簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 曾怡芳
Tseng Yi-Fang
論文名稱: 多媒體註解於非刻意學習情境下對國中生字彙學習之效益研究以不熟悉概念字彙為例
The Effects of Multimedia Annotations on EFL Young Adults’Incidental Vocabulary Learning with a Focus on Unfamiliar Concepts
指導教授: 林至誠
Lin, Chih-cheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 105
中文關鍵詞: 非刻意之字彙學習單字註解靜態圖片影片
英文關鍵詞: incidental vocabulary learning, annotations, still pictures, video clips
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:104下載:17
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文旨在比較輔助多媒體註解的閱讀情境,藉此探討多媒體註解對於國中生字彙學習之效益影響。自一九九六年開始的研究成果歸納出主要結論:當學習者對於目標單字已存有熟悉概念時,輔助影片無法發揮其效益。本實驗欲比較靜態圖片與影片分別搭配文字之字彙註解方式,於非刻意字彙學習情境下,對於國中生的不熟悉概念字彙學習是否有不同之效果。
    本研究方法採用前測、立即後測及延宕後測組間準實驗方法。研究者選出十個目標單字輔以三種多媒體註解-文字註解、文字註解搭配靜態圖片和文字註解搭配影片,實驗對象為北台灣某國中三班七年級學生,三班八十八名學生被隨機分為其中任一組多媒體註解。第一週受測者進行字彙前測,二週後進行線上多媒體閱讀,並在閱讀後進行字彙立即後測,兩週後接受字彙延宕後測。
    實驗結果採用三因子變異數方法分析。後測結果顯示組間後測成績有顯著差異,說明輔助影片比輔助靜態圖片和純文字註解顯著有效。針對外語學習,本實驗歸納主要結論:在不熟悉概念之英語字彙學習情境下,青少年學習者若輔以影片,會比輔以靜態圖片以及純文字註解更有收穫。本實驗鼓勵教師在引導學生學習不熟悉概念之生字時,可在教材中彈性運用動態圖像做為協助工具。

    Studies on comparing still pictures and video clips or animation as multimedia annotations produced inconclusive results. A further examination of the studies since 1996, however, showed that learners were familiar with the concepts of the target words, leaving extra visual aids, either still or dynamic, redundant. This study was intended to investigate whether video clips and animation, compared with still pictures, better assist our EFL learners’ incidental learning of words with unfamiliar concepts.
    The present study adopted a three-group immediate posttest and delayed posttest quasi-experimental design. Ten target words were selected and embedded in a reading text, each of which was annotated by the three annotation types: text-only, text and still pictures, and text and videos (or animation). Three intact classes, a total of 88 seventh graders, were recruited in a junior high school in northern Taiwan and each of the three was randomly assigned to one of the three annotation types. All participants took the pretest two weeks before the experiment to ensure their equivalence of baseline vocabulary knowledge, the immediate posttest right after reading the text, and the delayed posttest two weeks after the experiment without prior notice.
    A three-way (2 times of measurement x 2 types of tests x 3 groups of annotations) mixed repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences among the three groups, in which the video group outperformed both the picture group and the text group. For young adults’ EFL learning, learning new words of unfamiliar concepts with video clips and textual annotations is more effective than with still pictures and textual annotations and with textual annotations. Accordingly classroom teachers are strongly encouraged to incorporate dynamic images in their materials when engaging students in learning new words of unfamiliar concepts.

    ABSTRACT (Chinese) i ABSTRACT (English) ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES viii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION 1 1.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY 7 1.3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS OF THE STUDY 8 1.4 DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS 8 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 10 2.1 VOCABULARY AND ANNOTATION 10 2.1.1 Marginal Annotations 12 2.1.2 Single and Multiple-choice Annotations 14 2.1.3 L1 and L2 Annotations 16 2.2. THEORETICAL BASE FOR MULTIMEDIA LEARNING 19 2.2.1 Multimedia Learning Theories 21 2.2.2 Integrated Model of Second-language Acquisition with Multimedia 29 2.3. MULTIMEDIA-BASED ANNOTATIONS 31 2.3.1 Textual Annotations and Visual Imagery 32 2.3.2 Textual Annotations and Audio 38 2.3.3 Influence of Individual Difference 40 2.4 SUMMARY 41 CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 45 3.1 INTRODUCTION 45 3.2 PARTICIPANTS 45 3.3 MATERIAL 45 3.3.1 Main Text 45 3.3.2 Target Words 47 3.3.3 The Presentation of Visuals 49 3.4 TREATMENT 50 3.5 TEST INSTRUMENTS 53 3.5.1 Vocabulary Pretest 53 3.5.2 Vocabulary Posttests 54 3.5.3 Comprehension Tests 56 3.6 PROCEDURES 57 3.7 DATA ANALYSIS 59 3.7.1 Scoring 60 3.7.2 Statistical Procedures 60 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 62 4.1 RESULTS 62 4.1.1 Participants’ Baseline Knowledge of the Target Words 62 4.1.2 The Effectiveness of Treatments on Quantity of Vocabulary Knowledge 63 4.1.3 The Effectiveness of Treatments on Quality of Vocabulary Knowledge 71 4.2 DISCUSSIONS 75 4.2.1 Superior Effectiveness of Annotation on Quantity of Vocabulary Gain 75 4.2.2 Superior Effectiveness of Annotation in Quality of Vocabulary Gain 80 HAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION 83 5.1 SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS 83 5.2 PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATION 84 5.3 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH 87 REFERENCE 89 APPENDIX A 97 APPENDIX B 102 APPENDIX C 103

    Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Instructional Science, 35(6), 499-517.
    Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 202-232.
    Altman, R. (1997). Oral production of vocabulary. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second Language vocabulary acquisition (pp.69-97). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Ariew, R., & Ercetin, G. (2004). Exploring the potential of hypermedia annotations for second language reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 237-259.
    Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Baddeley, A.D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556-559.
    Baddeley, A.D. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(11), 417-423.
    Beatty, K. (2005). Teaching and Researching Computer-assisted Language Learning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    Bowles, M.A. (2004). L2 glossing: To CALL or not to CALL. Hispania, 87(3), 541-552.
    Candlin, C.N. (1988). Preface. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (eds.), Vocabulary and Language Teaching. New York: Longman.
    Cariana, R. B., & Lee, D. (2001). The effects of recognition and recall study tasks with feedback in a computer-based vocabulary lesson. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49 (3), 23-36.
    Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
    Chang, S.M. (2002). The roles of marginal glosses and pocket electronic dictionaries in EFL incidental vocabulary learning. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, R.O.C.
    Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigm? Language Learning and Technology, 1(1), 19-43.
    Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia call: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning and Technology, 2 (1), 22-34.
    Chennamo, K.S.(1993). Learning from videos: Factors influencing learners’ preconceptions and invested metal effort. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41 (3), 33-45.
    Chen, H. H. J. (1998). A preliminary investigation on Taiwanese EFL learners’ vocabulary size. In Processing’s of the 15th conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp. 193-212). Taipei: Crane Co.
    Chen, H. (2002). Investigating the effects of L1 and L2 glosses on foreign language reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium, Davis, CA.
    Chen, I.J. (2010). Effects of content presentation mode and foreign langugae proficiency on cognitive load and listening comprehension in mobile learning environment. Unpublished Doctoroal Thesis. Naitonal Taipei University of Eechonology, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Chen, I.J., & Chang, C.C. (2009). Cognitive load theory: An empirical study of anxiety and task performance in language learning. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(2), 729-746.
    Chun, D.M., & Plass, J.L. (1996b) Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia. System, 24(4), 503-519.
    Chun, D.M., & Plass, J.L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198.
    Chun, D.M. & Plass, J.L. (1997b). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 60-81.
    Chun, D.M., & Payne, J.S. (2004). What makes students click: working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32, 481-503.
    Clark, J.M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
    Davis, J.N. (1989). Facilitating effects of marginal glosses on foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal, (1), 41-48.
    de Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production: Levelt’s “speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1-24.
    Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Faerch, C. & Kaspar, G. (1986). The role of comprehension in second-language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, 257-274.
    Folse, K.S. & Chien, Y.C. (2003). Using L2 research on multimedia annotations to evaluate CALL vocabulary materials. TESOL Journal, 2, 25-37.
    Folse, K.S, (2006). The effects of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 273-293.
    Gettys, S., Imhof, L.A., Kautz, J.D. (2001). Computer-assisted reading: The effect of glossing format on comprehension and vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals, 34(2), 91-106.
    Glover, J. A. (1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (3), 392-399.
    Grace, C.A. (1998). Retention of word meanings inferred from context and sentence-level translations: implications for the design of beginning-level CALL software. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 533-544.
    Hong, X. (2010). Review of effects of glosses on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguists, 33(1), 56-73.
    Hoogeveen. (1995). Toward a new multimedia paradigm: Is multimedia assisted instruction really effective? System, 28(4), 113-115.
    Horst, M. (2005). Learning L2 vocabulary through extensive reading: a measurement study. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 355-382.
    Hsu, M.Y. (2008). The effects of multimodal glosses o incidental vocabulary learning. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Huang, H.S. & Hanley, J.R. (1994). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54(1), 73-98.
    Hulstijn, J.H. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P.J. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics (ppp. 113-125). London: Macmillan.
    Hulstijn, J.H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327-339.
    Hunt, A. & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 23-59.
    Hunt, A. & Beglar, D. (2002). Current research and practice in teaching vocabulary, methodology in language teaching an anthology of current practice. Edited by Jack C. Richards & Willy A. Renandya, (2002).
    Jacobs, G.M. (1994). What lurks in the margin: use of vocabulary glosses as a strategy in second language learning. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 5, 115-137.
    Jacobs, G.M., Dufon, P., & Hong, F.C. (1994). L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 reading passages: their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Research in Reading, 17, 19-28.
    Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 503-516.
    Jonassen, D., Tessmer, M. (1996). An outcome-based taxonomy for instructional systems design, evaluation and research. Training Research Journal, 2, 11-46.
    Jones, L. (2003). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition with multimedia annotations: The students' voice. CALICO, 21(1), 41-65.
    Jones, L. (2004). Testing L2 vocabulary recognition and recall using pictorial and written test items. Language learning & Technology, 8(3), 122-143.
    Joyce, E.E. (1997). Which words should be glossed in L2 reading materials? A study of first, second, and third semester French students’ recall? Pennsylvania Language Forum, 58-64.
    Kim, D., & Gilman, D. (2008). Effects of text, audio, and graphic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 114-126.
    Kost, C.R., Foss, P., & Lenzini, J.J. (1999). Textual and pictorial glosses: Effectiveness of incidental vocabulary growth when reading in a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 32(1), 89-113.
    Laufer, B. (1990). Why are some words more difficult than others? Some intra-lexical factors that affect the learning of words. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 28(4), 293-307.
    Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: do learners really require most vocabulary by reading? Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 565-585.
    Lee, S, & Muncie, J. (2006). From receptive to productive: improving ESL learners’ use of vocabulary in a post-reading composition task. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 295-320.
    Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    Lin, C.C.(2009). Learning action verbs with animation. Jaltcalljournal, 5(3), 23-40.
    Lin, H., Dwyer, F. & Swain J. (2006). The effects of varied cognitive strategies used to complement animated instruction in facilitating achievement of higher order learning objectives. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 155-167.
    Lomicka, L.L. (1998). “To gloss or not to gloss”: An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language learning & Technology, 1(2), 41-50.
    Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 225-244.
    Mayer, R.E., & Anderson, R.B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 444-452.
    Mayer, R.E., & Sims, V.K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.
    Mayer, R.E. (1997). Multimedia learning: are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
    Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312-320.
    Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R., Boire, M., & Vagge, S. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 638-643.
    Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (1999). Visual presentations in multimedia learning: conditions that overload visual working memory. Visual information and information systems, 1614, 798-805.
    Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Mayer, R.E. & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 207-119.
    Mayer, R.E. & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87-99.
    Mayer, R.E. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 89, 55-71.
    Mayer, R.E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and instruction, 13, 125-139.
    Mayer, R.E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(4), 256-265.
    McDaniel, M. A., & Mason, M.E.J. (1985). Altering memory representation through retrieval. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 371-385.
    Miyasako, N. (2002). Does text-glossing have any effects on incidental vocabulary learning through reading for Japanese senior high school students? Learning Education & Technology, 39, 1-20.
    Moreno, R., & Mayer, R.E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358-368.
    Moreno, R. & Mayer, R.E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia message. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117-125.
    Myong, H. K. (2005). glosses, comprehension, and strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17 (2).
    Nagata, N. (1999). The effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive glosses. Foreign Language Annals, 32(4), 469-479.
    Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paas, F., & Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
    Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Paivio, A., & Descrochers, A. (1980). A dual-coding approach to bilingual memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 388-399.
    Paivio, A., & Lambert, W. (1981). Dual coding and bilingual memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 532-539.
    Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Plass, J.L., Chun, D.M., Mayer, R.E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (1), 25-36.
    Plass, J.L., Chun, D.M., Mayer, R.E., & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language test with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 221-243.
    Plass, J.L. & Jones, L.C. (2005). Multimedia learning in second language acquisition. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (ppp.467-288). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Ray, G.D. (2010). Multimedia learning: Are we still asking the wrong questions? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(1), 103-120.
    Roby, W.B. (1999). “What’s in a gloss?” a commentary on Lara L. Lomicka’s “To gloss or not to gloss”: An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 94-101.
    Rott, S., Williams, J., & Cameron, R. (2002). The effects of multiple-choice L1 glosses and input-output cycles on lexical acquisition and retention. Language Teaching Research, 6(3), 183-222.
    Rott, S (2005). Processing glosses: A qualitative exploration of how form-meaning connections are established and strengthened. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(2), 95-124.
    Sadoski, M., Paivio, A., & Goetz, E.T. (1991). A critique of schema theory in reading and a dual coding alternative. Reading Research Quarterly, 4, 463-481.
    Salomon, G. (1983). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources. Educational Psychologist, 18 (1), 42-50.
    Segler, T.M. (2000). PhD research proposal: second language vocabulary acquisition and learning strategies in ICALL environment. Available at http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/s9808690/finalpaper2.pdf
    Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
    Schnotz, W. & Grzondziel, H.(1996). “Knowledge Acquisition with Static and Animated Pictures in Computer-Based Learning,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April 8-12.
    Swanborn, M.S. L., & de Glopper, L. (1999). Incidental word learning while reading: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 261-285.
    Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional Design in Teaching Areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
    Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning (pp.19-29). In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J.J. G., & Pass, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296. Computers in Human behavior, 18, 465-477.
    Watanabe, Y. (1997). Input, intake, and retention: Effects if increased processing on incidental learning of foreign language vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 287-307.
    Waring, R. (2003). At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(2), 130-163.
    Weiss, R, E., Knowlton, D.S. & Morisson, G.R. (2002). Principles for using animation in computer-based instruction: theoretical heuristic for effective design.
    Wittrock, M.C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11, 87-95.
    Wittrock, M.C.(1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 11, 87-95.
    Xu, J. (2010). Using multimedia vocabulary annotations in L2 reading and listening activities. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 311-327.
    Yanguas, I. (2009). Multimedia glosses and their effect on L2 text comprehension and vocabulary learning. Language learning & Technology, 13(2), 48-67.
    Yeh, Y., & Wang, C.W. (2003). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 131-144.
    Yoshii, M., & Flaitz, J. (2002). Second language incidental vocabulary retention: The effect of picture and annotation types. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 33-58.
    Yoshii, M. (2006). L1 and L2 glosses: their effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 85-101.

    QR CODE