簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳玟婷
Chen, Wen-Ting
論文名稱: 探討國小自然教師對科學教學與學習之覺察
Exploring Elementary Teachers’ Noticing to Science Teaching and Learning
指導教授: 吳心楷
Wu, Hsin-Kai
口試委員: 林靜雯
Lin, Jing-Wen
方素琦
Fang, Su-Chi
吳心楷
Wu, Hsin-Kai
口試日期: 2023/01/10
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科學教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Science Education
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 115
中文關鍵詞: 國小自然教師教師覺察科學教學與學習
英文關鍵詞: Elementary school teacher, Teacher noticing, Science teaching and learning
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300096
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:57下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究目的為探討七位不同專業背景(數理與非數理)的國小自然教師對科學教學與學習之覺察。教師覺察 (teacher noticing) 可分為三個歷程:注意、詮釋、決策,教師在科學課堂上關注了什麼,如何詮釋這個課室事件以及後續做出什麼教學決策。希望透過教師覺察的分析,可以理解不同背景教師對科學教學與學習的覺察,以利未來營造以學生為中心的學習情境。本研究方法以質性研究方式進行資料蒐集與分析,研究設計為拍攝一位焦點國小自然教師的教學過程並蒐集該課程學生作品,並由焦點教師主動記錄覺察時刻,再經研究者篩選覺察影片後進行每周晤談,其他六位參與教師則觀看焦點教師拍攝之覺察影片後進行晤談。透過以錄音與錄影的方進行資料蒐集,形成編碼架構後,再將訪談內容編碼、分析。本研究發現參與的國小自然教師,在教師覺察的三個歷程中,皆較聚焦於「科學教學方式」和「學生學習科學概念」兩面向,而其中數理背景之教師比非數理背景之教師能描述更細膩的發現,以及進行更多元的詮釋,給予的科學教學建議會針對科學概念。

    The aim of this study was to explore teacher noticing of 7 elementary science teachers, with different majors (mathematical and non-mathematical), to the science and learning. Teacher noticing could be divided into three components: attention (what to attend to), interpretation (how to interpret the event), and decisions about the next step/s (how to respond afterwards). Through an analysis of teachers’ noticing to science teaching and learning, this study could deepen current understanding about noticing of teachers from different backgrounds and provide insight into how to create a student-centered learning environment. The study collected classroom recordings from an elementary school science teacher (target teacher) and students’ artifacts in the class. The target teacher identified her noticing moments from the recordings and was interviewed weekly. Then video clips of noticing were selected and used to interview the remaining 6 teachers. Qualitative research methods were employed for data analysis and the interview transcripts were then coded, sorted, and analyzed to generate findings. This study showed that elementary science teachers who participated in this study focus on the aspects of science instruction and students’ learning of concepts. Additionally, the teachers with mathematics and science backgrounds offered more detailed descriptions and more diverse interpretations of their noticing than teachers without a mathematics and science background did. Furthermore, the decisions or actions given by mathematics and science teachers focused more on scientific concepts.

    摘要 i Abstract iii 目次 v 表次 vii 圖次 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 2 第三節 名詞解釋 3 第四節 研究範圍與限制 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 教師覺察 6 第二節 教師覺察與其相關因素 8 第三節 教師覺察與學生學習 10 第四節 國小階段「水的三態」科學概念與其迷思概念 15 第三章 研究方法 21 第一節 研究設計與流程 21 第二節 研究對象 23 第三節 資料蒐集 30 第四節 資料分析 40 第五節 研究信實度 50 第四章 研究結果 51 第一節 國小自然教師的教師覺察 51 第二節 不同背景國小自然教師的教師覺察 59 第三節 比較焦點教師與其他教師的教師覺察 75 第五章 結論與討論 105 第一節 結論 105 第二節 討論 107 第三節 建議 109 參考文獻 111 附錄 114

    吳心楷、辛靜婷 (2011)。數位學習研究中質性資料的管理與分析:以NVivo軟體的使用為例。收錄於宋曜廷(編著),數位學習研究方法(頁163-208)。高等教育。
    吳育典 (2020)。探究國小學童閱讀反駁式文本對於降低迷思概念的影響 –以水三態變化為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學教育學研究所,嘉義縣。
    李文隆(2005)。利用DAPA探究國小五年級學童「蒸發、凝結」之概念學習。未出版之碩士論文,國立台北師範學院,台北市。
    張凱綸(2002)。國小學童對「水的三態變化」概念之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所,屏東縣。
    張敬宜(1997):國小高年級學童蒸發、凝結與沸騰概念之研究。科學教育學刊,第5卷第3期,頁321-346。
    教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要自然科學領域。臺北市。檢自 https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/files/class_schema/課綱/17-自然科學/17-1/十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校自然科學領域.pdf
    陳淑筠(2002)。國內學生自然科學迷思概念研究之後設研究。未出版之碩士論文,臺東師範學院教育研究所,台東縣。
    陳景期、李素惠(2009)。實作探究對國小三年級學童「蒸發凝結」概念學習影響之研究。第23屆中華民國科學教育學術研討會發表之論文,國立臺灣師範大學。
    陳貴琳(2016)。探討國小學生對於雲與霧的迷思概念。臺灣化學教育,12。民105年3月2日,取自http://chemed.chemistry.org.tw/?p=15145。
    黃書敏(2008)。不同類型之科學閱讀文本融入教學對國小六年級學童迷思概念的影響-以水資源概念為例。未出版之碩士論文,臺北市立教育大學自然科學系碩士班,臺北市。
    黃嘉明(2004)。國小學童「水的蒸發、凝結、沸騰」迷思概念及心智模式之探討-以新屋鄉為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立新竹教育大學進修部數理教育碩士班(自然組),新竹市。
    楊世麒(2002)。以概念構圖作為探究國小高年級學童水循環概念的概念改變研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台北師範學院,台北市。
    楊明達,王靜如(2000)。兒童雲和雨概念。課程與教學,3(3),137-152。
    葉子菁(2013)。澄清學童水資源迷思概念之行動研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺東大學教育所,台東縣。
    Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers' ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005
    Benedict-Chambers, A. (2016). Using tools to promote novice teacher noticing of science teaching practices in post-rehearsal discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.009
    Campbell, B. K. (2018). Toward more student-centered instruction: The advent of teacher noticing and responsiveness in mathematics and science education research. The William & Mary Educational Review, 6(1), 3.
    Chan, K. K. H., Xu, L., Cooper, R., Berry, A., & van Driel, J. H. (2021). Teacher noticing in science education: do you see what I see? Studies in Science Education, 57(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1755803
    Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    Jacobs, V., & Spangler, D. (2017). Research on core practices in K-12 mathematics teaching. Compendium for research in mathematics education, 766-792.
    Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for research in mathematics education, 41(2), 169-202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169
    Luft, J. A., Hanuscin, D., Hobbs, L., & Törner, G. (2020). Out-of-Field Teaching in Science: An Overlooked Problem. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(7), 719-724. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1814052
    Luna, M. J. (2018). What does it mean to notice my students’ ideas in science today?: An investigation of elementary teachers’ practice of noticing their students’ thinking in science. Cognition and Instruction, 36(4), 297-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1496919
    Luna, M. J., Selmer, S. J., & Rye, J. A. (2018). Teachers’ noticing of students’ thinking in science through classroom artifacts: In what ways are science and engineering practices evident? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(2), 148-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1427418
    Luna, M. J., & Sherin, M. G. (2017). Using a video club design to promote teacher attention to students' ideas in science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.019
    Moss, D., & Poling, L. (2019). Using a Noticing Framework in a Mathematics Methods Course. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 3(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.26077/yjw6-6s37
    Russ, R. S., & Luna, M. J. (2013). Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 50(3), 284-314. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21063
    Sherin, M. G., & Jacobs, V. R. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 33-44). Routledge.
    Sherin, M. G., & Russ, R. S. (2011). Accessing mathematics teachers’ in-the-moment noticing. In Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 109-124). Routledge.
    Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 11(2), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7
    van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 164-181). Routledge.
    van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of technology and teacher education, 10(4), 571-596.

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2028/02/01
    QR CODE