簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 柯天路
Tianlu Ke
論文名稱: 反應形式對Stroop作業反應時間影響之研究
Effects of Response Type on Reaction Time of Stroop Task
指導教授: 陳李綢
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 74
中文關鍵詞: 史托普作業反應形式史托普干擾語彙現象
英文關鍵詞: Stroop Task, Response type, Stroop interference, Lexciality effect
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:610下載:194
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究的主要目的在於探討在聲音與按鈕兩種不同的反應形式下,Stroop作業的干擾現象會受到什麼影響。過去的研究主要著重在對顏色反應的情境,但不同反應形式的影響牽涉到字與顏色反應相對時間的變化,因此我們的研究同時涵蓋對字與顏色的反應,並藉由隨機方式呈現刺激,以降低受試者在固定類型刺激的反應中展出對應策略。

    研究參與者為台北市立體育學院的研究生,其中男性20人(平均年紀27.7± 5.5歲),女性28人(平均年紀 28.1± 3.99歲)。研究採重複量數實驗設計,共有四種不同的情境,分別是按鈕對字反應、按鈕對顏色反應、聲音對字反應、以及聲音對顏色反應。受試者必須完成這四種情境。為了避免情境間的順序效果,實驗將四種情境的先後順序排列出四種不同的流程,將每位受試者隨機分派到其中一種流程。實驗的結果以成對樣本t檢定及重複量數單因子變異數分析進行比較。

    研究結果發現:一、不同的反應形式對改變對字與對顏色的相對反應速度,以聲音反應時,字佔優勢,以按鈕反應時,顏色佔優勢。二、以聲音反應時,字會對顏色的反應產生干擾,顏色不會對字干擾;而以按鈕反應時,不僅是字會對顏色產生干擾(不過干擾產生的反應時間延遲縮短),顏色也會對字產生干擾。因此自動化理論與相對反應速度理論各自取得了部分優勢。三、輔助效果與Lexicality現象可能都是因為非隨機呈現下,受試者的對應策略造成的結果。最後,我們建議,未來在進行這類型的研究時,採用類似觸控面板這類可隨機更改按鈕顏色位置的工具,可更有效的避免受試者發展出對應策略的影響。

    This study aimed to investigate whether the distraction effect on Stroop task will be affected by different sources of response, namely, vocal response and motion response.

    Literatures in the field have in-depth discussions on responses to colors under different circumstances. However, source of response was rarely mentioned. A repeated measure experiment was designed to explore the interaction between stimuli (character and color) and sources of responses (vocal and motion). Motion response was operationalized as pressing on the colored buttons.

    Participants include 48 graduate students from a local college. Each participant was asked to respond to all four situations: vocal response to character, vocal response to color, motion response to character, and motion response to color. Stimuli were randomly generated, with and without distractions, to eliminate the possible development of problem-solving strategies. Sequential effect was evened out by permutations and random assignment.

    Two statistical findings were highlighted: 1. Vocal response react faster on characters and motion response react faster on color; 2. During vocal response, characters have a distraction effect but colors do not. However, both characters and colors have distraction effect on motion response but characters have a weaker distraction, as compare to distractions on vocal response.

    These results suggested that, due to non-random stimuli, pervious findings of supporting facilitation effect and Lexicality effect could be a by-product of problem-solving strategies developed by the respondent. Further studies are encouraged and suggestions are made.

    誌謝詞 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目次 v 表次 vi 圖次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題背景 1 第二節 研究目的與研究假設 6 第三節 名詞解釋 10 第二章 文獻探討 12 第一節 Stroop實驗的內容與意義 13 第二節 與Stroop作業反應時間相關的因素 17 第三節 對Stroop實驗的結果提出解釋的理論 29 第三章 研究方法 36 第一節 研究架構 36 第二節 實驗參與者 38 第三節 實驗時間與地點 38 第四節 實驗儀器與工具 38 第五節 實驗設計 39 第六節 統計分析 47 第四章 結果與討論 48 第一節 受試者與資料說明 48 第二節 Stroop作業的反應時間線 52 第三節 反應形式、作業要求、與刺激內容對Stroop 作業反應時 間影響之分析 56 第四節 輔助效果與干擾現象的相關 64 第五章 結論與建議 67 第一節 結論 67 第二節 未來研究建議 69 參考文獻 70 西文部分 70

    Brown, T. L. (2011). The Relationship Between Stroop Interference and Facilitation Effects: Statistical Artifacts, Baselines, and a Reassessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 85-99.

    Brown, T. L. (1996). Attentional selection and word processing in Stroop and word search tasks: The role of selection for action. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 265–285.

    Brown, T. L., Gore, C. L., & Pearson, T. (1998). Visual half-field Stroop effects with spatial separation of words and color targets. Brain and Language, 63, 122–142.

    Brown, T. L., Roos-Gilbert, L., & Carr, T. H. (1995). Automaticity and word perception: Evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1395–1411.

    Brown, W. (1915). Practice in Associating Color Names with Colors. Psychological Review, 22, 45-55.
    Cattell, J. Mck. (1886). The Time it Takes to See and Name Objects. Mind, 11, 63-65.

    Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.

    Dalrymple-Alford, E. C. (1972). Associative facilitation and interference in the Stroop color-word task. Perception and Psychophysics, 11, 274-276.

    Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Budayr, B. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop Color-Word Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 1211-1214.

    Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop Phenomenon and its Use in the Study of Perceptual, Cognitive, and Response Processes. Memory and Cognition, 1, 106-120.

    Effler, M. (1977a). Experimental contributions toward an analysis of the interference phenomenon observed with the Stroop test. Zeitschriftfltr Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologic, 24, 244-281. (From Psychological Abstracts, 1978, 60, Abstract No. 2368)

    Effler, M. (1977b). The influence of serial factors on the Stroop test. Psychologische Beitrage, 19, 189-200. (From Psychological Abstracts, 1978, 60, Abstract No. 184)

    Effler, M. (1978). Colour-distant versus colour-congruent colour words, their influence on naming times in the Stroop-test. Psychologische Beitrage, 20, 345-359. (From Psychological Abstracts, 1980, 64, Abstract No. 2591)

    Glaser, W. R., & Du¨ngelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 640–654.

    Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356–388.

    Henkin, Y., Yaar-Soffer, Y., Gilat, S., & Muchnik, C. (2010). Auditory Conflict Processing: Behavioral and Electrophysiologic Manifestations of the Stroop Effect. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21, 474-486.

    Jensen, A. R., & Rohwer, W D., Jr. (1966). The Stroop color-word test: A review. Acta Psychologica, 25, 36-93.

    Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.

    Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 219–234.

    Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523-553.

    Logan, G. D., Zbrodoff, N. J., & Williamson, J. (1984). Strategies in the color-word Stroop task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22,135-138.

    Lund, F. H. (1927). The Role of Practice in Speed of Association. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 424-433.

    MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a Century of Research on the Stroop Effect: An Integrative Review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203.

    MacLeod, C. M. (1992). The Stroop Task: The “Gold Standard” of Attentional Measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 121, 12-14.

    MacLeod, C. M. (1998). Training on integrated versus
    separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation. Memory & Cognition, 26, 201–211.

    MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 384–391.

    MacLeod, C. M., & Mathews, A. (1988). Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 653-670.

    MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 126-135.

    McClain, L. (1983a). Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color-word performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 735-743.

    McClain, L. (1983b). Stimulus-Response Compatibility Affects Auditory Stroop Interference. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 266-270.

    Melara, R. D. & Algom, D. (2003). Driven by Information: a Tectonic Theory of Stroop Effects. Psychological Review, 110, 422-471.

    Melara, R. D. & Marks, L. E. (1990a). Interaction among Auditory Dimensions: Timbre, Pitch, and Loudness. Perception and Psychophysics, 48, 169-178.

    Melara, R. D. & Marks, L. E. (1990b). Processes Underlying Dimensional Interactions: Correspondence between Linguistic and Nonlinguistic Dimensions. Memory and Cognition, 18, 477-495.

    Menard-Buteau, C, & Cavanagh,P. (1984). Localization of the form/colour interference at the perceptual level in a Stroop task with stimuli drawings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 421-439.

    Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 809-848.

    Neill, W T, & Westberry, R. L. (1987). Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 327-334.

    Nielsen, G. D. (1975). The locus and mechanism of the Stroop color word effect (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1974). Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 5672-B.

    Ogura, C. (1980). Formation of learning-set in the task of Stroop color-word test. Journal of Child Development, 16, 30-36.

    Palef, S. R., & Olson, D. R. (1975). Spatial and verbal rivalry in a Stroop-like task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29, 201-209.

    Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Pritchatt, D. (1968). An investigation into some of the underlying associative verbal processes of the Stroop colour effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 351-359.

    Roberts, K. L. & Hall, D. A. (2008). Examining a Supramodal Network for Conflict Processing: a Systematic Review and Novel Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data for Related Visual and Auditory Stroop Tasks. Journal of cognitive Neuralpsychology, 20, 1063-1078.

    Roe, W T, Wilsoncroft, W E., & Griffiths, R. S. (1980). Effects of motor and verbal practice on the Stroop task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 647-650.

    Roelofs, A. (2005). The Visual-Auditory Color-Word Stroop Asymmetry and its Time Course. Memory and Cognition, 33(8), 1325-1336.

    Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1 (pp. 45-76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Sichel, J. L., & Chandler, K. A. (1969). The color-word interference test: The effects of varied color-word combinations upon verbal response latency. Journal of Psychology, 72, 219-231.

    Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.

    Styles, E. A. (2006). The Psychology of Attention (2nd ed.). Hove, Psychology Press.

    Treisman, A., & Fearnley, S. (1969, May 3). The Stroop test: Selective attention to colours and words. Nature, 222, 437–439.

    Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 727–735.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE