簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 鄭惠雯
Cheng, Hui-Wen
論文名稱: 社區高齡者參與大學社會責任活動之相關研究-以臺北市萌芽型計畫為例
Community Older Adults’ Participation in University Social Responsibility Events: A Case Study on the Taipei City Germination Program
指導教授: 張少熙
Chang, Shao-Hsi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 93
中文關鍵詞: 大學社會責任高齡者活動參與社會責任知覺
英文關鍵詞: university social responsibility, older adults, activity participation, measuring university social responsibility
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202001419
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:94下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 因應高齡化時代急遽加速的到來,為高齡者安排妥當的照護是勢在必行,我國教育部自2017年開始推行大學社會責任實踐計畫,並於2018年正式連結高教深耕計畫,在各大專院校實施辦理大學社會責任計畫活動,本研究主要探討大學社會責任計畫對於社區高齡者在活動參與投入及社會責任知覺之相關情形。
    本研究以國立臺灣師範大學、國立陽明大學、臺北醫學大學所舉辦的大學社會責任活動之高齡者為主要對象,採立意抽樣法並以網路問卷及現場發放問卷,進行問卷調查。總計回收共問卷297份,有效問卷數為295份。問卷回收後以描述性統計、獨立樣本 t 檢定、單因子變異數分析及皮爾森積差相關等統計方式進行分析,所得研究結果如下:一、參與者主要以女性、70-74歲、國中(含)以下學歷及已婚為主要對象,活動種類則以健康體適能最多人參與;二、參與者在活動參與投入上會因其性別、年齡與教育程度的不同,感受也不相同,並且在參與學習成效上以課程學習活動達顯著;三、參與者在社會責任知覺感受會因其性別、年齡、婚姻與教育程度的不同,進而有所不同感受;四、活動參與投入與社會責任知覺兩者間,均呈現中度以上之相關性,又以「參與學習與成效經驗」及「道德責任」呈現高度相關性。本研究以量化研究方式,針對參與大學社會責任活動的高齡者進行探究,建議未來可加入質性研究的方式,並將地區與計畫類型擴大至不同學校、區域,使其研究更加完善,以促使大學善盡社會責任。

    In response to the early arrival of the aged society, arranging appropriate caregiving measures for older adults is paramount. The Ministry of Education commenced the project of University Social Responsibility (USR) in 2017 and officially joined the project with the Higher Education Sprout Project in 2018. Events relevant to USR have been hosted in various higher education institutions. This study discusses the relationship of the USR project with community older adults’ participation and commitment in said events and social responsibilities.
    In this study, older adults who had participated in the USR held by National Taiwan Normal University, National Yang-Ming University, and Taipei Medical University. The idea was derived from information that was gathered from online and also on-site questionnaires. The number of valid questionnaires was 295. Statistical analysis such as the establishment of sample t test, single-factor variance analysis and Pearson’s product variance correlation, the research results obtained are as follows. Frist, older adults who participated in the USR are mainly female, 70-74 years old, below middle school and married. The main target, the type of activity is the most people participating in physical fitness. Second, older adults’ participants appeared to have good activities and social responsibility, whose feelings differed depending on the of gender, age, education, and marital status. Third, the two dimensions, activities and social responsibility, all show a moderately positive correlation with one another. Furthermore, there were also high positive correlations between "participation learning and effectiveness experience" and "moral responsibility". This study uses quantitative research methods to explore older adults who participate in the USR. It is recommended that qualitative research methods be added in the future, and the types of regions and projects will be expanded to different schools and regions to make their research more complete and promote university research. Do social responsibility.

    中文摘要 i 英文摘要 ii 目次 iv 表次 vi 圖次 viii 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究問題 3 第四節 研究範圍與限制 3 第五節 研究重要性 4 第六節 名詞操作性定義 5 第貳章 文獻探討 7 第一節 企業社會責任起源 7 第二節 大學社會責任發展 10 第三節 大學社會責任執行現況 16 第四節 社區高齡老化情形 23 第五節 大學社會責任與在地老化之關係 26 第六節 本章總結 29 第參章 研究方法 31 第一節 研究架構 31 第二節 研究流程 32 第三節 研究對象與抽樣設計 33 第四節 研究工具 34 第五節 實施步驟與程序 43 第六節 資料處理與分析 44 第肆章 結果與討論 45 第一節 高齡者背景變項之描述性分析 45 第二節 高齡者活動參與投入、社會責任之現況 49 第三節 高齡者活動參與投入及社會責任之差異性分析 52 第四節 高齡者活動參與投入及社會責任之相關情形 65 第伍章 結論與建議 67 第一節 結論 67 第二節 建議 69 參考文獻 72 中文部分 72 英文部分 77

    大學社會責任實踐計畫 (2017)。教育部推動大學社會責任實踐計畫辦公室。取自: http://www.usr.nkfust.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=9&mid=995
    中央研究院(2011)。人口政策建議書。取自 http://www.sinica.edu.tw/manage/gatenews/showsingle.php?_op=?rid:3968
    中華民國內政部(2020)。重要指標參考。取自 https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/node.aspx?sn=6716
    內政部 (2020)。內政統計通報109年第10週。取自https://www.moi.gov.tw/files/site_node_file/8811/109年第10週內政統計通報_老化與扶養.pdf
    王保進 (1996)。統計套裝程式 SPSS 與行為科學研究。臺北市:泰華文化。
    王瑞霞、邱啟潤 (1996)。老年人體能活動參與及其相關因素的探討。高雄醫學科學雜誌,12(6),348-358。
    王潔媛 (2012)。臺灣長期照顧機構外籍監護工華語教學種子教師之經驗分析。長期照護雜誌,16(2),159-176。
    世界企業永續發展協會。取自: http://www.bcsd.org.tw/domain_node/domainnode/23
    石泱 (2010)。成功老化、活躍老化與生產老化對我國老人福利政策的省思。社區發展季刊,132,234-251。
    池祥萱、池祥麟、梁綺羚 (2016)。企業社會責任之策略性分析。管理評論 35(1),21-45。
    行政院(2005)。老人福利法。取自http://www.rootlaw.com.tw/LawContent.aspx?LawID=A040040060000900-1041209
    吳明隆、涂金堂 (2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南圖書。
    吳明錡 (2016)。[無邊界大學]在臺灣究竟意味著什麼?。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(9),155-157。
    吳舜堂、陳欽雨 (2017)。高齡長者社會支持, 社會參與與活躍老化關係之研究。福祉科技與服務管理學刊,5(4),331-352。
    李育齊、張少熙、劉若蘭 (2018)。高齡者長健方案規劃與成效評量研究:以臺灣師範大學銀齡樂活據點為例。載於「2018大學之社會責任國際學術研討會」會議手冊,172-173。南投縣:國立暨南國際大學。
    李明機 (2009)。簡析企業社會責任(CSR)之發展趨勢。證券櫃檯月刊,141,14-21。
    李晶、姚大偉、羅雅馨 (2012)。不同高齡者活動參與類型之休閒效益體驗差異分析。設計研究學報,(5),90-102。
    李新民、高敏惠 (2014)。老人休閒活動參與和成功老化相關之初探。人文社會電子學報, 10(1),97-122。
    李維靈、施建彬、邱翔蘭 (2007)。退休老人休閒活動參與及其幸福感之相關研究。人文暨社會科學期刊,3(2),27-35。
    林冠穎 (2008)。台灣老人休閒參與之轉變:成因及影響。
    林奕成 (2011)。學校與社區關係發展歷程研究:從學校本位課程與社區文化交融經驗分析。教育行政論壇,3(2)。
    邱民華 (2004)。台南縣中小學退休教師社會參與及其相關因素之研究(未出版碩士論文)。臺灣首府大學,臺南市。
    邱皓政 (2010)。量化研究與統計分析-SPSS (PASW)資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南
    洪世昌、王莒茵、張育慈、林佳穎、賴郁秀 (2012)。銀髮族學習需求與滿意度研究-以臺北市立圖書館樂齡學習中心為例。臺北市政府 101 年度自行研究報告。臺北市:臺北市立圖書。
    胡凱揚 (2017)。實習實作,串起大學社會責任與在地產業需求的關鍵-以慈濟科大通識體育課程微觀。運動管理,36,17-29。
    高等教育司(2018)。高等教育深耕計畫審查結果公布。取自: https://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.ashx?u=C099358C81D4876C725695F2070B467E8B81ED614D7AF43E796B7081D94509F731DF53B0DE4DB40C55F906B34249CF8A306B74EA0B921A1199285B9F744F6407830654A0E5FBB91ACB6FE211E3E87842&n=893AD011B28F7931A4CDE437E4E0DD9D6B2113B6A8652644CCD964D1F3C5BC735914AC1B5265E0605B47A0A05B86C1F2&icon=..pdf
    國立陽明大學 (2020)。陽明大學社會責任。取自https://www.ymusr.com.tw
    國立臺灣師範大學 (2020)。臺灣師範大學社會責任實踐計畫推動辦公室。取自http://usr.top.ntnu.edu.tw/index.html
    國家發展委員會(2019)。老年人口成長趨勢。取自https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/chart.aspx?c=5&uid=4110&pid=60
    張有恆、黃振哲 (2017)。臺灣港務股份有限公司企業社會責任策略之研究。航運季刊。26(2),1-23。
    張怡 (2003)。影響老人社會參與之相關因素探討。社區發展季刊,103,225-233。
    教育部《大學法》第 1 條。取自: http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL008606
    教育部大學社會責任推動中心 (2018)。關於計畫。取自:http://usr.moe.gov.tw/
    教育部產學合作資訊網 (2017)。產學合作成果/實習與教師研習/教師研習。取自 https://www.iaci.nkfust.edu.tw/Industry/ CP.aspx?s=348&n=370
    曹惟茜 (2019)。大學生參與大學社會責任實踐歷程之個案研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
    許怡平、李雅欣、胡益進、莊莉菁、陳政友 (2016)。台北市某行政區老人健康促進活動參與及其相關因素探討。台灣公共衛生雜誌,35(6),642-657。
    許瑞娟 (2008)。老人活動參與、社會支持與生活滿意度之研究(未出版碩士論文)。臺灣大學,臺北市。
    郭登聰 (2014)。建構[高齡友善城市]:從活躍老化到在地老化的重要課題-以社區照顧關懷據點為例。輔仁社會研究,4,1-42。
    陳文學、邱韻芳 (2017)。大學協力下的部落治理-以暨南大學參與眉溪部落為例。台灣原住民族研究學報,,7(1),1-26。
    陳梅英 (2014年2月5日)。2060 年成為全球第二老國家。取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/business/paper/751729
    陳毓璟 (2010)。老人寄宿所模式在活力老化學習之成效研究。健康促進與衛生教育學報。
    陳肇男、林惠生 (1995)。台灣老人之社團參與和生活滿意。台灣地區人口,家庭及生命品質研討會,345-367。
    國立陽明大學社會責任 (2019)。大學社會責任。取自https://www.ymusr.com.tw/
    黃松林、汪中華、楊秋燕 (2012)。社區照顧據點服務與社區生活滿意度之探討-以彰化縣據點為例。社會發展研究學刊,11,86-110。
    黃啟瑞、林婷鈴、劉恆逸 (2018)。中小企業也能善盡社會責任?-社會資本觀點。企業管理學報,(118),1-34。
    黃源協、莊俐昕 (2012)。從「成長」到「發展」-營造有感的幸福社區。社區發展季刊,138,21-33。
    黃源協、蕭文高 (2012)。社會政策與立法。臺北市:雙葉。296-300。
    黃瓊儀 (2018)。大學教育實踐社會責任之教學實務報告-以 [策略傳播] 課程執行 [眷村文化節:紅磚牆裡的秘密] 為例。兩岸企業社會責任與社會企業家學術期刊,3, 73-101。
    楊正誠 (2019)。大學社會責任發展的國內外趨勢。評鑑雙月刊,79,32-36。
    楊正誠 (2019)。國外大學進行社會責任實踐的例子:美國哈佛大學的永續力計畫簡介。評鑑雙月刊,80,39-42。
    楊志良 (2010)。由活躍老化觀點建構國民健康新願景。社區發展季刊,132, 26-40。
    楊國德 (2002)。成人教育在學校社區化的角色與功能。臺北市:作者。
    臺北醫學大學 (2019)。大學社會責任。取自http://nursing.tmu.edu.tw/plan/super_pages.php?ID=plan
    趙忠傑、楊子申、孔心怡 (2016)。國際企業社會責任趨勢與臺灣未來展望。兩岸企業社會責任與社會企業家學術期刊,1,74-89。
    蔡文輝、徐麗君 (1991)。老年社會學理論與實務。臺北市:巨流出版社。
    蔡佳汝 (2019)。大專院校的在地連結與學生的在地認同對在地就業意願之影響-以南臺科技大學為例(未出版碩士論文)。南臺科技大學,臺南市。
    蔡承家、張丞毅、陳依卿、阮惠玉 (2011年10月)。高齡者學習需求及參與意願關係之研究-以高雄縣樂齡學習資源中心為例。「老人服務事業管理系」會議論文,和美科技大學。
    衛生福利部統計處 (2017)。中華民國 106 年老人狀況調查報告。取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-1767-38429-113.html
    鄭政宗、賴昆宏 (2007)。台中地區長青學苑老人之社會支持,孤寂感,休閒活動參與及生命意義之研究。朝陽學報,12,217-254。
    盧婧宜、李雅慧 (2016)。高齡者持續參與學習之因素及其對高齡教育課程規劃之啟示。高雄應用科技大學人文與社會科學學刊,2(2),49-65。
    蕭文高 (2010)。活躍老化與照顧服務:理論、政策與實務。社區發展季刊,132,41-58。
    蕭至邦、廖淑娟 (2019)。大學社會參與和產學合作-以亞洲大學社區發展育成中心為例。台灣健康照顧研究學刊,20,72-102。
    謝美娥 (2019)。從社會參與之能力表現探討老人活動參與。東吳社會工作學報,37,43-80。
    蘇麗瓊、黃雅玲 (2005)。老人福利政策再出發—推動在地老化政策。社區發展季刊,110,5-14。

    英文部分
    Atakan, M. S., & Eker, T. (2007). Corporate identity of a socially responsible university–a case from the Turkish higher education sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 55-68.
    Bukov, A., I. Maas & T. Lampert (2002). ‘Social Participation in Very Old Age:Cross-Sectional & Longitudinal Findings from BASE’, Journal of Gerontology :Social Sciences, 57B(6): P510-P517.
    Burcea, M., & Marinescu, P. (2011). Students' perceptions on corporate social responsibility at the academic level. Case study: The faculty of administration and business, university of bucharest. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 13(29), 207-220.
    Chan, C. Y., Chou, D. W., & Lai, C. W. (2016). Does the stock market favor socially responsible firms? evidence from SEOs. Taiwan Economic Review, 44(2), 339-377.
    Chen, J., Xu, L., Wu, H., & Yang, Z. (2011). Relationship between the academic achievement and social responsibility for teachers in university. In Education Management, education theory and education application (pp. 15-19). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
    Chen, S. H., Nasongkhla, J., & Donaldson, J. A. (2015). University Social Responsibility (USR): Identifying an ethical foundation within higher education institutions. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(4), 165-172.
    Chile, L. M., & Black, X. M. (2015). University–community engagement: Case study of university social responsibility. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 10(3), 234-253.
    Dong, X., Chen, R., Li, C., & Simon, M. A. (2014). Understanding depressive symptoms among community-dwelling Chinese older adults in the greater Chicago area. Journal of aging and health, 26(7), 1155-1171.
    European Commission (2011). Corporate social responsibility & responsible business conduct Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/corporate-social-responsibility_en
    Everard, K. M., Lachb, H. W., Fishera, E. B., & Baumc, M. C. (2000). Relationship of activity and social support to the functional health of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(4), 208-212.
    Galbreath, J. (2010). How does corporate social responsibility benefit firms? Evidence from Australia.European Business Review, 22(4), 411–431.
    Gallardo-Vázquez, D., & Sánchez-Hernández, I. (2012). Information on corporate social responsibility and ME’ s environmental responsiveness: A regional study. Economics & Sociology, 5(2), 103–115.
    Gallardo-Vázquez, D., & Sanchez-Hernandez, M. I. (2014). Measuring corporate social responsibility for competitive success at a regional level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 72, 14-22.
    Garde Sánchez, R., Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., & López-Hernández, A. M. (2013). Online disclosure of university social responsibility: a comparative study of public and private US universities. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 709-746.
    Gomez, L. (2014). The importance of university social responsibility in Hispanic America: A responsible trend in developing countries. In Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: Emerging Trends in Developing Economies, 241-268. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    Harkavy, I. (2006). The role of universities in advancing citizenship and social justice in the 21st century. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1(1), 5-37.
    Harris, M., & Holley, K. (2016). Universities as anchor institutions: Economic and social potential for urban development. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research ,393-439. Springer, Cham.
    Ihlen, Ø. (2008). Mapping the environment for corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders, publics and the public sphere. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(2), 135-146.
    Ingley, C. B. (2008). Company growth and board attitudes to corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 4(1), 17-39.
    Jones, E. (2002). Social responsibility activism: Why individuals are changing their lifestyles to change the world .Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado.
    Kaplan, M. S., Newsom, J. T., McFarland, B. H., & Lu, L. (2001). Demographic and psychosocial correlates of physical activity in late life. American journal of preventive medicine, 21(4), 306-312.
    Karima, R., Oshima, Y., & Yamamoto, K. (2006). Identification of subjects for social responsibility education at universities and the present activity at the University of Tokyo. Environmental Science, 13(6),
    Kim, A., & Merriam, S. B. (2004). Motivations for learning among older adults in a learning in retirement institute. Educational Gerontology, 30(6), 441-455.
    Lamdin, L., & Fugate, M. (1997). Elder learning: New frontier in an aging society. AZ: The Oryx Press.
    Latif, K. F. (2018). The development and validation of stakeholder-based scale for measuring university social responsibility (USR). Social Indicators Research, 140(2), 511-547.
    Ledic, J., Culum, B., Nuzdic, S., & Jancec, L. (2008). What role do croatian higher institution play? A study on university civic Mission. Online Submission.
    Lennartsson, C., & Silverstein, M. (2001). Does engagement with life enhancesurvival of elderly people in Sweden? The role of social and leisure activities. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56(6), 335-342
    Lian, W. M., Gan, G. L., Pin, C. H., Wee, S., & Ye, H. C. (1999). Correlates of leisure-time physical activity in an elderly population in Singapore. American Journal of Public Health, 89(10), 1578-1580.
    Lim, B. T., & Loosemore, M. (2017). The effect of inter-organizational justice perceptions on organizational citizenship behaviors in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(2), 95-106.
    Loosemore, M., & Lim, B. T. H. (2017). Linking corporate social responsibility and organizational performance in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 35(3), 90-105.
    Manasakis, C., Mitrokostas, E., & Petrakis, E. (2014). Strategic corporate social responsibility activities and corporate governance in imperfectly competitive markets. Managerial and Decision Economics, 35(7), 460-473.
    Markova, I. (2008). The epistemological significance of the theory of social representations. Journal for Tthe Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 461-487.
    Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4), 323-337.
    McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
    Menec, V. H. (2003). ‘The Relation Between Everyday Activities & Successful Aging: A 6-Year Longitudinal Study’, Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B(2), S74-S82.
    Miller, J., Meyer, P., & Ruda, N. (2015, July). Patterns on civic engagement, service learning and campus community partnerships from the program for the advancement of service learning and social responsibility of universities. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Program, 11. ACM.
    Millican, J., & Bourner, T. (2011). Student-community engagement and the changing role and context of higher education. Education+ Training, 53(2/3), 89-99.
    Minhat, H. S., & Amin, R. M. (2012). Sociodemographic determinants of leisure participation among elderly in Malaysia. Journal of community health, 37(4), 840-847.
    Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility?. Corporate Governance:The international journal of business in society, 1(2), 16-22.
    Muijen, H. (2004). Corporate social responsibility starts at university. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 235–246.
    Nwankwo, E., Phillips, N., & Tracey, P. (2007). Social investment through community enterprise: The case of multinational corporations involvement in the development of Nigerian water resources. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(1), 91-101.
    Paul CJM & Siegel DS (2006) Corporate social responsibility and economic performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis 26(3), 207–211.
    Paul, C. J., & Siegel, D. S. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and economic performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 26(3), 207-211.
    Pearce, S. D. (1991). Toward understanding the participation of older adults in continuing education. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly, 17(5), 451-464.
    Peric ́, J., & Delic ́, A. (2016). Developing social responsibility in Croatian Universities: A benchmarking approach and an overview of current situation. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 13(1), 69-80.
    Petrenko, O. V., Aime, F., Ridge, J., & Hill, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 262-279.
    Petter, A. (2008). Civic Engagement: Challenges and Opportunities. University of Victoria (To the closing session of CU Expo08).
    Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
    Ramos-Monge, E., Llinàs Audet, F. J., & Barrena Martínez, J. (2019). Catalysts of university social responsability into strategic planning by thematic analysis and deductive coding. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 1-28.
    Reiser, J. (2007). Managing university social responsibility (USR). International Sustainable Campus Network: Best Practices—Future Challenges, 25-27.
    Reverte, C., Gómez-Melero, E., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility practices on organizational performance: evidence from Eco-Responsible Spanish firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2870-2884.
    Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity “begins at home”. Business & Society, 42(2), 169-201.
    Sánchez-Hernández, M. I., & Mainardes, E. W. (2016). University social responsibility: a student base analysis in Brazil. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 13(2), 151-169.
    Seitanidi, M. M., & Ryan, A. (2007). A critical review of forms of corporate community involvement: from philanthropy to partnerships. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(3), 247-266.
    Simpson, D. F., & Power, D. J. (2005). Use the supply relationship to develop lean and green suppliers. Supply Chain Management: An international Journal, 10(1), 60-68.
    Singh, S. (2016). Integrating Social Responsibility of University and Corporate Sector for Inclusive Growth in India. Higher Education for the Future, 3(2), 183-196.
    Stephens, J., Hernandez, M., Roma ́n, M., Graham, A., & Scholz, R. (2008). Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 317-338.
    Strain, L. A., C. C. Grabusic, M. S. Searle & N. J. Dunn (2002). ‘Continuing & Ceasing Leisure Activities in Later Life: A Longitudinal Study’, The Gerontologist, 42(2), 217-223.
    Sullivan, W. M. (2003). The university as citizen: Institutional identity and social responsibility. A special report. The Civic Arts Review, 16(1), 1–14.
    Vakil, T. (2014). Literature review on social responsibility in higher education. PRIA,Victoria university, 38-45.
    Vallaeys, F., De la Cruz, C., & Sasia, P. M. (2009). Responsabilidad social universitaria: Manual de primeros pasos. Inter-American Development Bank.
    Wilson, D, McKinlay, P, von Tunzelmann, A. (2006) Business Social Investment Activity in New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: AUT University.
    World Health Organization. (2015). Ageing and life course. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ageing/en/
    Yob, M. (2016). Cultural perspectives on social responsibility in higher education. High Learn Res Commun. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/hlrc/vol6/iss2/5/

    下載圖示
    QR CODE