簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳姣伶
Chiao-Ling Chen
論文名稱: 就業母親的嬰兒照顧選擇及托育經驗探究
Infant care choices and use of working mothers in Taiwan
指導教授: 黃迺毓
Huang, Nai-Yu
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 人類發展與家庭學系
Department of Human Development and Family Studies
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 195
中文關鍵詞: 就業母親嬰兒照顧選擇環境脈絡母親信念托育經驗生態系統理論
英文關鍵詞: working mothers, infant care choices, environmental context, maternal beliefs, infant care use, Ecological System Theory
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:169下載:25
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要目的有二:(1)探討就業母親的個人背景、信念與母親托育選擇的關聯情形,同時考驗母親信念的影響效應;(2)探討就業母親實際的托育內涵及情感經驗。本研究以350位就業母親為對象,透過問卷調查方式蒐集相關資料,再從中選取12位母親進行深入訪談。研究主要發現如下:
    ㄧ、母親教育程度愈高,由自己照顧嬰兒的比例愈低;家庭收入低者,由自己照顧嬰兒的比例則較高。
    二、母親的嬰兒照顧選擇不會因幼兒性別、出生序、氣質而有顯著差異。
    三、選擇自己照顧與機構式托育的就業母親在「專業學習取向」信念的得分較高,意即較重視照顧者的專業性及照顧環境學習內容的規劃。
    四、選擇機構式托育的就業母親較認同托育對嬰兒的「有利影響」;選擇自己照顧嬰兒的母親則對托育「不利影響」的知覺程度較高。
    五、選擇自己照顧嬰兒的母親有較強的「天賦母職」和「責任母職」信念。
    六、選擇親屬托育的母親有較強的「生涯抱負」,由自己照顧嬰兒的母親則對「工作的承諾」較低。
    七、母親的信念能有效預測其托育選擇。「人際取向」因素與母親選擇自己照顧嬰兒呈負向關聯,「專業學習取向」、「不利影響」和「天賦母職」三項因素與母親選擇自己照顧嬰兒有正向關聯。
    八、從生態系統觀點分析就業母親的嬰兒照顧歷程,顯示母親們主要經驗的托育問題包括配偶及家人參與情形的影響(小系統效應)、職場政策及工作壓力調適(小系統效應)、育兒或就業的抉擇(中間系統效應)、尋求托育服務及政策協助(外系統效應)、托育計畫的變化與調整(時間系統效應)以及傳統育兒觀念與照顧實務的衝突(大系統效應),而就業母親在嬰兒照顧歷程中因面臨各系統因素的影響,故產生不同的情緒感受及心理調適經驗。
    研究最後並根據研究結果提出未來研究、教育及政策推廣上的建議。

    The main purpose of this study is twofold: First, it is to examine the relationship between working mothers’ personal background, beliefs and their infant care choices. Second, it is to explore the process of working mothers’ decisions and feelings about infant care. A total of 350 working mothers participated in this study. All participants completed questionnaire survey, and then researcher picked 12 subjects from the same group to conduct in-depth interviews. The major findings were as following:
    (1)the higher maternal education and family income were associated with higher proportion of non-maternal care choices.
    (2)gender, birth order, and temperament of infant were not associated with mothers’ infant care choices.
    (3)maternal care and center day care users were more likely than family day care users concerning learning activities of infant care.
    (4)center day care users were more likely than family day care users to have higher scores on a scale concerning positive effects of day care.
    (5)working mothers who choose maternal care expressed stronger positive feelings about motherhood than mothers who used other types of infant care.
    (6)working mothers who choose relative care expressed stronger career orientation, and who choose maternal care expressed lower work commitment.
    (7)maternal beliefs can predict their choice of infant care effectively.

    According to the Ecological System Theory, the selection and use of infant care were affected by different aspects of factors across contexts and time. The qualitative results shows that the main issues in mothers’ infant care history including the impact of spouses and family members(microsystem effect), workplace policies and work pressure adjustment (microsystem effect), the choice of employment or not (mesosystem effect), the search for infant care (exosystem effect), the change of infant care arrangement (chronosystem effect), as well as the disagreement in infant-rearing attitude between traditional values and modern concept (macrosystem effect) and so on.

    謝誌………………………………………………………………………1 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………3 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………4 目次……………………………………………………………………..Ⅰ 表目錄…………………………………………………………………..Ⅲ 圖目錄…………………………………………………………………..Ⅳ 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機……………………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究背景與目的……………………………………………… 3 第三節 研究問題……………………………………………………… 5 第四節 名詞釋義……………………………………………………… 6 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 我國嬰幼兒照顧型態與發展現況…………………………… 8 第二節 影響就業母親嬰兒照顧選擇的因素.………………………..13 第三節 母親的嬰兒照顧選擇與生態系統理論 …………………….35 第四節 就業母親的托育經驗歷程與心理發展……………………...44 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究設計.……………………………………………………..49 第二節 研究架構..…………………………………………………….50 第三節 研究對象.……………………………………………………..51 第四節 研究工具..…………………………………………………….54 第五節 研究程序.……………………………………………………..65 第六節 預試及項目分析...……………………………………………67 第七節 資料處理..………………………………………………….…80 第四章 研究結果與討論 第一節 研究樣本基本資料分析.……………………………………..81 第二節 就業母親嬰兒照顧選擇之描述統計分析.…………………..86 第三節 就業母親個人背景、環境脈絡與其嬰兒照顧選擇之關係101 第四節 就業母親的信念與其嬰兒照顧選擇之關係……………….113 第五節 就業母親的信念對其嬰兒照顧選擇之預測情形………….121 第六節 就業母親的嬰兒照顧經驗敘說.……………………………126 第七節 就業母親的嬰兒照顧歷程之質性資料分析.………………141 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論……………………………………………………….…162 第二節 建議………………………………………………………….167 參考文獻 一、 中文部份…………………………………………………….…172 二、 英文部份…………………………………………………….…175 附錄一 就業母親嬰兒照顧安排調查問卷..………………………………182 附錄二 就業母親嬰兒照顧問題訪談指引………………………………..195 表 目 錄 表3-3-1 正式施測樣本來源及問卷發放/回收一覽表.……………………52 表3-6-1 嬰兒托育選擇工具信念量表之項目分析與信度分析結果..……69 表3-6-2 嬰兒托育選擇工具信念量表之因素分析結果..…………………71 表3-6-3 嬰兒托育影響知覺量表之項目分析與信度分析結果..…………72 表3-6-4 嬰兒托育影響知覺量表之因素分析結果..………………………73 表3-6-5 母職角色信念量表之項目分析與信度分析結果..………………74 表3-6-6 母職角色信念量表之因素分析結果..……………………………76 表3-6-7 母親就業態度量表之項目分析與信度分析結果..………………77 表3-6-8 母親就業態度量表之因素分析結果..……………………………79 表4-1-1 研究樣本基本資料(母親) ..………………………………………82 表4-1-2 幼兒基本資料..……………………………………………………84 表4-1-3 受訪母親基本資料..………………………………………………85 表4-2-1 嬰兒二歲前的主要照顧方式與照顧者一覽表..…………………86 表4-2-2 家人意見對母親托育決策的影響情形..…………………………89 表4-2-3 就業母親對所採用之嬰兒照顧方式的滿意情形及原因..………94 表4-2-4 就業母親嬰兒托育選擇的偏好及原因..…………………………98 表4-2-5 就業母親對托育政策的知覺..……………………………………99 表4-3-1 母親的年齡與嬰兒照顧選擇的卡方考驗摘要表………………102 表4-3-2 母親的教育程度與嬰兒照顧選擇的卡方考驗摘要表…………103 表4-3-3 母親的家庭收入與嬰兒照顧選擇的卡方考驗摘要表…………104 表4-3-4 幼兒特質×嬰兒照顧選擇(母親自己照顧/非母親照顧)交叉表..106 表4-3-5 家人參與×嬰兒照顧選擇(母親自己照顧/非母親照顧)交叉表..108 表4-3-6 職場環境×嬰兒照顧選擇(母親自己照顧/非母親照顧)交叉表..110 表4-3-7 居住環境托育資源×嬰兒照顧選擇交叉表..……………………111 表4-3-8 母親對傳統育兒觀念的知覺情形×嬰兒照顧選擇交叉表..……112 表4-4-1 就業母親托育選擇工具信念差異比較之變異數分析摘要表…114 表4-4-2 就業母親的托育影響知覺差異比較之變異數分析摘要表……116 表4-4-3 就業母親母職角色信念差異比較之變異數分析摘要表………118 表4-4-4 母親就業態度差異比較之變異數分析摘要表…………………119 表4-5-1 母親嬰兒照顧選擇之邏輯斯迴歸分析摘要表…………………123 表4-5-2 母親照顧/非母親照顧預測分配正確率交叉表.………..………124 圖 目 錄 圖2-1 母親嬰兒照顧選擇的脈絡模式……………………………………..31 圖2-2 影響母親托育選擇的生態觀點模式………………………………..33 圖2-3 影響母親選擇特定托育方式的因素………………………………..34 圖3-2 研究架構圖…………………………………………………………..50 圖4-2-1 家人意見對母親托育決策的影響情形..………………………….89 圖4-2-2 就業母親對嬰兒照顧選擇的滿意情形..………………………….96

    一、中文部份
    內政部兒童局(2001)。90年(台閩地區)兒童生活狀況調查報告。取自http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/
    內政部兒童局(2005)。94年(台閩地區)兒童及少年生活狀況調查報告。取自http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/
    內政部兒童局(2009a)。取得保母技術士證照人數統計。取自http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/
    內政部兒童局(2009b)。84-97年度托育機構概況。取自http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/
    內政部兒童局(2008)。建構友善托育環境~保母托育管理與托育費用補助實施計畫。取自http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/
    內政部(2006)。內政統計通報(九十五年第三十八週)。取自http://www.moi.gov.tw/
    內政部(2007)。內政統計通報(九十六年第三十九週)。取自http://www.moi.gov.tw/
    行政院主計處(2005)。國情統計通報。取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/
    行政院主計處(2006a)。婦女婚育與就業調查。取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/
    行政院主計處(2006b)。台灣地區家庭收支調查。取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/
    行政院勞委會(2008)。婦女勞動統計(97年版)。取自http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/
    行政院經濟建設委員會(2008)。OECD友善家庭政策建議。
    取自http://www.cepd.gov.tw/
    王靜珠(1987)。認識我國托兒所的社會地位與功能。社會福利,43,7-11。
    王叢桂(2000)。促進參與父職因素的探討。應用心理研究,第6期,131-171。
    王叢桂(2004)。父母職責信念與工作價值觀。應用心理研究,第22期,201-216。
    王舒芸、余漢儀(1997)。奶爸難為—雙薪家庭之父職角色初探。婦女與兩性學刊,第八期,115-149。
    武素萍(1994)。台北市職業婦女對家庭式嬰幼兒照顧品質期望與評價之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
    吳明隆(2007)。SPSS操作與應用—問卷統計分析實務。台北:五南。
    吳書昀(2007)。延續與變遷:談母職及其在社會政策決策中的角色。論文發表於2007台灣女性學學會暨高師大40週年校慶「家庭與工作:變遷現象與多元想像」學術研討會,高雄市。
    高傳正(1986)。托兒所的理論。國教天地,66,46-56。
    高員仙(1987)。台北市國民中小學已婚女教師子女托育現況之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
    涂妙如(2003)。影響家庭嬰幼兒照顧方式決策之相關因素研究。家政教育學報;5:95-120。
    涂妙如(2005)。幼兒的氣質、嬰幼兒期照顧方式與親子依戀之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系博士論文。
    馬祖琳(2005)。家長視域之家庭托育經驗實相探討。幼兒保育研究集刊,第一卷,第一期,2-10。
    陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2003)。多變量分析方法—統計軟體應用。台北:五南。
    陳姣伶、黃迺毓(2008)。托嬰機構托育現況及主管人員之專業理念初探—以台北市立案之托嬰中心(部)為例。人類發展與家庭學報,第十期,81-113。
    陳姣伶(2009)。家庭外的嬰幼兒照顧—國內二十年托育文獻回顧與評析。2009第七屆全國托教論壇論文集,70-83。
    陳惠娟、郭丁熒(1998)。「母職」概念的內涵之探討—女性主義觀點。教育研究集刊,41輯,73-101。
    黃迺毓(2003)。從台灣幼兒之托育現況與家長需求看對家庭教育的啟示。發表於國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系主辦之「生命歷程中的家庭教育國際研討會」,台北。
    黃迺毓等(2001)。家庭概論。國立空中大學。
    黃怡瑾(2001)。「私」領域中的女性困境:生育、教養與照顧工作之分工。台南師院學報,第34期,341-365。
    馮燕(1997)。托育服務-生態觀點的分析(修訂版)。台北:巨流。
    馮燕(2000)。兒童家庭社會人口特性與托育模式分析。國科會專案研究(計劃編號:NSC89-2412-H-002-005)。
    張娟芬(1991)。女性與母職—一個嚴肅的女性思考。當代,62,94-98。
    張靜文(1997)。女性的母職:社會學觀點的批判分析,社教雙月刊,20-25。
    游齡玉(1997)。台北市國小一年級學童運用托育情形之回溯調查—以士林區為例。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
    彭淑華(1995)。影響父母二十四小時兒童托育決策相關因素之探討。東吳社會工作學報,第一期,頁275-306。
    賈浩妃(1988)。祖父母協助托育孫子女的決定過程-運用家族治療中結構學派的分析。國立師範大學教育心裡與輔導研究所碩士論文。
    葉郁菁等著(2006)。托育服務。台北:心理。
    劉慈惠(1999)。幼兒母親對中國傳統教養與現代教養的認知。新竹師院學報,12期,311-345。
    劉慈惠(2001)。現代幼兒母親的教養信念—以大學教育程度者為例。新竹師院學報,14期,355-405。
    蔡嫦娟、張碧如(2003)。家長對家庭保母之選擇及關係之建立-兼談證照與非證照保母之比較。兒童福利期刊,第四期,133-155。
    藍佩嘉(1991)。母職—消滅女人的制度。當代,62,84-88。
    蘇怡之(2000)。保母托育服務的支持與管理—系統面策略。社會福利,76,17-25。

    二、英文部分

    Ainslie, R. C.(1990). Family and center contributions to the adjustment of infants in full-time day care. New Directions for Child Development,49,39-52.
    Atkinson, A. M.(1987). A comparison of mothers’ and providers’ preferences and evaluations of day care services. Child and Youth Care Quarterly,16,35-47.
    Atkinson, A. M.(1991).Fathers’ participation in day care. Early Child Development and Care,66,115-126.
    Atkinson, A. M.(1994).Rural and urban families’ use of child care. Family Relations,43,16-22.
    Berghout, A. M., Godfrey, M. K., Larsen, J. M., Knudsen, L., Shelley, L., et al. (1996). Determinants of children’s satisfaction with their child care providers. Early Child Development and care,115,19-36.
    Bogat, G. A., & Gensheimer, L. K.(1986). Discrepancies between the attitudes and actions of parents choosing day care. Child Care Quarterly, 15, 159-169.
    Bradbard, M. R., Brown, E. G., Endsley, R.C., & Readdick, C. A.(1994). Parents’ selections of proprietary day care centers for their school-aged children:A study of three southeastern university communities.Child and Youth Care Forum,23,55-72.
    Britner, P. A., & Phillips D. A.(1995). Predictors of parent and provider satisfaction with child care dimensions: A comparison of center-based and family child day care. Child Welfare, 6,1135-1168.
    Bronfenbrenner, U.(1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Bronfenbrenner, U.(1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development. Developmental Psychology,22,723-742.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. & Morris, P.A.(1998).The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon(Ed.), Handbook of child psychology(vol 1):Theoretical models of human development(993-1028).New York:Wiley.
    Bromer, J.(2001). Mothers, helpers, and preachers: The multiple roles and discourse of family child care providers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,16,313-327.
    Bromer, J., & Henly, J. R.(2004). Child care as family support: caregiving practices across child providers. Children and Youth Services Review,26,941-964.
    Burchinal, M. R., Ramey, S. L., Reid, M. K., & Jaccard, J.(1995). Early child care experiences and their association with family and child characteristics during middle childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,10,33-61.
    Caruso, G. L.(1991). The ecology of child care: The relationship of parent-caregiver support and child care quality to toddler behavior. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (Seattle,WA)
    Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Gruber, C. P., & Fitzerald, L. M.(1994). Children at home and in day care. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Cryer, D., & Burchinal, M.(1997). Parents as child consumers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,12,35-58.
    Duncan, S. & Strell, M.(2004). Combining lone motherhood and paid work:the rationality mistake and Norwegian social policy, Journal of European Social Policy, 14(1),41-54.
    Early, D. & Birchinal, M.(2001). Early child care: Relations with family characteristics and preferred care characteristics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,v16,n4,475-497.
    Endsley, R. C., & Minish, P. A.(1991).Parent-staff communication in day care centers during morning and afternoon transitions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,6(2),119-135.
    Elicker, J., Noppe, I.C., Noppe, L.D., & Fortner-Wood, C.(1997). The Parent-Caregiver Relationship Scale: Rounding out the relationship system in infant child care. Early Education and Development,v8,n1,83-100.
    Elvin-Nowak, Y. & Thomsson, H.(2001). Motherhood as idea and practice a discursive understanding of employed mothers in Sweden. Gender & Society, 15,407-428.
    Erdwins,C.J., & Buffardi,L.C.(1994). Different types of day care and their relationship to maternal satisfaction,perceived support,and role conflict. Child and Youth Care Forum,23,41-54.
    Erwin, P. J., Sanson, A., Amos, D., & Bradley, B. S.(1993). Parent involvement and quality daycare in proprietary centers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education,7,53-61.
    Fuller, B., Holloway, S., & Liang, X.(1996). Family selection of child-care centres: The influence of household support, ethnicity,and parental practices. Child Development, 67,3320-3337.
    Fuqua, R. W., & Labensohn, D.(1986). Parents as consumers of child care. Family Relations, 35,295-303.
    Gable, S., & Cole, K.(2000). Parents’ child care arrangements and their ecological correlates. Early Education & Development, 11(5),549-572.
    Galambos, N.L., & Lerner, J.V.(1987). Child characteristics and the employment of mothers with young children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28,87-98.
    Galinsky, E.(1990). Why are some parent/teacher partnerships clouded with difficulties? Young Children,45,38-39.
    Ghazvini, A. S., & Readdick, C. A. (1994). Caregiver-parent communication and quality of care in diverse child care settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,9,207-222.
    Hiedemann, B., Joesch, J.M. & Rose,E.(2004). More daughters in child care? Child gender and the use of nonrelative child care arrangements. Social Science Quarterly,85,154-168.
    Hock, E., Christman, K., & Hock, M.(1980). Factors associated with decisions about return to work in mothers of infants Developmental Psychology, 16, 535-536.
    Hofferth, S. L., & Phillips, D. A.(1991). Child care policy research. Journal of Social Issues,47,1-13.
    Hofferth, S. L.(1992). The demand for and supply of child care in the 1990s. In A. Booth(Ed.), Child care in the 1990s: Trends and consequences(pp.3-25). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
    Hofferth, S. L., Shauman, K. A., Henke, R. R., & West, J.(1998). Characteristics of children’s early care and education programs:Data from the 1995 National Household Education Survey(NHES Publication No.98-128). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing.
    Hofferth, S. L., & Wissoker, D. A.(1992). Price, quality, and income in child care choice. The Journal of Human Resources,27,70-111.
    Hogan, E.L.(1991).The importance of the mother-provider relationship in Family child care homes. paper presented at the Midwest Regional Conference of the Association for the Education of Young Children.(Des Moines,IA)
    Holloway, S. D., & Reichhart-Erickson, M.(1989). Child-care quality, family structure, and maternal expectations: Relationship to preschool children’s peer relations. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,10,281-298.
    Huston, A., Chang, Y., & Gennetian, L.(2002).Family and individual predictors of child care use by low-income families in different policy contexts. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,17,441-469.
    Hughes, R.(1985). The informal help-giving of home and center childcare providers.Family Relations,34,359-366.
    Johansen, A., Leibowitz, A., & Waite, L.(1996).The importance of child care characteristics in choice of care. Journal of Marriage and the Family,v58,759-772.
    Kadushin, A.(1980). Child welfare services. NY: Macmillan.
    Kisker, E. E., Hofferth, S. L., Phillips, D. A., & Farquhar, E.(1991). A profile of child care settinhs: Early education and care in 1990(vol.1). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
    Kontos, S., & Dunn, L.(1989). Attitudes of caregivers, maternal experiences with day care, and children’s development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,10,37-51.
    Kontos, S., & Wells, W.(1986). Attitudes of caregivers and the day care experiences of families . Early Childhood Research Quarterly,1,47-67.
    Kontos, S., Howes, C., Shinn, M., & Galinsky, E.(1995). Quality in family child care and relative care. New York:Teachers College Press.
    Leach, P., Barnes, J., Nichols, M., Goldin, J., Stein, A., Sylva, K., Malmberg, L. E., & the FCCC team(2006). Child care before 6 months of age: a qualitative study of mothers’ decisions and feelings about employment and non-maternal care. Infant and Child Development,15,471-502.
    Liang, X., Fuller, B., & Singer, J. D.(2000). Ethnic differences in child care selection: the influence of family structure, parental practices, and home language. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,v15,n3,357-384.
    Lombardi, J.(2005). Child care ie education…and more. Washington D.C.: NAEYC.
    Love, J. M., Harrison, L., Sagi-Schwartz, A., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Ross, C., Ungerer, J. A., et al (2003). Childcare matters: How conclusions may vary with context. Child Development,74,1021-1033
    Marshall, N. L.(2004).The quality of early child care and children’s development.Current Directions in Psychological Science,13,4,165-168.
    McGurk, H., Caplan, M., Hennessy, E., & Moss, P.(1993). Controversy, theory and social context in contemporary day care research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines,34,3-23.
    Melhuish, E. C., Moss, P., Mooney, A., & Martin, S.(1991). How similar are day-care groups before the of day care? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,12,331-346.
    NICHD Early Child Care Research Network(1997).Familial factors associated with the characteristics of non-maternal care for infants. Journal of Marriage and the Family,59,389-408.
    NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2001).Non-maternal care and family factors in early development: A overview of the NICHD Study of Early Child Care.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,22,457-492.
    NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2002).Child-care structure →process→outcome: Direct and indirect effects of child-care quality on young children’s development. Psychological Science,13,199-206.
    NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2004).Type of child care and children’s development at 54 months. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,v19,n2,203-230.
    Pence, A. K., & Goelman, H.(1987). Silent partners: Parents of children in three types of day care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,2,103-118.
    Powell, D. R.(1989). Families and early childhood programs. Washington, DC:NAEYC.
    Pungello, E. P. & Kurtz-Costes, B(1999).Why and how working women choose child care: a review with a focus on infancy. Developmental Review,19,31-96.
    Pungello, E. P. & Kurtz-Costes, B(2000).Working women’s selection of care for their infants: A prospective study. Family Relations,49,245-255.
    Rassin, G. M., Beach, P. S., McCormick. D. P., Niebuhr, V. N., & Weller, S.(1991). Health and safety in day care: Parental knowledge. Clinical Pediatrics, 30,344-349.
    Riley, L. A., & Glass, J. L.(2002). You can’t always get what you want—infant care preferences and use among employed mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family,64,2-15.
    Seo, S.(2003). Early child care choices: a theoretical model and research implications. Early Child Development and Care.v173(6), pp637-650.
    Singer, J., Fuller,B., Keiley, M. & Wolf, A.(1998).Early child-care selection: variation by geographic location, maternal characteristics, and family structure. Developmental Psychology,34,1129-1144.
    Sylva, K., Stein, A., Leach, P., Barnes, B., & Malmberg, L.(2007).Family and child factors related to the use of non-maternal infant care: An English study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,22,118-136.
    Uttal, L.(1996). Custodial care, surrogate care, and coordinated care:employed mothers and the meaning of child care. Gender and Society,10(3), 291-311.
    Volling, B.L., & Belsky, J(1993). Parent, infant and contextual characteristics related to maternal employment decisions in the first year of infancy. Family Relations,42,4-12.
    Wise, S.(2002).Parent’s expectations, values and choice of child care connections to culture. Family Matters,n6,48-55.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE