簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳思緯
Wu, Szu-Wei
論文名稱: 東亞國家之政治體制選擇偏好:一般公民、政治菁英與地緣政治面向之分析
Preferences of Political Regime in East Asian Countries: An Analysis Based on the Perspectives of Citizens, Political Elites and Geopolitics
指導教授: 陳文政
Chen, Wen-Cheng
口試委員: 董立文 朱金池 曾建元 關弘昌 陳文政
口試日期: 2021/12/03
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 東亞學系
Department of East Asian Studies
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 215
中文關鍵詞: 政治體制東亞民主化中國路徑典範競爭
英文關鍵詞: Political Regime, East Asia, Democratization, Chinese Paradigm, Paradigmatic Competition
研究方法: 次級資料分析
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200001
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:92下載:24
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究探討影響東亞政治體制選擇的三個面向:一般公民、政治菁英和地緣政治,結合量化和質化研究方法,先透過民主化理論和政治支持理論引導,再回顧過往相關研究之方向與成果,蒐集具代表性的數據資料以統計、文字探勘與地理資訊系統應用軟體進行處理,再將所得之研究成果以質性方法深入分析詮釋。
    首先,就東亞一般公民面向而言,本研究聚焦於重新檢證民主化理論,結果發現:在人口統計學變項之年齡與教育程度上,愈年長者愈支持民主、教育程度愈高者愈支持民主,對於民主化理論還是相對有解釋力的;另外在政治學變項上,對本國民主體制之認知愈高者愈支持民主,也對於民主化理論是相對有解釋力的;而人口統計學之性別變項與社會學變項之經濟條件,則對於民主化理論較無解釋力。
    其次,就政治菁英面向而言,本研究聚焦於東亞華語文化圈下三個政治體制歧異的國家(台灣、中國大陸、新加坡),針對政治菁英紛雜而又相似的政治類公開文稿特徵進行分析,結果發現:三國政治菁英皆強調經濟治理、重視對美關係、呼籲團結;中國大陸與台灣政治菁英從不同出發點皆重視民主;中國大陸與新加坡政治菁英皆因治理而強調多元文化價值;台灣與新加坡政治菁英皆因小國背景而提倡與國際社會的聯結。是以,本文可以發現三國政治菁英皆對民主政治體制擁有相當偏好,但在內涵上台灣政治菁英的民主偏好與自由有更強的聯結,中國大陸與新加坡政治菁英就呈現民主、治理與協調之間的融合關係。
    再者,就地緣政治面向而言,本研究爬梳美、中競逐關係下的地緣政治現況,透過空間性的資料展示,描繪出東亞的發展已經不是一味遵循西方模式,中國路徑逐漸吸引東亞國家,牽引東亞國家走向西方式自由民主之外的另一種選擇。
    最後,本研究針對東亞前典範時期之典範競爭概念進行分析,回顧不同政治體制各自論述之內涵與其在東亞情境下的不同表現與意義,進一步導出在未來的動態發展場域下,東亞地區基於規範主義式微將出現的區域合作以及從價值追求到聯盟爭霸的政治現實。

    This study explores three dimensions that influence the preferences of political regime in East Asian countries: citizens, political elites, and geopolitics through combining quantitative and qualitative methods, and proceeded by the following steps: First, it delved into theories of democratization and political support, and reviewed the existing literature. Second, the author collected representative data, and proceeded them with statistics, text mining and geographic information system application software. Third, the research employed qualitative method to analyze and interpret the research results.
    Some findings have been made. Firstly, from the perspectives of citizens, focusing on re-examination of the democratization theory, the results indicate that: the age and educational level are positively related with the relevant literature to support of democracy, meaning that the higher the age and education level, the more support for the democracy; and the awareness of the degree of democracy in one's own country is positively co-related with the literature to support of democracy, illustrating the higher awareness of democracy in one's own country, the more support for democracy; however, gender and economic conditions are less accorded with the literature related to support of democracy.
    Secondly, in terms of political elites, this research focuses on the three countries with different political regimes in the Chinese cultural circle of East Asia. Through analyzing the public governmental scripts, this research discovered that economic governance, the relationship with the United States as an objective focus, and the calling for unity are the common ground for the elites in the three countries. On the other hand, China and Taiwan have a strong emphasis on democracy but from different starting points, while China and Singapore emphasize the value of multiculturalism because of its governance, and Taiwan and Singapore advocate the connection with the international community due to the size of the regime. Therefore, the political elites within three regimes share a preference for the democratic system, while Taiwan is more inclined to a deeper connection with freedom and China and Singapore lean toward a harmony between democracy, governance and coordination.
    Thirdly, in terms of geopolitics, this research finds that Chinese paradigm has become more attractive to East Asian countries. Through spatial data display approach, the paper illustrates that East Asian development no longer strictly follows the western model, and that of China has become an attraction as an alternative to western democracy.
    Lastly, through reviewing the connotation of the various political systems in East Asian context and the analysis of paradigmatic competition in pre-paradigm period of East Asia, this research further concludes that there will be regional cooperation and political reality from the pursuit of value to the competition for the regional hegemony in the future.

    表 次 VI 圖 次 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與研究目的 1 第二節 研究途徑與研究方法 3 第三節 文獻回顧與研究資料 6 第四節 研究設計與研究假設 24 第五節 研究範圍與研究步驟 33 第二章 政治體制偏好的理念與分析架構 38 第一節 政治體制偏好概念之分析 38 第二節 政治體制偏好之相關理論 41 第三節 政治體制偏好之分析架構 46 第四節 本文分析架構之相關說明 50 第三章 東亞公民個體主觀認知中之政治體制偏好 52 第一節 西方民主理論假設及異例 52 第二節 東方政治現實之民主偏好特殊性 56 第三節 東亞公民政治體制偏好認知之分析 93 第四章 華語文化圈政治菁英修辭與政治體制偏好 97 第一節 語料庫建構之概念與邏輯 97 第二節 政治菁英關鍵詞組之客觀呈現 101 第三節 修辭語境、偏好之主觀詮釋分析 107 第四節 華語文化圈政治菁英之體制偏好 118 第五章 地緣政治框架、戰略投射與政治體制偏好 123 第一節 東亞地緣政治意識形態戰略框架 123 第二節 中國路徑影響力擴張之實證分析 126 第三節 地理圖像演繹與區域情勢之分析 140 第四節 地緣政治形塑東亞政治體制偏好 143 第六章 東亞政治體制選擇偏好:典範競爭觀點之分析 146 第一節 民主與非民主體制在東亞的競逐 146 第二節 政治體制的各自侷限與時代挑戰 150 第三節 東亞政治體制選擇偏好的未來發展 156 第七章 結論 160 第一節 研究發現 160 第二節 理論反思 164 第三節 研究限制 167 第四節 研究建議 168 參考文獻 170 附錄一 問卷題目與變數測量 190 附錄二 各國講稿文本資料目錄 192 附錄三 中國路徑指數數據資料 208

    壹、中文文獻
    王信賢(2018),〈科技威權主義:習近平「新時代」中國大陸國家社會關係〉,《展望與探索月刊》,第16卷第5期,頁111-127。
    王貿(2020),〈公務人員關注議題之文字探勘:以PTT公職板為例〉,《調查研究-方法與應用》,第45期,頁119-154。
    吳思緯(2019),〈從政治系統理論觀點分析中共當前社會監控模式〉,《安全與情報研究》,第2卷第2期,頁95-127。
    吳思緯(2020a),〈人工智慧、威權制度與獨裁偶像—中國模式的路徑〉,《法政學報》,第29期,頁37-72。
    吳思緯(2020b),〈兩岸情境下以假新聞為途徑之資訊戰分析〉,《國會季刊》,第48卷第2期,頁103-133。
    吳柏寬(2018),〈中資來了-談歐盟因應中資併購與「一帶一路」〉,《經濟前瞻》,第180期,頁69-74。
    宋學文(2004),〈從層次分析探討霸權穩定論:一個國際關係理論演化的研究方法〉,《問題與研究》,第43卷第2期,頁171-196。
    李酉潭(2007),〈臺灣民主化經驗與中國未來的民主化--以杭亭頓的理論架構分析之〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,第8卷第4期,頁1-47。
    李明輝(2001),〈儒家傳統與東亞的現代化──從李光耀與彭定康關於「亞洲價值」的爭論談起〉載於劉述先(主編),《儒家思想在現代東亞:韓國與東南亞篇》,頁125-166。臺北市:中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處。
    李冠和(2013),〈選舉式威權政體:選舉競爭度、穩定性與民主化〉,《政治科學論叢》,第57期,頁69-114。
    周桂田(1998),〈現代性與風險社會〉,《台灣社會學刊》,第 21 期,頁89-129。
    周嘉辰、謝銘元(2018),〈威權體制內部的民主制度:中國大陸民衆體制內政治參與對其政治態度的影響〉,《政治學報》,第66期,頁1-28。
    孟康鉉(2017),〈從地緣政治角度看21世紀東亞安全形勢〉,《韓國學報》,第30期,頁59-80。
    林永芳(2010),〈東亞區域經濟整合中、美因素的影響〉,《國家發展研究》,第9卷第2期,頁81-121。
    林秀雲譯,Earl Babbie著(2013),《社會科學研究方法》,台北:雙葉。
    林欣潔(2015),〈中國大陸學界對自由貿易協定戰略的評估〉,《東亞研究》,第46卷第1期,頁107-148。
    林賢參(2017),〈日印特別戰略夥伴關係及其對臺影響〉,《印度區域經貿文化及產學資源中心月刊》,第7期,頁16-18。
    林賢參(2018),〈日印關係與印度太平洋戰略〉,《歐亞研究》,第4期,頁47-56。
    林震岩(2018),《多變量分析SPSS的操作與運用》,二版,台北:智勝文化。
    邵軒磊(2019a),〈當代西方民主研究論述分析:知識系譜與文字探勘〉,《哲學與文化》,第46卷第2期,頁33-56。
    邵軒磊(2019b),〈機器學「習」—以文字探勘法探索習近平時期之大外宣戰略〉,《中國大陸研究》,第62卷第4期,頁133-157。
    邵軒磊、吳國清(2019),〈法律資料分析與文字探勘:跨境毒品流動要素與結構研究〉,《問題與研究》,第58卷第2期,頁91-114。
    邵軒磊、曾元顯(2018),〈文字探勘技術輔助主題分析—以「中國大陸研究」期刊為例〉,《問題與研究》,第57卷第1期,頁29-62。
    紀舜傑(2015),〈烏克蘭的國家認同-民族、民主、與地緣政治之作用〉,《臺灣國際研究季刊》,第11卷第3期,頁155-172。
    范盛保(2013),〈小國的大戰略-新加坡途徑〉,《臺灣國際研究季刊》,第9卷第1期,頁75-94。
    袁正綱(2015),《研究方法》,台中:滄海。
    張心怡(2014),〈TPP、RCEP的競合以及中國大陸對於區域經濟整合之態度轉變〉,《戰略安全研析》,第113期,頁4-11。
    張立德(2014),〈21 世紀美「中」權力關係檢視與展望:權力轉移理論觀點〉,《戰略與評估》,第5卷第2期,頁91-118。
    張育銓(2010),〈印巴、僧泰的多元衝突分析與方法評議〉,《問題與研究》,第49卷第2期,頁131-154。
    莊文忠(2003),〈制度的研究:『新制度論』觀點的比較與『後現代制度論』的發展〉,《理論與政策》,第16卷第4期,頁15-44。
    莫大華(2008),〈批判性地緣政治戰略之研究〉,《問題與研究》,第47卷第2期,頁57-85。
    莫大華(2016),〈新古典地緣政治理論的再起:以中共「一帶一路」地緣政治經濟戰略布局為例〉,《國防雜誌》,第31卷第1期,頁1-20。
    陳文政(2013),〈全球憲政主義之興起—典範競逐觀點的初步考察〉,《臺北大學法學論叢》,第88期,頁1-81。
    陳文政、莊旻達(2019),〈當代自由民主的侷限:理論與制度層次之初步考察〉,《哲學與文化》,第46卷第2期,頁5-32。
    陳文政、單文婷(2013),〈儒學與民主:中國大陸民主化脈絡下之挑戰與機遇〉,《哲學與文化》,第40卷第9期,頁113-137。
    陳瑋芬(2005)。《近代日本漢學的「關鍵詞」研究──儒學及相關概念的嬗變》。台北:國立台灣大學。
    陳義彥、陳景堯、林妤虹、吳宜璇、何景榮、任雲楠譯,David Marsh和Gerry Stocker著(2009),《政治學方法論與途徑》,台北:韋伯。
    程富陽(2012),〈析論中東「阿拉伯之春」的衝擊與影響〉,《國防雜誌》,第27卷第1期,頁18-29。
    鈕文英(2015),《研究方法與論文寫作》,台北:雙葉。
    楊三億(2014),〈歐盟對烏克蘭政策之外溢效果〉,《問題與研究》,第53卷第1期,頁1-34。
    楊志恆(2001),〈中共及日本在東北亞的角色〉,《遠景季刊》,第2卷第4期,頁29-55。
    楊喜慧、陳明通(2016),〈中國發展模式是否成為亞洲國家的學習對象?-一項東亞13國民眾的調查〉,《政治學報》,第61期,頁1-27。
    溫在弘、劉擇昌、林民浩(2010),〈犯罪地圖繪製與熱區分析方法及其應用—以1998-2007年台北市住宅竊盜犯罪為例〉。《地理研究》,第52期,頁43-63。
    葉至誠、葉立誠(2011),《研究方法與研究論文》,台北:商鼎。
    劉鶴群等(譯)、Babbie, Earl. (原著)(2010)。《社會科學研究方法》。台北:雙葉。
    蔡政修(2004),〈九一一事件後的美國國家安全戰略:以波灣戰爭與北韓核子危機為例〉,《問題與研究》,第43卷第6期,頁129-165。
    蔣復華(2010),〈從中共地緣政治觀點-探討臺灣戰略價值〉,《國防雜誌》,第25卷第4期,頁125-134。
    鄧志松、吳親恩、柯一榮(2012),〈廢票為何發生?兼論臺灣選舉無效票之空間效應,1992~2008〉。《選舉研究》,第19卷第2期,頁71-100。
    濱田耕作(2015),《東亞文明之黎明》,太原市:山西人民。
    謝邦昌、謝邦彥(2016)。《大數據:語意分析整合篇》。台北:五南。
    關弘昌(2008),〈台灣民主轉型期對中國大陸的和平政策—一個「政治利益」觀點的解釋〉,《政治學報》,第46期,頁45-68。

    貳、英文文獻
    Ambrosio, T. (2014). “Beyond the Transition Paradigm: A Research Agenda for Authoritarian Consolidation,” Demokratizatsiya, 2(3): pp.471-495.
    Anderson, B. (2016). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books.
    Anselin, L. (1995). “Local Indicators of Spatial Association-LISA,” Geographical Analysis, 27(2): pp.93-115.
    Aspinall, E., and Mietzner, E. M. (2019). “Southeast Asia's Troubling Elections: Nondemocratic Pluralism in Indonesia,” Journal of Democracy, 30: pp.104-118.
    Baaz, M., and Lilja, M. (2014). “Understanding Hybrid Democracy in Cambodia: The Nexus Between Liberal Democracy, the State, Civil Society, and a ‘Politics of Presence.’” Asian Politics & Policy, 6(1): pp.5-24.
    Bader, J. (2015a). “China, Autocratic Patron? An Empirical Investigation of China as a Factor in Autocratic Survival,” International Studies Quarterly, 59(1): pp.23-33.
    Bader, J. (2015b). “Propping Up Dictators? Economic Cooperation from China and Its Impact on Authoritarian Persistence in Party and Non-party Regimes,” European Journal of Political Research, 54(4): pp. 655-672.
    Beck, U., and Ritter, M. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd,
    Bell, D. (2006). Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Bell, D. (2010). “Reconciling Socialism and Confucianism? Reviving Tradition in China,” Dissent 57(1): pp.91-99.
    Berenschot, W., and Aspinall, E. (2020) “How Clientelism Varies: Comparing Patronage Democracies,” Democratization, 27(1): pp.1-19.
    Boecking, B., Hall, M., and Schneider, J. (2015). “Event Prediction: With Learning Algorithms-A Study of Events Surrounding the Egyptian Revolution of 2011 on the Basis of Micro Blog Data.” Policy and Internet, 7(2): pp.159-184.
    Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Boucher, D. (1990). “Inter-Community and International Relations in the Political Philosophy of Hobbes,” Polity, 23(2): pp.207-232.
    Bruns, G., Croissant, A., and John, M. (2002). Electoral Politics in Southeast & East Asia. Singapore: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
    Bunbongkarn, S. (2015). “What Went Wrong with the Thai Democracy?” Southeast Asian Affairs, 2015: pp.359-368.
    Chang, K. S. (2010). “The Second Modern Condition? Compressed Modernity as Internalized Reflexive Cosmopolitization,” The British Journal of Sociology, 61(3): pp. 444-464.
    Cheang, B., and Choy, D. (2021). Liberalism Unveiled Forging a New Third Way in Singapore. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd.
    Chen, T., and Hsu, C. H. (2018). “Double-Speaking Human Rights: Analyzing Human Rights Conception in Chinese Politics,” Journal of Contemporary China, 27 (112): pp.1-15.
    Chen, W. C. (2011), “Constitutional Patriotism as an Identity: A Study on the Feasible Approach toward Taiwan’s Democratic Consolidation,” European-Asian Journal of Law and Governance, 1, Special Issue: pp.16-53.
    Chu, Y. H. (2012), “China and East Asian Democracy: The Taiwan Factor,” Journal of Democracy, 23(1): pp.42-56.
    Chu, Y. H., Huang, K. P., Lagos M., and Mattes, R. (2020). “A Lost Decade for Third-Wave Democracies?” Journal of Democracy, 31(2): pp.166-181.
    Chu, Y. H., Shin, D. C., Welsh, B., and Chang, A. 2012/6/17-18, “Sources of Regime Support in East Asia,” (Taipei, Taiwan: Asian Barometer Conference on Democracy and Citizen Politics in East Asia.) pp.1-35.
    Clapp, P. (2007). Burma’s Long Road to Democracy. US: US Institute of Peace.
    Cliff, A. and John, O. (1973). Spatial Autocorrelation. London, UK: Pion.
    Cooley, A. (2015). “Authoritarianism Goes Global: Countering Democratic Norms,” Journal of Democracy, 26(3): pp.49-63.
    Dallmayr, F. (1997). “The Politics of Nonidentity,” Political Theory, 25(1), 33-56.
    Dalton, R. J. (1994). “Communists and Democrats: Democratic Attitudes in the Two Germanies.” British Journal of Political Science, 24(4): pp.469-493.
    David, R., and Holliday, I. (2018). Liberalism and Democracy in Myanmar. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Deibert, R. (2019). “Three Painful Truths about Social Media,” Journal of Democracy, 30(1): pp.25-39.
    Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Diamond, L. (2012). “China and East Asian Democracy: The Coming Wave,” Journal of Democracy, 23(1): pp.5-13.
    Diamond, L. (2015). “Facing up to the Democratic Recession,” Journal of Democracy, 26(1): pp.141-155.
    Diamond, L. (2016). In Search of Democracy. New York: Routledge.
    Diamond, L. (2019). “The Threat of Postmodern Totalitarianism,” Journal of Democracy, 30(1): pp.20-24.
    Diamond, L., Plattner, M., and Chu, Y. H. (eds.) (2013). Democracy in East Asia- A New Century. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    DiMatteo, L. (2018). “‘Rule of Law’ in China: The Confrontation of Formal Law with Cultural Norms,” Cornell International Law Journal, 51: pp.391-444.
    Downs, A. (1957). “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy,” Journal of Political Economy, 65(2): pp.135-150.
    Dressel, B., and Bonoan, C. R. (2019). “Southeast Asias Troubling Elections: Duterte Versus the Rule of Law,” Journal of Democracy, 30(4): pp.134-148.
    Easton, D. (1953). Political System. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
    Easton, D. (1975). “A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science, 5(4): pp.435-457.
    Englehart, N. (2000). “Rights and Culture in the Asian Values Argument: The Rise and Fall of Confucian Ethics in Singapore,” Human Rights Quarterly, 22: pp.548-568.
    Epstein, D. L., Bates, R., Goldstone, J., Kristensen, I., and O’Halloran, S. (2006). “Democratic Transitions,” American Journal of Political Science, 50(3): pp.551-569.
    Erikson, R. S., and Tedin, K. L. (2019). American Public Opinion: Its Origins, Content, and Impact. New York: Routledge.
    Escriba-Folch, A. and Wright, J. (2015). Foreign Pressure and the Politics of Autocratic Survival. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Etzioni, A. (2010). “Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant?” Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(4): pp.389-404.
    Fang, N. (2015). China’s Democracy Path. Germany: Springer-Verlag.
    Feldstein, S. (2019). “How Artificial Intelligence Is Shaping Repression,” Journal of Democracy, 30(1): pp.40-52.
    Ferguson, Y. H. (2017). China’s OBOR Policy, China-U.S. Relations, and the Return of Geopolitics. Mainland China Studies, 60(2): pp.55-85.
    Fish, M.S., and Seeberg, M.A. (2017). “The Secret Supports of Mongolian Democracy,” Journal of Democracy, 28: pp.129-143.
    Flikschuh, K. (2010). “Kant’s Sovereignty Dilemma: A Contemporary Analysis,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(4), 469-493.
    Foa, R. S. (2018). “Modernization and Authoritarianism,” Journal of Democracy, 29(3): pp.129-140.
    Foa, R. S., and Mounk, Y. (2016). “The Danger of Deconsolidation- The Democratic Disconnect,” Journal of Democracy, 27(3): pp.5-17.
    Foa, R. S., and Mounk, Y. (2017). “The Signs of Deconsolidation,” Journal of Democracy, 28(1): pp.5-15.
    Fox, R. A. (2001). “Confucian and Communitarian Responses to Liberal Democracy,” The Review of Politics, 59(3): pp.561-592.
    Fukuyama, F. (2012). “China and East Asian Democracy: The Patterns of History,” Journal of Democracy, 23(1): pp.14-26.
    Fukuyama, F. (2015a). Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrer, Straus and Giroux.
    Fukuyama, F. (2015b). “Why Democracy Is Performing So Poorly,” Journal of Democracy, 26(1): pp.11-20.
    Fukuyama, F. (2016a). “American Political Decay or Renewal? The Meaning of the 2016 Election,” Foreign Affairs, 95(4): pp.58-68.
    Fukuyama, F. (2016b). “Reflections on Chinese Governance,” Journal of Chinese Governance, 1(3): pp.379-391.
    Gainsborough, M. (2012). “Southeast Asia: Elites vs. Reform in Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam,” Journal of Democracy, 23: pp.34-46.
    Galston, W. (2018). “The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy,” Journal of Democracy, 29(2): pp.5-19.
    Geddes, B. (1999). “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1): pp.115-144.
    Getis, A., and Ord, J. (1992). “The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics,” Geographical Analysis, 24(3): pp.189-206.
    Gottfried, P. (2007) “The Rise and Fall of Christian Democracy in Europe,” Orbis, 51(4): pp.711-723.
    Grieco, J. M. (1988). “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” International Organization, 42(3): pp.485-507.
    Grimmer, J., and Stewart, B. (2013). “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts,” Political Analysis, 21(3): pp. 267-297.
    Hackenesch, C. (2015). “Not as Bad as It Seems: EU and US Democracy Promotion Faces China in Africa,” Democratization, 22(3): pp.425-426.
    Harris, E. (2009). Nationalism: Theories and Cases. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
    He, B. (2010). “Four Models of the Relationship between Confucianism and Democracy,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 37(1): pp.18-33.
    He, B. (2016). “Confucianism and Democracy: Testing Four Analytical Models in an Empirical World,” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 12(2): pp.59-84.
    Hennessy, B. (1985). Public Opinion. Monterey, CA: Books/Cole Publishing.
    Houle, C. (2009). “Inequality and Democracy: Why Inequality Harms Consolidation but Does Not Affect Democratization,” World Politics, 61(4): pp.589-622.
    Huang, M. H., and Chu, Y. H. 2015. “The Sway of Geopolitics, Economic Interdependence and Cultural Identity: Why Are Some Asians More Favorable toward China’s Rise Than Others?” Journal of Contemporary China, 24(93): pp.421-441.
    Huntington, S. (1991). “Democracy's Third Wave,” Journal of Democracy, 2(2): pp.12-34.
    Huntington, S. (2014). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. London, UK: Penguin.
    Huq, A., and Ginsburg, T. (2018). “How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy,” UCLA Law Review, 65: pp.78-169.
    Issacharoff, S. (2018). “Democracy’s Deficits,” The University of Chicago Law Review, 85(2): pp.485-519.
    Jaskulowski, K. (2010). “Western (civic) “versus” Eastern (ethnic) Nationalism,” The Origins and Critique of the Dichotomy. Polish Sociological Review 171: pp.289-303.
    Jenco, L. (2013). “Revisiting Asian Values,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 74(2): pp.237-258.
    Jennings, M. K., and Markus, G. B. (1984). “Partisan Orientations over the Long Haul: Results from the Three-Wave Political Socialization Panel Study,” American Political Science Review, 78(4): pp.1000-1018.
    Karl, T. L. (1990). “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America,” Comparative Politics, 23(1): pp.1-21.
    Knack, S. (2004). “Does Foreign Aid Promote Democracy?” International Studies Quarterly, 48(1): pp. 251-266.
    Kim, C. (2021). The New Dynamics of Democracy in South Korea. UK: Routledge.
    Krastev, I. (2011). “Paradoxes of the New Authoritarianism,” Journal of Democracy, 22(2): pp.5-16.
    Krastev, I. (2014). “From Politics to Protest,” Journal of Democracy, 25(4): pp.5-19.
    Krastev, I., and Holms, S. (2018). “Imitation and Its Discontents,” Journal of Democracy, 29(3): pp.117-128.
    Krekó, P. (2021). “How Authoritarians Inflate Their Image,” Journal of Democracy 32(3): pp.109-123.
    Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Kuhner, T. (2016). “The Corruption of Liberal and Socialist Democracy,” Fordham Law Review, 84: pp.2453-2476.
    Levitsky, S., and Way, L. (2006). “Linkage Versus Leverage. Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change,” Comparative Politics, 38(4): pp.379-400.
    Levitsky, S., and Way, L. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Levitsky, S., and Way, L. (2015). “The Myth of Democratic Recession,” Journal of Democracy, 26(1): pp.141-155.
    Levitsky, S., and Way, L. (2020). “The New Competitive Authoritarianism,” Journal of Democracy, 31(1): pp.51-65.
    Li, X. (2014). “Legal and Economic Development with Sui Generis Chinese Characteristics: A Systems Theorist’s Perspective,” Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 39(1): pp.159-229.
    Liddle, R. (2021). Democracy in Indonesia: From Stagnation to Regression? Thomas Power and Eve Warburton (eds.), Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
    Lind, J., and Wohlforth, W. (2019). “The Future of the Liberal Order Is Conservative: A Strategy to Save the System,” Foreign Affairs, 98(2): pp.70-80.
    Linz, J. J., and Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Linz, J. J., and Stepan, A. (2010). “Toward Consolidated Democracies,” in Juan Linz, Alfred Stepan and Philip Costopoulos (eds.), Debates on Democratization, pp.3-22, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
    Liu, S. H. (2011). “Reflections on Globalization from a Neo-Confucian Perspective,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38(1): pp.105-117.
    Lu, J., and Chu, Y. H. (2021). “Trading Democracy for Governance,” Journal of Democracy, 32(4): pp.115-130.
    Mainwaring, S., and Bizzarro, F. (2019). “The Fates of Third-Wave Democracies,” Journal of Democracy, 30(1): pp.99-113.
    Mandelbaum, M. (2019). “The New Containment: Handling Russia, China, and Iran,” Foreign Affairs, 98(2): pp.123-131.
    March, J. and Olsen, J. (1984). “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life,” The American Political Science Review, 78(3): pp.734-749.
    Margaret, E. R., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Luis, J. L., Kushner, S., Albertson, B., and Rand, D. G. (2014). “Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses,” American Journal of Political Science, 58(4): 1064-1082.
    McClosky, H. J., Shanks, M., and Sniderman, P. M. (1975). “Personal and Political Sources of Political Alienation,” British Journal of Political Science 5: pp.1-31.
    Miller, A. H. (1974). “Rejoinder to ‘Comment’ by Jack Citrin: Political Discontent or Ritualism?” The American Political Science Review, 68(3): pp.989-1001.
    Møller, J. and Skaaning, S. E. (2013). “The Third Wave: Inside the Numbers,” Journal of Democracy, 24(4): pp.97-109.
    Moore, B. (1966). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
    Muller, E. N., Jukam, T. O., and Seligson, M. A. (1982). “Diffuse Political Support and Antisystem Political Behavior: A Comparative Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science, 26(2): pp.240-264.
    Mutalib, H. (2000). “Illiberal Democracy and the Future of Opposition in Singapore,” Third World Quarterly, 21(2): pp.313-342.
    Nathan, A. (2015). “China’s Challenges,” Journal of Democracy, 26(1): pp.156-170.
    Nathan, A. (2016). “The Puzzle of Chinese Middle Class,” Journal of Democracy, 27(2): pp.5-19.
    Nathan, A. (2020). “The Puzzle of Authoritarian Legitimacy,” Journal of Democracy, 31(1): pp.158-168.
    Newman, O., and De Zoysa, R. (1997). “Communitarianism: The New Panacea?” Sociological Perspectives, 40(4): pp.623-638.
    Nguyen, H. H. (2016). Political Dynamics of Grassroots Democracy in Vietnam. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
    Nodia, G. (2014). “External Influence and Democratization: The Revenge of Geopolitics,” Journal of Democracy, 25(4): pp.139-150.
    Norrlof, C. (2019). “Educate to Liberate: Open Societies Need Open Minds,” Foreign Affairs, 98(2): pp.132-141.
    O' Donnell, G., Schmitter, P., and Whitehead, L. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    O' Loughlin, J., Ward, M. D., Lofdahl, C. L., Cohen, J. S., Brown, D. S., Reilly, D., Gleditsch, K. S., and Shin, M. (1998). “The Diffusion of Democracy, 1946-1994,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(4): pp.545-574.
    Odinius, D., and Kuntz, P. (2015). “The Limits of Authoritarian Solidarity: The Gulf Monarchies and Preserving Authoritarian Rule During the Arab Spring,” European Journal of Political Research, 54(4): pp.639-654.
    O' Loughlin, J. et al., (1998). “The Diffusion of Democracy, 1946–1994,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(4): pp.545-574.
    Ortmann, S. (2014). “Democratization and the Discourse on Stability in Hong Kong and Singapore,” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 10(1): pp.123-145.
    Ortmann, S., and Thompson, M. (2016). “China and the ‘Singapore Model,’” Journal of Democracy, 27(1): pp.39-48.
    Osgood, J. (2009). “Childcare Workforce Reform in England and ‘The Early Years Professional’: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” Journal of Education Policy, 24(6): pp.733-751.
    Park, C. M. (2007). “Democratic Consolidation in East Asia,” Japanese Journal of Political Science, 8(3): pp.305-326.
    Park, C. M. (2013). “Democratic Quality of Institutions and Regime Support in East Asia,” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 9(1): pp.93-116.
    Park, C. M. (2017). “Quality of Governance and Regime Support: Evidence from East Asia,” Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(2): pp.154-175.
    Pei, M. (2016). “Transition in China? More Likely Than You Think,” Journal of Democracy, 27(4): pp.5-20.
    Perry, E. (2013). “The Illiberal Challenge of Authoritarian China,” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 8(2): pp.3-15.
    Plattner, M. (2013). “Reflections on ‘Governance,’” Journal of Democracy, 24(4): pp.17-28.
    Plattner, M. (2014). “The End of the Transition Era?” Journal of Democracy, 25(3): pp.5-16.
    Plattner, M. (2015). “Is Democracy Decline?” Journal of Democracy, 26(1): pp.5-10.
    Plattner, M. (2017). “Liberal Democracy’s Fading Allure,” Journal of Democracy, 28(4): pp.5-14.
    Plattner, M. (2019). “Illiberal Democracy and the Struggle on the Right,” Journal of Democracy, 30(1): pp.5-19.
    Pomfret, R. (2000). “Transition and Democracy in Mongolia,” Europe-Asia Studies, 52: pp.149-160.
    Puppas, T. (2016). “The Specter Haunting Europe: Distinguishing Liberal Democracy’s Challengers,” Journal of Democracy, 27(4): pp.22-36.
    Qiang, X. (2019). “President Xi’s Surveillance State,” Journal of Democracy, 30(1): pp.53-67.
    Rustow, D. A. (1970). “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model,” Comparative Politics, 2(3): pp.337-363.
    Rigger, S. (2018). Studies on Taiwan’s Democracy and Democratisation. International Journal of Taiwan Studies, 1(1): pp.121-160.
    Said, E. W. (2003). Orientalism. London, UK: Penguin Classics.
    Schedler, A. (1998). “What is Democratic Consolidation?” Journal of Democracy, 9(2): pp. 91-107.
    Schedler, A. (2010). “What Is Democratic Consolidation?” in Larry Diamond, Plattner, Marc and Philip Costopoulos (eds.), Debates on Democratization, pp.59-76, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Schmidt, C., and Kleinfeld, R. (2020). The Crisis of Democracy? Chances, Risks and Challenges in Japan (Asia) and Germany (Europe). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    Schmidt, V. H. (2011). “How Unique is East Asian Modernity?” Asian Journal of Social Science, 39(3): pp.304-331.
    Shin, D. C. (2008). “The Third Wave in East Asia: Comparative and Dynamic Perspectives,” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 4(2): pp.91-131.
    Shin, D. C., and Kim, H. J. (2017). “Liberal Democracy as the End of History: Western Theories versus Eastern Asian Realities,” Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(2): pp.133-153.
    Shin, G. (2020). “South Korea's Democratic Decay,” Journal of Democracy, 31(3): pp.100-114.
    Snyder, J. (2019). “The Broken Bargain: How Nationalism Came Back,” Foreign Affairs, 98(2): pp.54-60.
    Spina, N., Shin, D., and Cha, D. (2011). “Confucianism and Democracy: A Review of the Opposing Conceptualizations,” Japanese Journal of Political Science, 12(1): pp.143-160.
    Starr, H. and Lindborg, C. (2003). “Democratic Dominoes Revisited: The Hazards of Governmental Transitions, 1974-1996,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(4): pp.490-519.
    States, U., Hess, R. D., and Torney, J. V. (1968). The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    Tamura, K. T. (2003). “The Emergence and Political Consciousness of the Middle Class in Singapore,” The Developing Economies, 41(2): pp.184-200.
    Tansey, O., Koehler, K., and Schmotz, A. (2016). “Ties to the Rest: Autocratic Linkages and Regime Survival,” Comparative Political Studies, 50(9): pp.1221-1254.
    Tholen B. (2018). “Political Responsibility as a Virtue: Nussbaum, MacIntyre, and Ricoeur on the Fragility of Politics,” Alternatives (Boulder, Colo.), 43(1): pp.22-34.
    Tseng, Y. H., Wang, Y. M., Lin, Y. I., Lin, C.J., and Juang, D.W. (2007). “Patent Surrogate Extraction and Evaluation in the Context of Patent Mapping,” Journal of Information Science, 33(6): pp.718-736.
    Tushnet, M. (2015). “Authoritarian Constitutionalism,” Cornell Law Review, 100: pp.391-461.
    Un, K. (2005). “Patronage Politics and Hybrid Democracy: Political Change in Cambodia, 1993-2003,” Asian Perspective, 29(2): pp.203-230.
    Velde, P. V., and Stremmelaar, J. (2006). What about Asia? Revisiting Asian Studies. Amsterdam, Nederland: Amsterdam University Press.
    Walker, C. (2018). “What Is the ‘Sharp Power?’” Journal of Democracy, 29(3): pp.9-23.
    Wallerstein, I. (2000) “Societal Development, or Development of the World-System?” Pp. 112-128 in The Essential Wallerstein. New York: The New Press.
    Wang, Y. Z. (2013) “The RCEP Initiative and ASEAN Centrality,” China International Studies, 42: pp.119-132.
    Wang, Z. and Tan, E. S. (2013). “The Conundrum of Authoritarian Resiliency- Hybrid and Nondemocratic Regimes in East Asia,” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 9(1): pp.199-219.
    Way, L. (2016). “The Authoritarian Threat: Weakness of Autocracy Promotion,” Journal of Democracy, 27(1): pp.64-75.
    Weber, M. (1964). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free press.
    Weber, M. (1968). On Charisma and Institution Building. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
    Wedeman, A. (2018). “The Rise of Kleptocracy: Does China Fit the Model?” Journal of Democracy, 29(1): pp.86-95.
    Wells, T. (2021). Narrating Democracy in Myanmar: The Struggle Between Activists, Democratic Leaders and Aid Workers. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
    Welsh, B. (1996). “Attitudes toward Democracy in Malaysia: Challenges to the Regime?” Asian Survey, 36: pp.882-903.
    Welzel, C. (2011). “The Asian Values Thesis Revisited: Evidence from the World Values Surveys”, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 12(1): pp.1-31.
    Weyland, K. (2017). “Autocratic Diffusion and Cooperation: The Impact of Interests vs. Ideology,” Democratization, 24(7): pp.1235-1252.
    Whitehead, L. (2014). “Antidemocracy Promotion: Four Strategies in Search of a Framework,” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 10(2): pp.1-24.
    Wike, R. and Fetterolf, J. (2018). “Liberal Democracy’s Crisis of Confidence,” Journal of Democracy, 29(4): pp.136-150.
    Wilkerson, J. and Casas, A. (2017). “Large-Scale Computerized Text Analysis in Political Science: Opportunities and Challenges,” Annual Review of Political Science, 20: pp.529-544.
    Yang, D. (2016). “China’s Developmental Authoritarianism: Dynamics and Pitfalls,” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 12(1): pp.45-70.
    Youngs, R. (2015). “Exploring ‘Non-Western Democracy,’” Journal of Democracy, 26(4): pp.140-154.
    Yu, K. (2016). Democracy in China: Challenge or Opportunity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Yun, W., and Bell, D. (2014). “The Revival of Confucianism in an Age of Globalization: Towards a Critical Confucianism,” The Journal of Multicultural Society, 5(1): pp.1-21.
    Zakaria, F. (1997). “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy,” Foreign Affairs, 76(6): pp.22-43.

    三、網路資源
    BBC NEWS(2021/3/23),〈新疆維吾爾人權:美歐英加等多國聯合制裁中國〉,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-56493143. 2021/11/2。
    一帶一路網(2021),〈國家推進“一帶一路”建設工作領導小組辦公室〉,https://www.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/jcsjpc.htm. 2021/11/2。
    人民網(2021),〈習近平系列重要講話數據庫〉,http://jhsjk.people.cn/. 2021/11/2。
    中華民國總統府(2021),〈焦點議題—重要談話〉,https://www.president.gov.tw/Issue/138. 2021/11/2。
    孔子學院總部/國家漢辦(2021),〈關於孔子學院/課堂〉,http://www.hanban.org/confuciousinstitutes/node_10961.htm. 2021/11/2。
    亞洲民主動態調查(2017),〈第四波調查(2010-2014)〉,http://www.asianbarometer.org/data/core-questionnaire. 2021/11/2。
    徐遵慈、洪晨陞(2019/10/24),〈美國對外援助政策之最新發展與臺美推動援外合作之前景〉,https://web.wtocenter.org.tw/Page.aspx?pid=331022&nid=68. 2021/11/2。
    陳勇汀(2017/10/19),〈揭露文字資料的量化數值! / A Text Analyzer for Text Mining〉,https://blog.pulipuli.info/2017/10/text-analyzer-for-text-mining.html. 2021/11/2。
    Altankhuyag, B., and Bértoa, F. C. (2021, May 12). “Are Presidential Elections Putting Mongolian Democracy in Peril?” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://thediplomat.com/2021/05/are-presidential-elections-putting-mongolian-democracy-in-peril/.
    Aspinwall, N. (2021, February 2). “US Asks Taiwan to Fill Void as Confucius Institutes Close,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Education/US-asks-Taiwan-to-fill-void-as-Confucius-Institutes-close.
    BBC News. (2020, October 15). “Thai Protests: How Pro-Democracy Movement Gained Momentum,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-54542252.
    Beltran, M. (2021, May 1). “5 Years of Duterte: A Calamity Reaching Its Crescendo,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/5-years-of-duterte-a-calamity-reaching-its-crescendo/.
    Brunnstrom, D. (2021, August 5). “U.S. Senators to Reintroduce Bill Targeting Cambodian Officials on Rights,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-senators-reintroduce-bill-targeting-cambodian-officials-rights-2021-08-05/.
    Bush, R. C. (2021, January 22). “Taiwan’s Democracy and the China Challenge,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/taiwans-democracy-and-the-china-challenge/.
    Byambasuren, E. (2021, May 19). “Is Mongolia Heading Toward One-Party Rule?” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://thediplomat.com/2021/05/is-mongolia-heading-toward-one-party-rule/.
    Chowdhury, D. (2021, February 3). “Trade to Be Part of Biden's China Strategy, Not Driving Force: Ex-USTR Official,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-rcep-gmf-idUSKBN2A30GV.
    Coronel, S. (2020, June 16). “This Is How Democracy Dies,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/06/maria-ressa-rappler-philippines-democracy/613102/.
    Cuddy, A. (2021, April 1). “Myanmar Coup: What Is Happening and Why?” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-55902070.
    Curato, N. (2021, January 22). “Democratic Expressions amidst Fragile Institutions: Possibilities for Reform in Duterte’s Philippines,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/democratic-expressions-amidst-fragile-institutions-possibilities-for-reform-in-dutertes-philippines/.
    Davidson, H. (2021, July 13). “China Bans Pro-Democracy Candidates in Macau,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/13/china-bans-pro-democracy-candidates-in-macau-elections.
    Ekvittayavechnukul, C. (2021, June 23). “Thai Pro-Democracy Activists March against Government,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://apnews.com/article/democracy-health-coronavirus-pandemic-3efe93bb137f5639f126ccad84399ede.
    Enos, O. (2020, January 22). “Cambodia’s Democracy On Trial,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/oliviaenos/2020/01/22/cambodias-democracy-on-trial/.
    Everington, K. (2021, July 12). “Taiwan Expected to Take Part in US Democracy Summit in December,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4118874.
    Freedom House (2019). “Freedom in the World 2019,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from www.freedomhouse.org.
    Freedom House. (2021). “Change in Freedom Score,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://freedomhouse.org/explore-the-map?type=fiw&year=2021&mapview=trend.
    Garfinkle, A. (2017, November 21). “The Puzzle of Singapore,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.the-american-interest.com/2019/11/21/the-puzzle-of-singapore/.
    Geiger, A. (2019, October 29). “Japan’s Support for Democracy-Related Issues: Mapping Survey,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.jcie.org/analysis/books-reports/democracy_mapping_survey/.
    Gokhale, V. (2020, December 18). “China Is Trying to Erode Democracy Worldwide,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/12/18/china-democracy-ideology-communist-party/.
    Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin and B. Puranen et al. (eds.). (2020). World Values Survey: Round Seven - Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid, Spain and Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute and WVSA Secretariat. Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp.
    Heritage Foundation (2020). “2020 Index of Economic Freedom,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.heritage.org/index/.
    Illmer, A. (2021, April 4). “China Is ‘Trampling on Hong Kong’s Democracy.’” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-56585731.
    Jaffrey, S. (2020, January 23). “Is Indonesia Becoming a Two-Tier Democracy?” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/01/23/is-indonesia-becoming-two-tier-democracy-pub-80876.
    Jakhar, P. (2019, September 7). “Confucius Institutes: The Growth of China's Controversial Cultural Branch,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-49511231.
    Kharpal, A. (2019, Augest 23). “Pompeo Says the US Message on Huawei is Clear. Trump’s Words Say Otherwise,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/23/huawei-mike-pompeo-appears-to-be-contradicting-president-donald-trump-on-the-chinese-firm.html.
    Le, T. V. (2021, April 15). “Vietnam’s Great Debate Over Democracy,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/vietnams-great-debate-over-democracy/.
    Lee, J. (2020, May 27). “South Korea’s Imperfect But Maturing Democracy,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://thediplomat.com/2020/05/south-koreas-imperfect-but-maturing-democracy/.
    Lee, S. J. (2021, June 29). “Generational Divides and the Future of South Korean,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/06/29/generational-divides-and-future-of-south-korean-democracy-pub-84818.
    Lemière, S. (2021, January 22). “Democratization on Hold in Malaysia,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/democratization-on-hold-in-malaysia/.
    Maizland, L. (2021, March 1). “China’s Repression of Uyghurs in Xinjiang,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-repression-uyghurs-xinjiang.
    Maizland, L., and Albert, E. (2021, February 17). “Hong Kong’s Freedoms: What China Promised and How It’s Cracking Down,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/hong-kong-freedoms-democracy-protests-china-crackdown.
    Mechkova, V., Pemstein, D., Seim, B., and Wilson, S. (2019). “Measuring Internet Politics: Introducing the Digital Society Project,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from http://digitalsocietyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/DSP_WP_01-Introducing-the-Digital-Society-Project.pdf.
    Mohamadi, M. (2021). “COVID-19 Vaccination Strategy in China: A Case Study – MDPI,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.mdpi.com › pdf.
    Nachemson, A. (2019, July 4). “Was Cambodia Ever Really a Democracy?” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://thediplomat.com/2019/07/was-cambodia-ever-really-a-democracy/.
    Newcomb, M. (2021, July 5). “Can Taiwan Provide the Alternative to Digital Authoritarianism?” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://thediplomat.com/2021/07/can-taiwan-provide-the-alternative-to-digital-authoritarianism/.
    Our World in data (2021). “Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations.
    Paddock, R. C. (2020, May 23). “Democracy Fades in Malaysia as Old Order Returns to Power,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/22/world/asia/malaysia-politics-najib.html.
    Pak, J. H. (2021, January 22). “North Korea’s Long Shadow on South Korea’s Democracy,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/north-koreas-long-shadow-on-south-koreas-democracy/.
    Pepinsky, T. (2021, January 26). “COVID-19 and Democracy in Indonesia: Short-Term Stability and Long-Term Threats Thomas Pepinsky,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2021/01/26/covid-19-and-democracy-in-indonesia-short-term-stability-and-long-term-threats/.
    Polity V Project (2018). “Polity5: Regime Authority Characteristics and Transitions Datasets,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html.
    Primandari, F. F. (2021, June 12). “Consolidating Indonesia’s Deteriorating Democracy,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2021/06/12/consolidating-indonesia-deteriorating-democracy/.
    Prime Minister's Office Singapore (2021). “Newsroom: PM Lee Hsien Loong,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.pmo.gov.sg/Newsroom?page=1&keywords=&from=PM%20Lee%20Hsien%20Loong&topic=&year=&type=.
    Ramzy, A., and May, T. (2021, August 15). “Hong Kong’s Opposition Quits in Droves,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/15/world/asia/hong-kong-china-politics.html.
    Reporters Without Borders (2020). “2020 World Press Freedom Index,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://rsf.org/en/ranking.
    RCEP Official Website (2021). “Participating Countries,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://rcepsec.org/about/#.
    Reuters. (2021, April 16). “Opponents of Myanmar Coup Form Unity Government, Aim for ‘Federal Democracy,’” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/opponents-myanmar-coup-announce-unity-government-2021-04-16/.
    Roantree, A. Marie, K. Wok, D., and Pang, J. (2021, August 15). “Organizer of Hong Kong Mass Protests Disbands in Latest Blow to Democracy Movement,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/world/china/organizer-hong-kong-mass-protests-disbands-latest-blow-democracy-movement-2021-08-15/.
    Roth, K. (2021, January 23). “World Report 2021: Thailand,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2021/country-chapters/thailand.
    Sambuu, B., and Menard, A. (2019, April 3). “Here’s How Democracy Is Eroding in Mongolia,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/04/03/heres-how-democracy-is-eroding-mongolia/.
    Solís, M. (2021, January 22). “Japan’s Democratic Renewal and the Survival of the Liberal Order,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/japans-democratic-renewal-and-the-survival-of-the-liberal-order/.
    Song, W. (2021, October 10). “Covid-19 Vaccines: Has China Made More than Other Countries Combined?” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/58808889.
    Soo, Z. (2021, April 2). “7 Hong Kong Democracy Leaders Convicted as China Clamps Down,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://apnews.com/article/democracy-hong-kong-jimmy-lai-china-asia-pacific-dd17218f4e242fcaf57db74d39450a3a.
    Strong, M. (2021, February 3). “Taiwan Most Democratic Country in East Asia,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4118874.
    The Economist (2019). “Democracy Index 2019,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.eiu.com/topic/democracy-index.
    The Economist. (2021, February 2). “Global Democracy Has a Very Bad Year,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2021/02/02/global-democracy-has-a-very-bad-year.
    Thum, R. (2018, May 15) “What Really Happens in China’s ‘Re-education’ Camps,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/15/opinion/china-re-education-camps.html.
    Tran, B. T. (2021, June 3). “No Trade-Off: Biden Can Both Deepen U.S.-Vietnam Ties and Promote Human Rights,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.csis.org/analysis/no-trade-biden-can-both-deepen-us-vietnam-ties-and-promote-human-rights.
    United Nations Human Rights Council (2019). “A/HRC/41/G/17 Document, 41 Session,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://undocs.org/A/HRC/41/G/17. 2019/09/08.
    Wanless, A. (2020, June 22). “The Philippines Is Democracy’s Dystopian Future,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/06/24/philippines-is-democracy-s-dystopian-future-pub-82147.
    World Bank (2018). “The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) Project,” https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/.
    World Bank (2020). “Database of Political Institutions,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/wps2283-database-political-institutions.
    World Values Survey (2020). “World Values Survey Wave 7,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp.
    Yamaguchi, J. (2021, September 22). “LDP Dominance Still Cripples Japanese Democracy,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2021/09/22/ldp-dominance-still-cripples-japanese-democracy/.
    Zainuddin, A. (2021, August 3). “Democracy Is Teetering in Malaysia as PM Tightens Grip on Power,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://thediplomat.com/2021/08/democracy-is-teetering-in-malaysia-as-pm-tightens-grip-on-power/.
    Zotero Documentation (2021). “Global AI Surveillance,” Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.zotero.org/groups/2347403/global_ai_surveillance/items.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE