簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林珮萱
Lin, Pei-Xuan
論文名稱: 從物種主義觀點探討動物保護之實然與應然:以流浪犬貓與野生動物之衝突為例
Discussing the is-ought problem of animal protection in speciesism stance: Taking the issue of free-ranging unowned cat and dog as the invasive alien species for example.
指導教授: 葉欣誠
Yeh, Shin-Cheng
口試委員: 林正昌
Lin, Cheng-Chang
吳宗憲
WU, Chuang-Hsien
葉欣誠
YEH, Shin-Cheng
口試日期: 2022/06/29
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 環境教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Environmental Education
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 190
中文關鍵詞: 物種主義動物保護動物福利野生動物流浪犬貓外來入侵種
英文關鍵詞: speciesism, animal protection, animal welfare, wild animal, invasive alien species, cat, dog
研究方法: 調查研究深度訪談法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201628
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:109下載:31
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 動物保護行動受西方動物倫理哲學思想:「動物福利」與「動物權利」所影響。動物倫理主張動物具有與人類相同的道德地位,若人類因為物種差異而給予動物不一致的道德考量或對待,則犯「物種主義」之道德原則的謬誤。流浪犬貓係因人類的棄養與放養而在自然環境中建立族群,造成大量野生動物死傷故為生態的外來入侵種。犬貓流浪與衍生的入侵生態係由人類造成,減少其數量也是具有社會共識的行動。但是由於犬貓作為人類的同伴動物,使得不同群體對於減少流浪犬貓的方式意見不同,並產生爭論。若干動物保護者以動物倫理的正義觀點為由,主張流浪犬貓應該受保護的同時,對於增加其他動物的生命危險未多加表示,產生了偏好犬貓的物種主義的表象,以及「支持動物保護」卻「間接傷害更多動物」的動機與結果矛盾的情況。如此形成了動物保護的實務面與動物倫理的道德原則不相容,亦即動物保護的實然與應然分歧的情形。
    本研究以「人類保護流浪犬貓但間接危害更多野生動物」為道德兩難命題。用動物倫理學者Peter Singer與Tom Regan之論點來推論本命題之應然面的主張,選擇保護犬貓者可能具有犬貓物種主義態度。實然面則透過文獻回顧與研究調查來建立,包括回顧「動物保護與動物倫理之關係」與「造成社會群眾對議題的立場不同的原因」相關的文獻,並藉由問卷調查法分析群眾對犬貓議題的道德判斷因素。本研究問卷調查結果顯示,社會群眾對議題的道德判斷因素,在直覺思考時多數人的道德判斷為正義傾向。高動物倫理信念者更有高的犬貓物種主義傾向,但在在犧牲困境中,保育類的道德地位更甚犬貓,而不是受到正義傾向驅動。對於真實的犬貓議題時,多數人傾向降低動物衝突的情況發生,認為要介入動物衝突事件,接受流浪貓狗的末端管理納入安樂死措施等。
    以深度訪談法瞭解動物保護倡議人士對議題的真實想法後,本研究認為犬貓議題在動保領域與生態保育領域之間存在論述框架的不對等,唯認知人人皆具有知識盲區,尊重與願意跨域思考,才有助於解決犬貓議題。

    The animal protection is deeply affected by animal ethic which includes human and non-human animal in the same moral community, and which is formed by Peter Singer's and Tom Regan’s publications, Animal Liberation and The Case for Animal Rights. Speciesism is a form of discrimination attitude, describing that someone unjustified gives moral consideration or treatment to others just in base of species differences. Cat and dog function as invasive species with killing numerous wild animals in natural environment, but they can't be treated as the removal object like others because of the intimate companion-animals in society. In this case, however, the animal welfare organizations who practice animal ethic in action usually protect the free-ranging unowned cat and dog’s animal right in nature, meanwhile take the victims under Cat’s and dog’s attack as an ecological problem rather than the moral object. Furthermore, they don’t save other invasive species life as cat and dog even though the species doesn’t harm wild animals.
    In this research, the conservation issue in the interpretation of animal welfare frame, taking it as the moral proposition. The result shows that most of people including animal welfare practitioners accept euthanasia threatment into the stray animals management system. People who has the higher animal rights belief still is the dog or cat speciesism. Half of Taiwanese people know this issue, and 15% of people only know that stray dogs cause casualties to wild animals. this research shows that most people are more justice in moral judgement. People with higher animal ethics beliefs have higher dog and cat speciesism. But in the dilemma of sacrifice between different species, the moral status of endangered animal is higher than dogs and cats for them. About the issues, most people tend to reduce the occurrence of animal conflicts, and accept to take the euthanasia measures in stray cats and dogs management.
    After understanding the real thoughts of animal protection advocates on the issue through in-depth interviews, this research believes that there is an asymmetry in the discussion framework between people in the field of animal protection and conservation biology. Thinking across domains can help resolve this issue.

    第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究邊界 2 第三節 研究目的與問題 2 第四節 名詞定義 2 第貳章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 人與動物的關係 6 第二節 動物倫理、物種主義與動物保護 11 第三節 流浪犬貓與野生動物衝突之動物保護爭議 21 第四節 流浪犬貓的保護存在界線?動物倫理的道德兩難困境 33 第五節 道德命題的道德判斷因素與影響途徑模型 36 第參章 研究方法 41 第一節 研究架構與流程 41 第二節 問卷調查法之研究假說建立 43 第三節 研究對象與抽樣方法 44 第四節 研究工具 46 第五節 研究限制 76 第肆章 研究分析與結果 77 第一節 受試者的動物倫理取向及基本背景 77 第二節 動物倫理取向者對物種的喜歡程度與對待態度之表現情形 89 第三節 動物倫理取向者對假設犧牲困境之道德判斷表現情形 96 第四節 動物倫理取向對犬貓的真實犧牲困境之道德判斷差異 107 第五節 訪談結果分析 112 第伍章 結論與建議 119 第一節 研究結論 119 第二節 研究建議 123 參考資料 126 附錄一、動物倫理取向、物種變項與喜歡程度之成對比較對照表 138 附錄二、動物倫理取向、物種變項與對待態度之成對比較對照表 145 附錄三、動物倫理取向、物種變項、狗/貓立場與道德傾向程度之單純單純主效果分析表 150 附錄四、訪談大綱 154 附錄五、訪談內容逐字稿與編碼結果 154

    Abbott, I. (2002). Origin and spread of the cat, Felis catus, on mainland Australia, with a discussion of the magnitude of its early impact on native fauna. Wildlife Research, 29(1), 51-74.
    Adams, M. (2018). Towards a critical psychology of human–animal relations. Social and personality psychology compass, 12(4), e12375.
    Althaus, F., Williams, A., Schlacher, T. A., Kloser, R. J., Green, M. A., Barker, B. A., ... & Schlacher-Hoenlinger, M. A. (2009). Impacts of bottom trawling on deep-coral ecosystems of seamounts are long-lasting. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 397, 279-294.
    Amiot, C. E., & Bastian, B. (2015). Toward a psychology of human–animal relations. Psychological bulletin, 141(1), 6.
    Armstrong, J., Friesdorf, R., & Conway, P. (2019). Clarifying gender differences in moral dilemma judgments: the complementary roles of harm aversion and action aversion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 353-363.
    Bailey, E. P. (1993). Introduction of foxes to Alaskan islands-history, effects on avifauna, and eradication. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE HOMER AK.
    Balmford, A., Bennun, L., Ten Brink, B., Cooper, D., Côté, I. M., Crane, P., Dobson, A., Dudley, N., Dutton, I., & Green, R. E. (2005). The convention on biological diversity's 2010 target. Science, 307(5707), 212-213.
    Batt, S. (2009). Human attitudes towards animals in relation to species similarity to humans: a multivariate approach. Bioscience horizons, 2(2), 180-190.
    Belyaev, D. K. (1979). Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. Journal of Heredity, 70(5), 301-308.
    Berg, C., Lerner, H., Butterworth, A., & Walzer, C. (2020). Wildlife Welfare. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7.
    Bjerke, T., Ødegårdstuen, T. S., & Kaltenborn, B. P. (1998). Attitudes toward animals among Norwegian children and adolescents: Species preferences. Anthrozoös, 11(4), 227-235.
    Blancher, P. (2013). Estimated number of birds killed by house cats (Felis catus) in Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 8(2).
    Bökönyi, S. (2014). Definitions of animal domestication. In The walking larder (pp. 22-27). Routledge.
    Borgi, M., & Cirulli, F. (2015). Attitudes toward animals among kindergarten children: species preferences. Anthrozoös, 28(1), 45-59.
    Bostyn, D. H., Sevenhant, S., & Roets, A. (2018). Of mice, men, and trolleys: Hypothetical judgment versus real-life behavior in trolley-style moral dilemmas. Psychological science, 29(7), 1084-1093.
    Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal.
    Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., & Bastian, B. (2011). The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals. Appetite, 57, 193–196.
    Brickner, I. (2002). The impact of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) on wildlife welfare and conservation: a literature review. With a situation summary from Israel. Unpublished Report. Available online at: http://www. tau. ac. il/lifesci/zoology/members/yom-tov/inbal/dogs. pdf.
    Brickner, I. (2003). The impact of domestic cat (Felis catus) on wildlife welfare and conservation: a literature review. With a situation summary from israel. Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, 21, 2964-2969.
    Broad, G. M. (2018). Effective animal advocacy: effective altruism, the social economy, and the animal protection movement. Agriculture and Human Values, 35(4), 777-789.
    Broom, D. M. (1991). Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. Journal of animal science, 69(10), 4167-4175.
    Browning, H. (2018). No room at the zoo: Management euthanasia and animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(4), 483-498.
    Byrd, N., & Conway, P. (2019). Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies. Cognition, 192, 103995.
    Callicott, J. B. (1980). Animal liberation: A triangular affair. Environmental ethics, 2(4), 311-338.
    Caviola, L., & Capraro, V. (2020a). Liking but devaluing animals: emotional and deliberative paths to speciesism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1080-1088.
    Caviola, L., Everett, J. A. C., & Faber, N. S. (2019). The moral standing of animals: Towards a psychology of speciesism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 1011–1029
    Caviola, L., Kahane, G., Everett, J. A., Teperman, E., Savulescu, J., & Faber, N. S. (2020b). Utilitarianism for animals, Kantianism for people? Harming animals and humans for the greater good. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
    Chao, J., Tsao, E., Traylor-Holzer, K., Reed, D., & Leus, K. (2005). Formosan Pangolin Population and Habitat Viability Assessment: Final Report. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Apple Valley, MN, USA.
    Chen, C. C., Chang, A. M., Wada, T., Chen, M. T., & Tu, Y. S. (2019). Distribution of Carnivore protoparvovirus 1 in free-living leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis chinensis) and its association with domestic carnivores in Taiwan. PloS one, 14(9), e0221990.
    Clutton-Brock, J. (1990). Α Natural History of Domesticated Mammals. Praehistorische Zeitschrift, 65(1), 73-76.
    Clutton-Brock, J. (Ed.). (2014). The walking larder: patterns of domestication, pastoralism, and predation. Routledge.
    Cochran, W. G. (2007). Sampling techniques: John Wiley & Sons.
    Cochrane, A. (2010). Introduction: Animals and Political Theory. In An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory (pp. 1-9). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
    Cushman, F. (2013). Action, outcome, and value: A dual-system framework for morality. Personality and social psychology review, 17(3), 273-292.
    Daly, B., & Morton, L. L. (2006). An investigation of human-animal interactions and empathy as related to pet preference, ownership, attachment, and attitudes in children. Anthrozoös, 19(2), 113-127.
    Darwin, C. (2010). The variation of animals and plants under domestication (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
    Décory, M. S. M. (2019). A Universal Definition of" Domestication" to Unleash Global Animal Welfare Progress. In dA Derecho Animal: Forum of Animal Law Studies (Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 0039-55).
    Dickman, C. R., & Newsome, T. M. (2015). Individual hunting behaviour and prey specialisation in the house cat Felis catus: implications for conservation and management. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 173, 76-87.
    Doherty, T. S., & Ritchie, E. G. (2017b). Stop jumping the gun: a call for evidence‐based invasive predator management. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 15-22.
    Doherty, T. S., Dickman, C. R., Glen, A. S., Newsome, T. M., Nimmo, D. G., Ritchie, E. G., Vanak, A. T., & Wirsing, A. J. (2017). The global impacts of domestic dogs on threatened vertebrates. Biological conservation, 210, 56-59.
    Doherty, T. S., Driscoll, D. A., Nimmo, D. G., Ritchie, E. G., & Spencer, R. J. (2019). Conservation or politics? Australia's target to kill 2 million cats. Conservation Letters, 12(4), e12633.
    Donovan, J. (1990). “Animal rights and feminist theory”. Signs, 15, 350–375.
    Driscoll, C. A., & Macdonald, D. W. (2010). Top dogs: wolf domestication and wealth. Journal of biology, 9(2), 1-6.
    Driscoll, C. A., Macdonald, D. W., & O'Brien, S. J. (2009). From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(Supplement 1), 9971-9978.
    Driscoll, C. A., Menotti-Raymond, M., Roca, A. L., Hupe, K., Johnson, W. E., Geffen, E., ... & Macdonald, D. W. (2007). The Near Eastern origin of cat domestication. Science, 317(5837), 519-523.
    Eagly, A. H. 1992. Uneven progress: Social psychology and the study of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(5): 693–710.
    Everett, J. A., & Kahane, G. (2020). Switching tracks? Towards a multidimensional model of utilitarian psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(2), 124-134.
    Faria, C., & Paez, E. (2014). Anthropocentrism and speciesism: conceptual and normative issues. Rev. Bioetica & Derecho, 32, 95.
    Fitzgerald, B. M., Turner, D. C., & Bateson, P. (2000). The domestic cat: The biology of its behaviour. DC.
    Fleming, P. J., Nolan, H., Jackson, S. M., Ballard, G. A., Bengsen, A., Brown, W. Y., ... & Sparkes, J. (2017). Roles for the Canidae in food webs reviewed: where do they fit?. Food Webs, 12, 14-34.
    Foley, P., Foley, J. E., Levy, J. K., & Paik, T. (2005). Analysis of the impact of trap-neuter-return programs on populations of feral cats. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 227(11), 1775-1781.
    Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford review, 5.
    Fraser, D. (1999). Animal ethics and animal welfare science: bridging the two cultures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 65(3), 171-189.
    Fraser, D. (2019). Why we need a new ethic for animals. Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research, 1(1), 7-21.
    Furnham, A., McManus, C., & Scott, D. (2003). Personality, empathy and attitudes to animal welfare. Anthrozoös, 16(2), 135-146
    Garner, R., 2004. Animals, politics and morality (2nd edn.). Manchester University Press, Manchester, U.K.
    Gawronski, B., Armstrong, J., Conway, P., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2017). Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 343.
    Goldstein-Greenwood, J., Conway, P., Summerville, A., & Johnson, B. N. (2020). (How) do you regret killing one to save five? Affective and cognitive regret differ after utilitarian and deontological decisions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(9), 1303-1317.
    Gompper, M. E. (2014). The dog-human-wildlife interface: assessing the scope of the problem. Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation, 9-54.
    Gradidge, S., Harvey, A., McDermott, D. T., & Zawisza, M. (2021). Humankind’s best friend vs. humankind’s best food: Perceptions of identifiable dog vs. pig victims. Human-Animal Interaction Bulletin.
    Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108.
    Gunnthorsdottir, A. (2001). Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation. Anthrozoös, 14(4), 204-215.
    Hall, C. M., Adams, N. A., Bradley, J. S., Bryant, K. A., Davis, A. A., Dickman, C. R., ... & Calver, M. C. (2016). Community attitudes and practices of urban residents regarding predation by pet cats on wildlife: an international comparison. PloS one, 11(4), e0151962.
    Hardin, G. (1960). The competitive exclusion principle. science, 131(3409), 1292-1297.
    Harlan, J. R., Gepts, P., Famula, T. R., Bettinger, R. L., Brush, S. B., Damania, A. B., ... & Qualset, C. O. (Eds.). (2012). Biodiversity in agriculture: domestication, evolution, and sustainability. Cambridge University Press.
    Hemsworth, P. H. 2003. Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81(3): 185–198.
    Herzog Jr, H. A., & Burghardt, G. M. (1988). Attitudes toward animals: Origins and diversity. Anthrozoös, 1(4), 214-222.
    Herzog Jr, H. A., Betchart, N. S., & Pittman, R. B. (1991). Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward animals. Anthrozoös, 4(3), 184-191.
    Hill, S. P., & Broom, D. M. (2009). Measuring zoo animal welfare: theory and practice. Zoo Biology: Published in affiliation with the American Zoo and Aquarium Association, 28(6), 531-544.
    Hills, A. M. 1995. Empathy and belief in the mental experience of animals. Anthrozoos 8: 132–142
    Home, C., Bhatnagar, Y. V., & Vanak, A. T. (2018). Canine Conundrum: domestic dogs as an invasive species and their impacts on wildlife in India. Animal Conservation, 21(4), 275-282.
    Horta, O. (2010). What is speciesism?. Journal of agricultural and environmental ethics, 23(3), 243-266.
    Horta, O., & Albersmeier, F. (2020). Defining speciesism. Philosophy Compass, 15(11), 1-9.
    Hu, C. H., Yu, P. H., Kang, C. L., Chen, H. L., & Yen, S. C. (2019). Demography and welfare status of free-roaming dogs in Yangmingshan National Park, Taiwan. Preventive veterinary medicine, 166, 49-55.
    Hughes, J., & Macdonald, D. W. (2013). A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological conservation, 157, 341-351.
    Inglis, M. (2016). Killing for Conservation: The Ethics of Life and Death in Conservation Policy (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield).
    Inglis, M. I. (2020). Wildlife Ethics and Practice: Why We Need to Change the Way We Talk About ‘Invasive Species’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 1-15.
    International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. Invasive Species Specialist Group. (2000). IUCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species. Species Survival Commission.
    Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining sample size.
    Jarić, I., Courchamp, F., Correia, R. A., Crowley, S. L., Essl, F., Fischer, A., González‐Moreno, P., Kalinkat, G., Lambin, X., & Lenzner, B. (2020). The role of species charisma in biological invasions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 18(6), 345-353.
    Jessup, D. A. (2004). The welfare of feral cats and wildlife. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 225(9), 1377-1383.
    Johansson, M., Sjöström, M., Karlsson, J., & Brännlund, R. (2012). Is human fear affecting public willingness to pay for the management and conservation of large carnivores?. Society & Natural Resources, 25(6), 610-620.
    Kahane, G., Everett, J. A., Earp, B. D., Caviola, L., Faber, N. S., Crockett, M. J., & Savulescu, J. (2018). Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology. Psychological Review, 125(2), 131.
    Kays, R. W., & DeWan, A. A. (2004, August). Ecological impact of inside/outside house cats around a suburban nature preserve. In Animal Conservation forum (Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 273-283). Cambridge University Press.
    Kellert, S. R. 1993. Attitudes, knowledge and behavior toward wildlife among the industrial superpowers: United States, Japan and Germany. Journal of Social Issues 49: 53–69.
    Kellert, S. R., Yale University. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Berry, J. K., & United States. Fish and Wildlife Service. (1980). Phase III: Knowledge, affection and basic attitudes toward animals in American society. Washington
    Kirkwood, J. K. (2013). Wild animal welfare. Report of the Whale Welfare and Ethics Workshop,
    Knight, a. 2008. “Bats, snakes and spiders, Oh my!” how aesthetic and negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species protection. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28: 94–103
    Kowalsky, N. (2016). Towards an ethic of animal difference. Environmental Philosophy, 13(2), 239-267.
    Kurushima, J. D., Lipinski, M. J., Gandolfi, B., Froenicke, L., Grahn, J. C., Grahn, R. A., & Lyons, L. A. (2013). Variation of cats under domestication: genetic assignment of domestic cats to breeds and worldwide random‐bred populations. Animal genetics, 44(3), 311-324.
    Larson, G., Karlsson, E. K., Perri, A., Webster, M. T., Ho, S. Y., Peters, J., ... & Lindblad-Toh, K. (2012). Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(23), 8878-8883.
    Leach, S., Kitchin, A., Sutton, R., & Dhont, K. (2021). Speciesism in everyday language.
    Leite, A. C., Dhont, K., Hodson, G. (2018). Longitudinal effects of human supremacy beliefs and vegetarianism threat on moral exclusion (vs. inclusion) of animals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 6.
    Levy, J. K., Gale, D. W., & Gale, L. A. (2003). Evaluation of the effect of a long-term trap-neuter-return and adoption program on a free-roaming cat population. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 222(1), 42-46.
    Li, Y., Wan, Y., Shen, H., Loss, S. R., Marra, P. P., & Li, Z. Estimates of wildlife killed by free-ranging cats in China. Biological conservation, 253, 108929.
    Lindblad-Toh, K., Wade, C. M., Mikkelsen, T. S., Karlsson, E. K., Jaffe, D. B., Kamal, M., ... & Lander, E. S. (2005). Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature, 438(7069), 803-819.
    Linklater, W. L., Farnworth, M. J., van Heezik, Y., Stafford, K. J., & MacDonald, E. A. (2019). Prioritizing cat‐owner behaviors for a campaign to reduce wildlife depredation. Conservation Science and Practice, 1(5), e29.
    Loss, S. R., & Marra, P. P. (2018). Merchants of doubt in the free-ranging cat conflict. Conservation biology: the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
    Loss, S. R., Will, T., & Marra, P. P. (2013). The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature communications, 4(1), 1-8.
    Loss, S. R., Will, T., Longcore, T., & Marra, P. P. (2018). Responding to misinformation and criticisms regarding United States cat predation estimates. Biological Invasions, 20(12), 3385-3396.
    Lowe, S., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S., & De Poorter, M. (2000). 100 of the world's worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database (Vol. 12). Invasive Species Specialist Group Auckland.
    Lunney, D. (2012). Wildlife management and the debate on the ethics of animal use. II. A challenge for the animal protection movement. Pacific Conservation Biology, 18(2), 81-99.
    Lynn, W. S., Santiago‐Ávila, F. J., Hadidian, J., Wallach, A. D., & Lindenmayer, J. (2020). Misunderstandings of science and ethics in the moral panic over cats: reply to Crespin et al. 2020. Conservation Biology, 34(4), 1038-1040.
    Mackenzie, R., & Jenkins, M. (2001). Handbook of the convention on biological diversity. Earthscan.
    Maeda, T., Nakashita, R., Shionosaki, K., Yamada, F., & Watari, Y. (2019). Predation on endangered species by human-subsidized domestic cats on Tokunoshima Island. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-11.
    McGuire, L., Palmer, S., & Faber, N. (2020). Loving some animals, eating others: Species categorisation in childhood, young adulthood and adulthood.
    McLaren, B. E., & Peterson, R. O. (1994). Wolves, moose, and tree rings on Isle Royale. Science, 266(5190), 1555-1558.
    McMahon, C. R., Harcourt, R., Bateson, P., & Hindell, M. A. (2012). Animal welfare and decision making in wildlife research. Biological conservation, 153, 254-256.
    Mcruer, D. L., Gray, L. C., Horne, L. A., & Clark Jr, E. E. (2017). Free‐roaming cat interactions with wildlife admitted to a wildlife hospital. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 81(1), 163-173.
    Medina, F. M., Bonnaud, E., Vidal, E., Tershy, B. R., Zavaleta, E. S., Josh Donlan, C., ... & Nogales, M. (2011). A global review of the impacts of invasive cats on island endangered vertebrates. Global Change Biology, 17(11), 3503-3510.
    Mella-Méndez, I., Flores-Peredo, R., Amaya-Espinel, J. D., Bolívar-Cimé, B., Mac Swiney G, M. C., & Martínez, A. J. (2022). Predation of wildlife by domestic cats in a Neotropical city: a multi-factor issue. Biological Invasions, 24(5), 1539-1551.
    Miller, R. M., Hannikainen, I. A., & Cushman, F. A. (2014). Bad actions or bad outcomes? Differentiating affective contributions to the moral condemnation of harm. Emotion, 14(3), 573.
    Molles, M. (2015). Ecology: concepts and applications. McGraw-Hill Education.
    Morey, D. F. (2006). Burying key evidence: the social bond between dogs and people. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33(2), 158-175.
    Morgan, J. M., & Gramann, J. H. (1989). Predicting effectiveness of wildlife education programs: A study of students’ attitudes and knowledge towards snakes. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 17(4), 501-509.
    Mori, E., Menchetti, M., Camporesi, A., Cavigioli, L., Tabarelli de Fatis, K., & Girardello, M. (2019). License to kill? Domestic cats affect a wide range of native fauna in a highly biodiverse Mediterranean country. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 477.
    Munro, D., Steer, J., & Linklater, W. (2019). On allegations of invasive species denialism. Conservation Biology, 33(4), 797-802.
    Munro, L. 2005. Strategies, action repertoires and DIY activism in the animal rights movement. Social Movement Studies 4 (1): 75–94.
    Murphy, B. P., Woolley, L.-A., Geyle, H. M., Legge, S. M., Palmer, R., Dickman, C. R., Augusteyn, J., Brown, S. C., Comer, S., Doherty, T. S., Eager, C., Edwards, G., Fordham, D. A., Harley, D., McDonald, P. J., McGregor, H., Moseby, K. E., Myers, C., Read, J., Riley, J., Stokeld, D., Trewella, G. J., Turpin, J. M., & Woinarski, J. C. Z. (2019). Introduced cats (Felis catus) eating a continental fauna: The number of mammals killed in Australia. Biological conservation, 237, 28-40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.013
    Nurse, A. (2016). Beyond the property debate: Animal welfare as a public good. Contemporary Justice Review, 19(2), 174-187.
    O’Brien, W. (2006). Exotic invasions, nativism, and ecological restoration: on the persistence of a contentious debate. Ethics, Place and Environment, 9(1), 63-77.
    Ohl, F., & Van der Staay, F. J. (2012). Animal welfare: At the interface between science and society. The Veterinary Journal, 192(1), 13-19.
    Ormandy, E. H., & Schuppli, C. A. (2014). Public attitudes toward animal research: a review. Animals, 4(3), 391-408.
    Paquet, P. C., & Darimont, C. T. (2010). Wildlife conservation and animal welfare: two sides of the same coin. Animal Welfare, 19(2), 177-190.
    Parry, J. (2011). Sentimentality and the enemies of animal protection. Anthrozoös, 24(2), 117-133
    Patil, I., & Silani, G. (2014). Alexithymia increases moral acceptability of accidental harms. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 597-614.
    Patil, I., & Silani, G. (2014). Reduced empathic concern leads to utilitarian moral judgments in trait alexithymia. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 501.
    Patil, I., Zucchelli, M. M., Kool, W., Campbell, S., Fornasier, F., Calò, M., ... & Cushman, F. (2021). Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(2), 443.
    Paul, E. S. (2000). Empathy with animals and with humans: Are they linked?. Anthrozoös, 13(4), 194-202.
    Plous, S. 1993. Psychological mechanisms in the human use of animals. Journal of Social Issues 49: 11–52.
    Posner, R. A. (2000). Animal rights.
    Possidónio, C., Piazza, J., Graça, J., & Prada, M. (2021). From Pets to Pests: Testing the Scope of the “Pets as Ambassadors” Hypothesis. Anthrozoös, 1-16.
    Prokop, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2008). “Disgusting” animals: Primary school children’s attitudes and myths of bats and spiders. Eurasia Journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 4(2), 87-97.
    Rand, J., Fisher, G., Lamb, K., & Hayward, A. (2019). Public opinions on strategies for managing stray cats and predictors of opposition to trap-neuter and return in Brisbane, Australia. Frontiers in veterinary science, 5, 290.
    REGAN,T., The Case for Animals Rights, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1985
    Reilly, J. S. (Ed.). (2001). Euthanasia of animals used for scientific purposes.
    Reynolds, C. J., & Conway, P. (2018). Not just bad actions: Affective concern for bad outcomes contributes to moral condemnation of harm in moral dilemmas. Emotion, 18(7), 1009.
    Riley, S. (2021). Protection of Biodiversity in Australia: Is Killing Cats an Effective and Ethical Approach?. Juriste International.
    Robert Elliot, “Environmental Ethics,” in Peter Singer, (Ed.), A Companion to Ethics. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell Reference, 1991.
    Robertson, S. A. (2008). A review of feral cat control. Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 10(4), 366-375.
    Royzman, E. B., & Baron, J. (2002). The preference for indirect harm. Social justice research, 15(2), 165-184.
    Ryder, R. D. (2010 [1970]). Speciesism: The original leaflet. Critical Society, 2, 1–2.
    RYDER,R., Victims of Science: The Use of Animals in Research, Open Gate Press, 1983
    Sandro, B. (2008). Introduction of the American grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Europe: a case study in biological invasion. Current Science, 903-906.
    Schaffner, J. E. (2018). Cat wars: the devastating consequences of a dangerous book.
    Schmidt, P. M., Swannack, T. M., Lopez, R. R., & Slater, M. R. (2009). Evaluation of euthanasia and trap–neuter–return (TNR) programs in managing free-roaming cat populations. Wildlife Research, 36(2), 117-125.
    Scoleri, V. P., Johnson, C. N., Vertigan, P., & Jones, M. E. (2020). Conservation trade-offs: Island introduction of a threatened predator suppresses invasive mesopredators but eliminates a seabird colony. Biological Conservation, 248, 108635.
    Serpell, J. A. (2004). Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare. Animal welfare, 13(1), 145-151.
    Shalev, A., & Ben-Mordehai, D. (1996). Snakes: Interactions with children with disabilities and the elderly—some psychological considerations. Anthrozoös, 9(4), 182-187.
    Shine, C., 2008, A toolkit for developing legal and institutional frameworks for invasive alien species. Global Invasive Species Programme, Nairobi
    Siettou, C., Fraser, I., & Fraser, R. (2013). A Choice Experiment Analysis of the Management of the Stray Dog Population in the UK (No. 355-2016-18180).
    SILVA‐RODRÍGUEZ, E. A., & Sieving, K. E. (2011). Influence of care of domestic carnivores on their predation on vertebrates. Conservation Biology, 25(4), 808-815.
    Smith, D. W., Peterson, R. O., & Houston, D. B. (2003). Yellowstone after wolves. BioScience, 53(4), 330-340.
    Soryl, A. A. (2019). Establishing the Moral Significance of Wild Animal Welfare and Considering Practical Methods of Intervention (Doctoral dissertation, master thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam).
    Soto, C. A., & Palomares, F. (2015). Human-related factors regulate the presence of domestic dogs in protected areas. Oryx, 49(2), 254-260.
    Srinivasan, K. (2013). The biopolitics of animal being and welfare: dog control and care in the UK and India. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), 106-119.
    Srinivasan, K., & Kasturirangan, R. (2017). Conservation and invasive alien species: violent love. In The Palgrave international handbook of animal abuse studies (pp. 433-452). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
    Stokes, D. 2007. things we like: human preferences among similar organisms and implications for conservation. Human Ecology 35: 361–369.
    Su, B., & Martens, P. (2018). How ethical ideologies relate to public attitudes toward animals: The Dutch Case. Anthrozoös, 31(2), 179-194
    Sun, N. C.-M., Arora, B., Lin, J.-S., Lin, W.-C., Chi, M.-J., Chen, C.-C., & Pei, C. J.-C. (2019). Mortality and morbidity in wild Taiwanese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla pentadactyla). PloS one, 14(2), e0198230.
    Sun, N. C.-M., Arora, B., Lin, J.-S., Lin, W.-C., Chi, M.-J., Chen, C.-C., & Pei, K. J.-C. (2018). Unprecedented account of mortality and morbidity in free ranging Formosan Pangolin (Manis pentadactyla pentadactyla). BioRxiv, 325167.
    Takahashi, M. A. (2004). Cats v. birds in Japan: How to reconcile wildlife conservation and animal protection. Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev., 17, 135.
    Taylor, N., & Signal, T. D. (2005). Empathy and attitudes to animals. Anthrozoös, 18(1), 18-27.
    Tisdell, C., Wilson, C., & Nantha, H. S. (2005). Association of public support for survival of wildlife species with their likeability. Anthrozoös, 18(2), 160-174.
    Toukhsati, S. R., Young, E., Bennett, P. C., & Coleman, G. J. (2012). Wandering cats: attitudes and behaviors towards cat containment in Australia. Anthrozoös, 25(1), 61-74.
    Trémolière, B., De Neys, W., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2012). Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian. Cognition, 124(3), 379-384
    Trouwborst, A., McCormack, P. C., & Martínez Camacho, E. (2020). Domestic cats and their impacts on biodiversity: A blind spot in the application of nature conservation law. People and Nature, 2(1), 235-250.
    Tschanz, B., Hegglin, D., Gloor, S., & Bontadina, F. (2011). Hunters and non-hunters: skewed predation rate by domestic cats in a rural village. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 57(3), 597-602.
    Tuminello, J. A. (2012). Invasive species management: an animal ethics perspective Colorado State University].
    Turner, D. C., Bateson, P., & Bateson, P. P. G. (Eds.). (2000). The domestic cat: the biology of its behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
    Twardek, W. M., Peiman, K. S., Gallagher, A. J., & Cooke, S. J. (2017). Fido, Fluffy, and wildlife conservation: The environmental consequences of domesticated animals. Environmental Reviews, 25(4), 381-395.
    Underwood, W., Anthony, R., Cartner, S., Corey, D., Grandin, T., Greenacre, C., ... & Yanong, R. (2013). AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2013 edition. Schaumburg, IL: American Veterinary Medical Association.
    Usher, M. B. (1986). Wildlife conservation evaluation: attributes, criteria and values. In Wildlife conservation evaluation (pp. 3-44). Springer, Dordrecht.
    van Heezik, Y., Smyth, A., Adams, A., & Gordon, J. (2010). Do domestic cats impose an unsustainable harvest on urban bird populations?. Biological Conservation, 143(1), 121-130.
    Vanak, A. T., Thaker, M., & Gompper, M. E. (2009). Experimental examination of behavioural interactions between free-ranging wild and domestic canids. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64(2), 279-287.
    Vigne, J.-D., Guilaine, J., Debue, K., Haye, L., & Gérard, P. (2004). Early taming of the cat in Cyprus. Science, 304(5668), 259-259.
    Wald, D. M., Jacobson, S. K., & Levy, J. K. (2013). Outdoor cats: Identifying differences between stakeholder beliefs, perceived impacts, risk and management. Biological Conservation, 167, 414-424.
    Wald, D. M., Lohr, C. A., Lepczyk, C. A., Jacobson, S. K., & Cox, L. J. (2016). A comparison of cat‐related risk perceptions and tolerance for outdoor cats in Florida and Hawaii. Conservation Biology, 30(6), 1233-1244. 
    WALDAU,P., The Specter of Speciesism: Buddhist and Christian Views of Animals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001, p. 38.
    Waliczek, T. M., Parsley, K. M., Williamson, P. S., & Oxley, F. M. (2018). Curricula influence college student knowledge and attitudes regarding invasive species. HortTechnology, 28(4), 548-556.
    Walker, J. K., Bruce, S. J., & Dale, A. R. (2017). A survey of public opinion on cat (Felis catus) predation and the future direction of cat management in New Zealand. Animals, 7(7), 49
    Weiss, E., Miller, K., Mohan-Gibbons, H., & Vela, C. (2012). Why did you choose this pet?: Adopters and pet selection preferences in five animal shelters in the United States. Animals, 2(2), 144-159.
    White, R. (2017). Animal abuse resulting from wildlife habitat destruction. In The Palgrave International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies (pp. 249-268). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
    Williamson, M., & Fitter, A. (1996). The varying success of invaders. Ecology, 77(6), 1661-1666.
    Wilson, E. O. (2002). The future of life. Vintage.
    Woods, M., McDonald, R. A., & Harris, S. (2003). Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain. Mammal review, 33(2), 174-188.
    Xue-Hong, Z. H. O. U., Xiao-Tong, W. A. N., & Yu-Hui, J. I. N. (2016). Concept of scientific wildlife conservation and its dissemination. Zoological research, 37(5), 270.
    Young, J. K., Bergman, D. L., & Ono, M. (2018). Bad dog: feral and free-roaming dogs as agents of conflict.
    Young, J. K., Olson, K. A., Reading, R. P., Amgalanbaatar, S., & Berger, J. (2011). Is wildlife going to the dogs? Impacts of feral and free-roaming dogs on wildlife populations. Bioscience, 61(2), 125-132.
    Zapata-Rıos, G. (2018). Dogs are more than wet kisses and tail wags: domestic dogs as invasive species. Anim. Conserv, 21, 287-288.
    Zavaleta, E. S., Hobbs, R. J., & Mooney, H. A. (2001). Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16(8), 454-459.
    Zeder, M. A. (2008). Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: Origins, diffusion, and impact. Proceedings of the national Academy of Sciences, 105(33), 11597-11604
    Zeder, M. A. (2012). The domestication of animals. Journal of anthropological research, 68(2), 161-190.
    Zickfeld, J. H., Kunst, J. R., & Hohle, S. M. (2018). Too sweet to eat: Exploring the effects of cuteness on meat consumption. Appetite, 120, 181-195.
    山田文雄. (2018). 島嶼生態系保全と外来イエネコ問題: 奄美大島と徳之島の事例から. 森林野生動物研究会誌, 43, 85-92.
    伊澤雅子.2002.ノネコ.外来種ハンドブック(村上興正・ 鷲谷いづみ・日本生態学会,編),p. 76.地人書館,東京.
    村上興正. (2001). 日本における外来種の法的規制 (< 特集> 国外外来種の管理法). 保全生態学研究, 5(2), 119-130.
    諸坂佐利. (2018). 我が国の動物関連法体系における鳥獣保護管理行政, 外来種対策及び動物愛護行政に関する法解釈学的, 法政策学的観点からの課題提供. 森林野生動物研究会誌, 43, 93-99.
    邱皓政(2000):量化研究與統計分析─SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南出版社,初版。
    邱皓政(2006):結構方程模式─LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉書廊,2006年9月。
    邱皓政(2021):量化研究法 二: 統計原理與分析技術 (第2版增修版)。台北:雙葉書廊,2021年5月。
    林淑馨. (2010). 質性硏究 : 理論與實務/林淑馨著 (初版). 巨流.
    方偉達 (2017)。期刊論文寫作與發表:第一本針對華人學者投稿國際期刊的實務寫作專書(初版)。五南
    吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(1995)。質的評鑑與研究(原著:Michael Quinn Patton)。桂冠
    林金定, 嚴嘉楓, & 陳美花. (2005). 質性研究方法: 訪談模式與實施步驟分析. 身心障礙研究季刊, 3(2), 122-136.
    曾岩, 平曉鴿, & 魏輔文. (2020). 野生動物的概念框架和術語定義. 生物多樣性, 28(5), 541-549.
    費昌勇, & 楊書瑋. (2011). 動物權與動物對待. 應用倫理評論, (51), 75-103.
    吳宗憲. (2020). 動物保護的公共治理 / 吳宗憲著 (二版). 翰蘆圖書出版有限公司.
    葉至誠, & 葉立誠. (2011). 研究方法與論文寫作 葉至誠, 葉立誠著 (3版 ed.). 商鼎文化出版社.
    Regan, T., & 李曦. (2010). 动物权利硏究 / (美)湯姆.雷根著 ; 李曦譯 (第1版 ed.). 北京大學出版社.
    Peter Singer 著,孟祥森、錢永祥譯,1995,《動物解放》,台北:關懷生命協會。
    李煒富. (2013) 從 Peter Singer 的動物解放學說探究台灣流浪犬的問題. PhD Thesis. National Central University.
    林聖蘋. (2007). 從 Tom Regan 的動物權利觀探究台灣流浪犬問題. 中央大學哲學研究所碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-135.
    施雅倪. (2019). 論我國流浪犬貓的行政管理 (Doctoral dissertation, 撰者).
    許晉瑋. (2010). 一個動物各種表述: 動物保護法制的虛像與實質. 臺灣大學法律學研究所學位論文, 1-337.
    郭家琪. (2005). 從神豬議題看台灣動物倫理課題. 生態臺灣 ;9期 ,P22-25
    陳佳琪. (2019). [流浪犬/分類] 論流浪狗的管理與動物權的爭議. 暨南大學公共行政與政策學系學位論文, 1-125.
    黃以育 2001 生命關懷與都市流浪犬問題之探討 世新大學 社會發展研究所學術論文
    楊書瑋(2013)。人與動物之權利關係-以娛樂動物為例。臺灣大學國家發展研究所學位論文。2013。1-182。
    楊登凱. (2011). 台灣保護動物法制之演進-探索法律對動物管制或保護之歷史. 臺灣大學法律學研究所學位論文, 1-182.
    廖宸葳. (2019). 以動物為本之初心看 TNVR-以中山大學流浪狗為例 (Doctoral dissertation, 撰者).
    劉書妤. (2019). 探討台灣外來入侵種的管制規範. 臺灣大學科際整合法律學研究所學位論文, 1-195.
    歐如慧. (2006). 動物保護之法制與實踐-以寵物與流浪動物之保護為主.
    蔡欣芸. (2009). 從動物保護法的生成與演變探討在地動物福利之發展與實踐-以犬, 貓為例. 臺灣大學科際整合法律學研究所學位論文, 1-104.
    簡妤儒. (2002). 寵物商品化與價值變遷: 分析 1950 年代後犬市場的形成與變遷. 國 立 台 灣 大 學 社 會 研 究 所 碩 士 論文, 未 出 版, 台 北.
    莊宜璟. (2020). 我國動物保護法爭議問題探討-以遊蕩動物為中心. 中原大學財經法律研究所碩士學位論文.
    呂佳家。2011。苗栗通霄淺山地區自由活動家貓之活動範圍和活動模式。國立屏東科技大學野生動物保育研究所碩士論文。
    郭智筌。2006。屏東縣低海拔地區自由放養家貓捕獵野生動物之探討。國立屏東科技大學野生動物保育研究所碩士論文。
    顏士清、余品奐(2018)。陽明山國家公園管理處委託報告之陽明山國家公園流浪動物族群現況調查成果報告
    網路部分:
    環境省.2015.我が国の生態系等に被害を及ぼすおそれのあ る外来種リスト(生態系被害防止外来種リスト).https:// www.env.go.jp/nature/intro/1outline/actionplan.html  http://www.maff.go.jp/j/press/kanbo/kankyo/pdf/150326- 01.pdf(2018 年 3 月 24 日確認).
    公共政策網路參與平台。我國應禁止餵養流浪動物。國家發展委員會。取自: https://join.gov.tw/idea/detail/b66186e7-b606-4757-aee9-3001613285fc?fbclid=IwAR0X3186vji8dbBaTHziXBs8YtxywJtNdZugaEQ3EfYXuRn9ZS7rAJ3228E
    公共政策網路參與平台。反「我國應禁止餵食流浪動物」之提議。國家發展委員會。取自: https://join.gov.tw/idea/detail/2a72da63-24c5-417d-9000-711f06688967
    阿伯硬餵浪犬廚餘!聽「山羌遭咬剩頭顱」嗆:本就不該在壽山(2018年12月7日)。ETtoday新聞雲。2021年5月17日,取自:https://pets.ettoday.net/news/1325024
    江睿智(2020年8月20日)。林務局野生動物監測發現流浪犬攻擊穿山甲案件上升。聯合新聞網。2021年4月14日,取自:https://udn.com/news/story/7470/4796040
    林詠青(2021年4月23日)。埃及聖䴉、綠鬣蜥亂台各界呼籲人道移除法制化。中央廣播電台。2021年5月14日,取自:https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2097773
    楊金城(2019年10月31日)。七股流浪犬追逐攻擊黑琵。自由時報,取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/1328522
    莊哲權(2021年4月28日)。野生動物常遭流浪犬貓咬死 生態工作者籲立法。中時新聞網,取自: https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20210428005308-260405?chdtv
    許展溢(2021年1月14日)6隻浪犬圍攻12公斤山羌!右後腳毀被安樂死 他們痛問還要多少次,ETtoday寵物雲,取自:https://www.ettoday.net/amp/amp_news.php?news_id=1899093&from=m.facebook.com&fbclid=IwAR0ZztJCUqEzfjF0vGIEQ0txR7yQTEazJYZ8daOgvLD5YcqcJlxv5ZRzA1s
    何睿宜(2020年9月28日)。石虎遭浪犬撕咬亡「附近滿地廚餘飼料」他心痛:餵養就是幫兇。ETtoday寵物雲。2021年4月14日,取自:https://pets.ettoday.net/news/1819509#ixzz6vaVkNh1S
    全国町村会(2012年4月23日)。北海道羽幌町/ネコ対策に条例制定。2021年5月4日,取自:https://www.zck.or.jp/site/spot/1707.html
    連續2起!2個月小石虎「腹部開洞」疑遭流浪狗咬死(2017年10月2日)。ETtoday新聞雲。2021年5月17日,取自: https://pets.ettoday.net/news/1023663
    殺処分しなくても「野良猫消えた」島、海鳥保護の貴重な事例に(2020年10月19日)。讀賣新聞。2021年5月2日,取自:https://www.yomiuri.co.jp /national/20201019-OYT1T50058/
    簡嘉馨(2015年7月13日)。自由開講》麝香貓何以背負餓死浪犬之罪?。自由評論網。2021年5月2日,取自:https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/1377725
    曾以寧(2021年1月8日)。動保入憲公聽會談進步價值也談動物間不平等的問題。環境資訊中心。2021年5月2日,取自:https://e-info.org.tw/node/228953
    湯雅雯(2015年7月4日)。動保團體:捨本逐末牴觸《動保法》。中時新聞網。2021年5月2日,取自:https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20150704000355-260114?chdtv
    劉玉秋(2021年3月3日)。外來種動物被妖魔化動保團體揭發虐殺移除亂象。中央廣播電台。2021年5月14日,取自:https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2093138
    穿山甲遭狗啃咬為求生自斷尾巴動保團體籲使用牽繩帶狗散步(2020年4月4日)。蘋果新聞。2021年4月14日,取自:https://hk.appledaily.com/ lifestyle
    /20200404/QCNFBDGZERUHXOIYIEPF4EOY/
    野生動物追思會(2016年12月23日)藤枝狗殺黃鼠狼,取自:https://www.facebook.com/Wildlife2016/photos/a.1744986199112285/1831574863786751
    野生動物急救站(2020年6月11日),取自:https://www.facebook.com/wrrc700/photos/pb.100050602384360.-2207520000../2944429915605345/?type=3

    下載圖示
    QR CODE