C., Borello, L., Thornberg, R., & Settanni, M. (2019). Empathy and defending behaviours in school bullying: the mediating role of motivation to defend victims. British Journal of Educational Psychology.
    Lynn-Hawkins, D., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10(4), 512-527.
    Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In R.B. Cairns, L.R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33-63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Mares, M. L., & Woodard, E. (2005). Positive effects of television on children's social interactions: A meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 7(3), 301-322.
    Mayeux, L., & Kraft, C. (2018). Social goals moderate the associations between peer status and behavior in middle school. Social Development, 27(4), 699-714.
    McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    McConville, D. W., & Cornell, D. G. (2003). Aggressive attitudes predict aggressive behavior in middle school students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral disorders, 11(3), 179-187.
    Meter, D. J., & Card, N. A. (2015). Defenders of victims of peer aggression: Interdependence theory and an exploration of individual, interpersonal, and contextual effects on the defender participant role. Developmental Review, 38, 222-240.
    Ministry of Education of Taiwan (2012). School bullying prevention center. Retrieved from http://140.111.12.225/bully/bullying.asp
    Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674-701.
    Namsel, T. R., Overpeak, M., Pilla, R. S., & Ruam, W. J. (2001). Bullying. American Medical Association, 285, 2094-2100.
    Nation, M., Vieno, A., Perkins, D. D., & Santinello, M. (2008). Bullying in school and adolescent sense of empowerment: An analysis of relationships with parents, friends, and teachers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18(3), 211-232.
    O’Moore, M., & Kirkham, C. (2001). Self‐esteem and its relationship to bullying behaviour. Aggressive Behavior, 27(4), 269-283.
    Ojanen, T., & Nostrand, F. V. (2014). Social goals, aggression, peer preference, and popularity: Longitudinal links during middle school. Developmental psychology, 50(8), 2134.
    Ojanen, T., Findley, D., & Fuller, S. (2012). Physical and relational aggression in early adolescence: Associations with narcissism, temperament, and social goals. Aggressive Behavior, 38(2), 99-107.
    Ojanen, T., Grönroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005). An interpersonal circumplex model of children's social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41(5), 699.
    Olthof, T. (2012). Anticipated feelings of guilt and shame as predictors of early adolescents' antisocial and prosocial interpersonal behaviour. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(3), 371-388.
    Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Vermande, M. M., Aleva, E. A., & van der Meulen, M. (2011). Bullying as strategic behavior: Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49(3), 339-359.
    Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere (Wiley).
    Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive Behavior: Current Perspectives (pp. 97-130). New York, NY: Springer.
    Orpinas, P., & Horne, A. M. (2006). Bullying prevention: Creating a positive school climate and developing social competence. Washing, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Padgett, S., & Notar, C. E. (2013). Bystanders Are the Key to Stopping Bullying. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 33-41.
    Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125-144.
    Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Affiliative and aggressive dimensions of dominance and possible functions during early adolescence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(1), 21-31.
    Pellegrini, A. D. (2008). The roles of aggressive and affiliative behaviors in resource control: A behavioral ecological perspective. Developmental Review, 28(4), 461−487.
    Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 259-280.
    Pellegrini, A. D., Long, J. D., D. Solberg, C. Roseth, D. Dupuis, C. Bohn, & M. Hickey (2010). In Jimerson S. R. , Swearer S. M. , & Espelage D. L. (Eds.), Bullying and Social Status During School Transitions. International Handbook of School Bullying: An International Perspective, (pp. 199-210). New York: Routledge.
    Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (1995). A peek behind the fence: Naturalistic observations of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 548.
    Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental psychology, 24(6), 807.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667.
    Pouwels, J. L., Lansu, T. A., & Cillessen, A. H. (2016). Participant roles of bullying in adolescence: Status characteristics, social behavior, and assignment criteria. Aggressive Behavior, 42(3), 239-253.
    Pouwels, J. L., van Noorden, T. H., Lansu, T. A., & Cillessen, A. H. (2018). The participant roles of bullying in different grades: Prevalence and social status profiles. Social Development, 27(4), 732-747.
    Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). What does it take to stand up for the victim of bullying? The interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(2), 143-163.
    Pronk, J., Lee, N. C., Sandhu, D., Kaur, K., Kaur, S., Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2017). Associations between Dutch and Indian adolescents’ bullying role behavior and peer-group status: Cross-culturally testing an evolutionary hypothesis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(6), 735-742.
    Pugh, R., & Chitiyo, M. (2012). The problem of bullying in schools and the promise of positive behaviour supports. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(2), 47-53.
    Rigby, K. E. N. (2000). Effects of peer victimization in schools and perceived social support on adolescent well-being. Journal of Adolescence, 23(1), 57-68.
    Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 425-440
    Roberts, W., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 67(2), 449-470.
    Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378.
    Rowley, S. J. (2000). Profiles of African American college students’ educational utility and performance: A cluster analysis. Journal of Black Psychology, 26(1), 3-26.
    Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships and groups. In N. Eisenberg (Series Ed.) & W. Damon (Volume Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Social, Emotional and Personality Development. (6th ed., pp. 571-645). New York, NY: Wiley.
    Ryan, A. M., & Shim, S. S. (2006). Social achievement goals: The nature and consequences of different orientations toward social competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1246-1263.
    Ryan, A. M., & Shim, S. S. (2008). An exploration of young adolescents' social achievement goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 672.
    Saarento, S., Boulton, A. J., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Reducing bullying and victimization: Student-and classroom-level mechanisms of change. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 61-76.
    Sainio, M., Veenstra, R., Huitsing, G., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(2), 144-151.
    Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: implications for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 453-459.
    Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 22(1), 1-15.
    Salmivalli, C, Peets, K (2009). Bullies, victims, and bully-victim relationships in middle childhood and early adolescence. In Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M. & Laurens, B. (Eds.), In Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups, (pp. 322-340). Guilford Press: New York.
    Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 246-258.
    Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668-676.
    Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(4), 305-314.
    Sapolsky, R. M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308(5722), 648-652.
    Siegel, N. M. (2009). Kids helping kids: The influence of situational factors on peer intervention in middle school bullying. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(7-A), pp. 2608.
    Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies' status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 35(1), 57-67.
    Smith, P. K., Catalano, R., Slee, P., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., & Olweus, D. (Eds.), (1999). The Nature of School Bullying: A cross-national perspective. London, UK: Psychology Press.
    Smokowski, P. R., & Kopasz, K. H. (2005). Bullying in school: An overview of types, effects, family characteristics, and intervention strategies. Children & Schools, 27(2), 101-110.
    Sokol, N., Bussey, K., & Rapee, R. M. (2015). The effect of victims' responses to overt bullying on same-sex peer bystander reactions. Journal of School Psychology, 53(5), 375-391.
    Somerville, L. H. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 121-127.
    Sugimura, N., Berry, D., Troop-Gordon, W., & Rudolph, K. D. (2017). Early social behaviors and the trajectory of peer victimization across the school years. Developmental Psychology, 53(8), 1447.
    Summers, K., & Demaray, M. K. (2008). Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.
    Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 475-483.
    Thornberg, R., Tenenbaum, L., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Jungert, T., & Vanegas, G. (2012). Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: To intervene or not to intervene?. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(3), 247.
    Trach, J., Hymel, S., Waterhouse, T., & Neale, K. (2010). Bystander responses to school bullying: A cross-sectional investigation of grade and sex differences. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(1), 114-130.
    Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., & Sacco, F. C. (2001). An innovative psycho dynamically influenced approach to reduce school violence. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(3), 377-279.
    Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., & Sacco, F. C. (2004). The role of the bystander in the social architecture of bullying and violence in schools and communities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1036, 215-232.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services of Stopbullying.gov (2019). What is bullying. Retrieved from https://www.stopbullying.gov/bullying/what-is-bullying
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services of Stopbullying.gov (2019). Facts about bullying. Retrieved from https://www.stopbullying.gov/resources /facts #footnote3 _t gdrbre
    Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 331-349.
    Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer‐valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 32(4), 396-408.
    Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 157-176.
    Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Bellmoff, L., Lopp, E., Birckbichler, L., & Marshall, M. (2008). Missing voices: Fourth through eight grade urban students’ perceptions of bullying. Journal of School Violence, 7(4), 97-118.
    Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. J., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual‐perspective theory. Child Development, 78(6), 1843-1854.
    Ward Jr, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236-244.
    Warden, D., & Mackinnon, S. (2003). Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem‐solving strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(3), 367-385.
    Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202.
    World Health Organization. Health for the world’s organization. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/adolescent/second-decade/section1
    Wu, W. C., Luh, D. L., Yen, L. L. (2013). Individual and family correlates of bullying roles among junior high school students in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 23(4), 372-381

    下載圖示
    QR CODE