簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 羅慧珊
Lo, Hui-Shan
論文名稱: 國小學童動作想像能力之評量與相關研究
The Study on Assessment of Motor Imagery for Elementary School Students
指導教授: 洪儷瑜
Hung, Li-Yu
吳亭芳
Wu, Ting-Fang
口試委員: 葉靖雲
Yeh, Jing-Yun
張韶霞
Chang, Shao-Hsia
孟令夫
Meng, Ling-Fu
洪儷瑜
Hung, Li-Yu
吳亭芳
Wu, Ting-Fang
口試日期: 2022/08/30
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 169
中文關鍵詞: 動作想像國小動作困難學童
英文關鍵詞: Motor imagery, students with motor difficulties in elementary school
研究方法: 調查研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201753
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:47下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在編製適用於國小學童之動作想像量表,並探討動作困難學童的動作想像能力。為達成以上之研究目的,本研究分為兩個子研究,子研究一為編製動作想像量表並檢視量表的信效度;子研究二為利用動作想像量表探究動作困難學童的動作想像能力。
    子研究一: 基於動作想像相關理論編製動作想像量表,共5個分量表,分別為:「想像有意義的動作-聽覺」、「想像無意義的動作」、「想像有意義的動作¬-視覺」、「假裝有意義的動作-聽覺」、「假裝有意義的動作-視覺」。以來自北部地區144位小一至小四學生作為樣本。經信效度分析,總量表內部一致性達0.848,各分量表,除分量表「假裝有意義的動作-視覺」外,內部一致性亦達0.5以上,顯示此量表具有一定程度的內部一致性。此外,總量表的折半信度為0.82,其中三個分量表「想像有意義的動作-聽覺」、「假裝有意義的動作-視覺」、「假裝有意義的動作-聽覺」的信度也達0.5以上,顯示此量表的折半信度為可接受的。各分量表之間以及分量表與總量表之間具有中高度的相關,顯示量表具有可信賴的建構效度。不同年級學童在各分量表平均數以及總量表平均具顯著差異,顯示此量表對於不同年級學童的動作想像能力具有良好的區辨效度。
    子研究二:本研究利用子研究一編製的動作想像量表,招募27位動作困難學童,並依據性別與年級配對27位一般發展學童作為對照組,採用獨立樣本t檢定探討動作困難學童與對照組在動作想像能力以及在各題項的差異,最後採用個案資料分析探討動作困難學童的亞型。
    根據兩個研究的結果,獲得以下結論:
    一、動作想像能力具發展性
    本研究結果顯示國小學童的動作想像能力隨著年紀越大,能力越發成熟且穩定。低年級學童在動作想像能力的變化較大,尤以一年級學童的表現皆顯著低於二、三、四年級的學童。然而,到了中年級之後,學童動作想像能力已接近成熟與穩定狀態。
    二、動作困難學童在動作想像能力的發展較對照組落後
    本研究結果顯示,動作困難學童不管是在動作的想像或是假裝動作的執行,他們的表現皆落後於對照組,即使是想像日常生活中常作的動作,動作困難學童仍不一定皆可以達成。
    三、具方向性及順序性的題目可能可區辨動作困難學童
    本研究結果顯示,單一動作或是較偏向認知概念的題目可能較不容易區辨出動作困難的學童,而帶有方向性或是動作順序的題目則較能夠區辨出動作困難學童。
    四、動作技巧與動作想像具相關性但兩者為獨立的概念
    根據本研究結果發現在動作技巧與動作想像兩種能力下有不同亞型之學童存在,並不是所有動作困難學童的動作想像能力就一定低落,亦存在著與同儕表現相當的個體,顯示動作技巧與動作想像能力兩者可能互為獨立的概念。

    The purpose of this study is to develop a “Motor Imagery Scale” for elementary school students and to explore the motor imagery ability of students with motor difficulties. In order to achieve the above research purposes, this study is divided into two parts: developing a “Motor Imagery Scale” and examining the reliability and validity of the scale; as well as exploring the motor imagery ability of students with motor difficulties by using the “Motor Imagery Scale”.
    Part 1: The “Motor Imagery Scale” was developed based on the related theories. It contains 5 subscales: imaging meaningful action-auditory (IMA), imaging meaningless action (IN), imaging meaningful action-visual (IMV), simulating meaningful action-auditory (PMA), and simulating meaningful action-visual (PMV). 144 first to fourth grade students from the northern region of Taiwan were recruited to participated in this study. The internal consistency of total scale was 0.848, and the internal consistency of each subscale, except subscale PMV , was more than 0.5, indicating adequate internal consistency of this scale. In addition, the split-half reliability of the total scale was 0.821, and the split-half reliability of the IMA, PMA and PMV was above 0.5, showing that the split-half reliability of this scale was acceptable. The correlations between the subscales, as well as the correlations between the subscales and the total scale, were moderate to high, indicating that the “Motor Imagery Scale” has reliable construct validity. There were significant differences among students of different grades in all subscales and the total scale, indicating that the “Motor Imagery Scale” has good discriminant validity for the students in different grades.
    Part 2: This study used the “Motor Imagery Scale” developed in part 1 to explore the motor imagery ability of students with motor difficulties. 27 students with motor difficulties were recruited , and 27 students with typical development according to gender and grade were matched as a control group. The independent t test was used to examine the difference of motor imagery abilities between the students with motor difficulties and the control group. Finally, students with motor difficulties were categorized to four subtypes based on their motor skills and motor imagery abilities.
    Based on the results, the following conclusions are reached:
    1. The ability of motor imagery is developmental.
    The results of this study indicated that the motor imagery ability of elementary school students mature with age and reach stable at the 3rd or 4th grades. The students of 1st or 2nd grades demonstrated more progressing in motor imagery ability than the 3rd or 4th graders.
    2. The motor imagery ability of students with motor difficulties was poorer than the control group.
    The results of this study demonstrated that students with motor difficulties perform poorer than the control group in imagining actions. Even in imagining motor actions related to performing daily routine, it’s still hard for students with motor difficulties.
    3. Items related direction and sequence may be able to distinguish students with and without motor difficulties.
    The results demonstrated that items related to imagining simple motor actions or motor actions related performing daily routine may be less likely to identify students with motor difficulties, while items related to imagining with direction and sequence were more able to distinguish the students with and without motor difficulties.
    4. Motor skills and motor imagery ability were related but independent concepts.
    According to the results, we found that students with motor difficulties could be categorized to four subtypes based on their motor skills and motor imagery abilities. Not all students with motor difficulties had poor motor imagery abilities. Motor skills and motor imagery may were independent concepts.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機.1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題.7 第三節 名詞解釋8 第二章 文獻回顧11 第一節 動作運用的機制與特質11 第二節 動作想像的定義與特質.21 第三節 特殊需求學童的動作想像能力29 第四節 動作想像能力的評估36 第三章 研究方法45 第一節 研究設計45 第二節 研究對象45 第三節 研究工具49 第四節 研究流程60 第五節 資料處理與分析63 第四章 研究結果65 第一節 動作想像量表之信效度65 第二節 動作困難學童動作的想像能力之探討75 第三節 動作困難學童亞型之初探91 第五章 研究討論101 第一節 動作想像量表之信效度101 第二節 學童動作想像能力的發展103 第三節 動作困難學童的動作想像能力105 第四節 動作困難學童之亞型110 第六章 結論與建議113 第一節 結論113 第二節 研究貢獻與研究限制116 第三節 建議118 參考文獻121 附錄 附錄一 動作想像量表專家內容效度問卷133 附錄二 專家內容效度評估結果157 附錄三 動作想像量表紀錄紙正式版161 附錄四 研究倫理審查核可證明書169

    李宏鎰、吳歡鵲、廖淑台 (2007)。閱讀障礙者在心像旋轉作業上的表現。中華心理衛生學刊,20(2),109-125.
    沈姿妤(2015)。隱喻熟悉度以及個人心像認知能力對於理解動作隱喻之影響:事件相關電位研究(未出版)。國立臺灣大學語言學研究所碩士論文,臺北士論文。
    林孟嶔、鄭溫暖、張鼎乾(2014)。 大專運動員動作與運動意象能力: 量表中文化與現況分析。運動研究, 23(2), 1-19。
    林月仙、曾進興、吳裕益(2014)。中文色塊測驗。心理出版社。
    曾美惠、傅中佩(2010)。動作協調問卷中文版。心理出版社。
    陳雅婷 (2014)。 泛自閉症障礙青少年的動作想像特性(未出版)。國立臺灣大學職能治療學系碩士論文,台北。
    陳心語、 孟令夫、 詹閔茹、 李宜玟、 洪儷瑜、 陳香瑜、 許瑋丹、 盧秋萍、 張益慈、 張維修、 徐宛伶、 林詩苓、趙培均、蔡麗蕙、 吳佩芳、 黃苑捷(2016)。 國小二及四年級孩童的肢體動作運用發展:以及物假裝手勢為例。職能治療學會雜誌,34(1), 90-117。
    Adams, I. L., Lust, J. M., Wilson, P. H., & Steenbergen, B. (2014). Compromised motor control in children with DCD: a deficit in the internal model? A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 225-244.
    American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association
    Ayres A.J. Sensory Integration and Praxis Test Manual (2004). updated edition. Eighth printing. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles.
    Asher, A. V., Parham, L. D., & Knox, S. (2008). Interrater reliability of Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT) score interpretation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(3), 308-319.
    Bartolo, A., & Ham, H. S. (2016). A cognitive overview of limb apraxia. Current Neurology and Neuroscience reports, 16(8), 1-9.
    Barhoun, P., Fuelscher, I., Kothe, E. J., He, J. L., Youssef, G. J., Enticott, P. G., ... & Hyde, C. (2019). Motor imagery in children with DCD: A systematic and meta-analytic review of hand-rotation task performance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 99, 282-297.
    Bodison, S. C. (2015). Developmental dyspraxia and the play skills of children with autism. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(5), 6905185060p1-6905185060p6.
    Butson, M. L., Hyde, C., Steenbergen, B., & Williams, J. (2014). Assessing motor imagery using the hand rotation task: Does performance change across childhood? Human Movement Science, 35, 50-65.
    Caeyenberghs, K., Tsoupas, J., Wilson, P. H., & Smits-Engelsman, B. C. (2009). Motor imagery development in primary school children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 34(1), 103-121.
    Cameron, C. E., Cottone, E. A., Murrah, W. M., & Grissmer, D. W. (2016). How are motor skills linked to children's school performance and academic achievement? Child Development Perspectives, 10(2), 93-98
    Cerritelli, B., Maruff, P., Wilson, P., & Currie, J. (2000). The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 108(1), 91-96.
    Cermak, S.A., Gubbay, S.S., & Larkin, D. (2002). What is developmental coordination disorder? In S.A. Cermak & D. Larkin (Eds.), Developmental coordination disorder (pp. 2–22). Albany, NY: Delmar
    Cermak, S.A., & May-Benson, T. A. (2020). Praxis and Dyspraxis. In A. C. Bundy & S.J. Lane(Eds), Sensory integration: Theory and practice(PP.128-131). F.A. Davis.
    Chang, S. H., & Yu, N. Y. (2016). Comparison of motor praxis and performance in children with varying levels of developmental coordination disorder. Human Movement Science, 48, 7-14.
    Chang, S. H., & Yu, N. Y. (2018). Development and validation of the Comprehensive Praxis Assessment for children aged 6–8. Human Movement Science, 57, 332-341.
    Chainay, H., Louarn, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Ideational action impairments in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and cognition, 62(3), 198-205.
    Chrysikou, E. G., Casasanto, D., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2017). Motor experience influences object knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(3), 395.
    Conson, M., Mazzarella, E., Frolli, A., Esposito, D., Marino, N., Trojano, L., ... & Grossi, D. (2013). Motor imagery in Asperger syndrome: testing action simulation by the hand laterality task. PLoS One, 8(7), e70734.
    Crucitti, J., Hyde, C., & Stokes, M. A. (2020). Hammering that nail: varied praxis motor skills in younger autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(9), 3253-3262.
    Cubelli, R., Marchetti, C., Boscolo, G., & Della Sala, S. (2000). Cognition in action: Testing a model of limb apraxia. Brain and Cognition, 44(2), 144-165.
    Decety, J. (1996). The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behavioural Brain Research, 77(1-2), 45-52.
    Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(5), 172-178.
    de Lange, F. P., Hagoort, P., & Toni, I. (2005). Neural topography and content of movement representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 97–112.
    Dewey, D., & Kaplan, B. J. (1992). Analysis of praxis task demands in the assessment of children with developmental motor deficits. Developmental Neuropsychology, 8(4), 367-379.
    Dowell, L. R., Mahone, E. M., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2009). Associations of postural knowledge and basic motor skill with dyspraxia in autism: Implication for abnormalities in distributed connectivity and motor learning. Neuropsychology, 23(5), 563–570.
    Dumont, C., Ska, B., & Joanette, Y. (2000). Conceptual apraxia and semantic memory deficit in Alzheimer's disease: two sides of the same coin? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6(6), 693-703.
    Dziuk, M. A., Larson, J. G., Apostu, A., Mahone, E. M., Denckla, M. B., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2007). Dyspraxia in autism: association with motor, social, and communicative deficits. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49(10), 734-739.
    Fuchs, C. T., & Caçola, P. (2018). Differences in accuracy and vividness of motor imagery in children with and without Developmental Coordination Disorder. Human Movement Science, 60, 234-241.
    Fuelscher I, Williams J, Wilmut K, Enticott PG, Hyde C. (2016). Modeling the maturation of grip selection planning and action representation: insights from typical and atypical motor development. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-14
    Funk, M., Brugger, P., & Wilkening, F. (2005). Motor processes in children's imagery: The case of mental rotation of hands. Developmental Science, 8(5), 402-408.
    Goldenberg, G. (2013). Apraxia: The cognitive side of motor control. Oup Oxford.
    Gizzonio, V., Avanzini, P., Campi, C., Orivoli, S., Piccolo, B., Cantalupo, G., ... & Fabbri-Destro, M. (2015). Failure in pantomime action execution correlates with the severity of social behavior deficits in children with autism: a praxis study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(10), 3085-3097.
    Goodgold-Edwards, S. A., & Cermak, S. A. (1990). Integrating motor control and motor learning concepts with neuropsychological perspectives on apraxia and developmental dyspraxia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(5), 431-439
    Guerra, Z. F., Lucchetti, A. L., & Lucchetti, G. (2017). Motor imagery training after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 41(4), 205-214
    Guilbert, J., Jouen, F., & Molina, M. (2018). Motor imagery development and proprioceptive integration: Which sensory reweighting during childhood? Journal of experimental child psychology, 166, 621-634.
    Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. (2007). Movement assessment battery for children – 2nd ed., Movement ABC-2. Examiner’s manual. London: Harcourt Assessment.
    Hirata, S., Okuzumi, H., Kitajima, Y., Hosobuchi, T., Nakai, A., & Kokubun, M. (2015). Relationship between motor skill impairments and motor imagery ability in children with autism spectrum disorders: A pilot study using the hand rotation task. Psychology, 6(06), 752.
    Hohmann, T., Exner, M., & Schott, N. (2016). The role of vision and auditory distraction on the temporal congruence between physical execution and motor imagery. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 11(1), 25-33.
    Hoyek, N., Champely, S., Collet, C., Fargier, P., & Guillot, A. (2009). Age and gender-related differences in the temporal congruence development between motor imagery and motor performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 555-560.
    Irie, K., Matsumoto, A., Zhao, S., Kato, T., & Liang, N. (2021). Neural basis and motor imagery intervention methodology based on neuroimaging studies in children with developmental coordination disorders: A Review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 620599.
    Johnson, S. H., Sprehn, G., & Saykin, A. J. (2002). Intact motor imagery in chronic upper limb hemiplegics: evidence for activity-independent action representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 841-852.
    Jarus, T., Lourie-Gelberg, Y., Engel-Yeger, B., & Bart, O. (2011). Participation patterns of school-aged children with and without DCD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(4), 1323-1331.
    Jeannerod, M., & Decety, J. (1995). Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5(6), 727-732.
    Katz, N., & Parush, S. (2001). The Dynamic Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment for Children (DOTCA-Ch)-Research version. Manual. Jerusalem, Israel: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    Kaur, M., Srinivasan, S. M., & Bhat, A. N. (2018). Comparing motor performance, praxis, coordination, and interpersonal synchrony between children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 72, 79-95.
    Karádi, K., Kovács, B., Szepesi, T., Szabó, I., & Kállai. J. (2001). Egocentric mental rotation in Hungarian dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 7, 3-11
    Lai, J. S., Fisher, A. G., Magalhães, L. C., & Bundy, A. C. (1996). Construct validity of the sensory integration and praxis tests. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 16(2), 75-97.
    Liang, S., Choi, K. S., Qin, J., Pang, W. M., Wang, Q., & Heng, P. A. (2016). Improving the discrimination of hand motor imagery via virtual reality based visual guidance. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 132, 63-74.
    Lopes, L., Santos, R., Pereira, B., & Lopes, V. P. (2013). Associations between gross motor coordination and academic achievement in elementary school children. Human Movement Science, 32(1), 9-20.
    Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385.
    McAvinue, L. P., & Robertson, I. H. (2008). Measuring motor imagery ability: a review. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 232-251.
    Miller, K. J., Schalk, G., Fetz, E. E., Den Nijs, M., Ojemann, J. G., & Rao, R. P. (2010). Cortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery, and imagery-based online feedback. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(9), 4430-4435.
    Mizuguchi, N., Nakata, H., Uchida, Y., & Kanosue, K. (2012). Motor imagery and sport performance. The Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine, 1(1), 103-111.
    Morris, M. K. (1997). Developmental dyspraxia. Apraxia: The Neuropsychology of Action, 245-268.
    Mostofsky, S. H., Dubey, P., Jerath, V. K., Jansiewicz, E. M., Goldberg, M. C., & Denckla, M. B. (2006). Developmental dyspraxia is not limited to imitation in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(3), 314–326.
    Munzert, J., Blischke, K., & Krüger, B. (2015). Motor imagery of locomotion with an additional load: actual load experience does not affect differences between physical and mental durations. Experimental Brain Research, 233(3), 809-816.
    Niederer, I., Kriemler, S., Gut, J., Hartmann, T., Schindler, C., Barral, J., & Puder, J. J. (2011). Relationship of aerobic fitness and motor skills with memory and attention in preschoolers (Ballabeina): Across-sectional and longitudinal study. BMC pediatrics, 11(1), 1-9.
    Nobile, E., Piedimonte, A., & Keller, R. (2018). Motor imagery and motor coordination in autism spectrum disorders: Similarities and differences. International Journal of Neurorehabilitation, 5(02), 1-2.
    Noten, M., Wilson, P., Ruddock, S., & Steenbergen, B. (2014). Mild impairments of motor imagery skills in children with DCD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(5), 1152-1159.
    Overton, W. F., & Jackson, J. P. (1973). The representation of imagined objects in action sequences: A developmental study. Child Development, 44(2), 309-314.
    Parsons, L. M., Fox, P. T., Downs, J. H., Glass, T., Hirsch, T. B., Martin, C. C., ... & Lancaster, J. L. (1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature, 375(6526), 54-58.
    Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467
    Power, E., Code, C., Croot, K., Sheard, C., & Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. (2010). Florida Apraxia Battery–Extended and Revised Sydney (FABERS): Design, description, and a healthy control sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(1), 1-18.
    Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(7), 576-582.
    Roley, S. S., Mailloux, Z., Parham, L. D., Schaaf, R. C., Lane, C. J., & Cermak, S. (2015). Sensory integration and praxis patterns in children with autism. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(1), 1-8.
    Rothi, L. J. G., & Heilman, K. M. (2014). Apraxia: Neuropsychology of action. Psychology Press.
    Roy, E. A., & Square, P. A. (1985). Common considerations in the study of limb, verbal and oral apraxia. In E. A. Roy (Ed.), Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders (pp. 111–161). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Roy, E. A. (1996). Hand preference, manual asymmetries, and limb apraxia. Manual asymmetries in motor control, 215-236.
    Richter, W., Somorjai, R., Summers, R., Jarmasz, M., Menon, R. S., Gati, J. S., ... & Kim, S. G. (2000). Motor area activity during mental rotation studied by time-resolved single-trial fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(2), 310-320.
    Rothi LJG, Ochipa C, Heilman KM. (1917). Cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis and apraxia. In: Rothi LJG, Heilman KM, eds. Apraxia: The Neuropsychology of Action. 29-49. UK, Psychology Press.
    Sinani, C., Sugden, D. A., & Hill, E. L. (2011). Gesture production in school vs. clinical samples of children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and typically developing children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(4), 1270-1282.
    Sirigu, A., & Duhamel, JR. (2001). Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable mental processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,13,910–919.
    Spruijt, S., Jouen, F., Molina, M., Kudlinski, C., Guilbert, J., & Steenbergen, B. (2013). Assessment of motor imagery in cerebral palsy via mental chronometry: the case of walking. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(11), 4154-4160.
    Spruijt, S., van der Kamp, J., & Steenbergen, B. (2015). Current insights in the development of children’s motor imagery ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 787.
    Souto, D. O., Cruz, T. K. F., Fontes, P. L. B., Batista, R. C., & Haase, V. G. (2020). Motor imagery development in children: changes in speed and accuracy with increasing age. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 8, 100.
    Stamenova, V., Black, S. E., & Roy, E. A. (2012). An update on the conceptual–production systems model of apraxia: evidence from stroke. Brain and Cognition, 80(1), 53-63.
    Steinman, K. J., Mostofsky, S. H., & Denckla, M. B. (2010). Toward a narrower, more pragmatic view of developmental dyspraxia. Journal of Child Neurology, 25(1), 71-81.
    Subirats, L., Allali, G., Briansoulet, M., Salle, J. Y., & Perrochon, A. (2018). Age and gender differences in motor imagery. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 391, 114-117.
    Takazono, P. S., & Teixeira, L. A. (2018). Effect of association of imagery and physical practice on children’s motor learning. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano, 20, 363-372.
    Tempest, S. (2017). Purposeful movement and apraxia. In Maskil, L., & Tempest, S.(Ed.), Neuropsychology for Occupational Therapists: Cognition in Occupational Performance, 4th ed., pp. 149-163). John Wiley & Sons.
    Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., ... & Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(2), 273-281.
    Toussaint, L., Tahej, P. K., Thibaut, J. P., Possamai, C. A., & Badets, A. (2013). On the link between action planning and motor imagery: A developmental study. Experimental Brain Research, 231(3), 331-339.
    Vargas, C. D., Olivier, E., Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Duhamel, J. R., & Sirigu, A. (2004). The influence of hand posture on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral Cortex, 14(11), 1200-1206.
    van der Fels, I. M. J., te Wierike, S. C. M., Hartman, E., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Smith, J., and Visscher, C. (2015). The relationship between motor skills and cognitive skills in 4–16 year old typically developing children: A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 18(6), 697–703.
    Vaivre-Douret, L., Lalanne, C., Ingster-Moati, I., Boddaert, N., Cabrol, D., Dufier, J. L., Golse, B., & Falissard, B. (2011). Subtypes of developmental coordination disorder: research on their nature and etiology. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36(5), 614-643.
    van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., Zwaan, R. A., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The functional role of motor activation in language processing: motor cortical oscillations support lexical-semantic retrieval. Neuroimage, 50(2), 665-677.
    Williams, J., Thomas, P. R., Maruff, P., & Wilson, P. H. (2008). The link between motor impairment level and motor imagery ability in children with developmental coordination disorder. Human Movement Science, 27(2), 270-285.
    Wuang, Y. P., Su, J. H., & Su, C. Y. (2012). Reliability and responsiveness of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children–Second Edition Test in children with developmental coordination disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 54(2), 160-165.
    Yang, J., & Shu, H. (2014). Passive reading and motor imagery about hand actions and tool-use actions: an fMRI study. Experimental Brain Research, 232(2), 453-467.
    Yang, T. X., Allen, R. J., Waterman, A. H., Zhang, S. Y., Su, X. M., & Chan, R. C. (2021). Comparing motor imagery and verbal rehearsal strategies in children’s ability to follow spoken instructions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203, 105033.
    Yu, W. H. (2004). The use of the Dynamic Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment for children (DOTCA-Ch) in Taiwan: a pilot study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston University.
    Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1.

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2025/10/01
    QR CODE