簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林佳旻
Lin, Chia-Min
論文名稱: 決定交易人去留臺股期貨市場之要因
Major Related Factors that Cause Traders to Stay in or Leave TAIEX Futures Market
指導教授: 蔡蒔銓
Tsai, Shih-Chuan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 33
中文關鍵詞: 臺股期貨離開市場處分效果羅吉斯迴歸模型
英文關鍵詞: TAIEX Futures, Leave the Market, Disposition Effect, Logistic Regression Model
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202001518
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:54下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來,國內期貨、選擇權商品交易量顯著成長,但市場參與程度無明顯提升,推測係因期間陸續有交易人選擇離開市場、停止交易,而交易量成長集中於某特性之自然人或機構法人,因此本文以2007年1月至2012年11月臺股期貨及小型臺指期貨全市場參與者之日內交易資料為研究樣本,以月為期間單位,劃分71期,並定義連續三個月(含)無成交量之自然人為離開市場,法人則為一個月。觀察羅吉斯迴歸模型檢定結果可得:當市場報酬率及市場波動度上升時,投資人留在市場的機率會提高;而月成交量及留倉量越高、偏好交易大型契約之投資人,留在市場機率也相對較高;若進一步以投資人身分別區分,則外資留在市場機率最高,其次為國內法人,最後才為自然人;而以處分效果作為研究行為偏誤因子,發現處分效果程度愈嚴重之投資人,其留在市場機率大幅降低。另,交易人累積收益或虧損金額對於其去留市場機率並無明顯影響。

    In recent years, trading volumes of TAIFEX’s futures and options contracts has grown noticeably, but in contrast, there was no significant increase in market participation. Presumable reasons might be some traders left the market and stopped trading, and thus the increasing volumes were mostly concentrated on certain type of individuals or institutional investors. This study uses intraday data of all market participants who traded TX and MTX from January 2007 to November 2012, and the individual investors with no TX or MTX trading volume in three consecutive months were regarded as they’ve left the market, while one month for institutional investors. By the results of Logistic regression model, we can find when the market return or market volatility increased, the probability of investors staying in the market would increase. The investors with higher monthly trading volumes or open interests, or preferred trading large-sized contracts like TX versus MTX, then their probability staying in the market was relatively high. Further, dividing all participants into different types, we can find foreign institutions had the highest probability staying in the market and then followed by domestic institutions and individuals. Investors who had more serious degree of disposition effect turned out to had the lower probability of staying in the market, and additionally, there was no obvious impact of accumulated gains or losses on the probability of investors staying in or leaving the market.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究架構與流程 2 第二章 文獻探討與回顧 4 第一節 交易行為及其資訊內涵 4 第二節 處分效果(Disposition Effect, DE) 7 第三章 研究方法 9 第一節 資料說明與樣本篩選 9 第二節 變數定義與說明 12 第三節 研究假說與迴歸模型 17 第四章 實證結果與分析 19 第一節 敘述統計 19 第二節 實證結果 25 第五章 結論與建議 30 參考文獻 32

    1)周賓凰、池祥萱、周冠男、龔怡霖(2002)。行為財務學─文獻回顧與展望。證券市場發展季刊,14(2),1-48。
    2)王韻怡、池祥萱、周冠男(2016)。行為財務學文獻回顧與展望─台灣市場之研究。經濟論文叢刊,44(1),1-55。
    3)林丙輝、張森林、葉仕國(2017)。台灣衍生性金融商品市場實證與運用研究文獻回顧與展望。臺大管理論叢,27(2),211-258。
    4)謝文良、曲靜芳(2016)。期貨未平倉量的資訊內涵及其交易活動之研究。臺大管理論叢,26(3),151-183。
    5)蔡永順、劉文智(2011)。台灣機構投資人過度自信行為實證研究。台灣管理學刊,11(2),91-126。
    6)王友珊、鍾惠民、江佳玲(2004)。台灣期貨市場波動性及流動性之動態關聯分析。證券市場發展季刊,16(3),83-113。
    7)Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
    8)Odean, Terrance. (1998). Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?. Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775-1798.
    9)Barber, B. M., Lee, Y-T., Liu, Y-J. & Odean, T. (2009). Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading?. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 609-632.
    10)Chou, R. K. & Wang, Y-Y. (2011). A Test of the Different Implications of the Overconfidence and Disposition Hypotheses. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(8), 2037-2046.
    11)Chou, R. K., Wang, Y-Y. & Yan, X. (2010). Patterns and Consequences of the Disposition Effect. The 18th Conference on the Theories and Practices of Securities and Financial Markets, Kaohsiung, National Sun Yat-sun University.
    12)Cornett, M. M., Schwarz, T. V. & Szakmary, A.C. (1995). Seasonalities and Intraday Return Patterns in the Foreign Currency Futures Market. Journal of Banking & Finance, 19(5), 843-869.
    13)Glaser, Markus & Martin, Weber. (2009). Which Past Returns Affect Trading Volume?. Journal of Financial Markets, 12(1), 1-31.
    14)Kahneman, Daniel & Lovallo, Dan. (1993). Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking. Management Science, 39(1), 17-31.
    15)Li, H. C., Lin, C. H., Cheng, T. Y. & Lai, S. C. (2013). How Different Types of Traders Behave in the Taiwan Futures Market. Journal of Futures Markets, 33(12), 1097-1117.
    16)Bessembinder, H., Seguin, P. J. (1993). Price Volatility, Trading Volume, and Market Depth: Evidence from Futures Markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 28(1), 21–39.
    17)Bollerslev, Tim. (1986). Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics. 31. 307-327.
    18)Clark, P. K. (1973). A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices. Econometrica. 41(1), 135-155.
    19)Fama, Eugene F. (1965). The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices. The Journal of Business. 38(1). 34-105.
    20)Chiyachantana, C. N., Jain, P. K., Jiang, C. & Wood, R. A. (2004). International Evidence on Institutional Trading Behavior and Price Impact. The Journal of Finance, 59(2), 869-898.

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2025/09/12
    QR CODE