簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 宋豐倫
Sung, Feng-Lun
論文名稱: 臺北市高中教師自覺嗓音健康問題及其相關因素之研究
The Distribution and Associated Factors of Perceived Voice Health Problems in Senior High School Teachers in Taipei City
指導教授: 董貞吟
Tung, Chen-Yin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 健康促進與衛生教育學系
Department of Health Promotion and Health Education
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 171
中文關鍵詞: 高中教師自覺嗓音健康問題嗓音保健認知嗓音保健行為自覺嗓音影響授課因素
英文關鍵詞: Senior high school teacher, Perceived voice health problem, Voice health knowledge, Voice health behavior, Perveived voice effect, Teaching characteristics
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:175下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在了解臺北市高中教師自覺嗓音健康問題之現況及其相關因素之探討,採自編、自填式問卷收集資料。有效樣本共417人,回收率為76%。重要結果如下:
    一、各項自覺嗓音健康問題中,近3成教師有出現「音域變窄,無法到達以往
    的高音或低音」、「喉嚨乾」、「喉嚨緊」的問題,約兩成出現「發聲
    疲倦,感到說話吃力」及「嗓音沙啞」,並有2.2%曾出現「失聲」的問
    題。整體研究對象發生自覺嗓音健康問題的頻率為46%。
    二、自覺嗓音影響中,5.2%的教師曾花較多的時間和金錢以改善嗓音問題、
    3.8%減少與同事的交談、3.6%因嗓音問題而感到沮喪。整體研究對象產
    生自覺嗓音影響的頻率為28%。
    三、8項嗓音保健認知題目中,答對率六成以上有4題、介於五至六成者有2
    題、不及五成者2題,整體答對率62.3%。
    四、8項嗓音保健行為中,以74.8%教師使用麥克風、61.9%避免吃辣較
    佳,而非授課時間少說話者僅30.0%、放慢說話速度22.8%較差。整
    體採取嗓音保健行為之頻率為63%。
    五、研究對象之嗓音持久度約為連續3節課,且在自覺嗓音健康問題上,
    「連續2-4節」皆顯著較「都不會」者嚴重;而在自覺嗓音影響
    方面,「連續2-3節」皆顯著較「都不會」者嚴重。
    六、每週授課節數較多者,其嗓音保健行為較佳:11-20節者、21節以上者
    顯著比1-10節者常採取嗓音保健行為。
    七、女教師在嗓音保健認知、嗓音保健行為皆顯著較男教師為佳,但自
    覺嗓音健康問題顯著較男性嚴重。
    八、研究對象中未曾接受過嗓音保健相關課程佔88.7%,曾接受者在嗓音保
    健認知、嗓音保健行為顯著較未曾接受者佳。
    九、研究對象曾因嗓音問題就醫者佔36.9%。曾就醫者在自覺嗓音健康問
    題、自覺嗓音影響皆顯著較未曾就醫者嚴重。
    十、自覺嗓音健康問題總分與自覺嗓音影響總分呈顯著中度之正相關。
    十一、嗓音保健認知、行為與背景因素、授課因素可解釋自覺嗓音健康
    問題總變異量的18.6%。

    The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution and associated factors of perceived voice health problems for senior high school teachers in Taipei city, and the instrument for data collection was a self-designed and self-reporting questionnaire . The number of the valid samples received was 417 and the response rate was 76%. The conclusion of the outcomes are:
    1. In the aspect of perceived voice health problems, there
    were about 30% of teachers felt low/high note
    difficulty, throat dryness and tightness; about 20% had
    tired voice and hoarseness; 2.2% of teachers had been
    aphonia. The frequency of the appearance of perceived
    voice health problem in this sample was 46%.
    2. In the aspect of perceived voice effect, there were
    about 5.2% of teachers had took much time and money to
    improve their voice problem; 3.8% reduced talking with
    colleagues; 3.6% felt sad because of voice problems. The
    frequency of the appearance of perceived voice effect in
    this sample was 28%.
    3. In 8 voice health knowledge items, the percentage of
    teachers’ right answer ratio is 62.3%.
    4. In 8 voice health behaviors, the better ones were using
    a microphone (74.8%) and avoiding eating spicy food; the
    worse ones were less talking out of class (30.0%) and
    slower talking (22.8%). The frequency of taking voice
    health behaviors in this sample was 63%.
    5. The voice endurance in this sample was took consecutive
    three classes, that took consecutive 2-4 classes
    teachers felt more serious in perceived voice health
    problems than none; and took consecutive 2-3 classes
    teachers felt more serious in perceived voice effect
    than none.
    6. The more classes per week, will take more voice health
    behavior. That had 11-20 classes, or over 21 classes per
    week, will take more voice health behavior than had 1-10
    classes per week.
    7. In voice health knowledge and behaviors, female teachers
    were significant better than male teachers, but felt
    significant worse than male ones in perceived voice
    health problems.
    8. There were 88.7% of teachers had never join voice health
    related curriculums, and they were worse than who had
    ever joined in voice health knowledge and behaviors.
    9. 36.9% of teachers took medical treatment because of
    voice problems, and they were significant worse than who
    had never done in perceived voice health problems and
    effects.
    10. There was a medium positive relationship between
    perceived voice health problems and perceived voice
    effects.
    11. Voice health knowledge, voice health behavior,
    demographic characteristics and teaching characteristics
    had the abilities to explain the perceived voice health
    problems was 18.6%.

    第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與重要性…………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………4 第三節 待答問題……………………………………………………5 第四節 研究假設……………………………………………………6 第五節 名詞解釋……………………………………………………7 第六節 研究限制……………………………………………………8 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 嗓音的形成…………………………………………………9 第二節 嗓音健康問題………………………………………………14 第三節 教師的嗓音健康問題………………………………………24 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………39 第二節 研究對象……………………………………………………40 第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………42 第四節 研究步驟……………………………………………………49 第五節 資料處理與分析……………………………………………50 第四章 結果與討論 第一節 研究對象背景因素、授課因素、嗓音保健認知、嗓音保 健行為、自覺嗓音健康問題與自覺嗓音影響之分布情 形…………………………………………………………… 56 第二節 不同背景因素於嗓音保健認知、嗓音保健行為、自覺嗓 音健康問題與自覺嗓音影響之差異……………………… 73 第三節 不同授課因素於嗓音保健認知、嗓音保健行為、 自覺嗓音健康問題與自覺嗓音影響之差異…………… 101 第四節 研究對象背景因素、授課因素與嗓音保健認知、 嗓音保健行為、自覺嗓音健康問題、自覺嗓音影響 之間的關係……………………………………………… 123 第五節 研究對象背景因素、授課因素、嗓音保健認知、 嗓音保健行為對自覺嗓音健康問題之解釋力………… 125 第五章 結論及建議 第一節 結論………………………………………………………139 第二節 建議………………………………………………………142 參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………144 附錄 附錄一 問卷內容效度考驗專家名單……………………………… 151 附錄二 專家效度考驗信函及問卷………………………………… 152 附錄三 預試問卷…………………………………………………… 162 附錄四 教師自覺嗓音健康問題及其相關因素之調查問卷 (正式問卷) …………………………………………… 167

    Albert Villanueva-Reyes. (2011). Voice Disorders in the Metropolitan Area of San Juan, Puerto Rico: Profiles of Occupational Groups. Journal of Voice, 25(1), 83-87.
    Bernstorf, E. D. (1993). Specific personal and environmental factors as
    predictors of vocal integrity in elementary vocal music teachers, Unpublished master’s thesis, Wichita State University, U.S.A.
    Boone, D.R. & McFarlane, S.C.(2000). The voice and voice therapy (6th ed.).
    Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Chan, R. W. (1994). Does the voice improve with vocal hygiene education? A
    study of some instrumental voice measures in a group of kindergarten teachers. Journal of Voice, 8(3), 279-291.
    Chen, S. H., Chiang. S. C., Chung. Y. M., Hsiao, L. C., & Hsiao. T. Y. (2010).
    Risk factors and effects of voice problems for teachers. Journal of Voice,
    24(2). 183-192.
    Colton, R. H., Casper, J. K., & Leonard, R. (2006). Understanding voice
    problems: A physiological perspective for diagnosis and treatment (3nded.). Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins.
    Gerard J. Tortora, Sandra Reynolds Grabowski. (2004). Introduction to the Human Body: The Essentials of Anatomy and Physiology (sixth edition). Hoboken: John & Sons, Inc.
    Gordana Kovacic (2005).Voice education in teacher training: an investigation into the knowledge about the voice and voice care in teacher-training students. Journal of Education for Teaching, 31(2), 87–97.
    Jacqueline, A. M., Jenniferk M. O., & Kenneth, M. G. (1998). Vocal Problem Among Teacher: A Review of Prevalence, Causes, Prevention, and Treatment. Journal of Voice, 12(4), 489-499.
    Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30 (3), 607-610.
    Roy, N., Merrill, R.M., Thibeatilt, S., Parsa, R., Gray, S.D., & Smith. F.M. (2004). Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 28 1-293.
    Russell, A., Oates, J., & Greenwood, K.M. (1998). Prevalence of voice problems in teachers. Journal of Voice, 12(4), 467-479.
    Sandra, E. H. & John, K. J. (1993). Vocal problems among aerobic instructors and aerobic participants. Journal of Communication Disorders. 26(3), 179-191.
    Sheng Hwa Chen, Shu-Chiung Chiang, Yuh-Mei Chung, Li-Chun Hsiao, & Tzu-Yu Hsiao. (2010). Risk Factors and Effects of Voice Problems for Teachers. Journal of Voice, 24(2), 183-192.
    Simberg, S., Sala, E., Rönnemaa, A.(2004). A comparison of the prevalence of vocal symptoms among teacher students and other university students. Journal of Voice, 18(3). 363 —36.
    Simberg, S., Sala, E., Vehmas, K., Laine, A. (2005). Changes in the Prevalence of Vocal Symptoms Among Teachers During a Twelve-Year Period. Journal of Voice, 19(1), 95-102.
    Smith, E., Kirchner, H.L., Taylor, M., Floffirian, H., Lemke, J.H. (1998). Voice problems among teachers: Differences by gender and teaching characteristics. Journal of Voice, 12, 328-334.
    Smith, E., Lemke, J.H., Taylor. M., Kirchner, L., Hoffman, I-I.( 1998). Frequency of voice problems among teachers and other occupations. Journal of Voice, 12, 480-488.
    Stemple, J.C., Glaze, L.E., Klaben, B.G. (2000). Clinical Voice Pathology: Theory and Management. (3th ed.). Canada : Singular.
    Szabo, L. (1986). The effect of pedagogical work on voice function. Cas Lek
    Cesk (CZECHOSLOVAKIA), 45, 1381-1382.
    Thomas G, de Jong F.I.C.R.S,Cremers CW.R.J.& Kooijman P.G.C.(2006). Prevalence of voice complaints, risk factors and impact of voice problems in female students. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 58(3), 65-84.
    中文部分
    王南梅、黃國祐、蘇茂昌、辛宗翰(2011)。華文版「嗓音障礙指數量表」(VHI-10)發展與驗證。台灣耳鼻喉頭頸外科雜誌,46(4),190-195。
    王淑俐(1988)。教師口才訓練術系列專文之三─老師應如何改善語音聲調及表情姿態的缺點?師友月刊,252,52-53。
    王淑俐(2003)。臺北市縣中小學教師上課使用麥克風之現況、原因及影響的調查研究。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(2),17-48。
    何一成(2009)。醫學名詞小百科─聲帶結節、聲帶炎、聲帶麻痺。嬰兒與母親,390,228。
    李卿菲(2010)。高雄市國中、國小教師嗓音狀況與使用麥克風的現狀之探討。高雄師範大學碩士論文,未出版。
    李憲彥(1988)。音聲外科及喉機能性外科學。台北市:聯經。
    李懿瑤(2008)。以健康信念模式分析國中教師聲帶結節預防行為之研究。台灣師範大學碩士論文,未出版。
    周繼文(1994)。談談高中導師的多重使命。台灣教育,527,頁31-33。
    林峯全(2007)。兒童嗓音誤用之文獻回顧。國小特殊教育,44,91-98。
    邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例解析(第五版)。台北市:五南。
    姚和順(1989)。教師職業病與聲帶保健。教與愛,26,7-10。
    姚榮松(1997)。發音原理與器官保養。載於劉金娥等著:國音及語言運用 (頁3-15)。臺北市:三民。
    張昭明、陳雪娥、劉昭明(1986)。噪音對於嗓音的影響。中耳醫誌,21(1), 106-112。
    張昭明、楊元勳、許廣琳(1987)。教師的嗓音問題-第一報。中耳醫誌,22(1),12-17。
    張昭明、楊元勳、許廣琳、陳敏龍、劉昭明(1987)。教師的嗓音問題-第二報。中耳醫誌,22(3),163-167。
    張嘉珮(2006)。教師嗓音保健調查及嗓音保健團體訓練之成效。國立高雄師範大學碩士論文,未出版。
    盛華(1998)。教師嗓音保健。教師天地,92,26-29。
    盛華、張學逸、傅秀雯、張斌(1985)。台北市國中教師音聲障礙調查研究。聽語會刊,20,186-194。
    許世昌(2000)。解剖生理學。台北:永大。
    陳雪娥(1985)。噪音對於聲音的影響。聽語會刊,2,36。
    陳麗鈴(2008)。「教師嗓音」系列研究:第一部分 台北市小學教師嗓音異常盛行率。台北市立教育大學碩士論文,未出版。
    黃友琳(2008)。「教師嗓音」系列研究:第二部分 台北市小學教師嗓音異常危險因子及其影響之研究。台北市立教育大學碩士論文,未出版。
    黃盈翠(2003)。嗓音衛生教育對改善教師嗓音誤用行為及嗓音特性之成效。國立台北護理學院碩士論文,未出版。
    黃美鄉(1985)。學校教師音聲狀況之調查研究。臺南師專學報,18,349-372。
    楊光榮(1987)。職業歌者的嗓音保健問題。音樂與音響,164,119-121。
    楊碧霞、蘇俊雄、鄭秀琴(2004)。大專有氧舞蹈教師聲帶調查研究。通識論叢,3,149-171。
    董貞吟(1999)。教師音聲健康問題之探討。學校衛生,35,32-44。
    董貞吟(2000)。學校噪音與教師授課音量、嗓音健康及其聽覺徵候變化之相關研究。衛生教育學報,14,113-136。
    董貞吟、殷蘊雯、黃乾全、宋慧娟、張家儒(民91)。教師職業病風險評估調查─以自覺嗓音健康問題為例。學校衛生,40,1-21。
    董貞吟、黃乾全(2000)。教師嗓音保健知識、行為及自覺健康之分析研究─吵靜地區學校教師之比較。師大學報,45(2),75-86。
    鄒永恩(2008)。從選舉談聲帶保養。中國醫訊,56,12-15。
    廖國翔、王泰隆、張欣平(2005)。國小教師嗓音障礙調查。北市醫學雜誌,2(4),32-35。
    臺南市國民小學教師暨兼任行政人員每週授課節數、學生每週學習節數核定表(2011)。臺南市政府教育局。
    蕭麗君、盛華(1993)。音聲異常之評估。臨床醫學,31(2),82-84。
    謝州融(1994)。導師應有的修養。台灣教育,527,39-40。
    顏瑞鴻、何宜螢、賴怜蜜(2000)。幼教教師聲帶問題之相關研究。嘉南學報,26,288-298。

    QR CODE