簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 賈語嫣
Chia, Yu-Yen
論文名稱: 不同內容轉換機制之答題遊戲對學生之影響
The Influences of Quiz Games with Different Content Switch Mechanisms on Student Learning
指導教授: 陳志洪
Chen, Zhi-Hong
口試委員: 陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih
鄭年亨
Cheng, Nien-Heng
陳志洪
Chen, Zhi-Hong
口試日期: 2022/07/08
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 73
中文關鍵詞: 答題式遊戲眼動儀專注度
英文關鍵詞: Quiz games, Eye tracker, Concentration
研究方法: 準實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200889
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:53下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在任何較為基礎的學習,例如:背單字,需要反覆練習以達到精熟狀態,即有意義理解的重複練習。基於精熟學習的遊戲化答題分為「純答題」及「遊戲式答題」,在遊戲式答題中學習者要答題又要進行遊戲,需要在兩者之間做轉換。在答題式遊戲中如何在遊戲和答題轉換是一個重要的議題,過去多數研究都是使用系統控制的模式,其和玩家控制答題與遊戲轉換時機的玩法及教育內容間的平衡和設計是不一樣的,但並未有研究者對兩種模式的差異進行探討,且較少探討學習者在使用歷程中的專注度。
    近年來已有許多研究使用眼動儀來追蹤學習者在網頁平台或系統中的眼動歷程及注意力的分配。因此,本研究希望分析在答題遊戲中不同內容轉換機制,對於學習者的學習成效、專注度、遊戲體驗及學習動機有無差異,並透過眼動儀進一步了解學習者在遊戲中的眼動歷程,以提供未來答題式遊戲機制和介面設計的建議。本研究將探討以下研究問題:(1)不同內容轉換機制之答題遊戲對學生學習成效的影響為何? (2)不同內容轉換機制之答題遊戲對學生感受──專注度、遊戲體驗、學習動機的影響為何? (3)不同內容轉換機制之答題遊戲中學生眼動歷程的差異為何?
    本研究之研究對象為新北市某國中8年級學生,人數共23人,參與30分鐘的活動,透過眼動儀追蹤學習者在遊戲過程中的眼動歷程,遊戲結束後進行感受問卷及學習者訪談。資料分析上透過成對樣本t檢定來了解使用者在答題遊戲中不同內容轉換機制下,其學習成效、專注度、遊戲體驗、學習動機及眼動數據是否有差異,並將眼動儀所蒐集到的資料進行序列分析,來了解受試者在不同內容轉換機制下,其眼動行為是否有差異。
    研究結果顯示:(1)學習者使用兩種模式之學習成效並無差異 (2)學習者在使用玩家控制時專注度較高,在作答時較能專注在觀看題目和答案選項; 學習者在使用玩家控制時遊戲體驗較好; 學習者在使用玩家控制時學習動機較高。 (3)眼動數據及序列分析顯示,學習者在使用玩家控制時會在答題畫面停留較長時間,且會隨時注意資源的狀況,在遊戲及答題的轉換頻率較少,所以可以專心在遊戲或答題中。而使用系統控制的學習者則較為專注在遊戲的進行,停留在遊戲及答題畫面的時間比例較為平均,能讓遊玩和學習佔固定時間長度,較能維持學習的時間比例。

    In basic knowledge learning, such as memorizing vocabularies, students need to repeat to achieve proficiency. The quiz games based on drill and practice are divided into two types, namely, "questions only" and "gamified questions". In the game-type answer, learners have to play games and answer questions, and they need to make a switch between the two. In quiz games, how to switch between answering questions and gaming is an important issue. In the past, most of the studies used "system control", which is different from the design of "user control" that balances the game playing method and educational content. However, there seems still lack of discussion on the differences between "system control" and "user control". In addition, previous studies mostly discussed the achievement, attitude, and motivation of digital game-based learning, but with less discussion on the users' concentration and cognitive process. In recent years, many studies have used eye trackers to track learners' eye movement process and attention distribution. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze whether "system control" and "user control" in quiz games have different effects on learners' concentration, learning motivation, game experience, and learning effectiveness. Also, further analysis of learners' eye movement process in the game through eye trackers is conducted to provide suggestions on the future quiz game mechanism and interface design.
    This study explores the following research questions: (1) What are the effects of quiz games with different content switching mechanisms on students' learning results? (2) What are the effects of quiz games with different content switching mechanisms on students' learning experience—concentration, game experience, and learning motivation? (3) What are the differences of students' eye movement process in quiz games with different content switching mechanisms? The participants of this study are 23 students in the eighth grade of a junior high school in Xinbei city. They participated in a 30 minutes activity. During the game, we tracked the learner's eye movement process through an eye tracker. After the game, post-test, feeling questionnaire and learner interview were conducted. In data analysis, the paired samples t-test is used to understand whether there are differences in the concentration, game experience, learning motivation, learning effectiveness, and eye movement data of users under different answer switch mechanisms, and the data collected by eye movement are analyzed in sequential analysis to understand whether there are differences in the eye movement behavior of subjects under different answer conversion mechanisms
    The result indicated that: (1) There is no difference in the learning outcomes of learners using the different content switching mechanisms (2) Learners show a higher degree of concentration when using "user control", and can focus on reading questions and answer options when answering; Learners have higher learning motivation when using "user control"; Learners have a better game experience when using "user control". (3) Eye movement data and sequential analysis show that learners will stay on the quiz screen for a long time when using "user control", and will pay attention to the status of resources at any time. The frequency of switching between games and quizzes is less, so they can concentrate on the games or quizzes. The learners who use the "system control" are more concentrated on the progress of the game, and the proportion of time staying on the game and quiz screen is relatively average, which can keep playing and learning takes a fixed length of time, and can maintain the proportion of learning time.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究問題 4 第三節 名詞解釋 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 精熟學習 6 一、精熟學習 6 二、反覆練習(drill and practice) 8 第二節 數位遊戲式學習 9 一、數位遊戲式學習的定義及特性 9 二、數位遊戲式學習的優點 10 三、數位遊戲式教材的設計 11 第三節 基於精熟學習的遊戲化答題 14 一、精熟學習的遊戲化答題 14 第四節 答題式遊戲之內容轉換機制 17 第五節 眼動行為及眼動追蹤在教育上的應用 22 一、眼動行為與認知處理 22 二、眼動追蹤 23 三、眼動追蹤在數位遊戲式學習上的應用 24 第三章 系統設計 28 第四章 研究方法 33 第一節 研究設計與架構 33 第二節 研究對象 34 第三節 實驗流程 34 第四節 研究工具 35 第五節 資料分析 39 第五章 結果與討論 40 第一節 學習成效結果 40 第二節 感受問卷結果 41 第三節 不同內容轉換機制之遊戲眼動歷程 42 一、環遊世界眼動畫面停留比例 42 二、環遊世界眼動凝視次數比例 45 三、環遊世界眼動訪視次數比例 45 四、環遊世界AOI訪問次序之序列分析 50 第四節 小節 54 第六章 結論與建議 55 第一節 研究結論 55 第二節 研究貢獻 56 第三節 研究限制 57 參考文獻 59 中文部分 59 英文部分 60 附錄一 感受問卷 72

    中文部分
    林佑昌(2014)。探討不同遊戲學習模式與知識程度的組合對遊戲式學習的影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。中原大學資訊工程學系。
    孫春在(2015)。遊戲式數位學習。高等教育出版社。
    許一珍, 范丙林, 巫宗翰, & 蕭文祥(2015)。心流經驗於遊戲使用者介面之研究。數位學習科技期刊,7(2),73-93。
    陳舜文、魏嘉瑩(2013)。大學生學習動機之 [雙因素模式]: 學業認同與角色認同之功能。中華心理學刊,55(1),41-55。
    連俊瑋、許和莉、許惠媚(2018)。嚴肅遊戲(Serious Game)平台與學習風格配適對學習成效影響之研究。電子商務學報,20(2),217-248。
    張芳全(2019)。班級脈絡,文化資本, 學習動機, 課後補習與英語學習成就之多層次分析。Journal of University of Taipei‧Education Vol,50(1),1-24。
    張春興(1996)。教育心理學: 三化取向的理論與實踐。臺灣東華。
    張雅棋(2016)。以一個創新的方法開發增強英語學術字彙的學習遊戲〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺中科技大學多媒體設計系碩士班。
    楊忠曉(2006)。導入認知風格之遊戲輔助學習系統〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所。
    鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學: 理論與實踐 (pp. 140-148)。桂冠圖書公司。
    鄭昭明(2006)。認知心理學。桂冠圖書公司。
    劉政宏(2009)。對學習行為最有影響力的動機成分? 雙核心動機模式之初探。教育心理學報,41(2),361-383。
    劉祺岳(2015)。塔防遊戲於數位遊戲式學習之應用:自我調整學習〔未出版之碩士論文〕。元智大學資訊傳播學系碩士班科技組。
    盧雨芯(2009)。引起學習動機-國中歷史課導言設計。歷史教育,(15),153-222。
    賴信行(2013)。以線上反覆練習進行國中數學補救教學之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學圖文傳播學系。
    蔡子瑋 & 沈毅珊(2016)。行動遊戲首頁介面配置之注意力研究。設計學研究, 19(1),81-102.
    韓佳玲、于富雲、王千濤、張立杰、陳德懷(2001)。網路同步遊戲系統於高中英語學科運用之實證性研究。2001年資訊素養與終身學習社會國際研討會, 資訊素養與各級教育教學之融合大會論文摘要集,台中市,台灣
    羅家駿、郭宛如(2020)。玩家人格特質與答題時間壓力對遊戲體驗, 態度與表現之影響。教育傳播與科技研究,(124),53-68。

    英文部分
    Abbott, W. W., & Faisal, A. A. (2012). Ultra-low-cost 3D gaze estimation: an intuitive high information throughput compliment to direct brain–machine interfaces. Journal of neural engineering, 9(4), 046016.
    Alexiou, A., & Schippers, M. C. (2018). Digital game elements, user experience and learning: A conceptual framework. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2545-2567.
    Alharbi, A. S., & Meccawy, Z. (2020). Introducing Socrative as a tool for formative assessment in Saudi EFL classrooms. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 372-384.
    Ali, N. M., Abdullah, S. Z., Salim, J., & Lee, H. (2013). Exploring user experience in game interface: a case study of The Sims 3. The Computer Games Journal, 2(1), 6-18.
    Aliyari, H., Sahraei, H., Erfani, M., Mohammadi, M., Kazemi, M., Daliri, M. R., ... & Farajdokht, F. (2020). Changes in cognitive functions following violent and football video games in young male volunteers by studying brain waves. Basic and clinical neuroscience, 11(3), 279.
    Anjaniputra, A. G., & Salsabila, V. A. (2018). The merits of Quizlet for vocabulary learning at tertiary level. Indonesian EFL Journal, 4(2), 1-11.
    Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge university press.
    Beserra, V., Nussbaum, M., & Grass, A. (2017). Using a fine-grained multiple-choice response format in educational drill-and-practice video games. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 717-732.
    Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1. Evaluation comment, 1(2), n2.
    Boller, S. (2013). Learning Game Design: Game Mechanics. Knowledge Guru.
    Boucheix, J. M., & Lowe, R. K. (2010). An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and instruction, 20(2), 123-135.
    Brownell, W. (1935). Psychological considerations in the learning and the teaching arithmetic. The Teaching of Arithmetic, 10th Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1-31.
    Carlson, R. A., Sullivan, M. A., & Schneider, W. (1989). Practice and working memory effects in building procedural skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(3), 517.
    Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split‐attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 233-246.
    Charsky, D. (2010). From edutainment to serious games: A change in the use of game characteristics. Games and culture, 5(2), 177-198.
    Chen, C. H., Liu, J. H., & Shou, W. C. (2018). How competition in a game-based science learning environment influences students' learning effectiveness, flow experience, and learning behavioral patterns. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 164-176.
    Chen, F., Cui, Y., & Chu, M. W. (2020). Utilizing Game Analytics to Inform and Validate Digital Game-based Assessment with Evidence-centered Game Design: A Case Study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(3), 481-503.
    Cloude, E. B., Dever, D. A., Wiedbusch, M. D., & Azevedo, R. (2020). Quantifying scientific thinking using multichannel data with crystal island: Implications for individualized game-learning analytics. In Frontiers in Education (p. 217). Frontiers.
    Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of educational psychology, 88(4), 715.
    Covaci, A., Ghinea, G., Lin, C. H., Huang, S. H., & Shih, J. L. (2018). Multisensory games-based learning-lessons learnt from olfactory enhancement of a digital board game. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(16), 21245-21263.
    Cutumisu, M., Turgeon, K. L., Saiyera, T., Chuong, S., González Esparza, L. M., MacDonald, R., & Kokhan, V. (2019). Eye Tracking the Feedback Assigned to Undergraduate Students in a Digital Assessment Game. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1931.
    Dedeaux, T., & Hartsell, T. (2018). Comparison between two types of educational computer games. Simulation & Gaming, 49(6), 661-674.
    De Freitas, S., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Online gaming as an educational tool in learning and training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 535-537.
    Dimitra, K., Konstantinos, K., Christina, Z., & Katerina, T. (2020). Types of Game-Based Learning in Education: A Brief State of the Art and the Implementation in Greece. European Educational Researcher, 3(2), 87-100.
    Diya, S. Z., Prorna, R. A., Rahman, I. I., Islam, A. B., & Islam, M. N. (2019, February). Applying brain-computer interface technology for evaluation of user experience in playing games. In 2019 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
    Duchowski, A. T., & Duchowski, A. T. (2017). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. Springer.
    Emerson, A., Sawyer, R., Azevedo, R., & Lester, J. (2018, July). Gaze-enhanced student modeling for game-based learning. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (pp. 63-72).
    Emerson, A., Cloude, E. B., Azevedo, R., & Lester, J. (2020). Multimodal learning analytics for game‐based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1505-1526.
    Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & education, 67, 156-167.
    Faya Cerqueiro, F., & Martín-Macho Harrison, A. (2019). Socrative in higher education: Game vs. other uses. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(3), 49.
    Frutos-Pascual, M., & Garcia-Zapirain, B. (2015). Assessing visual attention using eye tracking sensors in intelligent cognitive therapies based on serious games. Sensors, 15(5), 11092-11117.
    Furió, D., González-Gancedo, S., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Costa, M. (2013). The effects of the size and weight of a mobile device on an educational game. Computers & Education, 64, 24-41.
    Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J.E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation& Gaming, 33(4), 441-467.
    Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2017). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. In Simulation in Aviation Training (pp. 475-501). Routledge.
    Hong, J. C., Cheng, C. L., Hwang, M. Y., Lee, C. K., & Chang, H. Y. (2009). Assessing the educational values of digital games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 423-437.
    Hung, H. T., Yang, J. C., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., & Wang, C. C. (2018). A scoping review of research on digital game-based language learning. Computers & Education, 126, 89-104.
    Hussein, M. H., Ow, S. H., Cheong, L. S., Thong, M. K., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2019). Effects of digital game-based learning on elementary science learning: A systematic review. IEEE Access, 7, 62465-62478.
    Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121-130.
    Hyönä, J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 172-176.
    IJsselsteijn, W., Van Den Hoogen, W., Klimmt, C., De Kort, Y., Lindley, C., Mathiak, K., ... & Vorderer, P. (2008, August). Measuring the experience of digital game enjoyment. In Proceedings of measuring behavior (Vol. 2008, No. 2008, pp. 88-89). Maastricht, the Netherlands: Noldus.
    Jian, Y. C., & Ko, H. W. (2017). Influences of text difficulty and reading ability on learning illustrated science texts for children: An eye movement study. Computers & Education, 113, 263-279.
    Jian, Y. C., Wu, C. J., & Su, J. H. (2014). Learners' eye movements during construction of mechanical kinematic representations from static diagrams. Learning and Instruction, 32, 51-62.
    Jičínská, L., Sedláčková, P., Kolek, L., Tetourová, T., Volná, K., Lukavský, J., & Brom, C. (2021). Extrinsically Integrated Instructional Quizzes in Learning Games: An Educational Disaster or Not?. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
    Ketamo, H., & Kiili, K. (2010). Conceptual change takes time: Game based learning cannot be only supplementary amusement. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(4), 399-419.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., Hillemann, E., & Albert, D. (2011, July). Tracking the UFO’s paths: Using eye-tracking for the evaluation of serious games. In International conference on virtual and mixed reality (pp. 315-324). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
    Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and higher education, 8(1), 13-24.
    Kim, C., Park, S. W., & Cozart, J. (2014). Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 171-185.
    Krapfl, J. E. (2016). Behaviorism and society. The Behavior Analyst, 39(1), 123-129.
    Kuiper, E., & de Pater-Sneep, M. (2014). Student perceptions of drill-and-practice mathematics software in primary education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(2), 215-236.
    Law, E. L. C., & Sun, X. (2012). Evaluating user experience of adaptive digital educational games with Activity Theory. International journal of human-computer studies, 70(7), 478-497.
    Lee, J. Y., Donkers, J., Jarodzka, H., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2019). How prior knowledge affects problem-solving performance in a medical simulation game: Using game-logs and eye-tracking. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 268-277.
    Lees, M., Wentzel, M. T., Clark, J. H., & Hurst, G. A. (2020). Green tycoon: A mobile application game to introduce biorefining principles in green chemistry.
    Leite, H. M. D. A., Carvalho, S. N. D., Costa, T. B. D. S., Attux, R., Hornung, H. H., & Arantes, D. S. (2018). Analysis of user interaction with a brain-computer interface based on steady-state visually evoked potentials: case study of a game. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2018.
    Lim, C. S., Tang, K. N., & Kor, L. K. (2012). Drill and practice in learning (and beyond). Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 1040-1043.
    Lim, W. N. (2017, April). Improving student engagement in higher education through mobile-based interactive teaching model using socrative. In 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 404-412). IEEE.
    Lin, J.-H. (2017). Eye movement equipment, technology and research procedures. In Sun C.-T. et al. (eds.) Digital Learners Eyes, 79-81, NCTU Press, HsinChu
    Lin, Y. T., Tseng, Y. M., Lee, Y. S., Wang, T. C., Tsai, S. I., & Yi, Y. J. (2018). Development of a SoLoMo game-based application for supporting local cultural learning in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 115-128.
    Liu, S., Liang, T., Shao, S., & Kong, J. (2020). Evaluating localized MOOCs: The role of culture on interface design and user experience. IEEE Access, 8, 107927-107940.
    Lochner, L., Wieser, H., Waldboth, S., & Mischo-Kelling, M. (2016). Combining traditional anatomy lectures with e-learning activities: how do students perceive their learning experience?. International journal of medical education, 7, 69.
    Loderer, K., Pekrun, R., & Plass, J. L. (2020). Emotional foundations of game-based learning.
    Lopez, M. D. R., Vasquez, L. M. L., & Ortiz, J. A. (2019, March). Game Memocon, To Teach the Importance of Concentration in Learning Process. In Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference (Vol. 46).
    Mandell, C.J. and Mandell, S.L. (1984) Computers in Education Today, Weat Publishing Company, USA.
    Martínez-Jiménez, R., Pedrosa-Ortega, C., Licerán-Gutiérrez, A., Ruiz-Jiménez, M. C., & García-Martí, E. (2021). Kahoot! as a tool to improve student academic performance in business management subjects. Sustainability, 13(5), 2969.
    Mayer, R. E. (2010). Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and instruction, 20(2), 167-171.
    Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Baldwin, W. (1992). Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 5-13.
    Nicol, M. M., & Anderson, A. (2000). Computer‐assisted vs. teacher‐directed teaching of numeracy in adults. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 184-192.
    Ninaus, M., Greipl, S., Kiili, K., Lindstedt, A., Huber, S., Klein, E., ... & Moeller, K. (2019). Increased emotional engagement in game-based learning–A machine learning approach on facial emotion detection data. Computers & Education, 142, 103641.
    Nugraha, D. Y., & Nugraha, D. (2021). The Correlation between Learning Motivation and Learning Outcomes on Mathematics Subjects in XII Science Class Senior High School 4 Bone. Anatolian Journal of Education, 6(1), 157-166.
    Ong, J. S. H., Mohan, P. R., Han, J. Y., Chew, J. Y., & Fung, F. M. (2021). Coding a Telegram Quiz Bot to Aid Learners in Environmental Chemistry.
    Paras, B. (2005). Game, motivation, and effective learning: An integrated model for educational game design.
    Pavlas, D. (2010). A model of flow and play in game-based learning the impact of game characteristics, player traits, and player states.
    Pavlas, D., Bedwell, W., Wooten, S. R., Heyne, K., & Salas, E. (2009, October). Investigating the attributes in serious games that contribute to learning. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 53, No. 27, pp. 1999-2003). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
    Phan, M. H., Keebler, J. R., & Chaparro, B. S. (2016). The development and validation of the game user experience satisfaction scale (GUESS). Human factors, 58(8), 1217-1247.
    Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently?. On the horizon.
    Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. Paragon House
    Rafiola, R., Setyosari, P., Radjah, C., & Ramli, M. (2020). The Effect of Learning Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Blended Learning on Students’ Achievement in The Industrial Revolution 4.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(8), 71-82.
    Rahma, R., & Nurhadi, J. (2018). Can Power Spectral Density (PSD) be used to Measure Reading Concentration?.
    Rathakrishnan, M., Raman, A., Haniffa, M. A., Mariamdaran, S. D., & Haron, A. (2018). The drill and practice application in teaching science for lower secondary students. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 3(7), 100-108.
    Raybourn, E. M., & Bos, N. (2005, April). Design and evaluation challenges of serious games. In CHI'05 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2049-2050).
    Reynolds, R., & Chiu, M. M. (2012, July). Contribution of motivational orientations to student outcomes in a discovery-based program of game design learning. In International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS).
    Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V., Correa, M., Flores, P., ... & Salinas, M. (2003). Beyond Nintendo: design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40(1), 71-94.
    Rossiou, E., & Papadakis, S. (2007). Educational games in higher education: A case study in teaching recursive algorithms. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Education in a Changing Environment (Vol. 149157).
    Rozendaal, M. C., Keyson, D. V., de Ridder, H., & Craig, P. O. (2009). Game feature and expertise effects on experienced richness, control and engagement in game play. AI & society, 24(2), 123-133.
    Rowe, J. P., Shores, L. R., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2011). Integrating learning, problem solving, and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21(1-2), 115-133.
    Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). THE SCIENCE OF TRAINING: A Decade. Annu. Rev. Psychol, 52, 471-99.
    Sanosi, A. B. (2018). The effect of Quizlet on vocabulary acquisition. Asian Journal of Education and e-learning, 6(4).
    Setiawan, M. R., & Wiedarti, P. (2020). The effectiveness of Quizlet application towards students’ motivation in learning vocabulary. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 83-95.
    Shojaee, A., Kim, H. W., Cook-Chennault, K., & Alarćon, I. V. (2021, October). What you see is what you get?–Relating eye-tracking metrics to students' attention to game elements. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
    Silva, R., Rodrigues, R., & Leal, C. (2019). Play it again: how game-based learning improves flow in Accounting and Marketing education. Accounting Education, 28(5), 484-507.
    Sung, H. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Facilitating effective digital game-based learning behaviors and learning performances of students based on a collaborative knowledge construction strategy. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(1), 118-134.
    Syed Agil, S. Omar (2007). The prolegomena: Social science and the economic analysis of Ibn Khaldun. Unpublished master’s thesis, University Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia.
    Tella, A. (2007). The impact of motivation on student’s academic achievement and learning outcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(2), 149-156.
    Tsai, F. H. (2017). An investigation of gender differences in a game-based learning environment with different game modes. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3209-3226.
    van Gog, T., & Jarodzka, H. (2013). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance cognitive and metacognitive processes in computer-based learning environments. In International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 143-156). Springer, New York, NY.
    Vasiljevic, G. A. M., & de Miranda, L. C. (2019). The influence of graphical elements on user’s attention and control on a neurofeedback-based game. Entertainment Computing, 29, 10-19.
    Yusuf, M. O., & Afolabi, A. O. (2010). Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) on Secondary School Students' Performance in Biology. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(1), 62-69.
    Zhang, R., Walshe, C., Liu, Z., Guan, L., Muller, K., Whritner, J., ... & Ballard, D. (2020, April). Atari-head: Atari human eye-tracking and demonstration dataset. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 34, No. 04, pp. 6811-6820).
    Zou, D., Huang, Y., & Xie, H. (2021). Digital game-based vocabulary learning: where are we and where are we going?. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5-6), 751-777.
    Wang, A. I. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217-227.
    Widodo, A., Nursaptini, N., Novitasari, S., Sutisna, D., & Umar, U. (2020). From face-to-face learning to web base learning: How are student readiness. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 149-160.
    Winn, B. M. (2009). The design, play, and experience framework. In Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 1010-1024). IGI Global.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE