簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳珮綺
Pei-Chi, Chen
論文名稱: 創傷性腦傷者就業歷程之敘事研究
Narrative Research of the Employment Process of Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury
指導教授: 吳亭芳
Wu, Ting-Fang
田秀蘭
Tien, Hsiu-Lan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 復健諮商研究所
Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Counseling
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 245
中文關鍵詞: 創傷性腦傷就業敘事研究
英文關鍵詞: traumatic brain injury, employment, narrative study
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:134下載:25
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討創傷性腦傷者之就業歷程。研究者邀請了三位曾經歷創傷性腦傷、已在融合性工作環境中就業達一年以上的工作者來參與研究。三位研究參與者的年齡介於三十至三十八歲,其中兩位為男性,一位為女性。
    本研究採取敘事研究的方式,邀請研究參與者敘說其生命經驗,再採取「整體—內容」的分析模式來呈現研究結果,並輔以「類別—內容」的觀點來進行研究結果的討論。
    研究結果顯示,創傷性腦傷者傷後能力或特質的變化包括生理功能、認知能力、溝通及社交能力、情緒與人格、以及自我概念的轉變。三位研究參與者的職業生涯方向與工作目標都有調整,研究者將其路徑分別命名為「暫時屈就、累積實力的A」、「在漩渦裡打轉、無法承諾的B」以及「在穩定的基石上前進、仍有夢想的C」。另外,研究中也針對三位參與者就業歷程中所面臨的各種助力、阻力進行討論。
    基於研究結果,本研究針對職業重建人員、創傷性腦傷者及其家人,以及對未來研究等各方面,分別提出相關建議。

    The study aimed to investigate the employment process of individuals with traumatic brain injury. Two males and one female participants that had experienced the traumatic brain injury, in the age between thirty and thirty eight years old, with at least more than one year working experiences in the integrative employment environment were invited to participate in the study.
    By means of the narrative study approach, the researcher invited the participants to share their life experiences in depth interviews. The “holistic-content” perspective was used to analyze the data, and the results were discussed in the “categorical-content” perspective.
    The results showed that the change of the individuals’ ability and characteristics after traumatic brain injury consists of the shift in biological function, the cognitive ability, the communication ability and social skills, the emotional traits and personality, and the self-concept. Since three participants changed their pathways and career goals, the researcher named their paths as “the condescending A who accumulates his strength”, “the B in the whirlpool with no commitment”, and “the C who moves steadily with his dream”. Moreover, this study also investigated the facilitators and barriers in participants’ employment process.
    Based on the results, the study proposed some suggestions for the workers in vocational rehabilitation, individuals with traumatic brain injury and their family members, and for the future research in traumatic brain injury.

    致謝…………………………………………………………………………Ⅰ 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………Ⅱ 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………Ⅲ 目次…………………………………………………………………………Ⅳ 表次…………………………………………………………………………Ⅵ 圖次…………………………………………………………………………Ⅶ 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………… 1 第一節 研究動機……………………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究目的與問題……………………………………………… 7 第三節 名詞解釋……………………………………………………… 9 第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………11 第一節 創傷性腦傷的病理機制與影響功能…………………………11 第二節 創傷性腦傷者重返職場之相關研究…………………………19 第三節 生涯理論中偶發事件之內涵與相關研究……………………36 第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………43 第一節 研究方法的選取………………………………………………43 第二節 研究參與者……………………………………………………49 第三節 研究工具………………………………………………………51 第四節 研究歷程………………………………………………………56 第五節 資料整理與分析………………………………………………58 第六節 研究判準與倫理………………………………………………60 第四章 研究結果…………………………………………………………63 第一節 A的故事:走過坑洞,踏穩每一個腳步……………………63 第二節 B的故事:外星球來的轉學生,在沒人聽見的寂寞裡 一路碰撞…………………………………………………… 101 第三節 C的故事:努力不放棄,找到上天為你開的那道門………165 第五章 結果分析與討論……………………………………………… 193 第一節 創傷性腦傷後能力或特質的變化………………………… 193 第二節 職業生涯方向及工作目標的調整………………………… 201 第三節 創傷性腦傷後就業歷程中的阻力與助力………………… 211 第六章 結論與建議…………………………………………………… 223 第一節 結論………………………………………………………… 223 第二節 研究者反思………………………………………………… 227 第三節 研究限制與建議…………………………………………… 230 參考書目………………………………………………………………… 235 附錄……………………………………………………………………… 241 附錄一 訪談大綱…………………………………………………… 241 附錄二 研究參與同意書…………………………………………… 242 附錄三 研究檢核函………………………………………………… 245

    朱儀羚、康萃婷、柯禧慧、蔡欣志、吳芝儀(譯)(2004)。敘事心理與研究:自我、創傷與意義的建構(原作者:M. L. Crossley)。嘉義:濤石。(原著出版年:2000年)
    何雪綾(2008)。輕微頭部創傷患者的壓力因應歷程研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣大學,台北市。
    吳芝儀(譯)(2008)。敘事研究:閱讀、分析與詮釋(原作者:A. Lieblich, R. Tuval-Mashiach & T. Zilber)。嘉義:濤石。(原著出版年:1998年)
    吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(1995)。質的評鑑與研究(原作者:M. Q. Patton)。台北:桂冠。(原著出版年:1990年)
    易之新(譯)(2000)。敘事治療──解構並重寫生命的故事(原作者:J. Freedman & G. Combs)。台北市:張老師文化。(原著出版年:1996年)
    翁開誠(1997)。同理心開展的再出發──成人之美的藝術。輔仁學誌,26,261-274。
    高熏芳、林盈助、王向葵(譯)(2001)。質化研究設計:一種互動取向的方法(原作者:J. A. Maxwell)。台北市:心理。(原著出版年:1996年)
    許育光(2000)。敘事研究的初步探討──從故事性思考和互為主體的觀點出發。輔導季刊,36,17-26。
    許維素(1998)。輔導教師專業角色發展歷程之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    曾信熹(2007)。偶發事件對諮商心理師專業發展影響之敘說研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    楊淑涵(2002)。選擇非傳統學習領域之四技女生生涯決定歷程之敘說研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    楊雅嵐(2009)。偶發事件對流浪教師生涯決定影響之敘說研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    衛生署(2010年12月31日)。最新發佈統計書刊:97年度衛生統計系列(六)衛生統計動向、98年衛生保險統計、98年死因統計【新聞群組】。取自http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_2.aspx?now_fod_list_no=10238&class_no=440&level_no=1
    盧璐(1996)。創傷性腦傷患者之復健。中華民國物理治療學會雜誌,21,139-144。
    蕭景容(2003)。敘事取向生涯諮商中當事人之改變歷程(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    Accident Compensation Corporation (2006). New ACC guidelines for traumatic brain injury. Retrieved December 29, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.acc.co.nz/news/WIM2_059415.
    Brain Injury Association of America (2007). Facts about traumatic brain injury. Retrieved December 31, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.biausa.org/elements/pdfs/awareness/biaa_tbi_sheet.pdf.
    Bright, J. E. H., Pryor, R. G. L., & Harpham, L. (2005). The role of chance events in career decision making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3), 561-576.
    Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (2006). Traumatic brain injury in the United States: A report to congress. Retrieved December 29, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cdc.gov/NCIPC/pub-res/tbi_congress/04_estimates_goals.htm.
    Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Cochran, L. (1990). Narrative as a paradigm for career research. In R. A. Young & W. A. Borgen (Eds), Methodological Approaches to the Study of Career(pp57-59). New York: Praeger.
    Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Falvo, D. (2005). Medical and psychosocial aspects of choronic illness and disability. (3rd ed.). Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett.
    Guindon, M. H. & Hanna, F.J. (2002). Coincidence, happenstance, serendipity, fate or the hand of God: case studies in synchronicity. Career Development Quarterly, 50, 195-209.
    Haboubi, N. H. J., Long, J., Koshy, M., & Ward, A. B. (2001). Short-term sequelae of minor head injury (6 years experience of minor head injury clinic). Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 635-638.
    Hirschi (2010). The role of chance events in the school-to-work transition: The influence of demographic, personality and career development variables. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 39-49.
    Kersel, D. A., Marsh, N. V., Havill, J. H., & Sleigh, J.W. (2001). Neuropsychological functioning during the year following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 15, 283-296.
    Krumboltz, J. D. (1998). Serendipity Is Not Serendipitous. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(4), 390-392.
    Levack, W., McPherson, K., & McNaughton, H. (2004). Success in the workplace following traumatic brain injury: are we evaluating what is most important? Disability & Rehabilitation, 26, 290-298.
    Magnuson, S., Wilcoxon, S. A. & Norem, K. (2003). Career paths of professional leaders in counseling: plans, opportunities, and happenstance. Journal of Humanistic, Education and Development, 42, 42-52.
    McCrimmon, S., & Oddy, M. (2006). Return to work following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 20, 1037-1046.
    Mitchell, K. E., Levin, A. S., & Krumboltz, J. D. (1999). Planned happenstance: Constructing unexpected career opportunities. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77(2), 115-124.
    O’Connell, M.J. (2000). Prediction of return to work following traumatic brain injury: intellectual, memory, and demographic variables. Rehabilitation Psychology, 45, 212-217.
    Oppermann, J. D. (2004). Interpreting the meaning individuals ascribe to returning to work after traumatic brain injury: a qualitative approach. Brain Injury, 18, 941-955.
    Polkinghorne, D. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In J. H. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp.5-23). London: The Falmer Press.
    Power, P. W., & Hershenson, D. B. (2003). Work adjustment and readjustment of persons with mid-career onset traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 17, 1021-1034.
    Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Rubenson, C., Svensson, E., Linddahl, I., & Bjorklund, A. (2007). Experiences of returning to work after acquired brain injury. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14, 205-214.
    Savage, R. C. (2005). The great leap forward: Transitioning into the adult world. Preventing School Failure, 49(4), 43-52.
    Shames, J., Treger, I., Ring, H., & Giaquinto, S. (2007). Return to work following traumatic brain injury: trends and challenges. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 1387-1395.
    Sharf, R. S. (2006). Applying career development theory to counseling. (4rd ed.) CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Sherer, M., Novack, T. A., Sandar, A., Struchen, M. A., Alderson, A., & Thompson, R. N. (2002). Neuropsychological assessment and employment outcome after traumatic brain injury: a review. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 157-178.
    Tien, H. S.(2001). Career decision-making difficulties perceived by college students in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Psychology and Counseling, 33, 87-98.
    Tien, H. S., Lin, C., & Chen, S. (2005). A grounded analysis of career uncertainty perceived by college students in taiwan. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(2), 162-174.
    Tsaosides, T., Warshowsky, A., Ashman, T. A., Cantor, J. B., Spielman, L., & Gordon, W. A. (2009). The relationship between employment-related self-efficacy and quality of life following traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 299-305.
    Watt, N., & Penn, C. (2000). Predictors and indicators of return to work following traumatic brain injury in South Africa: Findings from a preliminary experimental database. South African Journal of Psychology, 30, 27-38.
    Weintraub, S. (2000). Neuropsychological assessment of mental state. In M. M. Mesulam, (Eds.), Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology (p.p. 121-173). NY: Oxford University Press.
    Williams, E. N., Soeprapto, E., Like, K., Touradji, P., Hess, S., & Hill, C. E. (1998). Perceptions of serendipity: Career paths of prominent academic woman in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 379-389.
    Yang, C. C., Huang, S. J., & Hua, M. S. (2005). The neurobehavioral disturbance of traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Psychology, 2, 49-63.
    Zoccolotti, P., Matano, A., Deloche, G., et al. (2000). Patterns of attentional impairment following closed head injury: A collaborative European study. Cortex, 36, 93-107.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE