簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蘇俊濠
Sou, Chon-Hou
論文名稱: 精神分析「詮釋」之概念研究:臨床實務與官方理論再連結之探究
A Psychoanalytic Conceptual Research on “Interpretation”: Relinking of Clinical Practice and Official Theories
指導教授: 陳秀蓉
Chen, Hsiu-Jung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 253
中文關鍵詞: 內隱分析性知識概念研究概念整合詮釋精神分析
英文關鍵詞: Conceptual research, Conceptual integration, Implicit psychoanalytic knowledge, Interpretation, Psychoanalysis
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000114
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:282下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 精神分析的學派互有特色,風格各異,卻面臨一場無紀律的理論多元主義危機,因此二十世紀末,學者們陸續提出尋找共同元素或理論縮減等方案,來解決溝通困難或作出理論整合的可能;可惜在認識論或學科走向的分歧外,還有核心的敵對主義阻撓,故此,回歸臨床思考中去探究官方理論外的私人理論──內隱分析性知識──不同學派治療師之間具相似性的內隱臨床邏輯,了解精神分析知識的產生過程,重新連結理論與臨床間的差異,將是精神分析未來的基礎。本研究參照Dreher的精神分析概念研究,先對主流官方理論學派的「詮釋」及「移情-反移情」概念作文獻分析,再藉現象學方法對精神分析臨床工作者作專家訪談,並將分析結果重新與官方理論對話。研究發現,受訪者們皆有一定內隱分析性知識,如詮釋作為試誤性思考的邀請、詮釋內容維度外,必然存有關係與情感維度以達致療效、分析的真相只是互為主體地共構之階段性真相等;至於理論與臨床間的距離,則是於長期治療中為克服困境而生的橋樑知識──源於與人格與驅力相關的本體知識──來連結。許多非官方觀點的研究結果皆被整理至一圖示中,示範了精神分析知識產生的歷程與架構。本研究提出再定義「詮釋」、「移情-反移情」等概念的理據與方式,指出共構的階段性真相中包含「共同-思考」的思考層面和「共同-處理」的情感與關係層面,並指出精神分析知識就是一再移置與反抗的歷程。最後,作出精神分析概念研究繼行的建議,以及應以「存差異,求關係」的方式開拓精神分析的未來。

    Different schools in psychoanalysis are charactered and diverged from each other, but there is a head-on crisis of undisciplined theoretical pluralism. Subsequently, from late 20th century, scholars advocated ways to solve the difficulty in communication or to make integration possible, by finding common elements or making theory-reduction therein. However, besides the disagreements about epistemology and disciplinary trend, the antagonism between schools leaves as the core obstruction. Therefore, to explore private theory beyond the official by concerning first in clinical thinking, namely the implicit psychoanalytic knowledge, this dissertation base on the implicit clinical logic which shared certain similarity between psychoanalytic therapists in different schools, aimed at a comprehension of the generation of psychoanalytic knowledge, and also relinking the discrepancy between official theory and clinical practice, as a foundation to psychoanalytic development. Referring to Dreher’s idea of psychoanalytic conceptual research, first a literature review is made on the concepts ‘interpretation’ and ‘transference-countertransference’ among several mainstream schools, then through the expert interviews with psychoanalytic practitioners, a result made by phenomenological analysis and would again dialogue with the previous official theories. This dissertation finds that all interviewees own certain implicit psychoanalytic knowledge: interpretation as an invitation of tentative thinking, a relational or affective dimension beyond the content in interpretation which leads to therapeutic efficacy, the analytic truth through intersubjective co-construction only served as a phased truth, etc. Moreover, the discrepancy between theory and clinical practice is relinked through conquering difficulties in chronic psychotherapy, in which a sort of bridged knowledge, derived from noumenon-knowledge related to personality and drive, is generated. Most results of unofficial discoveries have been collated into a graphic illustration which demonstrating the process and structure of the generation of psychoanalytic knowledge. In conclusions, this dissertation provides justifications and proposes ways to re-define the concept ‘interpretation’ and ‘transference-countertransference’, indicates the aspect of cogitation in ‘co-thinking’ and the aspect of affection and relation in ‘co-processing’ within a co-constructed phased truth, simultaneously, points out that psychoanalytic knowledge is a process with constant displacement and revolt. Finally, it makes suggestions to further conceptual research, and with the spirit of ‘reserving difference, seeking relationship’, the future of psychoanalysis is awaited to explore.

    謝辭 i 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目次 vi 表次 viii 圖次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與目的 13 第三節 名詞解釋 14 第二章 文獻探討 17 第一節 分析師的內隱分析性知識及研究方法 17 第二節 詮釋的本質與發展 24 第三節 移情的本質與發展 39 第四節 研究問題 49 第三章 研究方法 53 第一節 精神分析概念研究之現象學研究 53 第二節 研究參與者 58 第三節 研究工具 60 第四節 研究程序 62 第五節 資料分析程序 63 第六節 研究信效指標 68 第四章 研究結果 70 第一節 個人獨特的臨床實務現象 70 第二節 能被集結的個人內隱分析性知識 176 第五章 討論與建議 198 第一節 研究結果與官方理論的對話 198 第二節 對話與延伸討論 212 第三節 研究建議 229 第四節 研究者札記 233 參考文獻 239 中文部分 239 西文部分 240 附錄 250 附錄1 訪談大綱 250 附錄2 參與研究邀請函A 251 附錄3 參與研究邀請函B 252 附錄4 參與研究同意書[一式兩份] 253

    一、中文文獻
    余德慧(2001):詮釋現象心理學。心靈工坊。
    沈志中(2008):精神病、話語結構與慾望辯證:拉岡理論的出發點。中外文學,37(2),41-75。
    沈志中(2011):論愛情:精神分析觀點。中外文學,40(2),103-135。
    沈志中(2013):論護病關係中之同理心、傳移與愛。源遠護理,7(1),16-22。
    沈志中(2019):啟蒙光亮下的陰影。國立中山大學人文研究中心。
    吳琼(2011):雅克‧拉康:閱讀你的症狀。中國人民大學。
    林淑君、陳秉華(2002):心理治療者的反移情研究。教育心理學報,34(1),103-122。
    洪雅琴、李維倫(2007):精神分析取向心理治療與詮釋現象學的辯證關係:精神臨床研究的困境與解決。中華輔導學報,22,157-183。
    馬曉輝(2013):安娜‧佛洛伊德心理健康思想解析。浙江教育。
    郭本禹(2011):新自體心理學的詮釋觀。南京師大學報,5,125-130。
    高淑清(2008):質性研究的十八堂課:揚帆再訪之旅。麗文。
    鈕文英(2016):質性研究方法與論文寫作(二版)。雙葉。
    黃淑清、陳秉華(2005):心理動力取向治療的知識獲得初探研究。中華輔導學報,17,173-212。
    臺灣精神分析學會(2014):精神分析取向心理治療師推薦準則。取自:https://psychoanalysis.org.tw/home/article_content/183
    蔡榮裕(2008):精神分析之路的聯想:兼回應劉佳昌三篇關於外在現實的文章。台灣精神醫學會通訊,6月號。取自http://blog.yam.com/thinktcpc/trackback/25058554

    二、英文文獻
    Akhtar, S. (2009). Comprehensive dictionary of psychoanalysis. Karnac.
    Bateman, A., & Holmes, J. (2004). 當代精神分析導論──理論與實務(林玉華、樊雪梅譯)。五南。(原著出版年:1995年)
    Bernardi, R. (2014). The three-level model (3-LM) for observing patient transformations. In M. A. de Litvan (Ed.) Time for change (pp. 3-24). Karnac.
    Bernardi, R. (2015). What kind of discipline is psychoanalysis? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96, 731-754.
    Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2015). 質性研究分析:系統取向(藍依勤、羅育齡、林聖曦譯)。心理。(原著出版年:2010年)
    Bion, W. R. (1955). Language and the schizophrenic. In M. Klein, P. Heimann, & R. E. Money-Kyrle (Eds.), New directions in psychoanalysis (pp. 220–239). Tavistock.
    Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. Tavistock.
    Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. Karnac.
    Bion, W. R. (1965). Transformation: Change from learning to growth. Tavistock
    Bion, W. R. (1970). Attention and interpretation. Karnac.
    Bion, W. R. (1991/1977). A memoir of the future - The past presented. Karnac.
    Bohleber, W., Fonagy, P., Jiménez, J. P., Scarfone, D., Varvin, S., & Zysman, S. (2013). Towards a better use of psychoanalytic concepts: A model illustrated using the concept of enactment. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 94(3), 501-530.
    Bohleber, W., Jiménez, J. P., Scarfone, D., Varvin, S., & Zysman, S. (2015). Unconscious phantasy and its conceptualizations: An attempt at conceptual integration. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96(3), 705-730.
    Britton, R., & Steiner, J. (1994). Interpretation: Selected face or overvalued idea? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 1069-1078.
    Chiesa, M. (2010). Research and psychoanalysis: Still time to bridge the great divide? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27(2), 99-114.
    Coderch, J. (2015). My psychoanalytic journey. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 35, 142-154.
    Cooper, A. M. (2008). American psychoanalysis today: A plurality of orthodoxies. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 36(2), 235-253.
    Delattre. N., & Widlöcher, D. (2010). 哲學與精神分析的對談(李郁芬、黃世明、楊明敏譯)。五南。(原著出版年:2003年)
    Dreher, A. U. (2000). Foundations for conceptual research in psychoanalysis (Trans. Eva Ristl). Karnac.
    Dreher, A. U. (2004). What is psychoanalytic conceptual research? Retrieved from http://www.spiweb.it/ricerca/598-autori/4868-dreher-a-u-2004-what-is-psychoanalytic-conceptual-research
    Eagle, M. N., Wolitzky, D. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (2001). The analyst’s knowledge and authority: A critique of the “new view” in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 49(2), 457-488.
    Eekhoff, J. K. (2013, October). Beyond plurality - The IPA committee on conceptual integration. The 48th IPA Congress. Prague, Czech Republic.
    Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229.
    Evans, E. (2009). 拉岡精神分析辭彙(黃宗慧、劉紀蕙、廖朝陽、龔卓軍譯)。巨流圖書公司。(原著出版年:1996年)
    Falchi, V., & Nawal, R. (2009). Transference, countertransference and interpretation: The current debate. European Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 9(1), 12-18.
    Fonagy, P. (2003). Some complexities in the relationship of psychoanalytic theory to technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 72(1), 13-47.
    Fonagy, P. (2013). There is room for even more doublethink: The perilous status of psychoanalytic research. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23, 116-122.
    Freud, A. (1936). The ego and the mechanisms of defence. Karnac.
    Freud, A. (1978). The principal task of child analysis. Bulletin of the Hampstead Clinic (Anna Freud Center), 1, 11-16.
    Freud, S., & Breuer, J. (1895). Study on hysteria. The Standard Edition Volume II. Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. The Standard Edition Volume IV-V (pp. 3-621). Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1907). Delusions and dreams in Jensen’s gradiva. The Standard Edition Volume IX (pp. 3-95). Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1911). The handling of dream-interpretation in psycho-analysis. The Standard Edition Volume XII (pp. 91-96). Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1912). The dynamics of transference. The Standard Edition Volume XII (pp. 99-108). Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1914a). Remembering, repeating and working-through (Further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis II). The Standard Edition Volume XII (pp. 147-156). Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1914b). On narcissism: An introduction. The Standard Edition Volume XIV (pp. 69-102). Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1915). Observations on transference-love. The Standard Edition Volume XII (pp. 159-171). Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1916-17)[1915-17]. Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. The Standard Edition Volume XV-XVI. Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. The Standard Edition Volume XIX (pp. 3-59). Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1926). The question of lay analysis: Conversations with an impartial person. The Standard Edition Volume XX (pp. 179-250). Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. The Standard Edition Volume XXII (pp. 3-82). Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1937). Constructions in analysis. The Standard Edition Volume XXIII (pp. 257-269). Hogarth.
    Gabbard, G. O. (2004). Psychodynamic psychiatry in clinical practice (4th). American Psychiatric Publishing.
    Gabbard, G.O., & Horowitz, M. J. (2009). Insight, transference interpretation, and therapeutic change in the dynamic psychotherapy of borderline personality disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(5), 517-521.
    Gerber, A. J., & Knopf, L. E. (2015). An empirically-based psychoanalytic curriculum. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 35, 115-123.
    Greenson, R. (1967). The technique and practice of psychoanalysis. International University Press.
    Hartmann, H. (1958). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. International Universities Press.
    Heimann, P. (1950). On counter-transference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 31, 81-84.
    Herzog, B. (2011). Procedural interpretation: A method of working between the lines in the nonverbal realm. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 31, 462-474.
    Holland, N. N. (1982). Why this is transference, nor am I out of it. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 5, 27-34.
    Holland, N. N. (1983). Postmodern psychoanalysis. In I. Hassan & S. Hassan (Eds.), Innovation/Renovation: New perspectives on the humanities (pp. 291-309). University of Wisconsin Press.
    Holland, N. N. (1995). Postmodern psychoanalysis: Essays by Norman N. Holland. (Trans. Guoqing Pan). Shanghai Arts Publishing House.
    Jiménez, J. P. (2006). After pluralism: Towards a new, integrated psychoanalytic Paradigm. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87(6), 1487-1507.
    Jiménez, J. P. (2015). Psychoanalysis in postmodern times: Some questions and challenges. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 35, 609-624.
    Kächele, H., Schachter, J., & Thomä, H. (2009). From psychoanalytic narrative to empirical single case research: Implications for psychoanalytic practice. Routledge.
    Kernberg, O. F. (1967). Borderline personality organization. Journal of American Psychoanalysis Association, 15(3), 641-685.
    Kernberg, O. F. (1968). The treatment of patients with borderline personality organization. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 49, 600‐619.
    Kernberg, O. F. (1997). The nature of interpretation: Intersubjectivity and the third position. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 57(4), 297-312.
    Kernberg, O. F., Yeomans, F. E., Clarkin, J. F., & Levy, K. N. (2008). Transference focused psychotherapy: Overview and update. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 89, 601-620.
    Kernberg, O. F. (2016a). New developments in transference focused psychotherapy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 97, 385-407.
    Kernberg, O. F. (2016b). The four basic components of psychoanalytic technique and derived psychoanalytic psychotherapies. World Psychiatry, 15(3), 287-288.
    Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27, 99-110.
    Klein, M. (1952). The origins of transference. In Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963 (The writings of Melanie Klein, Vol.3) (pp. 48-56). The Free Press.
    Klein, M. (1955). The psychoanalytic play technique. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 25(2), 223-237.
    Klein, M. (1984a). The psychoanalysis of children (The writings of Melanie Klein, Vol.2). The Free Press.
    Klein, M. (1984b). Narrative of a child analysis (The writings of Melanie Klein, Vol.4). The Free Press.
    Kohut, H. (1968). The evaluation of applicants for psychoanalytic training. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 49, 548-554.
    Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. The University of Chicago Press.
    Koshes, R. J., & Sari, C. E. (1991). Transference love and countertransference love in clinical technique. Jefferson Journal of Psychiatry, 9(1), 40-48.
    Krause, R. (2009). Drive and affect in perverse actions. In P. Fonagy, R. Krause, & M. Leuzinger-Bohleber (Eds.), Identity, gender, and sexuality: 150 years after Freud (pp. 161-180). Karnac.
    Kristeva, J. (1996). The sense and non-sense of revolt. Columbia University Press.
    Kristeva, J. (1998). L'avenir d'une révolte. Calmann-Levy.
    Lacan, J. (2002/1966). Écrits, the first complete edition in English (Trans. Bruce Fink). Norton.
    Laplanche, J., Leclaire, S., & Pontalis, J. B. (2006). 幻想與無意識(沈志中譯)。行人。(原著出版年:1985年).
    Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, J. B. (2000). 精神分析辭彙(王文基、沈志中譯)。行人。(原著出版年:1997年)
    Lavie, J-C. (2006). 愛是完美的犯罪(李郁芬、吳建芝、林雨芳、黃世明、楊明敏、謝隆儀譯)。五南。(原著出版年:1997)
    Lerner, H. D., & Ehrlich, J. (1994). Psychoanalytic model. In V. B. Van Hasselt & M. Hersen (Eds.), Advanced abnormal psychology (pp. 67-91). Plenum.
    Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., & Fischmann, T. (2006). What is conceptual research in psychoanalysis? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 1355-1386.
    Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Kallenbach, L. & Schoett, M. J. S. (2016). Pluralistic approaches to the study of process and outcome in psychoanalysis. The LAC depression study: A case in point. Psychoanalytic psychotherapy, 30(1), 4-22.
    Levine, H. B. (2012). The analyst’s theory in the analyst’s mind. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 32, 18-32.
    Levy, K. N., & Scala, J. W. (2012). Transference, transference interpretations, and transference-focused psychotherapies. Psychotherapy, 49(3), 391-403.
    McQuillan, M. (2013). Departures: The American future of psychoanalysis. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 51, 142-157.
    Mitchell, S. A., & Black, M. J. (1995). Freud and beyond: A history of modern psychoanalytic thought. BasicBooks.
    Moore, B. E., & Fine, B. D. (1990). Psychoanalytic terms and concepts. The American Psychoanalytic Association and Yale University Press.
    Norcross, J. C., Pfund, R. A., & Prochaska, J. O. (2013). Psychotherapy in 2022: A delphi poll on its future. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44(5), 363-370.
    Ogden, T. (2005). This art of psychoanalysis: Dreaming undreamt dreams and interrupted cries. Routledge.
    Ornstein, P. H. (2015). On choosing a guiding theory for treatment in a pluralistic psychoanalytic world: My personal journey. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 10, 107-117.
    Phillips, A. (1993). On kissing, tickling and being bored: psychoanalytic essays on the unexamined life. Harvard University Press.
    Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference. Hogarth.
    Reed, G. S. (1997). The analyst’s interpretation as fetish. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 45(4), 1153-1181.
    Reik, T. (1956). Listening with the third ear: The inner experiences of a psychoanalyst. Farrar, Straus and Cudahy.
    Ricoeur, P. (2015). 從文本到行動(夏小燕譯)。華東師範大學。(原著出版年:1986年)
    Rodado, J. (2016). What do we talk about when we talk about psychoanalysis? International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 25(3), 179-185.
    Rosenfeld, H. (1987). Impasse and interpretation. Routledge.
    Arlow, A. J., & Rothstein, A. (1983). Interpretation: Toward a contemporary understanding of the term. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 31, 237-245.
    Sandler, J., Dare, C., Dreher, A. U., & Holder, A. (2011). 病人與精神分析師(施琪嘉、曾奇峰、蕭澤萍譯)。中國輕工業。(原著出版年:1992年)
    Sandler, J., & Fonagy, P. (1997). Recovered memories of abuse: true or false. Karnac & International Universities Press.
    Sayers, J. (1991). Mother of psychoanalysis: Helene Deutsch, Karen Horney, Anna Freud, Melanie Klein. Penguin Books.
    Schwartz, J. (2001). 卡桑德拉的女兒:歐美精神分析發展史(陳系貞譯)。究竟。(原著出版年:1999年)
    Segal, H. & Steiner, R. (1987). H. A. Rosenfeld (1910-1986). International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 68, 415-419.
    Sharpe, E. F. (1947). The psycho-analyst. In M. Brierley (Ed.), Collected papers on psycho-analysis (pp. 109-122). Brunner/Mazel.
    Siegel, A. M. (2005). 漢斯‧柯赫與自體心理學(葉宇記譯)。遠流。(原著出版年:1996年)
    Symington, N., & Symington, J. (2014). 等待思想者的思想:後現代精神分析大師比昂(蘇曉波譯)。心靈工坊。(原著出版年:1996年)
    The Boston Change Process Study Group (2010). Change in psychotherapy: A unifying paradigm. W.W. Norton.
    The Freud Folder (2015). The schools of psychoanalysis. Retrieved from http://thefreudfolder.com/index.html
    The Inter-Regional Encyclopedic Dictionary of Psychoanalysis (2018). Retrieved from http://www.ipa.world/IPA/Encyclopedic_Dictionary
    Tuckett, D. (2012). Some reflections on psychoanalytic technique: In need of core concepts or an archaic ritual. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 32, 87-108.
    Van der Heide, D. J. (2013). Psychoanalytic integration and the role of affect. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 32(4), 1013-1028.
    Wallerstein, R. S. (2005). Dialogue or illusion? How do we go from here? Response to André Green. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 633-638.
    Wallerstein, R. S. (2009). What kind of research in psychoanalytic science? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90, 109-133.
    Wallerstein, R. S. (2014). The intersect of psychoanalysis and totalitarianism. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 24, 601-614.
    Wallerstein, R. S. (2015). Psychoanalysis as I have known it: 1949-2013. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 25, 536-556.
    Werbart, A. (2010). Book review of H. Kächele, J. Schachter, & H. Thomä, from psychoanalytic narrative to empirical single case research: Implications for psychoanalytic practice. Psychotherapy Research, 20, 731-733.
    Winnicott, D.W. (1941). The observation of infants in a set situation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 22, 229-249.
    Winnicott, D.W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: A study of the first not-me possession. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34, 89-97.
    Winnicott, D. W. (1960). Counter-transference. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 33, 17-21.
    Winnicott, D. W. (2005/1971). Playing and reality. Routledge.
    Winnicott, D. W. (1989a). The use of an object and relating through identifications. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 218-227). Karnac.
    Winnicott, D. W. (1989b). The value of the therapeutic consultation. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 318-324). Karnac.
    Winnicott, D. W. (2018/1971). Therapeutic consultations in child psychiatry. Routledge.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE