本研究旨在發展「想像思考測驗」。經由文獻分析得知，想像思考包含四個因素：(1)流暢性、(2)變通性、(3)超越現實性及(4)鮮明性，由此發展測驗形式與計分指標。研究者先進行想像思考測驗之編製與預備性研究，以臺北市及嘉義縣150名高中學生為預試樣本，透過獨立樣本t檢定及二因子變異數分析確認「未來背包」題項適合作為正式題本。接著，以流暢、變通、超越現實、鮮明做為預測變項，以共識評量分數做為效標變項進行迴歸分析，進一步確認影響想像思考表現的主要因素包含(1)超越現實性及(2)鮮明性，並據此發展「想像思考測驗」之正式題本。研究者以臺灣區234名高中職學生為正式樣本進行施測，以「新編創造思考測驗」、「未來想像傾向量表」、「華─葛氏批判思考量表」中文版等測驗或量表為效標求取相關，和比較有無接受未來想像訓練高中學生想像思考測驗得分的差異，來做為效標關聯效度之證據。研究結果如下：
一、研究者針對「想像思考」構念編製測驗，以「未來背包」為題目，採圖、文兼具之測驗形式，計分指標則包含「超越現實」及「鮮明」兩個測量面向。
二、「想像思考測驗」在信效度檢驗方面，一致性信度Cronbach’s值超越現實為.945，鮮明為.923；兩種指標之再測信度則分別為.555和.320，均達中等相關；在效標關聯效度部分，超越現實指標與「新編創造思考測驗」之各分測驗均有低度到中度的顯著相關 (.254~.447) ；與「未來想像傾向」及「批判思考量表」則無相關。另一方面，「鮮明」指標與「未來想像傾向」有.478的顯著相關，與「新編創造思考測驗」及「批判思考量表」則無相關。此外，本測驗以參加未來想像社團之學生為效標組，與對照組比較起來，在超越現實指標上確實得分較高。
最終，研究者依據研究結果提出建議，供後續研究及實務工作之參考。

The main purpose of this study aims to construct and validate “Imaginative Thinking Tests”. According to literature review, imaginative thinking comprises four components: fluency, flexibility, beyond reality and vividness, respectively. Besides, the former four components were taken to take shape the tests and rating indices. In order to construct the formal tests, a total 150 senior high school students living in Taipei city and Chiayi County were selected as pretest-sample students. After data collection, the researcher adopted Independent-Sample T Test and Two-way ANOVA to explore the relationship between the four indices and consensual assessment. Then, Regression analysis was also used to confirm the main effective components of imaginative thinking (beyond reality and vividness were predictor variables, and scores of consensual assessment were criterion variables). Through analysis, it revealed that “beyond reality “and “vividness “ were indispensible units in imaginative thinking. The sample for the formal study was 234 senior high school students and vocational high school students. In reliability validation, test-retest reliability was adopted to ensure stability of the tests. For validity, the “New Creative Tests”, the “Scale of Future Imagination Disposition” and the “Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal” were criteria to obtain criterion-related validity.
The results are as followed:
1. In this study,” The Imaginative Thinking Tests” which comprised verbal and figural activities was developed, and the crucial rating indices were "beyond reality" and " vividness ".
2. With regard to reliability of this instrument, the Cronbach's α of "beyond reality" was .945, and of " vividness " was .923.The test-retest reliability of the two rating indices were .555 and .320, respectively.
3. In Criterion-Related Validity, the scores of "beyond reality" correlated significantly with that of the “New Creative Tests” but not significantly with that of WGCTA. There was significant correlation (r=.48) between the scores of " vividness " and that of the “Scale of Future Imagination Disposition”. Besides, compare with control group, pupils who attending future imagination courses had higher scores on index of beyond reality.
Finally, there are some main suggestions and recommendations from the results for future study and teachers.

一、中文部分

王愉敏（2011）。概念結合想像力測驗之編製(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中興大學企業管理學系，台中市。
朱智賢（1989）。心理學大辭典。北京：北京師範大學。
行政院（2009）。第八次全國科學技術會議總結報告。取自http://www.nsc.gov.tw/
pla/tc/8th/formal.asp.〔Executive Yuan (2009). Final Report of the Eighth National Science and Technology Conference. Retrieved from http://www.nsc.
gov.tw/pla/tc/8th/formal.asp
何子樂 (2003) 。想像比知識重要。台北:協志工業叢書出版有限公司。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺。（1998）。新編創造思考測驗研究。台北：教育部。
李乙明、李淑貞（譯）（2005）。創造力。台北：五南。(原書Robert J. Sternberg：Handbook of Creativity.)
巫宜錚 (2012) 。未來想像傾向量表(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學創造力發展研究所，台北市。
林幸台 (1986) 。心理測量導論。台北:五南。
林偉文、朱采翎、王毓苓、朱嘉琪、劉家瑜（2011）。科學教育、科技與設計之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 98-2511-S-152
-020 -MY2），未出版。
邱發忠、林耀南、陳學志（2009）。創造想像力機制暨課程設計及效果評估研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 98-2511-S-606 -001 -MY2），未出版。
邱發忠、陳學志、林耀南、涂莉苹 (2010,5月)。想像力構念之探討。中華資優教育學會、中華創造學會2010年兩岸資優與創造力教育發展學術研討會。台北：台灣師範大學。
邱發忠、陳學志、林耀南（2011）。以生產探索模式為基礎之跨領域創造想像實作研究─創造想像力機制暨課程設計及效果評估研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 98-2511-S-606 -001 -MY2），未出版。
徐芝君（2009）。心情與創意思考關係的多成份模式：調整焦點、向性、激發心情對創意思考的影響暨中介變項之探討(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系，台北市。
教育部（2011） 。【未來想像與創意人才培育中程個案計畫子計畫:啟航計畫書】。台北:教育部顧問室。
陳柏熹 (2011) 。心理與教育測驗:測驗編製理論與實務。新北市:精策教育。
陳梅英(譯) （1981），幻想力和想像力。台北市：黎明。（原書Brett R. L. [1969]. Fancy and imagination. London: Metheun.）
陳學志、洪素蘋、許禕芳、邱皓政、關秉寅、詹志禹 (2009)。擴散性思考與聚斂性思考的交會：有限解答之擴散性思考測驗之編製與信效度檢驗。教育科學研究期刊，54 (4)，29-61。
陳龍安 (1995) 。如果我是一隻小小鳥:想像力的培養。家庭月刊，五月份，124-126。
陳繼成（2011）。設計類科大學生想像力測驗之編製(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育測驗統計研究所，台中市。
梁朝雲、許育齡、劉育東、李元榮 (2011)。促發想像之環境因素的評測工具一以跨域設計教育為例的初探性研究。設計學報，16 (1) , 65-82 。
張世彗修訂（2006）。行動和動作創造思考測驗—指導手冊。台北：心理。
張春興（1989）。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市：東華。
詹志禹（2005）。人類的創造力從何而來。科學人雜誌中文版，38-41。台北：遠流。
詹志禹、陳玉樺（2011）。發揮想像力共創台灣未來─教育系統能扮演的角色。教育資料與研究雙月刊，100 ，23-52。
董奇（1995）。兒童創造力發展心理。臺北市：五南。
葉邵國 (1978 )。幼兒想像遊戲之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
賴美辰（2011）。「與2030年的我對話」未來想像教學方案發展之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育學系，臺北市。

二、西文部分

Abraham, A., Windmann, S., Daum, I., & Güntürkün, O. (2005). Conceptual expansion and creative imagery as a function of psychoticism. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 520–534.
Amabile, T. M.(1996). Creativity in context. Co: Westview Press.
Bredart, S., Ward, T. B., & Marczewski, P. (1998). Structured imagination of novel creatures’ face. American Journal of Psychology, 11, 607-725.
Chermahini, S., & Hommel, B. (2010). The blink between creativity and dopamine: spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115(3), 458-465.
Craft, A. (2005) .Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. London : HMSO.
Cropley, A. J. (1999). Creativity and cognition: Producing effective novelty. Roeper Review, 21, 253–265.
Dean, G. M. & Morris, P. E. (2010). The relationship between self-reports of imagery and spatial ability. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 245-273.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W.( 1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
Duffy,B.(1998). Supporting creativity and imagination in the early years. Philadelphia:Open University Press.
Egan, K. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning: Ages 8-15. London: Psychology Press.
Egan, K. (2008). The future of education: Reimagining our schools from the ground up. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge :University Press.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Creativity: A knowledge base, metacognitive skills, and personality factors. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 255–268.
Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative Imagery: Discoveries and Inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., & Smith, S.M. (1992). Creative cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177–189.
Gharabaghi, K. (2008). Contemplations about the imagination and complacency in child and youth care practice. Relational Child & Youth Care Practice, 21, 30-41.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hansen, L. K. and S. Kozel (2007). Embodied imagination: a hybrid method of designing for intimacy. Digital Creativity, 18, 207-220.
Hennessey, B. A. ,& Amabile, T.M. (1999). Consensual assessment. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker(Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, Vol.1(pp.347-360). NY: Academic Press.
Hoppe, K. D., & Kyle, N. L. (1990). Dual brain, creativity, and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 150-157.
Imagine Nation. (2008). New poll reveals stifling imagination in schools underlies innovation and skills deficit. Retrieved April 1, 2008 from: http://www.The imaginenation.net/ press/ 080124_ tinpr.pdf.
Karwowski, M. (2008). Measuring creativity using the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI). Part 1. Presentation of a new instrument to measure creative potential. The New Educational Review, 1, 44-54.
Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. ( 1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-388.
Lieberman, J. N. (1977). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity. New York: Academic Press.
Lindqvist, G. (2003). Vygotsky’s theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2&3), 245–251.
Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Thinking and problem solving (p. 289-332). London:Academic Press.
Mckellar, P. (1957). Imagination and thinking. New York: Basic Books.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 44, 220-232.
Morris, P. E., & Hampson, P. J. (1983). Imagery and nsciousness. London: Academic Press.
Moran, S. & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of creativity & development. In . R. K. Sawyer (ed.). Creativity and development. Oxford University Press. 61–90.
Mumford, M. D., (2001), “Something old, something new: Revisiting guilford's conception of creative problem solving”, Creativity Research Journal, 13(3&4), 267-276.
Murray, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R., & Sujan, M. (1990). The influence of mood on categorization: A cognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 41 1-425.
Ochse, R. (1990). Before the gates of excellence. New York: Cambridge University Press
Osborn, A. F.(1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Passmore, J. (1985). Recent philosophers: A supplement to a hundred years of philosophy. New York: Duckworth.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Reichling, M. J. (1990). Images of imagination. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 282-293.
Rubin, D. C., & Kontis, T. C. (1983). A schema for common cents. Memory & Cognition, 11, 335-341.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L., & The PDP research Group (Eds.), (1986). Parallel distributed processing, Volume1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Runco,M, A. (1985). Reliability and validity of ideational flexibility as a function of academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61,1075-1081.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of management, 30(6), 933.
Singer, J. L. (1999). Imagination. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity. San Diego: Academic Press.
Stevens, W. (1951). The necessary angel. New York: Vintage Books.Teachers' College Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992).Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol 1(1),1-5.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivation creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7-97.
Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1–40.
Ward, T. B., Patterson, M. J., Sifonis, C. M., Dodds, R. A., & Saunders, K. N. (2002). The role of graded category structure in imaginative thought. Memory & Cognition, 30, 199–216.
Ward, T. B., Patterson, M. J., & Sifonis, C. M. (2004). The role of specificity and abstraction in creative idea generation. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 1–9.
Ward, T. B., & Sifonis, C. M. (1997). Task demands and generative thinking: What changes and what remains the same? Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 245-259.
Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, J. (1997). Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought. In T. B. Ward,S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 1–27). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
Ward, T. B., & Wickes, K. N. S. (2009). Stable and dynamic properties of category structure guide imaginative thought. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 15-23.
White, A. (1990). The language of imagination. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity assessment packet. Buffalo, NY: DOK.
Zachopoulou, E., Trevlas, E., & Konstadinidou, E. (2006). The design and implementation of a physical education program to promote children’s creativity in the early years. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14, 279-294.