簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 梁慧雯
Hwey-Wen Liang
論文名稱: 高齡者同儕人際網絡間社會學習行為研究-以玩具工坊為例
A Study on Elderly Social Learning Behavior in Group Social Networks- A case of Toy Clinic Shop
指導教授: 洪榮昭
Hong, Jon-Chao
黃明月
Hwang, Ming-Yueh
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 社會教育學系
Department of Adult and Continuing Education
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 173
中文關鍵詞: 高齡學習社會學習行為社會網絡分析GridWare互動行為分析學習成就動機玩具工坊
英文關鍵詞: elderly learning, social learning behavior, social network analysis, GridWare, learning achievement motivation, Toy Clinic Shop
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:150下載:45
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討高齡者在組織中之社會學習行為及不同人際網絡角色者其社會學習行為模式。研究對象為兩所國小之玩具工坊高齡者(玩具醫師),研究方法為質性研究取向,運用社會網絡分析方法,了解玩具工坊之高齡者包含中心兼居間者、中心者及邊陲者等三種角色,並且以參與觀察與深度訪談法獲得此三種人際網絡角色者之學習成就動機、同儕間學習行為特徵、學習互動情形與學習相應行為等資料,以歸納分析高齡組織人際網絡間社會學習行為模式。研究獲致下列結論:

    一、玩具工坊高齡者人際網絡角色包含中心兼居間者、中心者與邊陲者等三類,其中團體的領導者扮演中心兼居間者角色,擔負資源協調與學習調度之責。
    二、不同人際網絡角色者之學習成就動機,在社會性學習成就動機上均包含社會關係維繫與社會貢獻取向;在個我性學習成就動機取向上,中心兼居間者與中心者為新知獲得與學習過程取向,而邊陲者則為能力證明與學習成就取向。
    三、不同人際網絡角色者學習互動行為特徵與內涵取向各有異同。
    四、玩具工坊高齡者社會學習行為可歸納為下模式:

    1、中心兼居間者社會學習行為模式-團體中悠遊的運籌學習者
    中心兼居間者個我性學習成就動機包含新知獲得與學習過程取向,社會性學習成就動機包含社會關係維繫與社會貢獻取向;學習行為特徵包含:1.團隊中資源調度分配、學習居間協調者、2.運籌調度與創意探索學習取向、3.學習挑戰中進行反省檢討,並堅持深入探索原理,融入同儕成功經驗。其學習應用行為是以運籌調度與創意探索學習為取向。

    2、中心者社會學習行為模式-團體中獨立的創作者
    中心者學習成就動機與中心居間者相同,學習行為特徵包含:1.知識探討與新概念獲取,重視知識的獲得與理解、2.學習挑戰中表現堅持與毅力,自我監控與調整學習目標、3.在團體中獨立的探索學習。由於中心者的專家角色,因此中心居間者其學習應用行為是個人自主性與創新力為取向,即使在團體中學習,中心者仍然保有獨立創作的學習風格。

    3、邊陲者社會學習行為模式- 團體中認真的觀察學習者
    邊陲者個我性學習成就動機包含能力證明與學習成就取向,社會性學習成就動機包含社會關係維繫與社會貢獻取向。學習行為特徵包含1.依賴團體學習,團體共學降低學習焦慮,增加高齡者人際互動、2.學習從認真的觀察模仿開始、3.從成功經驗獲得學習樂趣。其學習應用行為是從學習成就中獲得樂趣,而在團體中邊陲者是認真的觀察學習角色。

    本研究依據研究結論針對高齡學習機構提出下列建議:
    一、國小可運用閒置空間做為玩具工坊,促進高齡者社會學習、社會貢獻、代間學習與創意發展。
    二、高齡學習團體之領導者需能顧慮個人在群體中的關係,而給予學習支持、協助與調度。
    三、高齡學習團體應強調同儕關係的維持。
    四、高齡學習課程主題設計需規劃挑戰性的內容,激發團體不同網絡角色者之創意與成就感。
    五、高齡學習環境之安排,應以小組方式進行,以收同儕間社會學習之效。
    六、教師對於高齡者學習內容之安排應兼顧不同網絡角色之需求,催化同儕間學習與互動。
    七、高齡學習目標應兼具個人能力提升與社會影響之價值。

    Social learning contains the characteristics such as interactive, symbolic, vicarious and self-regulation. Elderly can experience social learning via interact with others in learning group. The purpose of this study is to explore social learning behavior of elderly include learning achievement motivation, learning characteristics, interaction and learning applied behaviors. Research methodology is qualitative research-participant observation and in-depth interviewing with 7 elderly in Toy Clinic Shop, social network analysis and GridWare analysis were used as tools to analyze the social learning behaviors. The findings of this study are as follow:

    1) There are 3 type network roles (Center-broker, Center, and Periphery) in elderly learning group. The Center-broker elderly is the leader of group and responsible for resource coordination and scheduling learning of group members.
    2) The meaning of elderly learning achievement motivation:
    In social orientation, includes social relationship and contribution; in person orientation, the Center-broker and Center elderly are access knowledge and learning process, the Periphery is proven ability and learning achievement.
    3) The interaction features and learning behaviors of the 3 type network roles have partly similarities and differences.
    4) Elderly social learning behavior can be summarized for the 3 models:
    The Center-broker elderly is a good managing and coordinative learner.
    The Center elderly is an independent creator in learning group.
    The Periphery elderly is an earnest observation learner.

    Based on research findings, suggestions are proposed as below:
    1)Elderly can promote their social learning, social contribution, intergenerational learning and develop creation in Toy Clinic Shop.
    2)The leader of elderly learning group should responsible for resource coordination and scheduling learning of group members.
    3) Elderly learning group should be mentioned on members’ relationship, challenging learning task, learning environment and the learning needs of different network roles elderly.

    中文摘要 英文摘要 目 錄 i 表 次 iii 圖 次 iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 2 第二節 研究目的 7 第三節 重要名詞解釋 8 第四節 研究方法、步驟與限制 10 第二章 文獻探討 13 第一節 玩具工坊之高齡學習內涵與辦理現況 13 第二節 高齡學習之意涵與心理社會發展觀點 19 第三節 組織內人際網絡對學習之影響 25 第四節 高齡學習之社會學習理論觀點 37 第五節 本研究待答問題 54 第三章 研究設計與實施 55 第一節 質性研究取向 55 第二節 研究場域 56 第三節 試探性研究 60 第四節 研究對象 62 第五節 研究概念圖、流程與期程 63 第六節 資料蒐集方式 66 第七節 研究信實度檢核 77 第八節 研究者角色與研究倫理 78 第四章 結果分析與討論 81 第一節 人際網絡資料分析 81 第二節 高齡者學習成就動機取向 87 第三節 高齡者同儕間學習行為分析 93 第五章 結論與建議 141 第一節 主要研究發現 141 第二節 結 論 144 第三節 建 議 151 第四節 研究省思 154 參考書目 157 中文部份 157 英文部分 162 附錄一 171 附錄二 172 附錄三 173

    中文書目
    內政部(2005)。老人生活狀況調查報告。臺北市:內政部。
    內政部(2011)。一○○年第二週內政統計通報。取自http://www.moi.gov.tw/files/news_file/week10002.doc
    方珮玲(2005)。高齡者參與代間方案歷程之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育學研究所碩士論文。
    白小瑜(2009)。從社會網絡中的”洞”獲利,重慶郵電大學學報(社會科學版),21(4),98-102
    石宇淋(2008)。團隊特性、互動網絡結構與團隊效能關係之研究-以轉換型領導與組織規範為干擾變數。靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    石泱(2004)。獨居老人社會支持、健康狀況與孤寂感對生活滿意影響之研究,輔仁學誌,39,43-66。
    任慶宗、劉士銘、黃楷茵(2005)。社會網絡分析法探討團隊成員異質性與知識分享意願。第十三屆國防管理學術暨實務研討會論文,國防管理學院。
    江盈慧(2009)。從學習風格探析高齡者資訊通訊科技的使用。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    江紹倫(1980)。知識心理學說與應用。臺北市:聯經。
    行政院經濟建設委員會(2004)。中華民國台灣地區民國93年至140年人口推計,臺北市:行政院經濟建設委員會。
    何芳蓉(2003)。新產品開發團隊之社會資本、知識分享與績效的實證研究。高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理系碩士論文。
    余安邦、楊國樞(1986)。成就動機的類型及其測量。國立台灣大學心理學研究所未發表之論文。
    余安邦、楊國樞(1987)。社會取向成就動機與個我取向成就動機,民族學研究所集刊,64,51-98。
    吳佳珍(2004)。社會網絡結構與組織創新績效-以電影產製組織的知識傳遞為例。臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。
    吳思怡(2009)。社會網絡及社會交換知識分享行為的影響-社會認知理論觀點。成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    李嵩義(2006)。高齡學習者學習偏好、社會支持與幸福感關係之研究。高雄師範大學成人教育研究所博士論文。
    李麗美(2002)。松年大學學員自我導向學習傾向愈學習滿意度相關研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
    李維靈、施建彬、邱翔蘭(2007)。退休老人休閒活動參與及其幸福感之相關研究。人文暨社會科學期刊,3(2),27-35。
    阮鵬宇(2006)。老人大學學習動機與學習滿意度之研究-以彰化縣政府老人大學為例。大葉大學工業工程與科技管理學研究所碩士論文。
    卓秀足、陳沁怡、楊仁壽(2007)。休閒餐飲業員工的社會網絡對團體效能之影響。觀光研究學報,13(1),47-72。
    周怜利譯(2000)。Erikson老年研究報告(原作者:E. H. Erikson, J. M. Erikson, H. O. Kivnick)。臺北市:張老師文化。(原著出版年:2000)
    周家華(1995)。社會老年學理論的研究。臺北市技術學院學報,28,1-25。
    周麗芳(2006)。華人工作團隊之社會關係成員效能:多元向度、多重網絡的探討。台灣大學心理學系博士論文。
    周麗芳、鄭伯壎、黃敏萍(2002)。華人工作團隊內關係與成員效能:價值觀契合與網絡核心性的中介效果。第四屆華人心理學家暨第六屆華人心理與行為科際國際學術研討會,中央研究院,臺北市。
    林三衛(1997)。老年生活品質:非制度功能支持網路對老年主觀幸福之影響-臺北市為例子。東海大學社會學研究碩士論文。
    林亭玉(2000)。社區老人教育之研究—以高雄市本館社區和君正社區為例。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文。
    林聚任(2009)。社會網絡分析、理論、方法與應用。北京:北京師範大學。
    林麗惠(2004)。高齡者對成功老化條件及策略之初探。高齡社會與高齡教育。臺北市:師大書苑。
    邱建璋(2002)。組織內關係類型、形成歷程及其互動內容之研究:社會網絡之觀點。屏東科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
    邱議德(2003)。以社會網路分析法評估工作團隊知識創造與分享。中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    洪志忠(2005)。從社會網絡看知識分享-以海關核心職能驗估人員為例。元智大學資訊社會學研究所碩士論文。
    胡幼慧(2008)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市:巨流。
    苗延威、張君玫譯(1998)。社會互動(原作者:M. Argyle)。臺北市:巨流。(原著出版年:1969)
    徐千惠(2010)。高齡學習需求與參與情況分析之研究:以苗栗縣六所樂齡學習資源中心為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
    徐士翔(2009)。國小學生同儕關係、成就動機與學業成就相關研究—以台南縣為例。國立屏東教育大學教育科技研究所碩士論文。
    高申春(2001)。人性輝煌之路:班度拉的社會學習理論。臺北市:貓頭鷹出版社。
    高昀琪(2006)。高齡學習者學習動機與學習滿意度之研究-以桃園縣老人大學為例。國立中正大學高齡者教育所碩士論文。
    張火燦、劉淑寧(2002)。從社會網路理論探討員工知識分享。人力資源管理學報,2(3),101-113。
    張秋嵐(2007)。長青學苑老人持續參與學習活動之研究。大葉大學休閒事業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
    張苙雲(1996)。社會變遷中各類社會支持系統功能的討論。行政院研究發展考核委員會:加強家庭教育促進社會和諧學術研討會論文集。行政院研究發展考核委員會。
    梁丹、葛玉輝、陳悅明(2010)。結構洞理論在高管團隊社會資本中應用研究展望,華東經濟管理,24(4),97-99。
    梁慧雯(1999)。老人居家服務志工持續參與因素之探討-以祥和計畫為例。東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
    許麗玲(2009)。網路學習社群創新擴散模式建構之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學研究所博士論文。
    郭為藩(2003)。發展心理學的新貌。成人學習-心理學的探討。臺北市:心理。
    陳秋蘭(2009)。屏東縣高齡者學習動機對幸福感影響。美合技術學院健康照護研究所碩士論文。
    陳清美(2001)。高齡學習者對學習環境偏好之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳榮德(2004)。組織內部社會網絡的形成與影響:社會資本觀點。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
    曾揚容(2003)。老人社會大學高齡學習者學習型態及其相關因素之研究。台灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文。
    曾進勤(2004)。老有所用:高齡者參與薪傳教學方案服務歷程之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所文教行政碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    程炳林、林清山(2001)。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研究。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,48(1),1-41。
    黃姿霓(2004)。中年人與老年人學習風格之比較研究 --以臺北市市社區大學為例。中正大學高齡者教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃郁婷(1995)。親子溝通、因應方式與老年人幸福感之關係。中國文化大學家政研究所碩士論文。
    黃郁婷、楊雅筠(2006)。老年人友誼支持與幸福感之研究 - 以臺北市市老人服務中心為例。社區發展,113,208-224。
    黃富順(1997)。高齡學習者的心理特性,載於老人的社區經營與教育參與研討會手冊,119-132。臺北市:中華民國社區教育學會。
    黃富順(2004)。高齡學習。臺北市:五南。
    黃富順、林麗惠、梁芷瑄(2008)。我國屆齡退休及高齡者參與學習需求意向調查研究。臺北市:教育部。取自http://b001.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/front/bin/ptlist.phtml?Category=63.
    黃富順、黃明月(2006)。邁向高齡社會老人教育政策白皮書。臺北市:教育部。
    楊文金(2000)。同儕友伴關係對六年級學生科學問題組對討論的影響分析。科學教育學刊,8(2),123-140。
    楊文金(2003)。國中理化實驗課中學習機會分佈之研究--從社會互動及認知投入的角度。科學教育學刊,11(1),75-95。
    楊書成(2006)。從社會交換理論觀點探討團隊成員內隱知識取得與分享之研究。中央大學資訊管理學系博士論文。
    葉育呈(2008)。組織成員的學習關係網路之研究。長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
    葉佳承(2003)。從熱認知觀點探討科學學習小組在權力場之互動與學習。花蓮師範學院國小科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    葉肅科(2005)。高齡化社會與老年生活風格,社區發展季刊,110,230-242。
    詹涵雯(2008)。桃園縣高齡者學習需求與參與意願之研究。國立中央大學客家政治經濟與政策研究所在職碩士專班碩士論文。
    劉軍(2009)。整體網分析講義:UCINET軟件實用指南。上海:格致。
    劉鎮寧(2009)。國民小學志工服務學習與其生活滿意度關係之研究。屏東教育大學學報,33,621-650。
    蔡文瑜(2003)。成人學習後設認知及其影響。載於郭為藩(編著),成人學習:心理學的探討。臺北市:心理。
    蔡明砡(1991)。老人教育學員學習滿意度及相關因素之研究-以臺北市市長青學苑為例。東吳大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
    蔡雅鈴(2005)。從初任父母之家庭談家庭資源及社會支持之運用,網路社會學通訊期刊,49,取自:http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/49/49-66.htm
    蔡嘉慧(1998)。國中生的社會支持、生活壓力與憂鬱傾向之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    鄭振宗、賴昆宏(2007)。台中地區長青學苑老人之社會支持、孤寂感、休閒活動參與及生命意義之研究,朝陽學報,12,217-254。
    魏彩密(2007)。高齡學習者溝通式英語教學學習滿意度之研究。國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系在職進修碩士論文。
    羅家德、朱慶忠(2004)。人際網絡結構因素對工作滿足之影響,中山管理評論,12(4),795-823。
    覺元宏(2010)。高齡學習需求與參與情況分析之研究:以嘉義市長青學苑為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。

    英文部分
    Ames, C.A. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.
    Anderson, M. H. (2002). The effects of individuals’ social network characteristics and information processing characteristics on their sensemaking of complex, ambiguous issues (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota.
    Antonucci, T. C. (1985). Personal characteristic, social support, and social behavior. In R.H. Binstock & E. Shanas (Eds.) Handbook of aging and the social sciences (2nd ed.)(pp. 94-128). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
    Antonucci, T. C. (1990). Social supports and social relationships. In R.H. Binstock & L.K. Gorge (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 205-226) (3rd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
    Antonucci, T. C., Lansford, J. E., Akiyama, H. (2001). Impact of positive and negative aspects of marital relationships and friendships on well-being of older adults. Applied Developmental Science, 5 (2), 68-75.
    Argyle, M. (1969). Social interaction. London: Methuen.
    Argyle, M., & Kendon, A. (1967). The experimental analysis of social performance. Advance in Eexperimental Social Psychology, 3, 55-98.
    Ashida, S. (2006). Social network characteristics and intention to participate in social activity programs at a new senior center (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University.
    Atkinson, J., & Birch, D. (1978). An introduction to motivation (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand.
    Atkinson, J.W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.
    Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
    Bandura, A. (1977b). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
    Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
    Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Bandura, A. (2000). Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organization behavior (pp. 120-135). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
    Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 1-43). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
    Berarducci, A., & Lengacher, C. A. (1998). Self-efficacy: An essential component of advance-practice nursing. Nursing Connections, 11(1), 55-67.
    Blyler, M., & Coff, R. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 677-686.
    Boekarets, M., & Minnaert, A. (1999). Self-regulation with respect to informal learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 533-544.
    Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
    Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In B. M. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 345-423). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Burt, Ronald S. (2001). Bandwidth and echo: Trust, information, and gossip in social networks. In Alessandra Casella & James E. Rauch (Eds.), Integrating the study of networks and markets (pp. 30-74). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    Campion, M. A., & Papper, E. M. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49(2), 429-452.
    Chang, S. H., & Yang, M. S.(1999). The relationships between the elderly loneliness and its factors of personal attributes, perceived health status and social support. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 15(6), 337-347.
    Chapin, J. (1998). Is service learning a good idea? Data from the national longitudinal study. Social Studies, 89(5), 215-211.
    Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49(2), 309-329.
    Cho, H., Lee, J.-S., Stefanone, M., & Gay, G. (2005). Development of computer-supported collaborative social networks in a distributed learning community. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24 (6), 435-447.
    Chung, J. (2009). An intergenerational reminiscence programme for older adults with early dementia and youth volunteers: Values and challenges. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 23(2), 259 -264.
    Clarebout, G., & Elen, J. (2009). The complexity of tool use in computer based environments. Instructional Science, 37, 474–486.
    Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293–321.
    Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. MA, Boston: Harvard Business Press.
    Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
    Cookson, P. (1986). A framework for theory and research on adult education participation. Adult Education Quarterly, 36 (3), 130-142.
    Cross, P. (1982). Adults as learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Cumming, E., & Henry, W. (1961). Growing old: The process of disengagement. New York: Basic Books.
    Dawson, S. (2008). A study of the relationship between student social networks and sense of community. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 224–238.
    Dean, A., Kolody, B., & Wood, P. (1990). Effect of social support from various sources on depression in elderly persons. Journal of Health and Social Behavior ,31, 148-161.
    Delahaye, B., & Ehrich, L. (2008). Complex learning preferences and strategies of older adults. Educational Gerontology, 34(8), 649-662.
    Die, A. H., Seelbach, W. C., Sherman, G. D. (1987). Achievement motivation, achieving styles, and morale in the elderly. Psychology and Aging, 2(4), 407-408.
    Duay, D., & Bryan, V. (2008). Learning in later life: What seniors want in a learning experience. Educational Gerontology, 34(12), 1070-1086.
    Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H.A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628-644.
    Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 , 501-519.
    Fisher, J.C. (1993). A framework for describing developmental change among older adult. Adult Education Quarterly, 43(2), 76-89.
    Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Flynn, F. J. (2005). Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 737-750.
    Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
    Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecologicalpsychology (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Gibson, S. K. (2004). Social learning (cognitive) theory and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 193-210.
    Goldblum-Ranzman, S. (2000). Successful aging in women (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Union Institute.
    Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
    Granovetter, M.S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
    Griffith, T. D. (2001). The relationship between death awareness and successful aging among older adults (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Florida State University.
    Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computersupported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6(2), 199–220.
    Harvey, P. W., & Thurnwald, I. (2009). Ageing well, ageing productively: The essential contribution of Australia's ageing population to the social and economic prosperity of the nation. Health Sociology Review, 18(4), 379–386.
    Havighurst, R. J., Albrecht R. (1953). Older people. New York: Longmans, Green.
    Havighurst, R. J. (1970). Changing status and roles during the adult life cycle: Significance for adult education. In R. W. Burnes (Ed.), Sociological backgrounds of adult education (pp. 17–38). Syracuse, NY: Center for the Study of Liberal Education for Adults.
    Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Building social networks via computer networks: Creating and sustaining distributed learning communities. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 159–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Helmreich, R. L. & Spence, J. T. (1978). The work and family orientation questionnaire: An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8(35), 21-35.
    Henderson, G.R., Iacobucci, D., & Calder, B.J. (1998). Brand diagnostics: Mapping branding effects using consumer associative networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 111, 306-327.
    Hernandez, C. R., & Gonzalez, M. Z. (2008). Effects of intergenerational interaction on aging. Educational Gerontology, 34(4), 292-305.
    Hertzog, C., & Dixon, R.A. (1996). Methodological issues in research on cognition and aging. In F. Blanchard-Fields & T. Hess (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive changes in adult development and aging (pp. 66-121). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Hess, T. (1999). The social cognitive perspective and the study of aging. In T. Hess & F. Blanchard-Fields (Eds.), Social cognition and aging (pp.1-14). Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press.
    Hong, J.C., Hwang, M.Y., Liang, H.W., & Chang, S. W. (2008). A toy clinic shop: innovation management in a Shin-Tai elementary school. Educational Gerontology, 34(11), 1018-1033.
    House, J. S., & Kahn, R. L. (1985). Measures and concepts of social support. In S. Cohen & L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 83-108). New York: Academic.
    Hwang, M. Y., Lin, Y. Y., & Liang, H. W. (2007). Elderly learning in the Toy Clinic Shop in Taiwan. Paper presented at Redesigning Pedagogy- Culture, Knowledge and Understanding, Singapore.
    Jacoby, B. (1996). Service-learning in high education: Conception and practice. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass
    Jarvis P. (2001). Learning in later life: An introduction for educations & carers. London: Kogan Page.
    Jarvis, P., & Walker, J. (1997). When the process becomes the product: Summer Universities for Seniors, Education and Ageing, 12, 60-68.
    Kahn, R.L., & Antouncci, T.C. (1980). Convoys over the life courses, attachment, roles and social. In P.B. Baltes & O.G. Brim (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (pp. 253-286). New York: Academic Press.
    Kaplan, M. (2007). An intergenerational approach to adult education: Some thoughts and considerations. Paper presented at 2007 International Forum on Promotion and Practice of Elder Education. Taipei, Taiwan.
    Klag, N. D. (1996). Toywise: Celebrating the art and science of teaching with toys. Utah, United States.
    Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. (1982). Network analysis, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Larson, R., Mannell, R., & Zuzanek, J. (1986). Daily well-being of older adults with friends and family. Psychology and Aging , 1 (2), 117-126.
    Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Lemon, B. W., Bengtson, V. L., & Peterson, J. A. (1972). An exploration of the activity theory of aging: Activity types and life expectation among in-movers to a retirement community. Journal of Gerontology, 27(4), 511-23.
    Leung, A., Chi, I., & Chiang, V. (2008). Chinese retirees' learning interests: A qualitative analysis. Educational Gerontology, 34(12), 1105-1121.
    Lewis, M. D., Lamey, A. V., & Douglas, L. (1999). A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development. Developmental Science, 2, 458-476.
    Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(4), 315 – 332.
    Lin, N. (1982). Social resources and instrumental action. In P. V. Marsden & Nan Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp.131-145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1984). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.
    Lowe, L. A., & Medina, V. L. (2010). Service learning collaborations: A formula for reciprocity. Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 91(2), 127-134.
    Lu, J., Chiu, M., & Law, N. ( in press). Collaborative argumentation and justifications: A statistical discourse analysis of online discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, Retreived from doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.021
    McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determines what people do. American Psychologist, 40, 812-815.
    McClelland, D.C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
    McClusky, H. Y. (1974). The coming of age of lifelong learning. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 7(4), 97-107.
    Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for work place performances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 121–146.
    Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R.S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
    Merriam, S., & Lumsden D. B. (1985). Educational needs and interests of older adults. In D. B. Lumsden (Ed.), The older adult as learner: Aspect of educational gerontology (pp. 51-71). New York: Hemisphere.
    Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
    Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-depth interviewing (2nd ed.). South Melbourne: Longman.
    Mitchell, J. C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In J. C. Mitchell (Ed.), Social network in urban situations. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
    Moody, H. R. (1976). Philosophical presuppositions of education for old age. Educational Gerontology, 1, 1-16.
    Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
    Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L.(1996). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
    O’ Leary, A. (1985). Self-efficacy and health. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 23(4), 437-451.
    Oliva, A. (2007). Social support, psychological well-being, and health among the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 33(12), 1053–1068.
    Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
    Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Retreived from http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html.
    Papalia, D. E., Olds, S. W., & Wood, P. (1990). Effect of social support from various sources on depression in elderly persons. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 148-161.
    Peterson, D. A. (1983). Facilitating education for older learners. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Peterson, J. W. (1997). Age of wisdom: Elderly black women in family and church. In J. Sokolovsky (Ed.), The cultural context of aging. Retreived from http://www.stpt.usf.edu/~jsokolov/webbook/peterson.pdf
    Robert, H. C. (1991). Marital status and personal well-being: A literature review. Family Relations, 40, 97-102.
    Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Geronotologist, 37, 433-440.
    Ruff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
    Schaefer, C., Coyne, J. C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). The health-related functions of social support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 381-406.
    Schaie, K. W., & Willis, S. L. (2002). Adult development and aging (5th ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall.
    Scott, J. (2002). Social networks: Critical concepts in sociology. New York: Routledge.
    Scott, T. L. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 591-615.
    Sigmon, R.L. (1996). An introduction to service-learning. In R.L. Sigmon (Ed.), Journey to service-learning: Experiences from independent liberal arts colleges and universities (pp. 3-7). Washington, DC: Council of Independent Colleges.
    Siu, O., & Phillips, D. (2002). A study of family support, friendship, and psychological well-being among older women in Hong Kong. International Journal of Aging and Human development, 55(4), 299-319.
    Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2009). Foundations of human resource development (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
    Tichy, N. M. (1981). Networks in organizations. In Paul G. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organization design (pp. 115-162). Oxford U. Press, London.
    Tino, V. (1993). Leaving colleve: Rethinkign the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Tsai, Y. H., Lin, C. P., Chiu, C. K., & Joe, S. W. (2009). Understanding learning behavior using location and prior performance as moderators. The Social Science Journal, 46(4), 787-799.
    Utz, R. L., Carr, D., Nesse, R., & Wortman, C. (2002). The effect of widowhood on older adults’ social participation: An evaluation of activity, disengagement, and continuity theories. The Gerontologist, 42(4), 522-533.
    Welch, D. C., & West, R. L. (1995). Self-efficacy and mastery: Its application to issues of environmental control, cognition, and aging. Developmental Review, 15, 150-171.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-Motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE