簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 莊致嘉
Chuang, Chih-Chia
論文名稱: 探討影響海洋廢棄物負責任行為的因子
Exploring the Factors Affecting the Responsible Behavior of Marine Debris
指導教授: 葉庭光
Yeh, Ting-Kuang
口試委員: 葉蓉樺
Yeh, Jung-Hua
黃婉如
Huang, Wan-Ru
葉庭光
Yeh, Ting-Kuang
口試日期: 2023/02/16
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 地球科學系
Department of Earth Sciences
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 59
中文關鍵詞: 海洋廢棄物環境負責任行為計畫行為理論感知威脅同理心
英文關鍵詞: marine debris, environmentally responsible behavior, theory of planned behavior, perceived threat, empathy
研究方法: 調查研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300336
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:53下載:35
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 人類的行為對地球環境的影響相當大。為了地球環境的永續,環境負責任行為已成為環境教育與海洋教育的重要目標 (Borden & Schettino, 1979) 。因此,探索哪些因素會促發人類產生環境負責任行為 (Roberts & Bacon, 1997) ,也是海洋/環境教育研究的重要方向。Ajzen (1991) 所提出計畫行為理論被認為是解釋行為的重要參考理論。雖然計畫行為理論對於行為具有相當好的解釋,但是近年來仍有許多學者嘗試調整該理論,進一步探索關鍵因素,以提升對行為的解釋率。由文獻分析,我們認為「感知威脅」與「同理心」是過去鮮被提及,但有可能具有重要影響的因子。
    本研究的目的即在透過問卷調查嘗試評估影響產生海廢相關環境負責任行為的可能因子。研究變項除了過去理論中已提及的(1)對海廢的態度、(2)對海廢的主觀規範與(3)對海廢相關行為的知覺控制之外,也嘗試將(4)海廢相關負責任行動的知識、(5)對海廢的感知威脅(認為海廢已對自己產生影響)與(6)對海洋的同理心這三個變項加入模式之中,評估這些變項對海廢相關環境負責任行為的影響程度。上述變項以量表形式發展評量工具。本研究徵求610名受試者參與(其中300名國小學生與310名高中學生)。多元回歸分析結果顯示,上述六項因素對產生海廢相關環境負責任行為的意願皆具有顯著正相關,在國小受試者部分,整體解釋率達66%;在高中部分,整體解釋率達59%。
    本研究結果顯示,感知威脅和同理心與海廢相關環境負責任行為間具有顯著正相關。因此,在未來海廢政策或海洋教育規劃上,除了過去重視的知識與態度提升,亦應思考如何透過引導民眾的感知威脅與同理心,以促發海廢相關環境負責任行為的產生。

    Human behavior has a considerable impact on the earth's environment. For the sustainability of the earth's environment, environmentally responsible behavior has become an important goal of environmental education and marine education (Borden & Schettino, 1979). Therefore, it is also an important direction of marine/environmental education research to explore which factors will promote human beings to produce environmentally responsible behaviors (Roberts & Bacon, 1997). The theory of planned behavior proposed by Ajzen (1991) is considered to be an important reference theory for explaining behavior. Although the theory of planned behavior has a fairly good explanation of behavior, in recent years, many scholars have tried to adjust the theory and further explore key factors to improve the explanation rate of behavior. Based on literature analysis, we believe that "perceived threat" and "empathy" are factors that were rarely mentioned in the past, but may have an important impact.
    The purpose of this study is to attempt to assess the possible factors affecting environmentally responsible behaviors related to the generation of marine debris through a questionnaire survey. In addition to (1) attitudes towards marine debris, (2) subjective norms towards marine debris, and (3) perceptual control over marine debris-related behaviors that have been mentioned in previous theories, the research variables also try to incorporate (4) Knowledge of responsible actions related to marine debris, (5) perceived threat to marine debris (believing that marine debris has affected you) and (6) empathy for the marine were added to the model to assess these The degree of impact of variables on environmentally responsible behaviors related to marine debris. The above variables develop an assessment tool in the form of a scale. This study recruited 610 subjects to participate (including 300 elementary school students and 310 high school students). Multiple regression analysis shows that the above six factors have a significant positive correlation with the willingness to act responsible for the environment related to marine debris. In the part of elementary school subjects, the overall explanation rate reached 66%; in the high school part, the overall explanation rate reached 59%.
    The results of this study show that perceived threat and empathy, two previously rarely mentioned factors, are significantly positively correlated with marine debris-related environmentally responsible behaviors. Therefore, in the future marine debris policy or marine education planning, in addition to the knowledge and attitude enhancement that was emphasized in the past, we should also think about how to promote the generation of environmentally responsible behaviors related to marine debris by guiding the public's perceived threat and empathy.

    第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的、問題與假設 10 第三節 研究限制 13 第貳章 研究方法 15 第一節 研究工具設計 15 第二節 研究對象及抽樣方式 17 第三節 問卷發放流程 18 第四節 資料分析方法 19 第參章 研究結果 23 第一節 問卷施測結果 23 第二節 變項相關性分析 26 第三節 獨立樣本T檢定分析 29 第四節 多元回歸分析 30 第肆章 研究結果討論 35 第一節 敘述統計分析結果討論 35 第二節 相關性分析結果討論 36 第三節 獨立樣本T檢定分析結果討論 39 第四節 多元回歸分析結果討論 41 第五節 建議 44 參考文獻 45 一、中文部分 45 二、英文部分 47 附錄 55

    毛國楠、劉政宏、彭淑玲、李維光、陳慧娟(2008)。能力信念、學業自我價值後效與學業成就對國小學生學習動機與學習情緒之影響。教育心理學報,39(4),569-588。
    行政院環境保護署(2019)。臺灣海洋廢棄物治理行動方案(第二版)。臺北市:行政院環境保護署。
    杜玉娟、莊荏惠(2016)。行為意圖之研究—以採購消防產品為例。
    李明嘉(2006)。海洋環境教育教學對學童知識、態度與行為影響研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台中教育大學環境教育研究所,台中。
    李城忠(2008)。應用統計學SPSS。新北市:新文京開發出版。
    吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    吳怡瀅(2016)。國小兒童自我概念、幸福感與利社會行為之相關研究。未出版碩士論文。國立臺中教育大學,台中。
    吳淑鶯、陳瑞和(2006)。計劃行為理論應用於網路書店購買行為之研究。中華管理評論,9(4),1-23。
    周尚曄、李岳庭(2012)。社會新鮮人學生時期友誼的維持與轉變探討。台灣心理諮商季刊,4(4),37-54。
    林志成(2019)。中時新聞網。青少年環保行動 國小生贏過高中生(民108年5月8日)。檢自https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20190508004294-260405?chdtv (Jan, 16, 2023)
    海洋委員會海洋保育署海廢行動計畫網頁,網頁內容(民111年9月28日)。檢自https://www.oca.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=158&parentpath=0,8,72 (Dec, 26, 2022)
    海洋委員會海洋保育署iOcean海洋保育網網頁,海洋廢棄物管理(民108年9月4日)。檢自https://iocean.oca.gov.tw/OCA_OceanConservation/PUBLIC/Marine_Litter_v2.aspx (Dec, 20, 2022)
    唐貺怡、周淑嬌、黃凱羚、葉國樑、黃禎貞、唐孝蘭、...、石玲如(2009)。國中生環境行爲意圖及相關因素研究—以台北縣某國中學生爲例。學校衛生,54,51-67。
    高維敏(2011)。國民中小學教師對普通海洋教育政策評估研究-以四縣市為例。
    許世璋(1999)。環保團體成員負責任行為的預測變項之比較研究。國科會八十八年度專題研究計畫NSC,88-2511。
    許世璋(2000)。大學環境教育介入研究—著重學生環境行動與其它相關環境素養變項之成效分析。2000年度環境教育研討會論文彙編,301-314。
    許世璋(2001)。我們真能教育出可解決環境問題的公民嗎?-論環境教育與環境行動。中等教育,52(2),52-75。
    許世璋(2003)。影響花蓮環保團體積極成員其環境行動養成之重要生命經驗研究。科學教育學刊,11(2),121-139。
    黃啟明(2002)。國民中學高關懷學生參與休閒活動行為意圖及其影響因素之研究-計劃行為理論運用與驗證。未出版碩士論文,國立體育學院體育研究所,臺中市。
    葉盈君(2012)。淺談計畫行為理論。檢自https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=2&edm_no=51&content_no=1421 (Dec, 21, 2022)
    蔡佩芬(2003)。培養孩子的自信與自尊。檢自https://bible.fhl.net/sundayschool/sundayschool25292.html (Jan, 12, 2023)
    鄭淞仁、何小曼(2009)。國小高年級學童環境價值觀與環境行為之研究-以「昆蟲與環境」教學活動為例。環境教育月刊,11,39-59。
    歐蓁瑛(2001)。態度與主觀規範對行為意圖之影響研究—以壽險業為例。未出版碩士論文,國立成功大學企業管理學系,台南。
    鍾嘉怡(2021)。動物同理心課程成效之研究-以臺北市立動物園黑猩猩戶外教學為例。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所,臺北。
    謝雯玲、王文博(2014)。以計畫行為理論及調節變數探討民眾利用桃園自行車道從事娛樂與運動的意圖。臺灣體育運動管理學報,14(2),253-290。
    蘇榮裕(2015)。計畫行為理論應用在中華職棒現場觀眾運動賞析行為之研究。運動休閒管理學報,12(1),85-96。
    Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
    Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. Attitude structure and function, 241, 274.
    Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
    Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1992). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of leisure research. 24(3), 207-224.
    Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2008). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, 1980. NJ: Prentice Hall. Albert JM. Mediation analysis via potential outcomes models. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 1282-1304.
    Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitude, intentions, and perceived behavior control. Journal of experimental social psychology, 22(5), 453-474.
    Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behavior: Reactions and reflections. Psychology and Health, 26(9), 1113-1127.
    Ajzen, I., & Klobas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic research, 29, 203-232.
    Ando, K., Yorifuji, K., Ohnuma, S., Matthies, E., & Kanbara, A. (2015). Transmitting pro‐environmental behaviours to the next generation: A comparison between G ermany and J apan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 134-144.
    Bang, H. K., Ellinger, A. E., Hadjimarcou, J., & Traichal, P. A. (2000). Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychology & Marketing, 17(6), 449-468.
    Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Zero degrees of empathy: A new theory of human cruelty. Penguin uk.
    Barrett, T., & Feng, Y. (2021). Evaluation of food safety curriculum effectiveness: A longitudinal study of high-school-aged youths’ knowledge retention, risk-perception, and perceived behavioral control. Food Control, 121, 107587.
    Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656-1666.
    Batson, C. D. (2014). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Psychology Press.
    Berenguer, J. (2007). The effect of empathy in proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors. Environment and behavior, 39(2), 269-283.
    Berenguer, J. (2010). The effect of empathy in environmental moral reasoning. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 110-134.
    Boele, S., Van der Graaff, J., De Wied, M., Van der Valk, I. E., Crocetti, E., & Branje, S. (2019). Linking parent–child and peer relationship quality to empathy in adolescence: A multilevel meta-analysis. Journal of youth and adolescence, 48, 1033-1055.
    Boksberger, P. E., Bieger, T., & Laesser, C. (2007). Multidimensional analysis of perceived risk in commercial air travel. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(2), 90-96.
    Borden, R. J., & Schettino, A. P. (1979). Determinants of environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 10(4), 35-39.
    Bradley, J. C., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M., (1999). Relationship Between Environmental Knowledge and Environmental Attitude of High School Students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(3), 17-21.
    Bragg, E. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal of environmental psychology, 16(2), 93-108.
    Christov-Moore, L., Simpson, E. A., Coudé, G., Grigaityte, K., Iacoboni, M., & Ferrari, P. F. (2014). Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Neuroscience & biobehavioral reviews, 46, 604-627.
    Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development. Educational psychologist, 38(4), 207-234.
    Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113.
    De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2010). Relationships between Value Orientations, Self-Determined Motivational Types and Pro-Environmental Behavioural Intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 368-378.
    De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of environmental psychology, 42, 128-138.
    Doane, A. N., Pearson, M. R., & Kelley, M. L. (2014). Predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among college students: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 154-162.
    Elliott, M. A., Armitage, C. J., & Baughan, C. J. (2003). Drivers' compliance with speed limits: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 964.
    Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
    Fabes, R. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1998). Meta-analyses of age and sex differences in children’s and adolescents’ prosocial behavior. Handbook of child psychology, 3, 1-29.
    Farley, S. D., & Stasson, M. F. (2003). Relative influences of affect and cognition on behavior: Are feelings more related to blood donation intentions?. Experimental Psychology, 50(1), 55.
    Feshbach, N. D., & Feshbach, S. (1969). The relationship between empathy and aggression in two age groups. Developmental psychology, 1(2), 102.
    Finger Jr, J. A., & Silverman, M. (1966). Changes in academic performance in the junior high school. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 45(2), 157-164.
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2).
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Review of Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
    Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual review of psychology, 65, 541-579.
    Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American journal of health promotion, 11(2), 87-98.
    Han, H., Hsu, L. T. J., & Sheu, C. (2010). Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tourism Management, 31(3), 325-334
    Hartley, J. M., Higgins, K. M., Peterson, M. N., Stevenson, K. T. & Jackson, M. W. (2021). Perspective From a Youth Environmental Activist: Why Adults Will Listen to Youth in Politics. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 636583.
    Hines, J. (1985). An analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(3), 655.
    Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of environmental education, 18(2), 1-8.
    Hoffmann, R., & Muttarak, R. (2020). Greening through schooling: understanding the link between education and pro-environmental behavior in the Philippines. Environmental Research Letters, 15(1), 014009.
    Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 307.
    Holmgren, R. A., Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). The relations of children’s situational empathy-related emotions to dispositional prosocial behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22(1), 169-193.
    Hsu, S. J. & Roth, R. E. (1998). An assessment of environmental literacy and analysis of predictors of responsible environmental behavior held by secondary teachers in the Hualien area of Taiwan. Environmental Education Research. 4(3), 229-249.
    Hsu, S. J. & Roth, R. E. (1999). Predicting Taiwanese secondary teachers’ responsible environmental behavior through environmental literacy variables. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 11-18.
    Hungerford, H. R., & Peyton, R. B. (1976). Teaching environmental education. Portland, Maine: J. Weston Walch.
    Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The journal of environmental education, 21(3), 8-21.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
    Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of moral thinking and choice in the years 10 to 16 (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Chicago).
    Krosnick, J. A., & Judd, C. M. (1982). Transitions in social influence at adolescence: Who induces cigarette smoking? Developmental Psychology, 18(3), 359.
    Ladd, G. W., Birch, S. H., & Buhs, E. S. (1999). Children's social and scholastic lives in kindergarten: Related spheres of influence? Child development, 70(6), 1373-1400.
    LaGrange, R. L., & Ferraro, K. F. (1989). Assessing age and gender differences in perceived risk and fear of crime. Criminology, 27(4), 697-720.
    Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process.
    Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company.
    Lee, S., Park, H. J., Kim, K. H., & Lee, C. K. (2021). A moderator of destination social responsibility for tourists’ pro-environmental behaviors in the VIP model. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 20, 100610.
    Lee, T. H., Jan, F. H., & Yang, C. C. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring environmentally responsible behaviors from the perspective of community-based tourists. Tourism Management, 36, 454-468.
    Li, X., Liu, Z., & Wuyun, T. (2022). Environmental value and pro-environmental behavior among young adults: The mediating role of risk perception and moral anger. Frontiers in psychology, 13.
    Maleksaeidi, H., & Keshavarz, M. (2019). What influences farmers' intentions to conserve on-farm biodiversity? An application of the theory of planned behavior in fars province, Iran. Global Ecology and Conservation, 20, e00698.
    Marcinkowski, T. J., & Rehring, L. (1995). The secondary school report: A report on the development, pilot testing, validation, and field testing of–The secondary school environmental literacy assessment instrument.
    Maslow, A. H. (1954). The instinctoid nature of basic needs. Journal of personality.
    Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(4), 503-515.
    Miller, K. (2005). Communications theories; perspectives, processes, and contexts. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Moan, I. S. V., & Rise, J., (2006). Predicting smoking reduction among adolescents using an extended version of the theory of planned behaviour. Psychology & Health, 21(6), 717-738.
    Musitu-Ferrer, D., Esteban-Ibañez, M., León-Moreno, C., & García, O. F. (2019). Is school adjustment related to environmental empathy and connectedness to nature?. Psychosocial Intervention, 28(2), 101-110.
    Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders: A handbook, 97-146.
    Oreg, S., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2006). Predicting proenvironmental behavior cross-nationally: Values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief-norm theory. Environment and behavior, 38(4), 462-483.
    Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (1996). Primary science: past and future directions.
    Owens, K. A., (2018). Using experiential marine debris education to make an impact: Collecting debris, informing policy makers, and influencing students. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 127, 804-810.
    Palmer, J. A., Suggate, J., Bajd, B., & Tsaliki, E. (1998). Significant influences on the development of adults’ environmental awareness in the UK, Slovenia and Greece. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), 429-444.
    Piaget, J. (1952). The fourth stage: The coordination of the secondary schemata and their application to new situations.
    Prochaska, J. J., Sallis, J. F., Slymen, D. J., & McKenzie, T. L. (2003). A longitudinal study of children’s enjoyment of physical education. Pediatric Exercise Science, 15(2), 170-178.
    Riess, H. (2017). The science of empathy. Journal of patient experience, 4(2), 74-77.
    Roberts, J. A., & Bacon, D. R. (1997). Exploring the subtle relationships between environmental concern and ecologically conscious consumer behavior. Journal of business research, 40(1), 79-89.
    Rohmann, A., Florack, A., & Piontkowski, U. (2006). The role of discordant acculturation attitudes in perceived threat: An analysis of host and immigrant attitudes in Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 683-702.
    Royzman, E. B., & Kumar, R. (2001). On the relative preponderance of empathetic sorrow and its relation to commonsense morality. New Ideas in Psychology, 19(2), 131–144.
    Saari, U. A., Damberg, S., Frömbling, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189, 107155.
    Schultz, P. W. (2000). New environmental theories: Empathizing with nature: The effects of Perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 391-406.
    Sevillano, V., Aragones, J. I., & Schultz, P. W. (2007). Perspective taking, environmental concern, and the moderating role of dispositional empathy. Environment and Behavior, 39(5), 685-705.
    Shelton, M. L., & Rogers, R. W. (1981). Fear-arousing and empathy-arousing appeals to help: The pathos of persuasion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11(4), 366-378.
    Sivek, D. J., & Hungerford, H. (1989) Predictors of responsible behavior in three Wisconsin conservation organizations. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(2), 35-40.
    Smith-Sebasto, N. J. (2010). The Effects of an Environmental Studies Course on Selected Variables Related to Environmentally Responsible Behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 26(4), 30-34.
    Smith-Sebasto, N. J., & D'Costa, A. (1995). Designing a likert-type scale to predict environmentally responsible behavior in undergraduate students: A multistep process. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(1), 14–20.
    Sobel MEd, D. (1996). Beyond ecophobia: Reclaiming the heart in nature education. Orion Society.
    Stern, P. C. (1992). What psychology knows about energy conservation. American psychologist, 47(10), 1224.
    Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424.
    Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1317–1338.
    Tam, K. P. (2013). Dispositional empathy with nature. Journal of environmental psychology, 35, 92-104.
    Tanner, T. (1980). Significant life experiences: A new research area in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20-24.
    Thapa, B. (1999). Environmentalism: The relation of environmental attitudes and environmentally responsible behaviors among undergraduate students. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 19(5), 426-438.
    Van Matre, S. (1990). Earth education: A new beginning. Institute for Earth Education, Cedar Cove, Greenville, WV 24945.
    Zemore, S. E., & Ajzen, I. (2014). Predicting substance abuse treatment completion using a new scale based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46(2), 174-182.
    Ziouzios, D., Rammos, D., Bratitsis, T., & Dasygenis, M. (2021). Utilizing educational robotics for environmental empathy cultivation in primary schools. Electronics, 10(19), 2389.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE