簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 羅蔣浩
Luo, Jiang-Hao
論文名稱: 法人持股對股價資訊含量、股價崩盤風險及崩盤後報酬率之影響
The Impact of Institutional Ownership on Information Content of Stock Price, on Risk and Returns subsequent to Stock Crash
指導教授: 周德瑋
Chou, De-Wai
口試委員: 周德瑋
Chou, De-Wai
鍾建屏
Chung, Chien-Ping
李修全
Lee, Hsiu-Chuan
口試日期: 2021/07/01
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 66
中文關鍵詞: 崩盤法人持股股價資訊含量股價崩盤風險
英文關鍵詞: Crash, Institutional shareholding, Information content of stock price, Risk of stock price crash
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100657
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:61下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以台灣證券市場之上市櫃公司為研究對象,通過R語言進行分析,
    發現,外資與投信持股比例上升皆可提升股價資訊含量,且其關係為倒U型,即持股比例過高時反而會造成股價資訊含量下降,自營持股比例提升則無法顯著提升股價資訊含量,其原因可能是自營整體持股比例過低。同時,外資和投信持股比例提升也可降低股價崩盤風險,自營商則無顯著關係。本研究發現技術面變量乖離率是崩盤後報酬率的重要解釋變量,其與崩盤後之跌幅呈正相關,崩盤前股價表現得越弱勢的個股崩盤後跌幅越大。在加入乖離率變量的情況下,外資在不考慮2020年時,在長及短天期與崩盤後報酬率顯著正相關,其短天期顯著原因可能是外資持股比例大,減持對股價造成壓力及散戶以外資為參考對象跟風賣出,長天期顯著原因可能是外資本身可能也在避免自身短期拋售對股價造成的壓力;投信及自營則可考慮其中長期變動對崩盤後報酬率的影響;主力之變動則無顯著關係。在考慮2020年數據時,各法人顯著性均有所下降。

    This research focuses on Listed Companies in Taiwan, we use R language to explore and we found that both the increase of the proportion of Foreign Investors and Securities Investment Trust Companies can increase the information content of the share price, and the relationship is an inverted U shape, the information content of the share price will decrease when the proportion of Foreign Investors and Securities Investment Trust Companies is too high .The increase in the proportion of Dealers could not significantly increase the information content of the share price, which may be due to the overall low proportion of Dealers. At the same time, the increase in the proportion of Foreign Investors and Securities Investment Trust Companies can also reduce the risk of stock price crash. Dealers has no significant relationship with the risk of stock price crash due to the low proportion of shares.And about the research of the relationship between the change in the proportion of institutional ownership and the decline of stock price after the crash. We found that the deviation rate of technical variables is an important explanatory variable, which is positively correlated with the decline after the crash, indicating that the weaker the stock price before the crash, the greater the decline after the crash. When the deviation rate variable is added and the data of 2020 is not taken into account, the long and short term of Foreign Investors is positively correlated with the Returns subsequent to Stock Crash ,The significant reason for the long term may be that the Foreign Investors may also be avoiding the pressure on the stock price caused by themselves. We believe that the impact of long-term changes in Securities Investment Trust Companies and Dealers on the Returns subsequent to Stock Crash .The change of main force(From CMONEY) has no significant relationship with the return subsequent to crash. When considering the data in 2020, the significance of each institution will decrease.

    第一章、緒論 1 第一節、研究背景與動機 1 第二節、研究目的 4 第二章、文獻探討及假說 5 第一節、股價資訊含量相關研究 5 第二節、股價崩盤風險相關研究 8 第三章、研究方法 11 第一節、法人持股比例與股價資訊含量的關係 11 第二節、法人持股比例變動與股價崩盤的關係 17 第四章、實證結果 23 第一節、法人持股比例與股價資訊含量 23 第二節、法人持股比例與股價崩盤風險 32 第三節、法人持股比例變動與崩盤後之收益率 39 第五章、結論與建議 57 第一節、研究結論 57 第二節、研究限制及建議 59 附錄 62 參考文獻 63

    Ajinkya, B. B., Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). The governance role of institutional investors and outsider directors on the properties of management earnings forecasts. 14th Annual Conference on Financial Economics and Accounting (FEA).
    Attig, N., Cleary, S., El Ghoul, S., & Guedhami, O. (2013). Institutional investment horizons and the cost of equity capital. Financial Management, 42(2), 441–477.
    Baker, M. (2000). Career concerns and staged investment: Evidence from the venture capital industry. Unpublished working paper, Harvard University.
    Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2000). The equity share in new issues and aggregate stock returns. the Journal of Finance, 55(5), 2219–2257.
    Ball, R. (2009). Market and political/regulatory perspectives on the recent accounting scandals. Journal of accounting research, 47(2), 277–323.
    Balsam, S., Bartov, E., & Marquardt, C. (2002). Accruals management, investor sophistication, and equity valuation: Evidence from 10–Q filings. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 987–1012.
    Bartov, E., Radhakrishnan, S., & Krinsky, I. (2000). Investor sophistication and patterns in stock returns after earnings announcements. The Accounting Review, 75(1), 43–63.
    Benmelech, E., Kandel, E., & Veronesi, P. (2010). Stock-based compensation and CEO (dis) incentives. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4), 1769–1820.
    Bhide, A. (1993). The hidden costs of stock market liquidity. Journal of financial economics, 34(1), 31–51.
    Black, F., & Litterman, R. (1992). Global portfolio optimization. Financial analysts journal, 48(5), 28–43.
    Boehmer, E., & Kelley, E. K. (2009). Institutional investors and the informational efficiency of prices. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3563–3594.
    Bushee, B. J., & Goodman, T. H. (2007). Which institutional investors trade based on private information about earnings and returns? Journal of Accounting Research, 45(2), 289–321.
    Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2001). Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of financial Economics, 61(3), 345–381.
    Collins, D. W., Kothari, S. P., Shanken, J., & Sloan, R. G. (1994). Lack of timeliness as an explanatory variable for the low returns/earnings association. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(3), 289–324.
    Collins, Daniel W., Kothari, S. P., Shanken, J., & Sloan, R. G. (1994). Lack of timeliness and noise as explanations for the low contemporaneuos return-earnings association. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(3), 289–324.
    Durnev, A., Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zarowin, P. (2003). Does greater firm-specific return variation mean more or less informed stock pricing? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(5), 797–836.
    Dye, R. A., & Sridhar, S. (2002). Resource allocation effects of price reactions to disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 385–410.
    Ertugrul, M., Lei, J., Qiu, J., & Wan, C. (2017). Annual report readability, tone ambiguity, and the cost of borrowing. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(2), 811–836.
    Fernandes, N., & Ferreira, M. A. (2008). Does international cross-listing improve the information environment. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 216–244.
    Gennotte, G., & Leland, H. (1990). Market Liquidity, Hedging, and Crashes. American Economic Review, 80, 999–1021.
    Guedhami, O., El Ghoul, S., Cleary, S. W., & Attig, N. (2014). Corporate Legitimacy and Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity.
    Jin, L., & Myers, S. C. (2006). R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of financial Economics, 79(2), 257–292.
    Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011a). CFOs versus CEOs: equity incentives and crashes. Journal of financial economics, 101(3), 713–730.
    Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011b). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639–662.
    Li, Q., Yang, J., Hsiao, C., & Chang, Y.-J. (2005). The relationship between stock returns and volatility in international stock markets. Journal of Empirical Finance, 12(5), 650–665.
    Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. The review of financial studies, 1(1), 41–66.
    Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000). The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements? Journal of financial economics, 58(1–2), 215–260.
    Peng, L., & Röell, A. (2008). Executive pay and shareholder litigation*. Review of Finance, 12(1), 141–184.
    Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of financial economics, 20, 237–265.
    Roll, R. (1988). R-S1-2. Journal of finance, 43(3), 541–566.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE