簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 倪湘志
NI,HSIANG-CHIH
論文名稱: 應用水工模型於溪床土砂災害治理對策之評估研究
Assessment of sediment disaster and feasibility of countermeasures using physical hydraulic model
指導教授: 吳嘉俊
Wu,Chia-Chun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 水土保持系所
Department of Soil and Water Conservation
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 104
中文關鍵詞: 土砂災害溪流治理水工模型
外文關鍵詞: Sediment disaster, Stream governance, Hydraulic model
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST202100420
相關次數: 點閱:29下載:12
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統
  • 2009年8月莫拉克颱風因強降雨引發嚴重坡地崩塌,大量土砂造成林邊溪支流來社溪溪床沖淤變化及下游地區土砂淤積,並直接衝擊位處低位河階的聚落安全。來社溪高變動的土砂,一直以來困擾著主管機關。地方政府自2012年起長期投入溪段清疏及緊急治理工程,亦受到鄰近保全對象對於成效的質疑。
    本研究以來社溪與內社溪匯流口上下游約2公里溪段,做為水工模型試驗範圍。水工模型試驗之目的,在於克服自2009年8月莫拉克颱風以來來社溪所面臨的整治困難與疑慮,其中包含:(1).清疏工程對於高變動溪床是否有效的質疑、(2).多年以來清疏所產生之土砂於溪岸堆置遭溪水侵襲的問題、(3).東部落上游護岸基腳屢遭溪水沖刷之控制對策、(4).來義鄉-D001大規模崩塌潛勢區坡趾淘刷問題等。本研究除了探討來社溪所面臨高變動溪床土砂沖淤及治理的問題外,並設法找出最合適的治理對策。
    水工模型試驗的結果發現,河道清淤的作法雖然於100年重現期距的極端降雨事件下無法達到預期功能,但在常時條件下,仍不失為經濟且有效的治理方案。東部落上游護岸基腳屢遭溪水沖刷問題,可藉由沉箱保護工搭配系列丁壩解決;系列丁壩則可解決大規模崩塌潛勢區坡趾淘刷問題,但工程所用經費龐大,是否符合經濟效益仍待主管機關綜合評估。

    2009 Morakot Typhon caused severe landslide and debris disaster in Tainan Branch Office jurisdiction. Debris and sediment directly induced scour as well as sedimentation in Linbian River. They also indirectly impacted the settlement situated along low-stage river terraces. Highly alternated sedimentation in Lai-Sher Stream has always troubled the corresponding authorities. The local government has invested in river dredging and emergency treatment projects since 2012. However, all these efforts have been questioned by neighboring settlement about the effectiveness.
    This study takes the 2-km river reach covering the upstream and downstream of the confluence of Lai-Sher and Nei-Sher streams and uses as the scope of hydraulic model tests. The purpose of this study is to overcome the difficulties and doubts in the remediation of Lai-Sher Stream since Typhoon Morakot in August 2009. Questions need to be answered include: (1) the effectiveness of sediment dredging operations, (2) safety of the yards along the Lai-Sher Stream that used to store sediment from dredging operations, (3) countermeasures for the protection of revetment foundation upstream of Easy Village, which has been repeatedly eroded by the stream, (4) scour at the foothill of Lai-Yi Township-D001 Large-scale landslide potential site. In addition to finding answers for the preceding questions, this study also tries to find the most appropriate control measures for future governance.
    Results of the hydraulic model tests found that, although the method of river dredging cannot achieve the expected function under the extreme rainfall event with a return period of 100 years, it is still an economical and effective treatment plan under normal conditions. The foundation of the bank revetment upstream of East Village has been repeatedly scourged by streams, which can be solved by using caisson protection structures with a series of spur dikes. Series of spur dikes can also solve the problem of scouring at the foothill of D001 Large-scale landslide potential site. However, the project cost is huge and may still need a comprehensive assessment by the corresponding agencies for the economical benefit.

    目錄
    摘要 i
    Abstract ii
    謝誌 v
    目錄 vi
    表目錄 ix
    圖目錄 xi
    第一章 前言與研究動機 1
    第二章 研究集水區概況及國外高變動溪流案例 3
    第一節 來社溪子集水區概況 3
    第二節 地質 4
    第三節 水文及降雨 7
    第四節 崩塌地分布與變遷 14
    第五節 溪流變遷 18
    第六節 主管機關作為 24
    第七節 國外沖淤文獻或評估案例 35
    第三章 試驗材料與方法 41
    第一節 水工模型設計及製作 41
    第二節 水工模型試驗 54
    第四章 結果與討論 67
    第一節無防護措施試驗成果 67
    第二節 不同清疏試驗成果 71
    第三節 不同流量對於清疏之影響 84
    第四節 系列丁壩工程方案試驗 88
    第五節 清疏土方堆積區安全評估 98
    第五章 結論與建議 99
    第一節 結論 99
    第二節 建議 100
    六、參考文獻 102

    參考文獻
    行政院農業委員會水土保持局,2017,來社溪集水區調查規劃成果報告書。
    行政院農業委員會水土保持局,2019,高變動溪床沖淤變化對保全對象之衝擊及因應評估(以來社溪內社溪滙流口為例)成果報告書。
    行政院農業委員會水土保持局,2020,高變動溪床沖淤變化對保全對象之衝擊及因應評估(以來社溪內社溪滙流口為例)第二年成果報告書。
    行政院農業委員會水土保持局臺南分局,2011,高屏溪與林邊溪上游山坡地土砂生產運移變遷調查分析計畫(1)成果報告。
    行政院農業委員會水土保持局臺南分局,2012,高屏溪與林邊溪上游山坡地土砂生產運移變遷調查分析計畫(2)成果報告。
    行政院農業委員會水土保持局臺南分局,2015,來社溪集水區土砂變遷與分析(1/3)。
    行政院農業委員會水土保持局臺南分局,2017,來社溪集水區土砂變遷與分析(2/3)。
    經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所,2011,水工模型試驗參考手冊。
    Chang, Li-Sho 1972. Miocene / Pliocene Boundary In Taiwan, International Geological Congress, 24th, Abstr., Resumes; No.24, pp.535-536.
    Ikeda, A., Igarashi, Y., Fushiki, O., Uemori, H., Igarashi, S., Hasegawa, M. and Sako, H. 2018. Property .f Sediment Movement in Azusa River (Kamikochi), Symposium Proceedings of the INTERPRAENENT 2018 in the Pacific Rim: 78-84.
    Julien, P.Y. 2002. River Mechanics, Cambridge University Press.
    Knighton, D. 2015. Fluvial Forms and Processes – A New Perspective, Chapter 5 – Adjustment of channel form, Routledge, NY., 151-260.
    Kharismalatri, H.S., Ishikawa, Y., Gomi, T. and Shiraki, K. 2018. Small flume experiment on deep-seated landslide collapsed material movement, Symposium Proceedings of the INTERPRAENENT 2018 in the Pacific Rim:132-138.
    Kondolf, G.M. 1994. Geomorphic and environmental effects of instream gravel mining. Landsc. Urban Plan. 28: 225–243.
    Kondolf, G.M. 1997. Hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environ. Manag. 21: 533–551.
    Korup, O. 2004. Landslide-induced river channel avulsions in mountain catchment of southwest New Zealand, Geomorphology 63: 57-80.
    Padmalal, D., Maya, K., Impacts, E. and Studies, S.C. 2014. Sand Mining: Environmental Impacts and Selected Case Studies. Springer, New York.
    Pryor, B.S., Lisle, T., Montoya, D.S. and Hilton, S. 2011. Transport and storage of bed material in a gravel-bed channel during episodes of aggradation and degradation: a field and flume study, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 36: 2028-2041.
    Rinaldi, M., Wyz, B. and Surian, N. 2005. Sediment mining in alluvial channels: physical effects and management perspectives. River Res. Appl. 21: 805–828.
    Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. CATENA 22(3): 169-199.
    Rosgen, D.L. 2001. A stream channel stability assessment methodology. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, Reno, NV. Vol. 1: II-18 – II-26.
    Schoklitsch, A. 1934. Der Geschiebetrieb und die Geschiebekraft, Wasserkraft Wasserwirt., 29(4): 37–43.
    Schoklitsch,A.1950 ‘Uber die Verkleinerung der Ges-chiebe in Flusslaufen' ,Sitzber. Akad. Wiss. Wien,Abt. Iia,vol. 142,no. 8 。
    Sims, A.J. and Rutherfurd, I.D. 2017. Management responses to pulses of bedload sediment in rivers, Geomorphology, 294:70-86.
    Simons, D.B. and Richardson, E.V. 1966. Resistance to Flow in Alluvial Channels, U.S. Geol. Surv., Prof. Pap. 422‐J.
    經濟部中央地質調查所地質資料整合查詢系統,http://gis.moeacgs.gov.tw/。

    下載圖示
    QR CODE