簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林尚武
Shang-wu Lin
論文名稱: 序列動作編序的年齡差異與練習效應
Age differences and practice effects on serial movement programming
指導教授: 卓俊伶
Jwo, Jun-Ling
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 138
中文關鍵詞: 快速瞄準動作反應時間類化動作程式練習年齡差異
英文關鍵詞: rapid aiming movements, reaction time, generalized motor program, practice, age differences
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:86下載:10
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討年齡差異與動作練習對序列動作編序的影響。研究以兒童、年輕成人與老年人各12人為實驗參加者。實驗工作為手持傳感筆,連續點觸兩個目標的快速序列動作,參加者須以快又準確方式完成。研究分成兩部分,第一部分進行序列動作編序年齡差異的觀察,實驗工作第一目標大小維持恆常,而第二目標分為大或小目標情境。每種情境各10次試作,不同情境以平衡消去法加以安排;第二部分探討練習對不同年齡個體序列動作編序的影響,每位參加者在小第二目標情境進行225次動作練習。利用6自由度磁力追蹤儀 (Polhemus LIBERTY) 收集反應時間及各運動學參數。經混合設計二因子變異數分析及類化動作程式分析發現:(一)兒童、年輕成人及老年人進行序列動作時,反應時間及起始動作各運動學特徵,均受到不同後續工作難度的影響,且序列動作均由單一動作程式負責執行。然而在後續工作難度高時,老年人使用更多時間進行動作在線修正,顯示序列動作編序仍具年齡差異;(二)動作練習提升兒童、年輕成人及老年人序列動作編序速度,並藉由改變動作參數減少動作執行時間。此外,動作經驗雖不能改變序列動作程式數量,但卻造成兒童與年輕成人動作相對時宜特徵的改變,老年人則沒有此現象。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of age differences and practice on serial movement programming. Twelve children, twelve young adults, and twelve older adults served as participants. The task was a rapid serial movement consisting of two targets. Participants were asked to hold a stylus to tap targets sequentially, and perform the task as quickly and accurately as possible. The study was divided into two parts. Part 1 examined age-related differences in serial movement programming. In the task, the first target size was constant, whereas there were large or small size conditions for the second targets. Each condition consisted of 10 trials, and different conditions were arranged with counter-balancing. Part 2 examined the effect of practice on serial movement programming in different age individuals. Each participant practiced 225 trails in the small second target condition. Reaction time and kinematic measures were recorded by six degrees of freedom Polhemus Liberty system. The mixed-design two-way ANOVA and generalized motor program analysis revealed that (1) when children, young adults, and older adults performed the serial movement, reaction time and the initial movement kinematics were affected by the subsequent movement difficulty, and the serial movement was implemented by a single motor program. When difficulty of the subsequent movement increased, however, older adults spent more time in on-line corrections, suggesting there were age differences in serial movement programming; (2) by practice, children, young adults, and older adults speeded up the programming of serial movement and modified parameters to decrease movement time. In addition, although movement experience could not change the number of motor program of serial movement, it did result in the modifications of movement relative timing in children and young adults, which was not the case in older adults.

    口試委員與系主任簽字之論文通過簽名表.............................................................................i 論文授權書................................................................................................................................ii 中文摘要...................................................................................................................................iii 英文摘要...................................................................................................................................iv 謝誌............................................................................................................................................v 目次...........................................................................................................................................vi 表次...........................................................................................................................................ix 圖次.........................................................................................................................................xiii 第壹章 緒論.......................................................................................................1 第一節 問題背景............................................................................................................1 第二節 研究問題..........................................................................................................12 第三節 研究的假定、限制與範圍..............................................................................12 第四節 名詞解釋..........................................................................................................14 第五節 研究重要性......................................................................................................15 第貳章 理論基礎與文獻探討.........................................................................17 第一節 訊息處理模式與動作編序..............................................................................17 第二節 動作編序的發展..............................................................................................21 第三節 序列動作編序相關文獻..................................................................................29 第四節 類化動作程式..................................................................................................36 第五節 練習對動作編序的影響..................................................................................39 第六節 文獻探討小結..................................................................................................45 第七節 假說..................................................................................................................47 第參章 方法.....................................................................................................49 第一節 實驗參加者......................................................................................................49 第二節 實驗儀器與設備..............................................................................................50 第三節 實驗工作與實驗設計......................................................................................52 第四節 實驗流程..........................................................................................................53 第五節 資料的收集與處理方法..................................................................................55 第肆章 結果.....................................................................................................59 第一節 序列動作編序的年齡差異..............................................................................59 第二節 練習對不同年齡個體序列動作編序的影響..................................................69 第伍章 討論.....................................................................................................83 第一節 序列動作編序的發展......................................................................................83 第二節 序列動作編序的練習效應..............................................................................91 第三節 綜合討論..........................................................................................................95 第陸章 結論與建議.......................................................................................101 第一節 結論................................................................................................................101 第二節 建議................................................................................................................102 引用文獻...........................................................................................................103 附錄...................................................................................................................110 附錄一 實驗參加者須知及同意書............................................................................111 附錄二 老年人認知功能問卷....................................................................................112 附錄三 用手習慣問卷................................................................................................113 附錄四 各項統計分析摘要表與事後比較表............................................................114

    呂美玲(2003)。老年人健康狀況、身體活動與功能性體適能相關之探討。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    林尚武、卓俊伶、陳重佑、楊梓楣(2010)。工作難度對序列動作編序的影響及其年齡差異。體育學報,43(4),39-56。
    Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.
    Anson, J. G. (1982). Memory drum theory: Alternative tests and explanations for the complexity effects on simple reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 228-246.
    Armbrüster, C., & Spijkers, W. (2006). Movement planning in prehension: Do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement? Motor Control, 10, 311-329.
    Brown, T. L., & Carr, T. H. (1989). Automaticity in skill acquisition: Mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 686-700.
    Chaput, S., & Proteau, L. (1996). Aging and motor control. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 51B, 346-355.
    Cheng, P. W. (1985). Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts of skill acquisition. Psychological Review, 92, 414-423.
    Chua, R., & Elliott, D. (1993). Visual regulation of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 12, 365-401.
    Clark, H. M., & Robin, D. A. (1998). Generalized motor programme and parameterization accuracy in apraxia of speech and conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 12, 699-713.
    Clark, H. M., Robin, D. A., McCullagh, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (2001). Motor control in children and adults during a non-speech oral task. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1015-1025.
    Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486-495.
    Elliott, D., Helsen, W. F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 342-357.
    Fischman, M. G. (1984). Programming times as a function of number of movement parts and changes in movement direction. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 405-423.
    Fischman, M. G., & Lim, C. H. (1991). Influence of extended practice on programming time, movement time, and transfer in simple target-striking responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 39-50.
    Fischman, M. G., Christina, R. W., & Anson, J. G. (2008). Memory drum theory’s C movement: Revelations from Franklin Henry. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 312-318.
    Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
    Gallahue, D. L., & Ozmun, J. C. (2002). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults (5th ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
    Haaland, K. Y., Harrington, D. L., & Grice, J. W. (1993). Effects of aging on planning and implementing arm movements. Psychology and Aging, 8, 617-632.
    Hay, L. (1979). Spatial-temporal analysis of movements in children: Motor programs versus feedback in the development of reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 189-200.
    Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448-458.
    Herbort, O., & Butz, M. V. (2010). Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 867-878.
    Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
    Johnson-Frey, S. H., McCarty, M. E., & Keen, R. (2004). Reaching beyond spatial perception: Effects of intended future actions on visually guided prehension. Visual Cognition, 11, 371-399.
    Kerr, B. (1978). Task factors that influence selection and preparation for voluntary movements. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 55-78). New York: Academic Press.
    Ketcham, C. J., Seidler, R. D., Van Gemmert, A. W. A., & Stelmach, G. E. (2002). Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological sciences, 57B, 54-64.
    Khan, M. A., Franks, I. M., & Goodman, D. (1998). The effect of practice on the control of rapid aiming movements: Evidence for an interdependency between programming and feedback processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 425-444.
    Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G. P., Buckolz, E., & Franks, I. M. (2006). Programming strategies for rapid aiming movements under simple and choice reaction time conditions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 524-542.
    Khan, M. A., Mourton, S., Buckolz, E., & Franks, I. M. (2008). The influence of advance information on the response complexity effect in manual aiming movements. Acta Psychologica, 127, 154-162.
    Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J. P., Stolze, H., Jöhnk, K., Boczek-Funcke, A., & Illert, M. (1998). Development of prehension movements in children: A kinematic study. Experimental Brain Research, 122, 424-432.
    Lashley, K. S. (1917). The accuracy of movement in the absence of excitation from the moving organ. American Journal of Physiology, 43, 169-194.
    Magill, R. A. (1998). Motor learning: Concepts and applications (5th ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
    Magnuson, C. E., Robin, D. A., & Wright, D. L. (2008). Motor programming when sequencing multiple elements of the same duration. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 532-544.
    Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., Jeannerod, M., Athenes, S., & Dugas, C. (1987). Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 365-378.
    Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Smith, J. E. K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340-370.
    Morgan, M., Phillips, J. G., Bradshaw, J. L., Mattingley, J. B., Iansek, R., & Bradshaw, J. A. (1994). Age-related motor slowness: Simply strategic? Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 49, 133-139.
    Oldfiled, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-112.
    Payne, V. G., & Isaacs, L. D. (2002). Human motor development: A lifespan approach (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
    Poston, B., Van Gemmert, A. W. A., Barduson, B., & Stelmach, G. E. (2009). Movement structure in young and elderly adults during goal-directed movements of the left and right arm. Brain and Cognition, 69, 30-38.
    Pratt, J., Chasteen, A. L., & Abrams, R. A. (1994). Rapid aimed limb movements: Age differences and practice effects in component submovements. Psychology and Aging, 9, 325-334.
    Rose, D. J., & Christina, R. W. (2006). A multilevel approach to the study of motor control and learning (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.
    Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
    Schmidt, R. A. (1976). Control processes in motor skills. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 4, 229-261.
    Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavior emphasis (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Schneider, D. M., & Schmidt, R. A. (1995). Units of action in motor control: Role of response complexity and target speed. Human Performance, 8, 27-49.
    Seidler-Dobrin, R. D., & Stelmach, G. E. (1998). Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly. Experimental Brain Research, 119, 467-474.
    Shapiro, D. C., Zernicke, R. F., Gregor, R. J., & Diestel, J. D. (1981). Evidence for generalized motor programs using gait pattern analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 33-47.
    Short, M. W., Fischman, M. G., & Wang, Y. T. (1996). Cinematographical analysis of movement pathway constraints in rapid target-striking tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 157-163.
    Sidaway, B. (1991). Motor programming as a function of constraints on movement initiation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 120-130.
    Sidaway, B., Sekiya, H., & Fairweather, M. (1995). Movement variability as a function of accuracy demand in programmed serial aiming responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 67-76.
    Smiley-Oyen, A. L., & Worringham, C. J. (1996). Distribution of programming in a rapid aimed sequential movement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 379-397.
    Smiley-Oyen, A. L., Lowry, K. A., & Kerr, J. P. (2007). Planning and control of sequential rapid aiming in adults with Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 103-114.
    Thomas, J. R., Yan, J. H., & Stelmach, G. E. (2000). Movement substructures change as a function of practice in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 228-244.
    Van Braeckel, K., Butcher, P. R., Geuze, R. H., Stremmelaar, E. F., & Bouma, A. (2007). Movement adaptations in 7- to 10-year-old typically developing children: Evidence for a transition in feedback-based motor control. Human Movement Science, 26, 927-942.
    van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Fleckenstein, R. M., Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1117-1126.
    Wadman, W. J., Denier van der Gon, J. J., Geuze, R. H., & Mol, C. R. (1979). Control of fast goal-directed arm movements. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 5, 3-17.
    Walker, N., Philbin, D. A., & Fisk, A. D. (1997). Age-related differences in movement control: Adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological sciences, 52B, 40-52.
    Weiss, P., Stelmach, G. E., & Hefter, H. (1997). Programming of a movement sequence in Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 120, 91-102.
    Welford, A. T. (1977). Motor performance. In J. E. Birren, & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 450-496). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
    Welford, A. T. (1980). Relationships between reaction time and fatigue, stress, age, and sex. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction time (pp. 321-354). New York: Academic Press.
    Welsh, T. N., Higgins, L., & Elliott, D. (2007). Are there age-related differences in learning to optimize speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure? Human Movement Science, 26, 892-912.
    Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review Monographs, 3, 1-114.
    Wrisberg, C. A., & Wulf, G. (1997). Diminishing the effects of reduced frequency of knowledge. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 17-26.
    Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1996). Average KR degrades parameter learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 371-381.
    Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 19, 1134-1150.
    Yan, J. H. (2000). Effects of aging on linear and curvilinear aiming arm movements. Experimental Aging Research, 26, 393-407.
    Yan, J. H., Thomas, J. R., & Payne, V. G. (2002).How children and seniors differ from adults in controlling rapid aiming arm movements. In J. E. Clark & J. H. Humphrey (Eds.), Motor development: Research & reviews volume 2 (pp. 191-217). Reston, VA: NASPE.
    Yan, J. H., Thomas, J. R., & Stelmach, G. E. (1998). Aging and rapid aiming arm movement control. Experimental Aging Research, 24, 55-69.
    Yan, J. H., Thomas, J. R., Stelmach, G. E., & Thomas, K. T. (2000). Developmental features of rapid aiming arm movements across the lifespan. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 121-140.
    Young, D. E., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Units of motor beavior: Modifications with practice and feedback. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 763-795). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Young, D. E., & Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Motor programs as units of movement control. In N. I. Badler, B. A. Barsky, & D. Zeltzer (Eds.), Making them move: Mechanics, control, and animation of articulated figures (pp. 129-155). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE