簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 宋愛蓉
Sung-ayrong
論文名稱: 故事結構教學對國中聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解之成效
指導教授: 杜正治
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 190
中文關鍵詞: 故事結構聽覺障礙閱讀理解
英文關鍵詞: story structure, hearing disabilities, reading comprehension
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:97下載:28
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討故事結構教學對國中聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解能力之學習成效。研究對象以台北縣某國中三位聽覺障礙學生,研究方法以單一受試設計之跨受試多探試設計,自變項為故事結構教學策略,係只結合故事地圖的教學策略。依變項為基本閱讀理解測驗與故事重述評量。研究期間每位受試依序接受基線期、處理期以及維持期等實驗教學之進行。資料蒐集方式為研究者在學生閱讀故事後,請學生完成基本閱讀理解測驗與故事重述評量,以故事重述測驗的評量以書寫及口頭方式紀錄整理重述之總字數與故事的完整性,並以評估故事結構教學之成效。研究結果依所蒐集受試者的資料點分別繪製成曲線圖,並分析列成階段內視覺分析結果摘要表,另由階段內分析摘要表整理出相鄰階段間變化分析摘要表進行分析。歸納本研究結果如下:
    一、故事結構教學的介入對三位受試者在基本閱讀理解測驗的表現皆有立即提升效果。
    二、故事結構教學對三位受試者在基本閱讀理解測驗之表現皆有保留效果。
    三、故事結構教學對三位受試者在故事重述的表現有立即提升效果。
    四、三位受試在六個故事要素中,尤以「主角與次要主角名稱」、「情境」、「故事結局」、「故事經過」和「故事結局」五個要素的表現穩定,但在「心理反應」要素的表現在維持期階段比現不穩定。但整體而言故事結構教學對三位受試者在故事重述的測驗結果皆有保留效果。
    五、經故事結構教學後,三位受試者在故事重述測驗總分以及故事重述總字數皆有提升效果。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the Story Structure Instruction on the reading comprehension of 3 junior high school students with hearing disabilities.
    The multiple probe design across subjects of single subject research was adopted to evaluated the effects. The direct instruction of a story map was the independent variable, and the changes of basic reading test and story retell test were the dependent variables.
    Results indicated an immediate increase on the reading comprehension performances by all the three students from baseline to independent phase condition of the intervention. The effects of the maintenance were also observed in this study. In addition, on story retell measures, results demonstrated the scores of the test and the total number of words were increased.

    目次 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 7 第三節 名詞釋義 8 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 聽覺障礙學生閱讀能力之影響與相關研究 11 第二節 閱讀相關理論基礎 28 第三節 故事結構教學之理論與相關研究 42 第三章 研究方法 53 第一節 研究設計 53 第二節 研究對象 57 第三節 研究工具 63 第四節 研究程序 68 第五節 課程與教學設計 70 第六節 資料處理分析 76 第四章 研究結果 81 第一節 故事重述故事結構之成效分析 81 第二節 基本閱讀理解測驗之結果分析 104 第三節 綜合討論 121 第五章 結論與建議 135 第一節 結論 135 第二節 建議 136 參考文獻 139 中文部分 139 第二節 建議 144 附錄一 家長同意書 157 附錄二 閱讀材料一覽表 158 附錄三 語言樣本 159 附錄四 故事重述評分標準 160 附錄五 教學活動設計 161 附錄六 故事地圖(示範期) 163 附錄七 故事地圖(引導期) 164 附錄八 故事地圖(獨立期) 165 附錄九 文章及閱讀理解測驗 166 附錄十 受試訪談紀錄 187 表 次 表2-2-1故事文章重要元素名稱 33 表2-2-2故事地圖 30 表2-2-3故事文章重要元素名稱 33 表2-2-4國內外故事結構教學之相關研究摘要表 40 表2-3-1聽障生閱讀理解相關研究整理表 48 表2-3-2聽障生故事結構教學之閱讀理解關研究 50 表3-1-1實驗教學一實驗教學個階段流程表 54 表3-2-1甲生基本資料表 59 表3-2-2乙生基本資料表 61 表3-2-3丙生基本資料表 62 表3-3-1故事重述故事結構分析表 66 表3-3-2故事理解測驗題型與題數配置表 67 表3-5-1閱讀理解教材(範例) 70 表4-1-1甲生各階段內故事重述視覺分析結果摘要表 82 表4-1-2甲生相鄰階段間故事重述視覺分析結果摘要表 83 表4-1-3甲生各階段故事結構要素正確率平均分數表 84 表4-1-4甲生基本故事重述測驗之C統計摘要表 86 表4-1-5乙生各階段內故事重述視覺分析結果摘要表 87 表4-1-6乙生相鄰階段間故事重述視覺分析結果摘要表 89 表4-1-7乙生各階段故事結構要素正確率平均分數表 90 表4-1-8乙生故事重述測驗之C統計摘要表 91 表4-1-9丙生各階段內故事重述視覺分析結果摘要表 93 表4-1-10丙生相鄰階段間故事重述視覺分析結果摘要表 94 表4-1-11丙生各階段故事重述要素正確率平均分數表 95 表4-1-12丙生故事重述測驗之C統計摘要表 96 表4-1-13三位受試各階段故事重述測驗平均正確率總表 97 表4-1-14三位受試各階段主角要素的平均分數表 97 表4-1-15三位受試各階段情境要素的平均分數表 98 表4-1-16三位受試各階段主要問題的平均分數表 99 表4-1-17三位受試各階段故事經過的平均分數表 100 表4-1-18三位受試各階段心理反應的平均分數表 101 表4-1-19三位受試各階段故事結局的平均分數表 101 表4-1-20三位受試各階段故事重述平均總字數 102 表4-1-15三位受試各階段情境要素的平均分數表 98 表4-1-16三位受試各階段主要問題的平均分數表 99 表4-2-1甲生各階段內基本閱讀理解測驗視覺分析表現摘要表 105 表4-2-2甲生相鄰階段間基本閱讀理解視覺分析結果摘要表 106 表4-2-3甲生各階段不同閱讀理解測驗題型平均分數表 106 表4-2-4甲生基本閱讀理解測驗之C統計摘要表 108 表4-2-5乙生階段內基本閱讀理解視覺分析結果摘要表 109 表4-2-6乙生相鄰階段間基本閱讀理解視覺分析結果摘要表 110 表4-2-7乙生各階段不同閱讀理解測驗題型平均分數表 110 表4-2-8乙生基本閱讀理解測驗之C統計摘要表 112 表4-2-9丙生階段內閱讀理測驗解視覺分析結果摘要表 113 表4-2-10丙生相鄰階段間閱讀理解測驗視覺分析結果摘要表 114 表4-2-11丙生各階段不同閱讀理解測驗題型正確率平均分數表 115 表4-2-12丙生基本閱讀理解測驗之C統計摘要表 116 表4-2-13三位受試各階段閱讀理解測驗之平均分數表 116 表4-2-14三位受試各階段理解文章基本事實題型平均分數表 117 表4-2-15三位受試各階段理解推論題型平均分數表 118 表4-2-16三位受試各階段抽取大意題型平均分數表 118 表4-2-17三位受試中文閱讀理解測驗前後測結果比較分析表 119 圖 次 圖2-2-1 RUMELHART的故事結構圖 29 圖2-2-2故事地圖(MY STORY MAP ) 30 圖2-2-3黃瑞珍的故事結構圖 31 圖2-2-4 STAAL繪製的故事臉 34 圖2-2-5依STALL(2000)故事臉改編 36 圖3-1-1研究架構 53 圖3-3-1故事地圖 65 圖3-3-2故事臉改編自STAAL 65 圖3-4-1研究流程圖 68 圖3-5-1基線期活動流程圖 72 圖3-5-2教師示範期流程圖 73 圖3-5-3教師引導階段流程圖 74 圖3-5-4學生獨立階段活動流程圖 74 圖3-5-5維持期階段活動流程圖 75 圖4-1-1甲生各階段基本故事重述測驗總分曲線圖 81 圖4-2-2乙生各階段基本故事重述測驗總分曲線圖 87 圖4-1-3丙生各階段基本故事重述測驗總分曲線圖 92 圖4-2-1甲生各階段之基本閱讀理解測驗總分曲線圖 104 圖4-2-2乙生各階段之基本閱讀理解測驗總分曲線圖 108 圖4-2-3丙生各階段之基本閱讀理解測驗總分曲線圖 112

    參考文獻
    一、中文部分
    王文科(1994):認知發展理論與教育。台北:五南。
    王心怡(2005):故事結構教學對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解教學成效之研究。國立台南大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    王瓊珠(2004):故事結構教學與分享閱讀。台北市:心理。
    石兆蓮(1997):閱讀理解。載於林清山(主編):輔導計畫叢書32:有效學習的方法,77-108。台北市:教育部。
    朴仁植策劃、曲慧敏譯(2003):蜜蜜甜心派:幸福的好滋味。台北:印刻。
    江家平(2006):故事結構教學對增進國中低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解與故事重寫能力之研究。國立台北教育大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    吳潔芳(1995):談提升聽障兒童閱讀能力之教學策略。國小特殊教育,19,68-71。
    呂淑如(1993):聽覺障礙兒童語言發展能力及相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    杜正治(2006):單一受試研究法。心理出版社。
    杜正治譯(1994):(Tawney J. W. & Gast D. J. 原著)單一受試研究。台北市:心理。
    李姿德(2003):交互教學法對增進聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解能力之研究。國立臺南師範學院特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    李映玲(2002):聽障生閱讀理解策略之個案研究。台中師範學院國教研究所,未出版。
    岳修平(譯)(1998):E. D. Gagné, C.W. Yekovich & F. R. Yekovich 著。教學心理學—學習的認知基礎。台北:遠流。

    林玉霞(2000):聽覺障礙學生字彙檢索歷程之調查研究。載於輔導區特殊教育學術研討會論文集,頁123-138。嘉義:國立嘉義大學。
    林玉霞(2001):淺談聽覺障礙學生閱讀問題。載於人子(16-21)。嘉義:嘉義大學。
    林佩菁(2002):故事結構教學對國中學障生閱讀理解表現之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    林玟慧(1995):閱讀理解策略教學對國中閱讀障礙學生閱讀教學效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    林芸禾(2007):故事結構教學增進高職輕度智能障礙學生閱讀理解能力之研究。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    林建平(1994):國小學童的閱讀動機、理解策略與閱讀成就之相關研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,26 期,267-294 頁。
    林清山(譯)(1990):Richard E. Mayer 著。教育心理學—認知取向。台北:遠流。
    林寶貴(1987):聽覺障礙學生國語文能力之研究。台灣教育學院學報,12,1-27。
    林寶貴(1994):聽覺障礙教育與復健。初版,五南。
    林寶貴、李真賢(1987):聽覺障礙學生國語文能力之研究。教育學院學報,12,1-27。
    林寶貴、黃玉枝(1997):聽障學生國語文能力及錯誤類型之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,15,109-129。
    林寶貴、錡寶香(1999):中文閱讀理解測驗。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系印製。P14-16。
    林寶貴、錡寶香(1999):兒童口語理解測驗。教育部中部辦公室發行。
    柯華葳(1993):語文科的閱讀教學。載於李詠吟主編:學習輔導(307-349)頁。台北:心理。

    柯華葳(1999):閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。行政院國家科學委員會特殊教育工作小組印行。
    洪月女(譯)(1998):Ken Goodman 著。談閱讀。台北市:心理。
    胡永崇(1996):後設認知策略教學對國小閱讀障礙學童閱讀理解成效之研究。屏東市:屏東師範學院特殊教育中心。
    胡志偉、顏乃欣 (1991-1992):閱讀中文的心理歷程:80年代研究的回顧與展望。載於曾志朗編中國語文心理學研究第一年度結案報告。中正大學認知科學研究中心。
    高令秋(1996):歷程導向寫作教學法對國中聽覺障礙學生寫作能力影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    張春興(1996):教育心理學。台北:東華 。

    張莉珍(2003): 故事夠圖策略與摘要策略過增進國小六年級低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解之比較研究。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    張新仁(民81):認知心理學對教學的影響。教育研究雙月刊,28,13-50。
    張蓓莉(1987):回歸主流聽覺障礙學生語文能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,3,119-134。
    張蓓莉(1989):聽覺障礙學生之語言能力研究。特殊教育研究學刊,5,165-204。
    張蓓莉(1994):台灣地區聽覺障礙學生句型理解能力。特殊教育研究學刊,10,209-227。
    教育部(1998):國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北:教育部。
    教育部(2003):國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文領域。臺北:教育部。
    許雅惠(2007):故事結構教學對國小低年級注意力缺陷過動症兒童閱讀理解之研究。國立台北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    陳姝蓉(2002):故事結構教學對增進國小閱讀障礙學生閱讀理解能力之研究。臺北市立師範學院身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    陳淑絹(1995):「指導-合作學習」教學策略增進國小學童閱讀理解能力之實徵研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文,未出版。
    曾世杰(1988):聽覺障礙學生中文字或詞辨識之轉錄研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所論文,未出版。
    曾世杰(1996):聽障者閱讀困難的可能原因之一。特殊教育季刊,60,17-20。
    曾世杰(1998):聾人閱讀中文詞時「詞彙觸接」與「短期記憶」歷程之轉錄現象研究。國立台南師範學院特殊教育系。特殊教育與復健學報,6,65-101頁。
    曾彥翰(2006):文章結構教學對增進國小聽覺障礙學生說明文閱讀理解成效之研究。台北市教育大學。身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    曾智敏(2002):影響重度聽障者閱讀的因素―以大專以上學歷聽障生回溯。高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    黃秀霜(2001):中文年級認字量表,台北市:心理。
    黃瑞珍(1999):故事結構分析法在語言學習障礙兒童教學之應用。國小特殊教育,27,頁4-10。
    黃瓊儀(2003):不同閱讀理解策略教學對國小閱讀解障礙學生教學成效之研究。國立台北師範學院特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    葉淑美(2002):合作故事圖解教學法對國小低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解成效之研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。

    廖凰伶(2000):直接教學與全語教學對國中低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解表現之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。

    趙尹薇(2006):故事結構教學對提升國小學習障礙學生閱讀理解成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    劉麗容、盧娟娟(1997):聽障兒童語言發展之理論基礎與策略。教育資料與研究,17,85-86。
    蔡銘津(1995):文章結構理論探討及其在閱讀教學上的啟思。師說,87,27-31。
    盧宇香(2004):合作學習與自我教導對聽覺障礙兒童閱讀理解成效之研究。國立花蓮師範學院特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    錡寶香(1989):聽覺障礙學生的閱讀教學。特教園丁,11(4),6-11。
    錡寶香(2000):聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解能力之分析。特殊教育學報,14,155-187。
    錡寶香(2004):國小低閱讀能力學童與一般學童的敘事能力:故事結構之分析。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系,特殊教育研究學刊,26,247-269。
    薛明里(1996):聽覺障礙學生國語文詞句錯誤分析研究,特殊教育季刊,58,21-24。
    鍾聖校(1995):認知心理學。台北:心理。

    二、英文部分
    Akamatsu, C. T. (1988). Summarizinf stories: The role of instrution in text structure in learing to write. American Annals of the Deaf, 133, 294-302.
    Alexander, J E., & Heathington, B. S. (1988). Assessing and correcting classroom reading problem. Glenview, Illinoies: Scott, Foresman and Company.
    Allen, T. (1986). Patterns of academic achievement among hearing impaired students: 1974-1983. In A. Schildroth & M. Karchmer (Eds.), Deaf children in America. (pp.161-206). San Diego, CA: College-Hill.
    Applegate, M. D., Quinn, K. B., & Applegate, A. J.(1994). Using metacognitive strategues to enhance achievement for at-risk liberal arts college students. Journal of Reading,38, 32-41.
    Araujo, L.(2000). Traversing home/school, English/Portuguese: Young learing path to learing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Of Delaware, Delaware.
    Armbruster, B. B. (1986). Schema theory and the design of content-area textbooks. Educational Psychological, 21(4),253-267.
    Armbruster, B. B. (1986). Schema theory and the design of content-area textbooks. Educational Psychological, 21(4),253-267.
    Baumann, J.F., & Bergeron, B.S.(1990). Story map instruction using childrens literature: Effcts on on first graders’comprehention of central narrative elements.Journal of Reading Behavior,22(4),407-437
    Beck, I.L., & Mckoewn, M.G.(1981). Developing questions the promote comprehension: The story Map. Language Arts,58(8),913-918.
    Bender,W.N(2001).Learnin disabilities:characteristics.identification, and teaching strategues(4ͭ ͪ ed.).Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
    Bender,W.N.(1995). Learning disabilities characteristics, identification, and teaching strategies. Boston, MA: Allyn and bacon.
    Brasel, K., & Quigley, S.,(1975).Influence of Certain Language and Communication Environment in Early Childhood on the Development of Language in Deaf Individuals.Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 20, 95-107
    Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Inducing strategic learing from texte by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Leanig and Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 1-17.
    Calderon, M., Slavin, R., &Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1998). Effects of bilingual cooperative integrated reading and composition on students making the transition from spanish to English reading. The Elementary School Journal, 99(2), 153-165.
    Conrad, R. (1979). The deaf school child. London: Harper & Row.
    Davis, & Zephaniah, T. (1994). Effects of prereading story mapping on elementary readers’ comprehension.Journal of Educationl Research,87(6),353-360.
    Davis, J. E. et.al(1986). Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairment on language, education, and psychosocial behavior of children. Jouranl of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51:53-62.
    Dimino, J.A., Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & Blake, G.(1990).Story grammar:An approach for promoting at-risk secondary students’ comprehension of literature. Elementary School Journal,91(1),19-32.
    Dimino, J.A., Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & Blake, G.(1990).Story grammar: An approach for promoting at-risk secondary students’ comprehension of literature. Elementary School Journal,91(1),19-32.

    Dole, J. A.(2000). Explicit and implicit instruction in cpmprehension. In B.M.Taylar, M. F. Graves & P. van den Broek(Eds.), Reading for Meaning: Fostering Comprehension in The Middle Grade (pp.1-31). NY:Teachers College.
    Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
    Donin, J., Doehring, D. G., & Brrowns, F. (1991). Text cpmprehension and reading achievement in orally educated hearing-impaired children. Discourse Processes, 14, 307-337.
    Erikson, M . E. (1987). Deaf readers reading beyond the literal. American Annals of the Deaf, 132, 291-294.
    Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1991). Reading comprehension instruction. In J.
    Flood, J. M. Jensen, D. Lapp, & J. R. Squire (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts(pp. 732-742). NY: MacMillan
    Foley, M. M.(2000). The (un) making of a reader. Language Arts,77(6),506-511.
    Gagne, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. 9-22. Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.
    Gambrell, L. B., & Chasen, S. P.(1991). Explicit story structure instruction and the narrative writing of fourth-and fifth-grade below-average readers. Reading Research & Instruction, 31(1), 54-62
    Gardill, M. C., & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). Advanced story map instruction: Effects on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 2-17.

    Gersten , R.(1998). Recent advances in instructional research for students with learning disabilities:An overview. Learning Disabilities Research Practice, 13(3), 162-170.
    Giffith, P. L., & Ripich, D. N. (1988). Story structure recall in hearing-impired, learing-disabled, and nondisabled children. American Annals of the Deaf, 133, 43-50.
    Gilchrist, E. D. (1992) .The effects of modeled pre-reading strate- gies on the reading comprehension of upper elementary deaf students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, South Carolina.
    Gough, P. B.(1976). One second of reading. In E. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds). Language by ear and by eye(pp. 331-358).Cambringe: MIT Press.
    Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1994). Cognitive Strategy Instruction : Methodological Issues and Guidelines in Conducting Research. In V. Sharon & B. Candace (Eds.), Research issues in learning disabilities. (pp.146-160).
    Griffith, P. L., & Ripich, D. N.(1988). Story structure recall in hearing-impaired, learing-disabled and no disabled childen. American Annals of The Deaf, 133, 43-50.
    Gunning, T. G. (1996). Creating reading instruction for all children. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Gurney, D., Gerstein, R., Dimino, J., & Carmine , D.(1990).Story grammar:Effective literature instruct for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities,23, 335-342.
    Gurneyet, D., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., & Carnine(1990).Story grammar: Effective literature instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(6), 335-342.
    Harris, V.L.(1982).Short-term Recall by Deaf Signers of American Sign Language Implication of Encoding Strategy for Order Recall, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 572-583
    Hayes, P. & Arnold, P.(1992). Ishearing-impaired children's reading delayed or different? Journal of Research in Reading. 15(2), 104-116.
    Holt, J. (1993). Stanford achievement test (8th edition): Reading comprehension subgroup results. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 172-175.
    Idol, L.(1987).Group story mapping:A comprehension strategy for both skilled and unskilledreaders.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 196-205.
    Idol, L., & Croll,V.J.(1987).Story-Mapping training as a means of improving reading comprehension.Learning Disability Quarterly, 10,214-229.
    Kamhi, A. G. & Catts, H. W.(1991). Reading disabilities: terminology, definitions, and subtyping issues. In A. G. Kamhi & H. W Catts(Eds.), Reading disabilities: a developmental language perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Kelly, L. P.(1993). Recall of English funtion words and inflections by skilled and average deaf readers. American Annals of the deaf.138(3),288-296.
    King, M.C & Quigley,P.S.(1985). Reading and deafness.San bingo: College-Hill
    McAnally, L.P., Rose, S. & Quigley,P.S.(2002). Reading prac-tices with deaf learner. Austin: PRO-ED.
    Kintsch,W., & Van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
    Kuldanek, K.(1998). The effects of using a combination of story frames and retelling strategies with learing disabled students to build their comprehension ability.
    Kyle, J. G. (1980). Sing of Speech: Cooperating in deaf education Special Education: Forward Trends, 8(3), 21-28.
    Lapp, D. & Flood, J.(1986).Teaching students to read. New York.
    Learner, J. (2003). Learning Disabilities: Theories, diagnosis and teaching strategies (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    Lerner, J. (1989). Learning disabilities:Theories, diagnois, and teaching strategies. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Lerner, J.(2000). Learning disabilities:Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies.(8 th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
    Lipson, M.Y., &Wixson, K.K. (1991). Assessment and instruction of reading disability:on interactive approach. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publisher Inc.
    Lorch, E. P., Sanchez, R. P., Broek, P. v. d., & Milich, R. (1999).The relation of story structure properties to recall of television stories in young children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and nonreferred peers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27(4), 293-309.
    Luetke-Stahlman, B., Griffiths, C. & Montgomery, N. (1998). Development of text structure knowledge as assessed by spoken and signed retellings of a deaf second-grade student. American Annals of the Deaf, 143, 337-345.
    Mallette, B., Harper, G. F., Maheady, L., & Dempsey, M. (1991). Retention of spelling words acquired using a peer-mediated instructional procedure. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26(2), 156-164.
    Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N.S. (1977). Remember of things parsed:Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
    Mastropieri, M.A, & Scruggs,T.E.(1997).Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities.Remedial & Special Educaton, 18, 197-216
    Mayer, R. E.(1983). Thinking,problem solving,cognition. New York,NY: W.H. Freeman & Company.
    Mayer, R. E.(1987). Educational Psychology: A cognition approach. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company.
    Mercer, C. D. & Mercer, A. R.(2001). Teaching students with learing problems(6 th).NewYork: Macmillan Publishing Company.
    Mercer, C. D.(1992). Students with learning disabilities. Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company.
    Mercer, C. D., & Mercer, A. R.(2005). Teaching students with learning problems. New York, NY: Mavmillan Publishing Company.
    Meyer, B. J. F. (1980, April). Text Structure and its use in the study of reading comprehension across the adult life-span. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA
    Michael Faggella-Luby, Jean S Schumaker, Donald D Deshler (2007) . Embedded learning strategy instruction: story-structure pedagogy in heterogeneous secondary literature classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(2),131-147
    Miller, P. E. (2000). Syntactic and semantic deafness. American Annals of the Deaf, 145, 436-451.

    Montague, M. (1988). Story grammar and learning disabled students’ comprehension and production of narrative prose.
    Moores, D. F. (2001). Educating the deaf psychology: Princ pls , and practices(5th ed.). Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
    Moores, D.F.(2001). Education the deaf psychology:Prinicipls, and Practices(5th ed.).Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    Naremore, R. C.(1997). Making it hang together: Children's use of mental frameworks to structure. Topics in Language Disorders,18(1), 16-29.
    Newby, R.F., Caldwell, J., & Rech, D. R.(1989). Improving the reading comprehension of children with dysphonetic and dysedetic dyslexia using story grammar. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 373-380.
    Olson, M. W., & Gee, T. C. (1988). Understanding narratives: A review of story grammar research. Childhood Education, 64(4), 302-306.
    Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2). 117-175.
    Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, D. A. (1987). Enhancing instructional time through attention to metacognition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(2), 66-75.
    Paul, P. (1996). Reading vocabulary knowledge and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 3-15.
    Paul, P. V.(1993). Toward an understanding of deafness and reading. Bulletin of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 3, 117— 129.
    Pearson, P. D. & Dole, J.A.(1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: a review of research and new conceptualization of instruction. The Elementary School Journel,88,151-165.
    Pearson, R. D. (1985). Changing the face of reading comprehension instruction. Reading Teacher, 38, 724-738.
    Polloway, E. A., & Patton, J.R.(1996). A comparison of a cloze training procedure and a question answer response technique on the reading comprehension of hearing-impaired students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of Maryland,MY.
    Pual, P.V.(1998).Reading for student with hearing impairment:Research review and implications.The Volta Review,99(2),73-87
    Quigley, S., & Paul, P. (1984). Language and deafness. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
    Quigley, S., & Paul, P. (1989). English language development. In M. Wang, M.Reynolds, & H. Walberg (Eds.), The handbook of special education: Research and practice. Vols.1-3. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Rayner, K., & Pollastsek, S. (1989). The reading psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Rearson, R. D.(1985).Changing the face of reading comprehension instruction. Reading Teacher, 38,724-738.
    Reutzel, D. R. (1986). Investigating a synthesized comprehension: The cloze story map. Reading Teacher, 39(6), 524-528.
    Richek, M.A., Caldwell, J.S.,J ennings, J.H., & Lerner, J.W.(2002). Reading problems: Assessment and teaching strategies. (4th). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Robertson, L. & Flexer, C.(1993).Reading development: A parent survey of children with hearing impairment who developed speech and language through the auditory-verbal method. The Volta Review,95(3),253-261.

    Rogoff, B., & Gardner,W.(1984). Guidance in cognitive development: An examination of mother-child instruction. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave(Eds.) Every day cognition: Its development in social context,95-116. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Roth, F.P.(2000).Narrative writing: Development and teaching with children with writing difficulties. Topics in Language Disorders,20(4), 15-27.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic(ED.), Attention and Performance(Vol.6,p.573-603) Hillsadale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J.Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp.33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Saywitz, K. J., Snyder, L., & Lamphear, V. (1996). Helping children tell what happened: A follow-up study of the narrative elaboration procedure. Children Maltreatment, 1(3), 200-216.
    Schirmer, B. R. (1993). Construction meaning from narrative text: Cognitive processes of deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 397-403.
    Schirmer, R. B., & Bond, L. W. (1990). Enhancing the hearing impaired child’s knowledge of story structure to improve comprehension of narrative text. Reading Improvement,27(4), 242-245.
    Scribner, & E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Short, E. J. & Ryan, E.B.(1984).Metacognitive Difference Between Skilled and Less Skilled Readers : Remediating Deficits Through Story Grammar and Attribution Training . Journal of Educational sychology,76(2) ,225-235.

    Simmons, D. C. (1993). Integrating narrative reading comprehension and writing instruction for all learners. (ERIC document: 365 943).
    Slavin,R.E.(1996).Research on cooperative learning and achievement:What we know,what we need to know.Contemporary Education Psychology,21,43-69.
    Staal, L. A. (2000). The story face: An adaptation of story mapping that incorporates visualization and discovery learning to enhance reading and writing. The Reading Teacher, 54(1), 26-31.
    Stanvich, K. E.(1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly,21,360-407
    Stender, B. K. (2002). Enchenceing reading comprehension thou- gh successive increases in complexity.(Doctoral Dissertation, University of Columbia, 1988)
    Strong, M., & Prinz, P. (2000). Is American Sing Language skill related English literacy? In C. Chamberlain, J. P. Mayberry (Eds). Lnguage acquisition by eye(pp.131-142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Swanson, P. N., & De La Paz, S.(1998). Teaching effective cpmprehension strategies with learning and reading disabilities. Intervention in school & Clinic, 33(4), 209-219.
    Thomdyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77-110.
    Trybus, R.(1985).Today’s Hearing Impaired Childen and Youth:A Demographic and Academic Profile. Washington, D. C. : Gallaudet Researc Institute.

    Trybus, R., & Karchmer, M.(1977). School achievement scores of hearing impaired children: National date on achievement status and growth patterns.American Annals of the Deaf: Directory of Programs and Service,122,62-69.
    Vacca, J. L., Vacca, R.T., & Gove, M.K.(1995). Reading and learning to read. New York, NY: Longman.
    Vallecorsa,A.L. & deBettencourt,L.U. (1997) .Using a mapping procedure to teach reading and writing skills to middle grade students with learning disabilities. Education & Treatment of child, 20,173-189.
    Walker, L., Munro, J., & Rickards, F. W.(1998). Teaching inferential reading strategies througe pictures. Volta Review, 100(2), 105-115.
    Walker,B.J.(1992).Diagnostic teaching of reading:Techniques for instruction and assessment.New York,NY: Macmillon Publishing Company.
    Webster, L. (1986). Deafness, development and literacy. London: Methuen.
    Weintraub, L.(1984, November). Once upon a time: Using fairy tales and nuresery rhymes to develop pre-reading skills in children. Perspectives for Teaching of the Hearinf Impaired, pp. 16-19.
    Wilson, K. (1979). Influence and language processing in hearing and deaf children. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Boston University.
    Winograd, P. & Hare, V. C. (1988). Direct instruction of reading comprehension strategies: The nature of teacher explanation. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz & P. A. Alexander(Eds.), Learing and study strategies: Ussues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation. (pp.121-139).
    Wood, J. K., & Petz, S. L. (1997).Using idea mapping to aid comprehension of hearing-impaired students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40 (8), 644-645.
    Wood, P., Bruner, J., & Ross, G.(1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Children Psychology and Psychaitry,17,89-100.
    Wray, D., Flexer, C. & Vaccaro, V.(1998) Classroom performance of children who are deaf of hearing and who learned spoken communication through the auditory-verbal approach: An evaluation of treatment efficacy. The Volta Review,99(2), 107-119.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE