簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許糸淇
Syu, Mi-Ci
論文名稱: 飼糧中添加酵母細胞壁及乳酸菌合生劑對產蛋雞及肉雞生產性能之影響
Effect of dietary supplementing yeast cell wall and lactic acid bacteria synbiotics on production performances of laying hens and broilers
指導教授: 謝豪晃
Hsieh, How-Hong
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 農學院 - 動物科學與畜產系所
Department of Animal Science
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 97
中文關鍵詞: 肉雞乳酸菌產蛋雞生產性能合生劑酵母細胞壁
外文關鍵詞: Broilers, Lactic acid bacteria, Laying hen, Production performances, synbiotic, Yeast cell wall
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6346/THE.NPUST.AS.002.2018.D06
相關次數: 點閱:107下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統
  • 本試驗旨在探討飼糧中添加酵母細胞壁(yeast cell wall)及乳酸菌(lactic acid bacteria)對雞隻生產性能、蛋品質及屠體性狀之影響。試驗一為蛋雞試驗,選用68週齡的海蘭W-36及海蘭銀褐色蛋雞兩個品系,各96隻,共192隻,採4處理 × 4重複,每重複組6隻雞,採個別籠飼。4處理組分別為:BD(基礎飼糧)、BP 0.75(添加酵母細胞壁及益生菌各375 ppm)、BP 1.0(添加酵母細胞壁及益生菌各500 ppm)、BP 1.5(添加酵母細胞壁及益生菌各750 ppm)。試驗期間,每14天為一週期,共6個週期。每日每隻蛋雞給予定量飼糧,於固定時間收集剩料及記錄產蛋,計算產蛋性能(產蛋率、產蛋量、採食量和飼料換蛋率),每週期固定時間集雞蛋樣品,測定蛋品質,及進行儲存試驗。於試驗結束後,經採血檢測血液生化值,同時進行腸道菌相及腸道絨毛型態檢測。試驗二為肉雞試驗,使用一日齡羅斯(Ross)公肉雞352隻,採4處理 × 4重複之試驗設計。4處理組分別為:BD(基礎飼糧)、BP 0.75(添加酵母細胞壁及益生菌各375 ppm)、BP 1.5(添加酵母細胞壁及益生菌各750 ppm)、BP 2.0(添加酵母細胞壁及益生菌各1000 ppm),於14、28、35及40日齡時進行生長性能測定,並於生長試驗結束後,進行屠體性狀測定及腸道型態檢測。試驗一結果顯示,以BP 1.5組比對照組、BP 0.75及BP 1.0組,有顯著較高的產蛋率、產蛋量和攝食量(P < 0.05)。BP 0.75、BP 1.0及BP 1.5組之蛋重顯著較對照組重,也具顯著較佳的飼料換蛋率。於蛋品質方面,BP 1.5組之蛋黃顏色評分顯著較對照組低,BP 0.75組之蛋殼厚度顯著比對照組厚(P < 0.05);蛋殼強度在各處理組間則無顯著差異。試驗二結果顯示,以BP 2.0組顯著較對照組提升肉雞體重及平均隻日體增重(P < 0.05)。在屠體性狀方面則各組間無顯著差異。腸道菌相方面,試驗一以BP 1.0組之腸道中有顯著較高的乳酸菌數。試驗二以BP 2.0組腸道有顯著較高之乳酸菌含量(P < 0.05)。試驗一蛋雞空腸絨毛高度以BP 1.5組顯著高於對照組;迴腸絨毛高度以BP 0.75、BP1.0及BP1.5組顯著高於對照組;絨毛高度與腺窩深度比則以1.5 BP組顯著高於對照組及BP 0.75組。於試驗二,有添加酵母細胞壁及乳酸菌之處理組的肉雞空腸及迴腸絨毛高度顯著高於對照組,且以BP 2.0之處理組具有顯著較高的空腸及迴腸絨毛高度和腺窩比(P < 0.05)。綜合上述,飼糧中適量添加酵母細胞壁及乳酸菌,可以提升蛋雞的產蛋率、蛋重及產蛋量,並改善飼料換蛋率;亦可提升肉雞的上市體重及平均隻日體增重。因此,此酵母細胞壁及乳酸菌混合之合生劑,可作為非抗生素的飼料添加劑,使用於家禽飼料中。

    The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of dietary supplementing yeast cell wall and lactic acid bacteria on production performances, egg quality and carcass traits of chickens. Exp. 1, one hundred and ninety six laying hens at 68 weeks of age from two commercial strains Hy-line W-36 and Hy-line Sliver Brown were randomly assigned to each of 4 treatments × 4 replicates experimental design with 6 birds in each group, and were housed in individual battery cages. The four treatments were fed diets with BD (Corn-Soybean meal basal diet), BP 0.75 (with 375 ppm yeast cell wall and lactic acid bacteria, respectively), BP 1.0 (with 500 ppm yeast cell wall and lactic acid bacteria, respectively), and BP 1.5 (with 750 ppm yeast cell wall and lactic acid bacteria, respectively). The experiment was carried out for 6 periods (2 wks for a period). Egg weight and feed consumption were recorded daily. At the end of the experiment, two hens from each treatment were randomly selected for serum biochemistry, gut microflora and gut morphology test. Exp. 2, three hundred and fifty two day-old Ross male broilers were randomly allotted into 4 treatments × 4 replicates experimental design with 22 birds in each pen. The four treatments were fed diets with BD (Corn-Soybean meal basal diet), BP 0.75 (with 375 ppm yeast cell wall and lactic acid bacteria, respectively), BP 1.5 (with 750 ppm yeast cell wall and lactic acid bacteria, respectively), and BP 2.0 (with 1000 ppm yeast cell wall and lactic acid bacteria, respectively). Growth performances were measured at 14, 28, and 35 days of age. Six birds from each treatment were randomly selected at the end of growth trial for carcass traits, gut microflora and morphology test. The result of Exp. 1 showed that the egg production, egg mass and feed consumption were significantly higher for BP 1.5 group than control, BP 0.75, and BP 1.0 groups. All BP treated groups had higher egg weight and better feed wt./egg wt. ratio than control group (P < 0.05). The results of Exp. 2 showed that BP 2.0 group increased broiler body weight and average daily gain than control group (P < 0.05). In Exp. 1, the Lactobacilli count in jejunum was significantly higher for BP 1.0 group than control and BP 0.75 groups. In Exp. 2, the Lactobacilli counts in jejunm and rectum were significantly higher for BP 2.0 group than control, BP 0.75 and BP 1.5 groups (P < 0.05). The result of intestinal morphology showed that, in Exp. 1, the villus height of laying hen jejunum was significantly higher in the BP 1.5 group than control group. The villus height of ileum in BP 0.75, BP 1.0 and BP 1.5 groups were significantly higher than control group. The villus height/crypt depth ratio was significantly higher in the BP 1.5 group than control and BP 0.75 groups. In Exp. 2, the villus height of broiler jejunum and ileum from all BP treated groups were significantly higher than control group, and the BP 2.0 group had significantly highest villus height/crypt depth ratio of jejunum and ileum. The overall results indicated that dietary supplementing of yeast cell wall and lactic acid bacteria synbiotics increased egg production, egg mass, egg weight, feed consumption and improved feed conversion ratio in laying hens and increased body weight, and body weight gain in broiler, therefore such feed additive could be used as non-antibiotic feed additive in poultry diets.

    摘要..........I
    Abstract..........III
    謝誌..........V
    目錄..........VI
    圖表目錄..........VIII
    壹、前言..........1
    貳、文獻探討..........2
    一、益生菌..........2
    (一)益生菌定義..........2
    (二)腸道菌叢建立..........3
    (三)益生菌的作用機制..........5
    (四)益生菌的選擇與特性..........7
    (五)乳酸菌之介紹..........11
    二、益生素..........12
    (一)益生素之介紹..........12
    (二)酵母菌與酵母細胞壁之介紹..........14
    參、材料方法..........20
    一、試驗動物及試驗設計..........20
    二、試驗飼量之添加劑..........20
    三、試驗飼糧與設計..........21
    四、飼養管理..........21
    (一)蛋雞飼養管理及光照計畫(試驗一)..........21
    (二)肉雞飼養管理(試驗二)..........22
    五、測定項目..........26
    (一)飼料採樣與一般成分分析..........26
    (二)蛋雞產蛋性能測定(試驗一)..........28
    (三)蛋品質測定(試驗一)..........28
    (四)儲存天數對豪式單位之影響測定(試驗一)..........29
    (五)肉雞生長性能測定(試驗二)..........29
    (六)屠體性狀(試驗二)..........29
    (七)腸道菌相測定..........30
    (八)腸道絨毛高度及腺窩深度測量..........32
    (九)血液生化值(試驗一)..........32
    (十)統計方法..........34
    肆、結果與討論..........37
    一、蛋雞產蛋性能..........37
    二、蛋品質..........50
    (一)蛋內部品質..........50
    (二)蛋殼品質..........56
    三、儲存天數對雞蛋品質豪氏單位之影響..........61
    四、肉雞生長性能..........66
    五、肉雞屠體率..........71
    六、腸道菌相..........73
    七、腸道黏膜型態..........76
    八、血液生化值..........80
    伍、結論..........82
    陸、參考文獻..........83
    附錄..........90
    作者簡介..........97

    任大勇、李昌、秦艷青、金寧一。2011。乳酸菌益生功能及作用機制研 究進展。中國獸醫雜誌。45(2):47-50。
    朱志明、朱旺明、藍漢冰、崔祥東。2014。釀酒酵母營養調控功能及其在水產飼料中的應用研究進展。動物營養學報。26(12):3550-3560.
    林志勳。2010。畜牧要覽飼料與營養篇。第407-444頁。睿焴出版社。屏東縣。
    邵強、黃友解、韓月、鄒梅、王友明。2017。酵母細胞壁的結構組成, 生物學功能及在養殖業中的應用。浙江畜牧獸醫。(1):13-16。
    黃美瑩。2006。乳酸菌之保健功效。水試專訊。14:43-4。
    Aguilar‐Uscanga, B., and J. M. Franҫois. 2003. A study of the yeast cell   wall composition and structure in response to growth conditions and mode of cultivation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 37(3):268-274.
    Ahmed, A. M. H., A. Rodriguez, M. L. Vidal, J. Gautron, J. Garcia-Ruiz, and Y. Nys. 2003. Effect of moult on eggshell quality. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:782-783.
    Alloui, M. N., W. Szczurek, and S. Świątkiewicz. 2013. The usefulness of prebiotics and probiotics in modern poultry nutrition: A review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 13(1):17-32.
    Berry, W. D. 2003. The physiology of induced molting. Poult. Sci. 82:71-980.
    Bradley, G. L., T. F. Savage., and K. I. Timm. 1994. The effect of supplementing diets with Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii on male poult performance and ileal morphology. Poult. Sci. 73:1766-1770.
    Brown, M. 2011. Modes of action of probiotics: recent developments. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 10(14):1895-1900.
    Chichlowski, M., J. Croom, B. W. McBride, G. B. Havenstein and M. D. Koci. 2007. Metabolic and physiological impact of probiotics or direct-fed-microbials on poultry: A brief review of current knowledge. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 6:694-704.
    Curtis, P. A., F. A. Gardner, and D. B. Mellor. 1985. A comparison of selected quality and compositional characteristics of brown and white shell eggs. I. Shell quality. Poult. Sci. 64:297-301.
    Das, L., E. Bhaumik, U. Raychaudhuri, R. Chakraborty. 2012. Role of nutraceuticals in human health. J. Food Sci. Technol. 49:173-183.
    Elaroussi, M. A., L. R. Forte, S. L. Eber, and H. V. Biellier. 1994. Calcium homeostasis in the laying hens. 1. age and dietary calcium effects. Poult. Sci. 73:1581-1589.
    Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J. App. Microbiol. 66(5):365-378.
    Gallazzi, D., A. Giardini, G. M. Mangiagalli, S. Marelli, V. Ferrazzi, C. Orsi, and G. L. Cavalchini. 2008. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL on laying hen performance. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 7(1):27-37.
    Ganguly S. 2013. Supplementation of prebiotics, probiotics and acids on immunity in poultry feed: a brief review. World Poult. Sci. J. 69:639-648.
    García-Hernández, Y. T. Pérez-Sánchez, R. Boucourt, J. L. Balcázar, J. R. Nicoli, J. Moreira-Silva, Z. Rodríguez, H. Fuertes, O. Nuñez, N. Albelo, and N. Halaihel. 2016. Isolation, characterization and evaluation of probiotic lactic acid bacteria for potential use in animal production. Res. Vet. Sci. 108:125-132.
    Gibson, G. R., and M. B. Roberfroid. 1995. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: Introducing the concept of prebiotics. J. Nutr. 125:1401-1412.
    Gurbuz, E., T. Balevi, V. Kurtoglu, and Y. Oznurlu. 2011. Use of yeast cell walls and Yucca schidigera extract in layer hens’ diets. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 10(2):134-138.
    Haddadin, M. S. Y., S. M. Abdulrahim, E. A. R. Hashlamoun, and R. K. Robinson. 1996. The effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the production and chemical composition of hen's eggs. Poult. Sci. 75(4):491-494.
    Haenel, H. and J. Bendig. 1975. Intestinal flora in health and disease. Progr. Food Nutr. Sci. 1:21-64
    Hashim, M., J. Fowler, A. Haq, and C. A. Bailey. 2013. Effects of yeast cell wall on early production laying hen performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 22(4):792-797.
    Hassanein, S. M., and Soliman, N. K. 2010. Effect of probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) adding to diets on intestinal microflora and performance of Hy-line layers hens. J. Am. Sci, 6(11):159-169.
    Huyghebaert, G., R. Ducatelle, and F. Van Immerseel. 2011. An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers. Vet. J. 187:182-188.
    Jahanian, R., and M. Ashnagar. 2015. Effect of dietary supplementation of mannan-oligosaccharides on performance, blood metabolites, ileal nutrient digestibility, and gut microflora in Escherichia coli-challenged laying hens. Poult. Sci. 94(9):2165-2172.
    Janardhana, V., M. M. Broadway, M. P. Bruce, J. W. Lowenthal, M. S. Geier, R. H. Hughes, and A. G. D. Bean. 2009. Prebiotics modulate immune responses in gut-associated lymphoid tissue of chickens. J. Nutr. (139) 1404-1409.
    Kabir, S. M. L., M. M. Rahman, M. B. Rahman, S. U. Ahmed. 2004. The dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 3(5):361-364.
    Kabir, S. M. L. 2009. The role of probiotics in the poultry industry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10(8):3531-3546.
    Khaksefidi, A., and S. Rahimi. 2005. Effect of probiotic inclusion in the diet of broiler chickens on performance, feed efficiency and carcass quality. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 18(8):1153-1156.
    Kim, G. B., Y. M. Seo, C. H. Kim, and I. K. Paik. 2011. Effect of dietary prebiotic supplementation on the performance, intestinal microflora, and immune response of broilers. Poult. Sci. 90:75-82.
    Koiyama, N. T. G., N. B. P. Utimi, B. R. L. Santos, M. A. Bonato, R. Barbalho, A. H. Gameiro, C. S. S. Araújo, and L. F Araújo. 2017. Effect of yeast cell wall supplementation in laying hen feed on economic viability, egg production, and egg quality. J. Appl. Poult. res. 0:1–8.
    Lavelin, I., N. Meiri, and M. Pines. 2000. New insight in eggshell formation. Poult. Sci. 79:1014-1017.
    Li, X. H., Y. P. Chen, Y. F. Cheng, W. L. Yang, C. Wen, and Y. M. Zhou. 2016. Effect of yeast cell wall powder with different particle sizes on the growth performance, serum metabolites, immunity and oxidative status of broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 212:81-89.
    Lilly, D. M., and R. H. Stillwell. 1965. Probiotics: growth-promoting factors produced by microorganisms. Science. 147(3659):747-748.
    Lipke, P. N., and R. Ovalle. 1998. Cell wall architecture in yeast: new structure and new challenges. J. Bacteriol. 180(15):3735-3740.
    Liu, Y., and G. Huang. 2018. The derivatization and antioxidant activities of yeast mannan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 107:755-761.
    Mack, D., S. Michail, S. Wei, L. McDoughall, and M. Hollignsworth. 1999. Probiotic inhibits enteropathogenic E. coli adherence in vitro by inducing intestine mucin gene expression. Am. J. Physiol. 276:G941-G950.
    Mahdavi, A. H., H. R. Rahmani, and J. Pourreza. 2005. Effect of probiotic supplements on egg quality and laying hen’s performance. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 4(7):488-492.
    Marteu, P., P. Seksik, P. Lepage, and J. Dore. 2004. Cellular and physiological effects of probiotic and prebiotics. Med Chem. 4:889-896.
    Mikulski, D., J. Jankowski, J. Naczmanski, M. Mikulska, and V. Demey. 2012. Effects of dietary probiotic (Pediococcus acidilactici) supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, egg traits, egg yolk cholesterol, and fatty acid profile in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 91(10):2691-2700.
    Mitsuoka, T. 1982. Recent trends in research on intestinal flora. Bifidobacteria Microflora. 1:3-24
    Morales-López, R., E. Auclair, F. Garcia, E. Esteve-Garcia, and J. Brufau. 2009. Use of yeast cell walls; β-1, 3/1, 6-glucans; and mannoproteins in broiler chicken diets. Poult. Sci. 88(3):601-607.
    Moran, C. A. 2004. Functional components of the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: applications for yeast glucan and mannan. p.283-296. In: Alltech’S 20th Annual Symposium ‘Biotechnology in the Feed Industry’ . Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.
    Mountzouris, K. C., P. Tsirtsikos, E. Kalamara, S. Nitsch, G. Schatzmayr, and Fegeros, K. 2007. Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poul. Sci. 86(2):309-317.
    Musikasang, H., A. Tani, A. H-kittikun, and S. Maneerat. 2009. Probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from chicken gastrointestinal digestive tract. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25(8):1337-1345.
    Ng, S. C., A. L. Hart, M. A. Kamm, A. J. Stagg, and S. C. Knight. 2009. Mechanisms o action of probiotic: Recwnt advance. Inflammation Bowel Dis. 15:300-310.
    Nys, Y. 1999. Nutritional factors affecting eggshell quality. Czech J. Ani. Sci.44:135-143
    Nys, Y., M. T. Hincke, J. L. Arias, J. M. Garcia-Ruiz, and S. E. Solomon. Avian eggshell mineralization. Poult. Avian Biol. Rev. 10:143-166.
    Oelschlaeger, T. A. 2010. Mechanisms of probiotic actions–a review. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 300(1):57-62.
    Packer, R. B. 1974. Probiotics, the other half of the antibiotics story. Anim. Nutr. Health. 29:4-8.
    Patterson, J. A., and K. M. Burkholder. 2003. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poul. Sci. 82(4):627-631.
    Poggenpoel, D. G., G. F. Ferreira, J. P. Hayes, and J. J. D. Preez. 1996. Response to long-term selection for egg production in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 37:743-756.
    Popova, T. 2017. Effect of probiotics in poultry for improving meat quality. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 14:72-77.
    Reisinger, N., A. Ganner, S. Masching, G. Schatzmayr, and T. J. Applegate. 2012. Efficacy of a yeast derivative on broiler performance, intestinal morphology and blood profile. Livest. Sci. 143(2):195-200.
    Roberts, J. R. 2004. Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. J. Poult. Sci. 41(3):161-177.
    Roland, D. A., and M. Bryant. 2000. Nutrition and feeding for optimum egg shell quality. In: Proceedings of the XXI World’s Poultry Congress. August 20-24, 2000. Montreal, Canada.
    Saarela, M., G. Mogensen, R. Fondén, J. Mättö, and T. Mattila-Sandholm. 2000. Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties. J. biotechnol. 84(3):197-215.
    Salarmoini, M., and Fooladi, M. H. Fooladi. 2010. Efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus as probiotic to improve broiler chicks performance. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 13:165-172.
    Salminen, S., A. C. Ouwehand, and E. Isolauri. 1998. Clinical applications of probiotic bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 8:563-572.
    Santin, E., A. Maiorka, M. Macari, M. Grecco, J. C. Sanchez, T. M. Okada, and A. M. Myasaka. 2001. Performance and intestinal mucosa development of broiler chickens fed diets containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 10(3):236-244.
    Shen, T. Y., H. L. Qin, Z. G. Gao, X. B. Fan, X. M. Hang and Y. Q. Jiang. 2006. Influences of enteral nutrition comdind with probiotics on gut microflora and barrier function of rat with abdominal infection. World J. Gastroenterol. 12:4352-4358.
    Shetty, P. H., and L. Jespersen. 2006. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid bacteria as potential mycotoxin decontaminating agents. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 17(2):48-55.
    Shurson, G. C. 2018. Yeast and yeast derivatives in feed additives and ingredients: sources, characteristics, animal responses, and quantification methods. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 235:60-67.
    Spring, P., C. Wenk, K. A. Dawson, and K. E. Newman. 2000. The effects of dietary mannan oligosaccharides on cecal parameters and the concentrations of enteric bacteria in the ceca of salmonella-challenged broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 79:205-211.
    Sugiharto, S. 2016. Role of nutraceuticals in gut health and growth performance of poultry. J. Saudi Soc. Agr. Sci. 15(2):99-111.
    Vila , B., E Esteve-Garcia, and J. Brufau. 2010. Probiotic micro-organisms: 100 years of innovation and efficacy; modes of action. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 65:369-380.
    Xue, G. D., S. B. Wu, M. Choct, and R. A. Swick. 2017. Effects of yeast cell wall on growth performance, immune responses and intestinal short chain fatty acid concentrations of broilers in an experimental necrotic enteritis model. Anim. Nutr. 3(4):399-405.
    Yalçın, S., S. Yalçın, İ. Onbaşılar, H. Eser, and A. Şahin. 2014. Effects of dietary yeast cell wall on performance, egg quality and humoral immune response in laying hens. Ankara Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg. 61:289-294.
    Yegani, M., and D.R. Korver. 2008. Factors affecting intestinal health in poultry. Poult. Sci., 87:2052-2063
    Zhang, J. L., Q. M. Xie, J. Ji, W. H. Yang, Y. B. Wu, C. Li, J. Y. Ma, and Y. Z. Bi. 2012. Different combinations of probiotics improve the production performance, egg quality, and immune response of layer hens. Poult. Sci. 91(11):2755-2760.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE