簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許高誌
Hsu, Kao-Chih
論文名稱: 員工的團隊自主性對創新行為影響之研究─以工作滿意度為中介變項
A Study of the Influence of Employees’ Team Autonomy on Innovative Behavior – Using Job Satisfaction as a Mediator
指導教授: 朱益賢
Chu, Yih-Hsien
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 96
中文關鍵詞: 員工自主性工作自主性團隊自主性工作滿意度創新行為
英文關鍵詞: Employee Autonomy, Job Autonomy, Team Autonomy, Job Satisfaction, Innovative Behavior
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202001057
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:94下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在競爭激烈、科技日新月異的的環境中,員工自主性與創新行為被認為是能夠讓組織保持活力,不被環境洪流淹沒的重要概念。透過賦予員工自主性,使組織中的成員得到一展長才的機會,而員工的創新行為能使組織能隨時檢視自身的狀態,並進一步進行調整與改善,透過這兩方面的影響,讓組織有能力去快速適應變遷的環境。
    員工自主性為組織成員在面對組織的任務時,在任務的執行上,能夠掌控的程度,但現在許多任務無法單靠個人的能力來解決,需要透過團隊力量才能完成目標。因此在自主性相關的探討上,本研究主要針對團隊能擁有的自主性進行討論。實現創新需要將行動力與想像力進行結合,創新行為指的是實現創新中的行動力。當團隊成員能感知到所在的團隊具有較高的自主性時,在心理上,成員會比較容易對於工作產生正面的想法。若成員對於現況產生新想法時,成員會因此有比較高意願對新想法進行嘗試。
    本研究旨在探討員工的團隊自主性對於創新行為的影響,並以工作滿意度作為中介變項,為達上述目的,本研究以電子產業中的技術研發與行銷企劃的團隊成員作為研究對象。研究方法採問卷調查法,於2017年9月至12月共回收有效問卷271份,而後將資料進行統計分析後,並提出以下結論。
    一、團隊自主性對於員工的創新行為有顯著正向的影響,其中以團隊工作方法自主性最為明顯。
    二、工作滿意度對於員工的創新行為有顯著正向的影響。
    三、團隊自主性對於員工的工作滿意度有顯著正向的影響,其中以團隊工作標準自主性最為明顯。
    四、工作滿意度對於員工所感知到的團隊自主性對於其創新行為的展現具有部分中介的效果。
    根據本研究的結果,團隊自主性中的團隊工作方法自主性與團隊工作標準自主性對於員工展現其創新行為的頻率的影響最高,若組織想增進員工出現創新行為,可以透過這提升團隊工作方法與工作標準這兩方面的自主性,但若想增加出現創新構想的頻率的話,可以先提升團隊工作方法與團隊工作時間方面的自主性。

    In a highly competitive environment, employee autonomy and innovative behavior are both considered as important concepts that keep companies and organizations surviving. With the autonomy given, members of the organizations have the opportunity to exercise their expertise. Employees' innovative behavior allow organizations to continuously adapt and reform themselves. Through both of them, an organization will be able to adapt itself to the rapidly changing environment.
    Employee autonomy is defined as the degree of which a member responsible for organizing a task has control over the execution of. But, many tasks do not only require the ability of the employees, but also the power of the team. So, this study focuses on the autonomy which a team has. Innovation requires the combination of imagination and execution. Innovative behavior is defined as the implementation of innovative execution. When the members of a team perceive a higher degree of team autonomy, they tend to harbor positive thoughts psychologically about the work. When members come up with new ideas, they are therefore willing to try new ideas.
    The purpose of this study is to explore the influence of team autonomy of employee innovation behavior in Taiwan's workplace. Job satisfaction is used as a mediator. To achieve the aforementioned objectives, this study targets the team members in the RD&D and the marketing planning of the electronics industries as participants. From September to December 2017, 271 effective questionnaires were collected. Through statistical analysis of the effective questionnaires, the following conclusions were obtained:
    1. Team autonomy perceived has a significant positive impact on employee’s innovative behavior, among which the autonomy of teamwork method is the most obvious.
    2. Job satisfaction of employees has a significant positive impact on employees’ innovation behavior.
    3. Team autonomy has a significant positive impact on job satisfaction of employees, among which the autonomy of teamwork standard is the most obvious.
    4. Job satisfaction of employees acts as a mediator of team autonomy between employees and their innovative behaviors.
    According to the results of this study, teamwork method autonomy and teamwork standard autonomy have the highest impact on the frequency with which employees demonstrate their innovative behavior. If organizations look forward to promote innovation behaviors, the increase of autonomy of teamwork method and teamwork standard are highly recommended. If organizations want to stimulate more innovation ideas, team's work methods and team's job scheduling autonomy can be improved to begin with.

    誌 謝 i 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT v 目 錄 vii 表 次 ix 圖 次 xi 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究緣起 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 名詞解釋 4 第四節 研究範圍與限制 5 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 員工團隊自主性 7 第二節 創新行為 11 第三節 工作滿意度 15 第四節 各變項之間相關性的探討 20 第三章 研究設計與實施 27 第一節 研究架構與假設 27 第二節 研究方法 28 第三節 研究工具 29 第四節 研究對象 40 第五節 資料分析 41 第六節 研究流程 43 第四章 結果與討論 47 第一節 描述性統計分析 47 第二節 信度檢定 53 第三節 相關分析 54 第四節 迴歸分析 56 第五節 研究假設驗證 64 第五章 結論與建議 67 第一節 結論 67 第二節 建議 69 參考文獻 71 一、中文部分 71 二、外文部分 75 附錄 85 附錄一 問卷(專家審查版) 86 附錄二 專家問卷修訂對照表 92 附錄三 員工團隊自主性對創新行為之影響之調查問卷(正式) 94

    參考文獻
    一、中文部分
    方顯光、陳國嘉、陳嘉珮、羅偉綸 (2012)。客服人員情緒勞務負擔與工作滿意度之研究-以亞太電信為例。全球管理與經濟,8(1),48-62。
    牛涵錚、辛敏綺 (2011)。創新與創業精神研究之回顧與發展。創新與管理,8(4),33-62。
    王端旭、趙軼 (2011)。工作自主性、技能多樣性與員工創造力:基於個性特徵的調節效應模型。商業經濟與管理,10,43-50。杭州。
    江明修 (2002)。研究方法論。台北: 智勝。
    余明助、李孟修 (2013)。高績效人力資源實務、感知社會支持、組織承諾與個人創新行為關係之研究—以社會交換理論觀點。勞資關係論叢,15(2),1-23。
    吳修辰、蔡靚萱、趙維肖 (2016)。解密Pokémon狂潮。商業周刊,1497,76-88。
    吳統雄 (2011)。最適樣本數。取自http://tx.liberal.ntu.edu.tw/~PurpleWoo/Methodology/Sampling_Size_Optimal.htm
    吳凱琳 (2007)。創新的兩難(原作者:C. M. Christensen )。臺北市:商周出版(原著出版年:1997)
    吳靜吉、廖素華(1978)。明尼蘇達滿意問卷研究。政治大學學報,37-38。
    李美玲、周萍芬 (2003)。員工認知對工作態度與工作績效之探討。遠東學報,20(4),869-882。
    杜秉叡、黃鈺涵 (2014)。人格會調節工作壓力與工作滿意度之關係嗎?。多國籍企業管理評論,8(2),123-150。
    杜淑娟 (2012)。主動積極性格可以降低工作倦怠嗎?由特質活化理論檢視知覺主管支持與工作自主性的調節效果 (碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/81922845380207827121
    周姵君 (2014)。工作家庭衝突對創新行為之影響-以工作滿意為中介變項 (碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/43424607530435755096
    林尚平、劉敏興、陳建龍 (2013)。職涯功能定位與專業承諾之關係:以工作滿意度為中介變項。觀光休閒學報,19(2),179-205。
    林明杰、李信達 (2011)。組織社會化程度、授權賦能認知對個人創新行為影響之研究:顧客導向行為的中介效果。科技管理學刊,16(2),53-80。
    林明達 (2010)。知覺組織支持、團隊自主性與專業團隊績效:以台灣各縣市體育會為例 (碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/34048107508611498403
    邱皓政 (2011)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市:五南。
    邱雅萍、吳舒晨與吳泰震 (2008)。塑造團隊特性以提升團隊成員知識分享與知識創造之研究。萬能商學學報,13,51-68。
    徐承毅、李文雄、許志賢 (2007)。人事人員背景對工作滿意度之研究-以T公司為例。通識研究集刊,11,217-250。
    徐聯恩、洪兆祥 (2013)。營造支持性氛圍就能促進員工創新嗎?。創業管理研究,8(3),23-46。
    張仁家 (2009)。專科學校教師工作自主性、組織學習、團體凝聚力與課程與教學創新之關係研究。技術及職業教育學報,3(2),1-21。
    張春興 (1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
    張紹勳 (2002)。電子商店之關係品質模式----融合交易成本理論及科技接受模式的觀點 (博士論文)。國立政治大學資訊管理學系。未出版,台北市。
    張騰 (2014)。發展機會、工作自主性對情感承諾及組織公民行為的影響 (碩士論文)。取自:http://etds.must.edu.mo/etdservice/download_file?etdun=U0142-14072014140
    許士軍 (1990)。管理學。臺北市:東華書局股份有限公司。
    陳彥茹 (2013)。組織創新如何影響員工創新行為? 以人力資源和創新氣氛為中介變項 (碩士論文)。取自http://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT079962530。
    陳慶輝(2016)。製造業價值鏈資訊應用計畫。經濟部工業局產業振興科。取自https://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/external/ctlr?PRO=project.rwdProjectView&id=1286#
    陳聰典 (2002)。工作自主性、工作壓力與創造力關係之研究。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/96649325126286885635。
    彭于萍、翁振益 (2009)。服務業員工之工作自主性與組織公民行為之關係探討─以工作滿意度為中介變項。崇右學報,15(2),167-194。
    曾志超(2014年4月25日)。鼓勵創新扭轉台灣科技產業的未來稱【部落格文字資料】。取自http://www.npf.org.tw/2/13527
    游偉誌(2001年9月6日)。女性就業空間分析報告【新聞群組】。取自http://www.104.com.tw/cfdocs/2000/analysis/report_010906.htm
    張正苓、胡玉城(譯)(2016)。無主管公司:Google、Twitter、Zappos……都在用的新型管理制度,人人是領導,零管理反而更有競爭力、創造高績效(原作者:B. J. Robertson )。臺北市:三采文化(原著出版年:2015)。
    黃家齊、黃荷婷 (2006)。團隊成員目標導向對於自我與集體效能及創新之影響一個多層次研究。管理學報,23(3),327-346。
    楊少杰 (2015)。全面解讀合弄制(Holacracy)管理模式【部落格文字資料】。取自http://www.chinahrd.net/blog/350/227499/349423.html
    萬維鋼 (2014年6月3日)。Holacracy:一種新的管理方法【部落格文字資料】。取自http://www.geekonomics10000.com/820
    趙心潔 (2000)。激勵性報酬、員工屬性與工作滿意度之研究-以高科技產業為實證對象。亞太管理評論5(1),53-74。
    鄞惠君 (2002)。海陸輪調制度對海陸勤人員工作滿足與組織承諾之相關探討─以A公司海陸勤人員為例 (碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/00261340721927471243
    劉東、陳曉萍、姚欣 (2012)。從自主到創新:和諧式激情中介作用。Journal of Applied Psychology, 201(96),294-309。
    蔡啟通 (2008)。內在動機與員工創新行為之關係:Amabile 三元交互效果及Shin中介效果之驗證。管理學報,25,549-575。
    蔡靚萱 (2016)。全球最當紅的企業長這樣!。商業周刊,1472。80-93。
    鄭驍 (譯) (2012)。Valve新員工手冊。取自http://media.steampowered.com/apps/valve/hbook-SCH.pdf

    二、外文部分
    Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
    Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
    Amabile, T. M., & Gitomer, J. (1984). Children's artistic creativity: Effects of choice in task materials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 209-215.
    Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403.
    Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.
    Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. doi:10.1177/0149206314527128
    Bailyn, L. (1985). Autonomy in the industrial R & D Lab. Human Resource Management, 24(2), 129-146.
    Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
    Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership: Good, Better, Best. Organizational Dynamics, 13(3), 26-40.
    Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
    Bell, S. J., & Menguc, B. (2002). The employee-organization relationship, organizational citizenship behaviors, and superior service quality. Journal of Retailing, 78(2), 131-146.
    Blum M, Naylor J. (1986). Industrial psychology: Its theoretical and social foundation. New York: Harper and Row.
    Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307-311.
    Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The Measurement of Work Autonomy, Human Relations, 38(6), 551-579.
    Campbell, J. P., Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, K. E., & Weick, K. E. (1970). Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Carnegie, R. and Butlin, M. (1993). Managing the innovative enterprise: Australian companiescompeting against the world’s best. Melbourne: Business Council of Australia.
    Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
    Cohen-Meitar, R., Carmeli, A., & Waldman, D. A. (2009). Linking meaningfulness in the workplace to employee creativity: The intervening role of organizational identification and positive psychological experiences. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 361–375.
    Cordery, J. L., Morrison, D., Wright, B. M., & Wall, T. D. (2010). The impact of autonomy and task uncertainty on team performance: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2‐3), 240-258.
    Cribbin, J.J. (1972). Effective Managerial Leadership, New York: American Management Association.
    Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, (3). 555-590.
    De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64. doi:10.1108/14601060710720546
    Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating Internalization: The Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119-142. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.ep9406221281
    Dierdorff, E. C., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Consensus in work role requirements: The influence of discrete occupational context on role expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1228-1241.
    Ford, B., & Kleiner, B. H. (1987). Managing engineers effectively. Business, 37(1), 49-52.
    Fried, Y. & Ferris, G.R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40, 281-322.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 328–388.
    Galbraith, J. R. (1982). Designing the innovating organization. Organizational Dynamics, 10(3), 5-25.
    Gerwin, D., Moffat, L. (1997). Authorizing processes changing team autonomy during new product development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14, 291-313.
    Greenhaus, J. H., & Callanan, G. A. (1994). Career Management. Fort Worth, Texas: The Dryden Press.
    Gustainiené, L. and Endriulaitiené, A. (2009). Job satisfaction and subjective health among sales managers, Baltic Journal of Management,4(1), 51–66.
    Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organization behavior, 15-342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
    Hackman, J. R. and Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of The Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170.
    Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work Redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings (5th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hal.
    Hass, M. R. (2006). Knowledge gathering, team capabilities, and project performance in challenging work environments. Management Science, (8), 1170-1184
    Hastings, W. R. (2009, Aug 1). Netflix Culture: Freedom & Responsibility. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/reed2001/culture-1798664/2-Netflix_CultureFreedom_Responsibility2
    Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 40(1), 53-62.
    Holt, K. (1988). The role of the user in product innovation. Technovation, 7(3), 249-258.
    Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper & Brother Publisher.
    Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive Affect, In T. Dalgleish and M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp.521-539). New York: Wiley.
    Ivancevich, J., & Donnelly, J. (1975). Relation of organizational structure to job satisfaction, anxiety-stress, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(2), 272-280.
    Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort--reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
    Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A., & Locke, E. A. (2005). Core Self-Evaluations and Job and Life Satisfaction: The Role of Self-Concordance and Goal Attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 257-268. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.257
    Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
    Kianto, A., Vanhala, M., & Heilmann, P. (2016). The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(4), 621-636. doi:10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0398
    Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.
    Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165-186.
    Langfred, C. W. (2000). The Paradox of Self-Management: Individual and Group Autonomy in Work Groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 563-585.
    Langfred, C. W. (2005). Autonomy and performance in teams: The multilevel moderating effect of task interdependence. Journal of Management,31 (4), 513-529.
    Livingstone, L., Palich, I., Carini, G. (1998). Viewing strategic innovation through the logic of contradiction. Competitiveness Review, 8(1), 46-54.
    Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satısfaction. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1st ed.). Chicago, 45, 1297-1349.
    Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    Loher, B. T., Noe, R. A., Moeller, N. L., & Fitzgerald, M. P. (1985). A meta-analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 280-289.
    Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.
    Mccormick, E.J., and Tiffin, J. (1974). Industrial psychology (6 th Ed). Englewood Cliffs N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
    Miller, D. B. (1986). Managing professionals in research and development: A guide for improving productivity and organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
    Morse, N.C. (1953). Satisfaction in White Collar Job. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
    Nabers, J. (2014, July 16). Holy holacracy [Web blog message]. Retrieved from http://hrdesigns.com/holy-holacracy
    Nerkar, A. A., McGrath, R.G., MacMillan, I. C. (1996). Three facets of satisfaction and their influence on the performance of innovation teams. Journal of Business, 11,167-188
    Nguyen, A. N., Taylor, J., & Bradley, S. (2003). Job autonomy and job satisfaction: new evidence (Lancaster University). Retrieved from https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/staff/ecasb/papers/job%20autonomy%20%20job%20satisfaction%2030july03.pdf
    OECS (2005). Defining innovation. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/site/innovationstrategy/defininginnovation.htm
    Porter, L. (1961). A study of perceived need satisfactions in bottom and middle management jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45(1), 1-10. doi:10.1037/h0043121
    Rogers, E. M. (2002). Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addictive Behaviors, 27(Integrating Substance Abuse Treatment and Prevention in the Community), 989-993. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00300-3
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
    Shaikh, M. A., Bhutto, N. A., & Mailto, Q. (2012). Facets of job satisfaction and its association with performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7), 322-326.
    Shalley, C. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 179.
    Shalley, C. E. Gilson, L., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 215-223.
    Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53.
    Shonk, J. H. (1992). Team-based organizations: Developing a successful team environment. Homewood, Ill: Business One Irwin.
    Smith, P. C., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Spector, P.E. (1994). Job Satisfaction Survey (University of South Florida). Retrieved from http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~spector/scales/jsspag.html
    Sweetman D, Avery J. B., & Luthans F. (2011). Relationship between Positive Psychological Capital and Creative Performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28, 4-13.
    Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30(3), 413-432
    Utterback, J. M. (1996). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Publication.
    Užienė, L. (2015). Open Innovation, Knowledge Flows and Intellectual Capital. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213 (20th International Scientific Conference "Economics and Management 2015 (ICEM-2015)"), 1057-1062. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.525
    Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
    Van Mierlo, H., Rutte, C. G., Vermunt, J. K., Kompier, M. J., & Doorewaard, J. M. (2007). A multi-level mediation model of the relationships between team autonomy, individual task design and psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 647-664.
    Van Mierlo, H., Rutte, C. V., Vermunt, J. K., Kompier, M. A. J., & Doorewaard, J. A. M. C. (2006). Individual autonomy in work teams: The role of team autonomy, self-efficacy, and social support. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(3), 281-299.
    Van Veldhoven, M. (2013). Questionnaire on the Experience and Evaluation of Work – QEEW. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262493487_Questionnaire_on_the_Experience_and_Evaluation_of_Work_-_QEEW
    Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
    Weiss, D.J., Dawis, R.V., England, G.W. and Lofquist, L.H. (1967). Manual for the minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
    West, M., & Farr, J. (1989). Innovation at work: psychological perspectives. Social Behavior, 4, 15-30.
    Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
    Xie, J. L. and Johns, G. (1995). Job scope and stress: can job scope be too high. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1288-1309.

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2025/07/31
    QR CODE