本研究利用乾銑削6061-T6鋁合金薄件時，分別探討對表面粗糙度及曲線輪廓度之影響特性。利用田口穩健製程設計探討表面粗糙度與曲線輪廓度之單一品質特性最佳參數組合，以L16(45)直交表規劃參數組合執行實驗，選用切削速度、每刃進給量、軸向深度、預留量與刀刃數為製程參數，分別進行濕銑削及乾銑削實驗，為減少時效變形影響，將工件加工後放置三天後再量測。實驗結果進行田口望小分析與變異數分析分別求得各品質特性之最佳參數組合。接著利用灰關聯生成正規化後，設定辨識係數計算灰關聯係數，並透過模糊理論求得衡量指標(MPCI)，利用此指標進行田口望大分析找出濕銑削與乾銑削切削在同時考量表面粗糙度和曲線輪廓度的多重品質特性最佳參數組合。研究結果顯示單一品質特性最佳化後濕銑削表面粗糙度平均值0.1337µm及曲線輪廓度3µm；乾銑削表面粗糙度平均值0.1822µm與曲線輪廓度1µm，因為乾銑削無切削液沖刷鋁屑進而黏屑導致粗糙度較高，但最佳化後切削速度較高能有效降低變形量。多重品質特性最佳化後濕銑削表面粗糙度平均值0.2618µm，曲線輪廓度為5µm；而乾銑削表面粗糙度平均值為0.1861µm，曲線輪廓度為5µm。乾銑削比濕式銑削可得到更好的表面粗糙度改善值約29%，但曲線輪廓度兩種環境之實驗結果皆為5µm，得知在不影響加工品質要求下，可採用乾銑削減少切削液使用來達到節省成本與綠色切削之目的。

In this study, when dry milling 6061-T6 aluminum alloy thin parts, the characteristics of the influence on the surface roughness and contour of curved line were discussed. Using Taguchi's robust process design to explore the best parameter combination of single quality characteristics of surface roughness and contour of curved line, the experiment was carried out with L16(45) orthogonal arrays planning parameter combination, and the cutting speed, feed per edge, axial depth, pre the allowance and the number of cutting edges are process parameters. Wet milling and dry milling experiments were performed separately. In order to reduce the effect of aging deformation, the workpiece was measured after being placed for three days after processing. The results of the experiment were analyzed by Taguchi Minori analysis and variance analysis to obtain the best parameter combination for each quality characteristic. Then use the gray correlation to generate the normalization of the experimental results, then set the identification coefficient to calculate the gray correlation coefficient, and obtain the measurement index (MPCI) through fuzzy theory, and use this index to conduct Taguchi analysis to find out the wet milling and dry milling cutting in It also considers the best parameter combination of multiple quality characteristics of surface roughness and curve profile. The research results show that after optimization of single quality characteristics, the average value of wet-milling surface roughness is 0.1337µm and the curve profile is 3µm; the average value of dry milling surface roughness is 0.1822µm and curve profile is 1µm. Sticky chips result in higher roughness, but the optimized cutting speed can effectively reduce the amount of deformation. After optimizing multiple quality characteristics, the average surface roughness of wet milling is 0.2618µm, and the profile of the curve is 5µm; while the average surface roughness of dry milling is 0.1861µm, and the profile of the curve is 5µm. Dry milling can obtain a better surface roughness improvement value of about 29% than wet milling, but the experimental results of curve profile in both environments are 5µm. It is known that under the same processing quality, the use of cutting fluid can be reduced to achieve The purpose of cost saving and green cutting.

[1] A. Thakur, S. Gangopadhyay, 2016, “Dry machining of nickel-based super alloy as a sustainable alternative using TiN/TiAlN coated tool , ” Journal of Cleaner Production 129, India, pp. 256-268.
[2] Xiaoliang Liang, Zhanqiang Liu, Wentao Liu, Xiaojun Li, 2019, “Sustainability assessment of dry turning Ti-6Al-4V employing uncoated cemented carbide tools as clean manufacturing process, ” Journal of Cleaner Production 214 (2019), China, pp. 279-289.
[3] A. Devillez, G. Le Coz, S. Dominiak, D. Dudzinski, 2011, “Dry machining of Inconel 718, workpiece surface integrity, ” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 211 (2011), France, pp. 1590-1598.
[4] S. Hemakumar, P. Kuppan, 2017, “Experimental Investigations on the Machinability of Inconel 625 under Dry Cutting Environment, ” Materials Today: Proceedings 5 (2018), India, pp. 11718-11726.
[5] A.D. Pathak, R.S. Warghane, S.U. Deokar, 2017, “Optimization of cutting parameters in Dry Turning of AISI A2 Tool Steel using Carbide Tool by Taguchi Based Fuzzy Logics, ” Materials Today: Proceedings 5 (2018),India, pp. 5082-5090.
[6] 林其德，2012，鎳基合金端銑削切削溫度與刀具壽命研究，博士論文，國立中正大學，機械工程學系，嘉義。
[7] 高霽，曹國強，2005，，「利用CO2高能激光輔助乾式切削GH761試驗研究」，遼寧工程技術大學學報，遼寧，文章編號：1008-0562(2005)05-0739-03。
[8] 陳藝民，2013，304不銹鋼薄板高速銑削之特性探討，碩士論文，國立屏東科技大學，機械工程研究所，屏東。
[9] Garimella Sridhar, Poosa Ramesh Babu, 2016, “Effect of material removal rate on machining Contour of thin-wall thin-floor components, ” Materials Today: Proceedings 5, India, pp. 27018-27027.
[10] 陳郁雯，李旭昇，黃聖杰，李輝煌，2018，「智慧型刀把於薄件加工切削力驗證及工件體積誤差補償分析」，2018台灣精密工程學會，台南，論文編號：B35。
[11] Liu Gnag, 2007, “Study on deformation of titanium thin-walled part in milling process, ” journal of materials processing technology 209, China, pp.2788-2793.
[12] 戴仲裕，陳科翰，黃啟榮，彭達仁，2018，「金屬薄件製程解析與高效率製造技術」，工具機技術專輯，台灣。
[13] 魏政宇，2012，高速銑削AISI304不銹鋼薄板特性之探討，碩士論文，國立屏科大學，機械工程研究所，屏東。
[14] 陳俊龍，2007，SKD11模具硬化材料之高速切削及薄件振動分析，碩士論文，國立高雄應用科技大學，模具工程系，高雄。
[15] 楊益綸，2018，酒桶刀應用於五軸工具機加工曲面時最佳化參數之探討，碩士論文，國立屏東科技大學，機械工程研究所，屏東。
[16] 黃勝正，2006，灰色預測中辨識係數對鉛酸電池放電系統影響之研究，碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學，機電工程系
[17] 許哲維，2013，田口法應用於深孔鑽削S45C中碳鋼之特性探討，碩士論文，國立屏東科技大學，機械工程研究所，屏東。
[18] 張育誌，2018，五軸工具機高速銑削鎳基合金渦輪葉片最佳化參數之探討，碩士論文，國立屏東科技大學，機械工程研究所，屏東。
[19] 言論嘆，2019，「乾式加工技術中刀具的選擇」，科技。
[20] Wikipedia, 2017, “Drilling , ” Wikimedia Foundation, Inc, Available at: www.wikipedia.org, Accessed 6 May 2020.
[21] 王進德，2007，類神經網路與模糊控制理論入門與應用，全華圖書股份有限公司，台北，第7-20頁。
[22] 華人百科，2016，「表面粗糙度」。
[23] GUANGDONG KEJIAN INSTRUMENT CO, LTD, 2019, ” Contour Measurement , ” Accessed 16 November 2020.