簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林佩汶
Lin, Pei-Wen
論文名稱: 戲仿歷史中的對話論: 薩爾曼·魯西迪的《佛羅倫斯的女巫》
Dialogism in the Parodied History: Salman Rushdie’s The Enchantress of Florence
指導教授: 蘇榕
Su, Jung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 74
中文關鍵詞: 薩爾曼·魯西迪《佛羅倫斯的女巫》巴赫汀對話論杭琪恩《戲仿理論》
英文關鍵詞: Salman Rushdie, The Enchantress of Florence, Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin, dialogism, Linda Hutcheon, A Theory of Parody
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202202513
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:48下載:24
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 薩爾曼·魯西迪的小說經常使用奇幻元素和歷史的強烈存在感來檢視絕對真理的可能性。《佛羅倫斯的女巫》展現了一個對話論的世界,其世界的產生不僅是因為事實(文藝復興時期和蒙古歷史)與虛構(東西方的相遇和矛盾的展示)的融合,也是因為公共歷史論述與魯西迪特定化的、戲仿的歷史相互作用的結果。
    魯西迪的《佛羅倫斯的女巫》中的戲仿歷史成功地跨越了幾種不同體制的邊界。此文本的不確定狀態不僅來自於從真實世界到超現實世界的過境,從而解決了主觀客觀的二分法,也審視了真理的核心價值。我試圖透過巴赫汀的《對話論》,以及杭琪恩(Linda Hutcheon)的《戲仿理論》來處理這個議題。
    我的論文分為四個章節。第一章介紹小說家薩爾曼·魯西迪的生平和作品,《午夜之子》和《佛羅倫斯的女巫》的比較以及文獻回顧。第二章著重在介紹本論文涵蓋的理論框架: 對話論,戲仿後現代主義以及歷史。第三章:後現代的戲仿:《佛羅倫斯的女巫》試圖透過互文性,雙聲話語以及檢視在想像與現實之間跨界的對話論將《佛羅倫斯的女巫》分析為一部戲仿歷史。第四章是結論,我提及戲仿的功能,以及此小說中的雙重聲調,互文性和矛盾關係並非創造出超越任何時間和空間概念的反歷史論述。相反的,這部諧擬的文本展現了一個既強調現在也強調歷史的多元化世界。

    Salman Rushdie’s novels constantly confront the possibility of absolute truth with fantastic elements and the strong presence of history. The Enchantress of Florence is deeply rooted in a dialogized world; a result of the merging of the factual (the Renaissance and Mongol histories) and the fictional (the encounter between the East and West and the display of paradoxes) and also the interaction between the public historical discourse and Rushdie’s particularized, parodied history.
    Rushdie’s parodied history in The Enchantress of Florence successfully crosses several kinds of boundaries in different regimes. The text’s indeterminate status results from not only the boundary-crossing from the real to the surreal worlds, thus resolving the subjective-objective dichotomy, but it also problematizes the core value of reality. I intend to approach the issue by Bakhtin’s theory of dialogism, together with the appropriation of Linda Hutcheon’s theory of parody.
    My thesis is divided into four parts. Chapter one is the introduction of the thesis, the novelist Salman Rushdie’s life and works, the comparison between Midnight’s Children and The Enchantress of Florence and finally, the reviews of literature. Chapter two focuses on the theoretical framework and key concepts covered in this thesis: dialogism, parody, postmodernism and history. Chapter three intends to rationalize The Enchantress of Florence as a parodied history through intertextuality, double-voiced speeches and the investigation of the dialogic discourse regarding boundary-crossing between imagination and reality. In the concluding chapter, I mention the functions of parody. The parodic factors of the novel—double-voicedness, intertextuality and paradoxes do not create an ahistorical discourse that seeks to transcend any concept of time and space. On the contrary, this parodied text exemplifies a pluralized world which emphasizes both the present and the past.

    Table of Contents Chapter One: Introduction 1 The Enchantress of Florence 1 Rushdie, His Novels and Islam 5 Midnight’s Children and The Enchantress of Florence 7 Reviews of Literature: Secular Humanism, Intertextuality and Boundary-crossing 9 Chapter Two: Theoretical Framework and Key Concepts of The Enchantress of Florence 15 Dialogism 15 Parody—an Effective Tool of Postmodernist Fictions 19 Parody, Dialogism and Postmodernism in The Enchantress of Florence 23 History in Rushdie’s The Enchantress of Florence and in Postmodernist Theory 26 Chapter Three: A Postmodern Parody: The Enchantress of Florence 31 Intertextual Bouncing 32 Another’s Speech; Refracted Authorial Intentions 50 Border-crossing between Reality and Imagination 55 Chapter Four: Conclusion 62 Works Cited 68

    Al-Olaqi, Fahd Mohammed Taleb Saeed. “The

    Influence of the Arabian Nights on English

    Literature: A Selective Study.” European

    Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 30, ser. 3,

    2012, pp. 384–396. 3.

    Álvarez, Enrique Galván. “Children’s

    Voices at Midnight: Can the Subaltern Speak

    in Rushdie’s Narrativisation of History?”

    Estudios Ingleses De La Universidad

    Complutense, vol. 17, 10 Mar. 2009, pp. 115

    –125. Print.

    Amara, Radhouan Ben. “Frontiers and

    Thresholds in Rushdie's Writings.” Between,

    I, no. 1, May 2011, pp. 1–16.

    Arabian Nights' Entertainments, edited by

    Robert L. Mack, Oxford University Press, UK,

    1996. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://0-

    ebookcentral.proquest.com.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.

    tw/lib/ntnutw/detail.action?docID=431086.
    "Authors@Google: Salman Rushdie." YouTube.

    Talks at Google, 19 June 2008. Web. 15 May

    2015. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?

    v=Ah9PyZNb4F8>.

    Bakhtin, M. M., and Michael Holquist. The

    Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: U

    of Texas, 1981. Print.

    Bertens, Hans. Literary Theory: The Basics.

    London ; New York: Routledge, 2003.Print.

    Bharat Mehta, Bharat. "Mughal Emperor

    Jahangir (Son of Akbar) - Important
    India." Important India. N.p., 09 Sept.

    2013. Web. 31 Aug. 2016.

    Bloom, Harold. Italo Calvino: Comprehensive

    Research and Study Guide. Chelsea
    House Publishers, 2002.

    Bové, Paul A. "Mendacious Innocents, Or, The

    Modern Genealogist as Conscientious

    Intellectual: Nietzsche, Foucault, Said."

    Boundary 29.3 (1981): 359. Web.

    Chauhan, Pradyumna S. "Salman Rushdie: Fact,

    Faith and Fiction." Salman Rushdie

    Interviews: A Sourcebook of His Ideas.

    Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2001. 99-101.

    Print.

    Crapanzano, Vincent. "The Postmodern

    Crisis." Rereading Cultural Anthropology

    (2012): 87-102. Web. 20 May 2015.

    Dentith, Simon. Parody. London: Routledge,

    2000. Questia. Web. 19 May 2015.

    Dharker, Rani. "An Interview with Salman

    Rushdie." Salman Rushdie Interviews: A

    Sourcebook of His Ideas. By Pradyumna S.

    Chauhan. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2001. 47-

    62. Print.

    Edwards, Brian. “Review: A Theory of

    Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century

    Art Forms.” Australasian Journal of

    American Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, 1 Dec.

    1985, pp. 65–69.JSTOR. Print.

    Bachtin, Michail M., and Caryl Emerson.

    “Editor's Preface.” Problems of

    Dostoevsky's Poetics, Univ. of Minnesota

    Press, 2009, pp. xxix-2. Print.

    "Fatehpur Sikri, Uttar Pradesh -

    Archaeological Survey of India." Fatehpur

    Sikri, Uttar Pradesh - Archaeological Survey

    of India. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Oct. 2016.

    Fendler, Lynn. "Praxis and Agency in

    Foucault’s Historiography." Studies in

    Philosophy and Education Stud Philos Educ

    23.5-6 (2004): 445-66. Web.

    Foucault, Michel. "Nietzsche, Genealogy,

    History." The Foucault Reader, ed. Paul

    Rabinow. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984.

    Print.

    Geetha, B. J. "Salman Rrushdie's The

    Echantress of Florence: An Intertextual

    Review." The Dawn Journal 3.1 (2014): 778-

    87. Web. 22 May 2015.

    Guo, Hong-ling. Beyond Difference: Potential

    Relationality and Salman Rushdie's The

    Enchantress of Florence. Thesis. National

    Taiwan Normal University, 2011. Taipei:

    n.p., 2011. Print.

    Hirschkop, Ken. "Is Dialogism for Real?"

    Social Text 30 (1992): 102-13.JSTOR. Web. 22

    Mar. 2016.

    Holquist, Michael.Dialogism: Bakhtin and His

    World. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2002.

    Questia. Web. 1 May 2015.

    Hoy, Mikita. "Bakhtin and Popular Culture."

    New Literary History 23.3, History,

    Politics, and Culture (1992): 765-82. JSTOR.

    Web. 10 June 2016.

    Hutcheon, Linda. The Politics of

    Postmodernism. London: Routledge, 1989.

    Print.

    Hutcheon, Linda. "The Politics of

    Postmodernism: Parody and History."Cultural

    Critique 5 (1986): 179. Web. 16 May 2015.

    Jefferson, Ann, and Margaret A. Rose.

    "Parody//Meta-Fiction." Poetics Today 3.3

    (1982): 231. JSTOR. Web. 19 May 2015.

    Jameson, Fredric. Foreword. The Postmodern

    Condition: A Report on Knowledge. By Jean-

    François Lyotard, Geoffrey Bennington, and

    Brian Massumi. Vol. 10. Minneapolis: U of

    Minnesota, 1984. Vii-Xxv. Print. Theory and

    History of Literature. Print.

    Lyotard, Jean-François, Geoffrey Bennington,

    and Brian Massumi. The Postmodern Condition:

    A Report on Knowledge. Vol. 10. Minneapolis:

    U of Minnesota, 1984. Print. Theory and

    History of Literature.

    Khagi, Sofya. "Art as Aping: The Uses of

    Dialogism in Timur Kibirov's "To Igor'

    Pomerantsev. Summer Reflections on the Fate

    of Belles Lettres""The Russian Review 61.4

    (2002): 579-98. JSTOR. Web. 08 June 2016.

    Kiremidjian, G. D. "The Aesthetics of

    Parody."The Journal of Aesthetics and Art

    Criticism 28.2 (1969): 231+. JSTOR. Web. 19

    May 2015.

    Maitland, Sara. "Blasphemy and Creativity."

    The Salman Rushdie Controversy in

    Interreligious Perspective. Lewiston: E.

    Mellen, 1990. 115-30. Print.

    Man, Paul De. "Dialogue and Dialogism."

    Poetics Today 4.1 (1983): 99-107.JSTOR

    [JSTOR]. Web. 10 Feb. 2015.

    Massyn, Peter John. "Dialogism and Carnival:

    Reflections on Bakhtin, Language and the

    Body." Journal of Literary Studies 7.2

    (1991): 132-45. Web.

    Matson, Floyd W. "History as Art: The

    Psychological-Romantic View." Journal of the

    History of Ideas 18.2 (1957): 270-79. JSTOR.

    Web. 15 Sept. 2016.

    Moore, Geneva Cobb. "A Demonic Parody: Toni

    Morrison's A Mercy." The Southern Literary

    Journal 44.1 (2011): 1-22. Questia. Web. 7

    Jan. 2015.

    Moulakis, Athanasios. Republican Realism in

    Renaissance Florence: Francesco

    Guicciardini's Discorso Di Logrogno. Rowman

    & Littlefield, 1998. Print.

    Mozumder, Suman. "Rediff.com Slide Show:

    Jodhabai a Myth, Asserts Salman

    Rushdie."Rediff.com Slide Show: Jodhabai a

    Myth, Asserts Salman Rushdie. N.p., 4 June

    2008. Web. 11 May 2016.

    Myviewprem. "Jodha and Salim (Jodha Akbar

    Forum)." Jodha and Salim. N.p., 19 Nov.

    2013. Web. 02 Oct. 2016.

    Neuman, Justin. "The Fictive Origins of

    Secular Humanism." Criticism 50.4 (2009):

    675-82. Web.

    O'Connor, William Van. "Parody as

    Criticism." College English 25.4 (1964):

    241. JSTOR. Web. 19 May 2015.

    Park‐Fuller, Linda M. "Voices: Bakhtin's

    heteroglossia and polyphony, and the

    performance of narrative literature."

    Literature and Performance 7.1 (1986): 1-12.

    Web.

    Patrascu, Ecaterian. "Feminism and

    Femininity in Salman Rushdie's the

    Enchantress of Florence."Journal of Research

    in Gender Studies 4.2 (2014): 1-22.

    ProQuest. Web. 8 June 2016.

    "Pazzi Conspiracy." Infoplease. Infoplease,

    2012. Web. 01 May 2016.

    Pearson, Ann. “‘Remembrance ... Is Nothing

    Other than a Quotation’: The Intertextual

    Fictions of W. G.Sebald.” Comparative

    Literature, vol. 60, no. 3, 2008, pp. 261–

    278. JSTOR. Print.

    Phiddian, Robert. "Are Parody and

    Deconstruction Secretly the Same Thing?" New
    Literary History 28.4, Philosophical

    Thoughts (1997): 673-96. JSTOR. Web. 03 May

    2016.

    Pipes, Daniel. The Rushdie Affair: The

    Novel, the Ayatollah, and the West. New

    York, NY: Carol Pub. Group, 1990. 41-46.

    Print.

    Random House of Canada. “Salman Rushdie,

    author of The Enchantress of Florence.”

    Online video clip. YouTube. YouTube, 23 Oct

    2008. Web. 18 July 2017.

    Richards, John F. The Mughal Empire.

    Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993. Print.
    Riffaterre, Michael. “The Intertextual

    Unconscious.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 13,

    no. 2, The Trial(s) of Psychoanalysis, 1

    Jan. 1987, pp. 371–385.

    Rollason, Christopher. "Amitav Ghosh's Sea

    of Poppies and Salman Rushdie's The

    Enchantress of Florence: History and the

    Future of Indian Writing in English."

    (2008): 1-3. Web. 15 May 2015.

    Rushdie, Salman. Imaginary Homelands: Essays

    and Criticism, 1981-1991. London: Granta,

    1991. Print.

    ---. "Salman Rushdie: Enchantress of

    Florence." Jimmy Carter Library and Museum,

    Atlanta, GA. 7 July 2008. WGBH. Web. 21 Apr.

    2015.

    ---. “Salman Rushdie, Author of The

    Enchantress of Florence.” Youtube, Random

    House of Canada, 23 Oct. 2008, Web. 15 July

    2017.

    ---. "Salman Rushdie: Enchantress of

    Florence." Jimmy Carter Library and Museum,

    Atlanta, GA. 7 July 2008. WGBH. Web. 21 Apr.

    2015.

    ---. "Salman Rushdie on The Enchantress of

    Florence: Characters, Quotes, Analysis,

    Summary (2008)."YouTube. The Film Archives,

    18 Jan. 2014. Web. 15 May 2015.

    ---. The Enchantress of Florence. Houston,

    TX: Random House, 2009. Print.

    ---."Words & Wine: Salman Rushdie - The

    Enchantress of Florence." YouTube. YouTube,

    7 Nov. 2008. Web. 22 May 2015.

    "Salman Rushdie: His Life, His Work and His

    Religion." The Independent. Independent

    Digital News and Media, 13 Oct. 2006. Web.

    22 May 2015.

    Schmidt, Patrick. “What We Hear Is Meaning

    Too: Deconstruction, Dialogue, and

    Music.”Philosophy of Music Education

    Review, vol. 20, no. 1, 2012, pp. 3–24.

    JSTOR. Print.

    Sheridan, Alan. Michel Foucault: The Will to

    Truth. London: Routledge, 1990. Questia.

    Web. 12 May 2015.

    Singer, Alan. "The Voice of History/The

    Subject of the Novel." NOVEL: A Forum on

    Fiction 21.2/3, Why the Novel Matters: A

    Postmodern Perplex Conference Issue (1988):

    173-79. JSTOR. Web. 15 Apr. 2015.

    Southgate, Beverley. History, What and Why?:

    Ancient, Modern, and Postmodern

    Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 1996.

    Questia. Web. 12 May 2015.

    Stone, Jonathan. "Polyphony and the Atomic

    Age: Bakhtin's Assimilation of an

    Einsteinian Universe." PMLA 123.2 (2008):

    405-21. JSTOR. Web. 25 Apr. 2015.

    Strout, Cushing. "Border Crossings: History,

    Fiction, and Dead Certainties."History and

    Theory 31.2 (1992): 153-62. JSTOR. Web. 24

    Sept. 2016.

    Taylor, Ben. “Bakhtin, Carnival and Comic

    Theory.” Thesis (Ph. D.), 1995, pp. 1–348.
    Teimouri, Mahdi. "On the Question of Overlap

    between the Post-colonial and the

    Postmodern." Sarjana 27.2 (2012): 1-12. Web.

    Thiara, N. W. "Enabling Spaces and the

    Architecture of Hybridity in Salman

    Rushdie's The Enchantress of Florence." The

    Journal of Commonwealth Literature 46.3

    (2011): 415-31. Web.

    Thompson, Willie. Postmodernism and History.

    Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave

    Macmillan, 2004. Print.

    Wink, André. Makers of the Muslim World.

    Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2009. Print.

    Wolf, Louis. "Nobody Gets Off the Bus: The

    Viet Nam Generation Big Book." Government

    Manipulation and Distortion of History, Part

    I, Louis Wolf. Viet Nam Generation Inc. &

    the Institute of Advanced Technology in the

    Humanities, 28 Jan. 1999. Web. 12 May 2015.

    <http://www2.iath.virginia.edu/sixties/HTML_

    docs/Texts/Scholarly/Wolf_Distortion_01.html

    >.

    Wurgaft, Lewis D. "Identity in World

    History: A Postmodern Perspective."History
    and Theory 34.2, Theme Issue 34: World

    Historians and Their Critics (1995): 67-85.

    JSTOR. Web. 09 Oct. 2016.

    Zagorin, Perez. "History, the Referent, and

    Narrative: Reflections on Postmodernism

    Now." History and Theory 38.1 (1999): 1-24.

    Web.

    Zhongwen, Qian. "Problems of Bakhtin's

    Theory about "Polyphony"." New Literary

    History 28.4 (1997): 779-90. Web.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE