本研究聚焦於將比賽表現評量工具 (GPAI) 的理論基礎，重新建構適用在羽球運動的羽球比賽表現評量工具 (B-GPAI)。首先藉由文獻分析找出 GPAI 在羽球運動可能適用的構面，並分析出初步的操作性定義，接著於 2020 年 5 月 1 日至 6 月 13 日，邀集運動教育學教授、羽球專長體育教師及非羽球專長體育教師三類族群共 13 位專家，進行德懷術專家問卷調查，建構本研究 B-GPAI 之構面；同時將確立之構面與臺灣十二年國民基本教育健康與體育領域課程綱要之第五學習階段學習表現指標進行對應，接著以描述性統計方法進行資料分析。所得結論共分為二，首先有關 B-GAPI 的構面，依觀察時機的順序分別為「做決定」、「移位調整」、「支援協助」及「技能執行」等四項，其中「支援協助」僅使用在羽球運動的雙打比賽。接著有關 B-GAPI 與健體領域學習表現之對應，其呼應比率由高到低依序為，技能範疇 (100%)、行為範疇 (55%)、認知範疇 (50%)，情意範疇 (30%)，而依 B-GPAI 呼應比率其各學習範疇在優先順序，主要技能範疇為主，其次依序為行為範疇、認知範疇、情意範疇。基於上述，建議體育教師可在教學現場以 B-GPAI 的構面作為觀察學生行為表現之依據；研究者可將 B-GPAI 在教學現場進行建構效度之研究，另外亦可針對其他運動項目及不同學習範疇發展適用的評量工具，幫助教師在教學上的評量可以更加全面。

Basing on the theoretical foundation of Game Performance Assessment Instrument, this study aimed to construct a sport-specific game performance assessment instrument for the net/wall game form of badminton (B-GPAI). First, this study analyzed references for finding out appropriate components and their initial definitions of B-GPAI, then, from May 1st to 13th June, 13 scholars and experts who were professors of sport pedagogy and physical educators with and without badminton as their most confident sport were invited to take part in a task force and a three-round Delphi survey was conducted to refine and get a consensus of the components and definitions of B-GPAI. Finally, the result gained from the previous two steps was adopted to align with learning performance indicators of the upper secondary school level of Curriculum Guidelines of 1-12Year Basic Education of Taiwan. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze and present the outcomes of this study. The results were two-fold: First, four components of B-GPAI were reinforced, including decision making, adjust, support, and skill execution, in that the component of support is only suitable for double matches. Second, the ratios of the alignment of B-GPAI with the learning performance indicators ranged from high to low: skill domain (100%), behavior domain (55%), cognitive domain (50%), and affective domain (30%). It is suggested that PE teachers can use the B-GPAI in observing students’ badminton behavioral performances in school context. In terms of future studies, the construct validity of newly constructed B-GPAI is worthy of investigation and GPAI for the other specific sports should be constructed so that the assessment in physical education will become more comprehensive.

王文科 (1999)。教育研究法。臺北市：五南。

王文科、王志弘 (2017)。教育研究法。臺北市：五南。

江文慈 (2007)。超越測量―評量典範轉移的探索與啟示。教育實踐與研究，20(1)，173-200。

吳統雄 (1985)。態度與行為研究的信度與效度：理論、應用、反省民意。學術專刊，2，229-53。

吳雅玲 (2001)。德懷術及其在課程研究上的應用。教育研究，9，297-306。

余民寧 (2011)。教育測驗與評量：成就測驗與教學評量。臺北市：心理。

李永山、黃錦川、許譽勝 (2008)。以修正式德菲法探討台灣資訊軟體公司競爭策略之研究。資訊電子學刊，3 (1)，39-50。

林玫君 (2011)。國小中年級戲劇賞析評分規範與實作評量任務之發展研究。藝術教育研究，21，1-31。

林靜萍 (2007)。創意體育教學的理念與策略。載於張建成、葉國樑、施致平 (主編)，
中小學健康與體育學習領域之教學與實務 (頁82–98)。台北，台灣：師大書苑。

林繼宏 (2006)。羽毛球意識的培養。湖北體育科技，25(5)，567-569。

施登堯 (2014)。體育評量與成績考查。載於黃嘉莉 (主編)，遊戲取向教學法與多元評量 (頁11-24)。臺北市：師大出版中心。

洪詠善、范信賢 (2015)。同行-走進十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自：
https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-10121,c1179-1.php?Lang=zh-tw

侯恩毅、彭美麗、李瑞生 (1999)。羽球。北京市：北京體育大學出版社。

翁梓林 (1998)。實作評量在網球技能測驗之應用。中華體育季刊，12(3)，125-132。
doi: 10.6223/qcpe.1203.199812.1817

夏文龍 (2011)。理解式球類教學法應用於國中學生羽球學習之行動研究 (未出版碩士論
文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。

涂金堂 (2013)。教育測驗與評量。臺北市：三民書局。

郭工賓 (2000)。國民小學校長辦學績效評鑑指標建構之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺 北師範學院，臺北市。

郭秀燕 (2008)。傳統教學法與理解式球類教學法在羽球教學效果之研究。興大體育學刊，9，129-138。

許以亭 (2012)。臺灣戶外冒險教育指導員專業能力指標之建構 (未出版碩士碖文)。國立臺東大學，臺東縣。

陳建宏 (2009)。理解式球類教學應用於國小四年級羽球教學之行動研究 (未出版碩士
論文)。國立臺東大學，臺東縣。

陳春蓮 (2004)。淺談真實性評量於體育教學之應用。學校體育，83，44-50。 doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.29937/PES.200408.0008

教育部 (2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校健康與體育領域課程綱要。臺北市：教育部。

國家教育研究院 (2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。國家教育研究院於 103
年 11 月 28 日以教研課字第 1030135678A號函陳報教育部版。取自：
https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw

國家教育研究院 (2015)。核心素養發展手冊。取自：
https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/14/pta_8251_9890220_04409.pdf

陳學淵、王國華 (2005)。國中教師發展實作評量之探討-以自然與生活科技領域教師為
例。科學教育，14，165-180。doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6767/JSE.200501.0165

陳月亮、阮文德 (2009)。羽毛球運動技戰術及節奏特徵之研究。黃石理工學院學報，26(6)，85-87。

張碧峰、馬義傑、黃健行 (2012)。戰略式教學法與傳統式教學法對學生羽球學習效果之差異研究。運動與健康研究，2(1)，50-66。

程俊諺 (1986)。羽球運動。雲林縣：雲林縣羽球委員會。

程瑞福 (2002)。國民中學體育教師評鑑指標之建構 (未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。

黃志成 (2004)。理解式球類教學對國小六年級學生羽球學習效果之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。

黃志成 (2008)。運用真實性評量提升學生球類運動比賽表現。學校體育，109，31-35。

楊琇惟、施登堯 (2020)。比賽表現評量工具應用於體育教學之回顧。臺灣教育評論月刊，9(7)，90-95。

蔡清田 (2013)。社會科學研究方法新論。臺北市：五南。

歐宗明 (2016)。體育系統觀察法。臺北：師大書苑。

蕭明芳、林靜萍 (2009)。體育教學多元評量之探討。中華體育季刊，23(2)，119-126。doi: https://doi.org/10.6223/qcpe.2302.200906.1914.

闕月清、鄭漢吾 (2006)。理解式球類教學法對中學生學習效果之探討。臺灣運動教育學報，1(2)，25-43。

闕月清、蔡宗達、黃志成 (2008)。理解式球類教學法。載於闕月清 (主編)，理解式球類教學模式 (21-39)。臺北市：師大書苑

蘇錦祥 (2009)。同儕互評應用於理解式球類教學之行動研究―以國小六年級合球教學
為例 (未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。

Alan, C. L. (2011). Measurement & Evaluation in Physical Education and Exercise Science (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummimgs.

Almond, L. (1986). Research-based teaching in game. In J. Evans. (Ed.), Physical education , sport and schooling: Studies in the sociology of physical education (pp. 155-165). London :Falmer Press.

Arias-Estero, J., & Castejo ́n, F. (2014). Using instruments for tactical assessment in physical education and extra-curricular sports. European Physical Education Review, 20(4), 525-535.

Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in the secondary school. Bulletin of Physical Education, 10, 9-16.

Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1986). The curriculum model. In R. Thorpe, D. Bunker, & L. Almond (Eds.), Rethinking games teaching (pp. 8). Loughborough, England: University of Technology.

Chen, W., Hendricks, K., & Zhu, W., (2013). Development and Validation of the Basketball Offensive Game Performance Instrument. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 32, 100-109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.32.1.100

Earl, L. M., (2013). Assessment as learning: using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Grice, T. (2008). Badminton steps to success. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Glaser, R. (1990). Toward new models for assessment. International Journal of Educational Research, 14(5), 475-483.

Griffin, L.L., Mitchell, S.A., & Oslin, J.L. (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Hensley, L. D. (1997). Alterative assessment for physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 68(7), 19-24.

Hopper, T. (2003). Four Rs tactical awareness: Applying game performance assessment in net/wall example. Journal of Teaching Elementary Physical Education, 4(2), 16-21.

Hopper, T. (2007). Teaching tennis with assessment ‘for’ and ‘as’ learning: A TGfU net/wall example. Journal of Physical Health Education, 73(3), 22-28.

Lund, J L. (1997). Authentic assessment: Its development & application. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 68(7), 25-29.

Lund, J. L., & Kirk, M. F. (2002). Performance-based assessment for middle and high school physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Linstone, H., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Mass: Addison-Wesley.

López-Pastor, V. M. L., Kirk, D., Catalán, E. L., MacPhail, A. & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education: A review of international literature. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 57-76.

Joyner, A. B. & McManis, B. G. (1997). Quality control in alternative assessment. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 68(7), 38-40.

Moore, C. M. (1987). Group techniques for idea building. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Melograno, V. J. (1994). Portfolio assessment: Documenting authentic student learning. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 65(8), 58-61.

Metzler, M. (2011). Instructional models for physical education (3rd ed). Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway.

Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 426-436. doi:10.1353/rhe.1995.0008

Memmert, D., & Harvey, S. (2008). The Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI): Some concerns and solutions for further development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 220-240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.27.2.220

Mitchell, S. A. & Oslin, J. L., (1999). Assessment series K-12 physical education series: Assessment in games teaching. Reston, VA: National Association of Sport and Physical Education.

Mitchell, S. A., Griffin, L. L., & Oslin, J. L. (1994). Tactical awareness as developmentally appropriate for the teaching of games in elementary and secondary physical education. The Physical Educator, 51, 21-28.

Mitchell, S. A., Griffin, L. L., & Oslin, J. L. (1998). The Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 231-243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.17.2.231

Mitchell, S.A., Oslin, J. L., & Griffin, L.L. (2006). Teaching sport concepts and skills A tactical games approach (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL Human Kinetics.

Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703-713.

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.