簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 侯皓程
Hou Hao-Cheng
論文名稱: 遊戲式形成性評量對國小學生數學學習的影響:以同分母分數減法單元為例
Effects of Game-Based Formative Assessment on Learning Elementary School Mathematics : The Case of Like-Denominators Subtraction Unit
指導教授: 張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En
宋曜廷
Sung, Yao-Ting
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 158
中文關鍵詞: 冒險遊戲遊戲式學習形成性評量潛藏式評量
英文關鍵詞: adventure game, Game-Based Learning, Formative Assessment, Stealth Assessment
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:840下載:45
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究的目的在於檢證遊戲式形成性評量對國小學生在同分母分數減法單
    元中的學習動機、評量表現、錯誤類型診斷精確率和系統滿意度之影響。遊戲式形成性評量系統係整合遊戲物件模型、證據中心評量設計,以及貝氏網路診斷機制等發展而成,用以提升學生在課堂中參與形成性評量的動機。
    本研究以 283 名新北市國小四年級學生為研究對象,採準實驗設計以驗證系
    統的可用性。經共變數分析、積差相關等統計方法進行資料處理與分析後,研究結果顯示遊戲式形成性評量系統能有效提升學生的學習動機,學生的評量表現與平日數學表現相關程度高,系統的錯誤類型診斷精確率優於傳統的線上評量系統,系統滿意度亦獲得學生的正向評價。本研究提供師生於一般教室使用平板電腦進行形成性評量活動的可行模式。

    This research tends to investigate the effects of game-based formative
    assessment on learning elementary school mathematics like-denominators subtraction
    unit. This research integrates the element of adventure game into assessment system
    to promote students’ motivation of participating in formative assessments in class.
    The game-based formative assessment system, has been developed by referring to the
    combination of game object model , evidence-centered design, and Bayesian model
    inference mechanism.
    Quasi-experimental design was used to examine the system’s usability. 283 New
    Taipei City Elementary School fourth-grade students particated in this study.
    ANCOVA and Pearson's product-moment correlation were used to analysis data. The
    results showed that the game-based formative assessment system can promote
    students' motivation.There was high correlation between students’performance in
    assessment sysetm and in usual mathematical class; the error type diagnostic accuracy
    rate of the system is better than traditional online assessment system; and most of
    students got great satisfaction from using the system. This research provides a feasible
    model for teachers and students to do formative assessment activities by using Tablet
    PC in the general classroom.

    第一章 緒論 ............................................................................................................... 1 第一節 研究背景與動機.................................................................................... 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題............................................................................ 4 第三節 名詞解釋................................................................................................ 5 第四節 研究範圍與限制.................................................................................... 6 第二章 文獻探討 ....................................................................................................... 7 第一節 遊戲式學習............................................................................................ 7 第二節 潛藏式評量.......................................................................................... 17 第三節 同分母分數減法.................................................................................. 25 第三章 系統設計與發展 ......................................................................................... 30 第一節 評量設計.............................................................................................. 30 第二節 遊戲設計.............................................................................................. 46 第三節 系統架構與功能.................................................................................. 51 第四章 研究方法 ..................................................................................................... 74 第一節 研究參與者.......................................................................................... 74 第二節 研究設計.............................................................................................. 75 第三節 研究工具.............................................................................................. 78 第四節 研究程序.............................................................................................. 81 第五節 資料處理與分析.................................................................................. 83 第五章 研究結果與討論 ......................................................................................... 85 第一節 學習動機.............................................................................................. 85 第二節 評量表現.............................................................................................. 94 第三節 錯誤類型診斷精確率........................................................................ 105 第四節 系統滿意度........................................................................................ 108 第五節 綜合討論............................................................................................ 113 第六章 結論與建議 ............................................................................................... 120 第一節 結論.................................................................................................... 120 第二節 建議.................................................................................................... 122 參考書目 ................................................................................................................... 125 附錄一 學習動機量表 ............................................................................................. 131 附錄二 系統滿意度問卷 ......................................................................................... 136 附錄三 學生訪談問卷 ............................................................................................. 138 附錄四 教師訪談問卷 ............................................................................................. 140 附錄五 精選遊戲畫面 ............................................................................................. 141

    一、中文部分
    江玉玲(2009)。數學虛擬教具對等值分數概念學習的影響。未出版之,國立臺
    灣師範大學資訊教育學系,台北市。
    李宗哲(2008)。國小四年級學生在不同意義分數加減問題的表徵表現之研究。
    未出版之,國立臺南大學數學教育學系碩士班,台南市。
    李源順(2005)。同分母真分數加減運算的教學建議。台灣數學教師 (電子) 期
    刊,(3),2-26。
    周雅釧、黃志勝、施淑娟、郭伯臣(2009)。結合線上診斷評量系統之適性補救
    教學研究。網際網路技術學刊,10(4),419-425。
    林垣圻、李俊儀、郭伯臣(2005)。以貝氏網路為基礎的適性測驗電腦化的可行
    性評估-以國小數學科診斷測驗為例, 台中教育大學數學教育研究所碩士
    論文。。
    林哲宇(2009)。Arcs 融入體驗式學習之學習活動中目標導向與教學策略對國小
    生電腦技能學習之影響。未出版之,國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系,台
    北市。
    林碧珍(1990)。從圖形表徵與符號表徵之間的轉換探討國小學生的分數概念:
    新竹師院學報。
    張春興(1995)。張氏心理學辭典 (二版). 台北: 東華。。
    教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域:教育部。
    莫韻蓉(2008)。以即時形成性評量為基礎之電腦輔助教學對國小同分母分數減
    法單元之學習成效。未出版之,國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系,台北市。
    陳金葉(2009)。資訊融入異分母分數加減單元教學對國小五年級學生學習成效
    與動機之影響。未出版之,國立臺中教育大學數學教育學系,台中市。
    曾靖雯(2003)。以表徵觀點看國小三年級分數教學之行動研究。未出版之,臺
    東師範學院教育研究所,台東縣。
    湯錦雲(2002)。國小五年級學童分數概念與運算錯誤類型之研究。未出版之,
    屏東師範學院數理教育研究所,屏東縣。
    葉思義(2010)。數位遊戲設計逹人講座:碁峰資訊股份有限公司。
    蔣治邦(1994)。由表徵觀點探討新教材數與計算活動的設計。國民小學數學科
    新課程概說 (低年級)(頁 60-76). 臺北縣: 臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。
    謝堅、蔣治邦、林淑娟(2002)。國小數學教材分析–整數的數量關係。臺北: 國
    立教育研究院籌備處。
    蘇育琳(2011)。應用模擬式遊戲於理財教育對國小學童理財學習成效及動機之
    影響。未出版之,國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系,台北市。

    二、西文部分
    Amory, A. (2001). Building an Educational Adventure Game: Theory, Design, and
    Lessons. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(2), 249-263. doi:
    citeulike-article-id:2889937
    Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1992). RATIONAL NUMBER, RATIO, r
    AND PROPORTION. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and
    learning, 296.
    Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in
    Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. doi:
    10.1080/0969595980050102
    Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Inside The Black Box: Raising Standards Through
    Classroom Assessment: NferNelson.
    Boyle, E., Connolly, T. M., & Hainey, T. (2011). The role of psychology in
    understanding the impact of computer games. Entertainment Computing, 2(2),
    69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2010.12.002
    Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, S. F. (2001). Learning through computer-based
    concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,
    17(1), 21-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2001.00156.x
    Clarke, S. (2001). Unlocking Formative Assessment: Practical Strategies for
    Enhancing Pupils' Learning in the Primary Classroom: Hodder Education.
    Dickey, M. (2006). Game Design Narrative for Learning: Appropriating Adventure
    Game Design Narrative Devices and Techniques for the Design of Interactive
    Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development,
    54(3), 245-263. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-8806-y
    Eck, A. H. B. A. L. R. R. V. (2010a). Preparing Instructional Designers for
    Game-Based Learning: Part 1. TechTrends, 54(3), 27-37. doi:
    10.1007/s11528-010-0400-9
    Eck, A. H. B. A. L. R. R. V. (2010b). Preparing Instructional Designers for
    Game-Based Learning: Part 2. TechTrends, 54(4), 19-27. doi:
    10.1007/s11528-010-0416-1
    Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement:
    Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational
    Research, 74(1), 59-109.
    Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy.
    Comput. Entertain., 1(1), 20-20. doi: 10.1145/950566.950595
    Grundy, S. (1991). A computer adventure game as a worthwhile educational
    experience. Interchange, 22(4), 41-55. doi: 10.1007/bf01806965
    Harrigan, K. A. (1999). Applying theories used in drama to the design of educational 127
    multimedia.
    Hartmann, T., & Klimmt, C. (2006). Gender and Computer Games: Exploring
    Females’ Dislikes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4),
    910-931. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00301.x
    Heckerman, D., Mamdani, A., & Wellman, M. P. (1995). Real-world applications of
    Bayesian networks. Commun. ACM, 38(3), 24-26. doi:
    10.1145/203330.203334
    Hudson, J. N., & Bristow, D. R. (2006). Formative assessment can be fun as well as
    educational. [Article]. Advances in Physiology Education, 30(1), 33-37. doi:
    10.1152/advan.00040.2005
    Keller, J., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and E-learning design: A
    multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3),
    229-239. doi: 10.1080/1358165042000283084
    Lesh, R. (1979). Mathematical learning disabilities: Considerations for identification,
    diagnosis, and remediation. Applied mathematical problem solving, 111-180.
    Lesh, R., Landau, M., & Hamilton, E. (1983). Conceptual models and applied
    mathematical problem-solving research. Acquisition of mathematics concepts
    and processes, 263-343.
    Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among
    representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. Problems of
    representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics, 33-40.
    Messick, S. (1994). The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of
    Performance Assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
    Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., & Lukas, J. F. (2004). A Brief Introduction to
    Evidence-Centered Design. CSE Report 632. US Department of Education,
    33.
    Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. D. (2006). Implications of Evidence-Centered Design for
    Educational Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4),
    6-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00075.x
    Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). Rejoinder to Commentaries
    for "On the Structure of Educational Assessments". Measurement:
    Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(1), 92-101. doi:
    10.1207/s15366359mea0101_04
    Moser, R. (1997). A fantasy adventure game as a learning environment: why learning
    to program is so difficult and what can be done about it. SIGCSE Bull., 29(3),
    114-116. doi: 10.1145/268809.268853
    Moyer, P. S., & Bolyard, J. (2002). Exploring Representation in the Middle Grades:
    Investigations in Geometry with Virtual Manipulatives. TEaL Faculty 128
    Publications, 52.
    Moyer, P. S., Niezgoda, D., & Stanley, J. (2005). Young children’s use of virtual
    manipulatives and other forms of mathematical representations.
    Technology-supported mathematics learning environments, 67, 17-34.
    National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000). Principal and Standards for
    school mathematics. Reston:VA:NCTM.
    Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer
    Science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation.
    Computers & Education, 52(1), 1-12. doi:
    10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
    Pausch, R., Gold, R., Skelly, T., & Thiel, D. (1994). What HCI designers can learn
    from video game designers. Paper presented at the Conference on human
    factors in computer systems, Boston.
    Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible
    Inference: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
    Prensky, M. (2007). Digital Game-Based Learning: Paragon House.
    Randel, J. M. (1992). The Effectiveness of Games for Educational Purposes: A
    Review of Recent Research. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 261-276.
    Rupp, A. A., Gushta, M., Mislevy, R. J., & Shaffer, D. W. (2010). Evidence-Centered
    Design of Epistemic Games: Measurement Principles for Complex Learning
    Environments. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 8, 48.
    Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals.
    Cambridge: MA: MIT.
    Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning.
    In S. T. J. D. Fletcher (Ed.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 503-524).
    Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
    Shute, V. J., Hansen, E. G., & Almond, R. G. (2008). You Can't Fatten A Hog by
    Weighing It – Or Can You? Evaluating an Assessment for Learning System
    Called ACED. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,
    18(4), 289-316.
    Shute, V. J., Ventura, M., Bauer, M. I., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2009). Melding the
    power of serious games and embedded assessment to monitor and foster
    learning: Flow and grow. In U. Ritterfeld, M. Cody & P. Vorderer (Eds.),
    Serious games: Mechanisms and effects (pp. 295–321). Mahwah, NJ:
    Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
    Sindre, G., Natvig, L., & Jahre, M. (2009). Experimental validation of the learning
    effect for a pedagogical game on computer fundamentals. Education, IEEE
    Transactions on, 52(1), 10-18. Squire, K. (2006). From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience.
    Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19-29.
    Suh, J., Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Heo, H. (2005). Examining Technology Uses in
    the Classroom: Developing Fraction Sense Using Virtual Manipulative
    Concept Tutorials. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(4), 1-22.
    Suh, J. M. (2005). Third graders' mathematics achievement and representation
    preference using virtual and physical manipulatives for adding fractions and
    balancing equations. GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY.
    Vygotskiĭ, L. S. (1997). The Collected Works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the Theory
    and History of Psychology Including the Chapter on the Crisis in Psychology
    (Vol. 3): Springer.
    Wang, T.-H. (2008). Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: Development
    and evaluation. Computers &;Education, 51(3), 1247-1263. doi:
    10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.011
    Watts, N. (2006). Writing a Novel: Hodder General Publishing Division.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE