簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林書伶
Lin, Shu-Ling
論文名稱: 臺北市國中生手足關係、同儕互動與領導才能發展之研究
Influence between Sibling Relationship, Peer Interaction and The Development of Leadership Based on Junior High School Students in Taipei
指導教授: 林安邦
Lin, An-Pan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 公民教育與活動領導學系
Department of Civic Education and Leadership
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 139
中文關鍵詞: 臺北市國中生手足關係同儕互動領導才能發展
英文關鍵詞: Taipei junior high school student, sibling relation, peer interaction, leadership development
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204818
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:120下載:41
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討臺北市國中生手足關係、同儕互動與領導才能發展之現況、相關情形及預測力,並比較不同背景變項的學生在手足關係、同儕互動與領導才能發展之差異。研究採用問卷調查法,以104學年度臺北市89所公私立國民中學的學生為對象,共抽取1100位學生為受試者進行調查,以改編之「手足關係問卷」、「同儕互動問卷」與「領導才能發展問卷」進行施測,回收1024份有效問卷,資料以SPSS 22.0進行描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數、積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析與討論,獲得研究結論如下:
    一、臺北市國中生手足關係「親密」多於「競爭」;同儕互動「正向」多於「負向」;領導才能發展以「領導特質」高於「概念能力」及「人際能力」。
    二、么子/么女在整體手足關係、手足的親密關係顯著高於長子/長女。長子/長女在手足的競爭關係顯著高於么子/么女。
    三、臺北市國中女生在整體同儕互動、同儕的正向關係及領導才能發展之領導特質,均顯著高於男生;男生在同儕互動之負向關係顯著高於女生。
    四、七年級臺北市國中生在整體同儕互動顯著高於八、九年級。九年級臺北市國中生在同儕互動之負向關係顯著高於七、八年級。
    五、有手足的臺北市國中生在同儕的負向關係顯著高於獨生子女。
    六、臺北市國中生之手足關係與領導才能發展呈低度正相關。
    七、臺北市國中生之同儕互動與領導才能發展呈中度正相關。
    八、臺北市國中生同儕互動之正向關係及手足關係之親密關係能有效預測領導才能發展。
    最後,根據研究結果,對教育工作者及後續研究提出建議。

    This study set and elaborated the development as well as the prediction of sibling relationship, peer interaction, and leadership among junior high school students in Taipei City. The study also attempted to examine the effect of background variables upon students’ different developments of sibling relationship, peer interaction, and leadership.
    The study was conducted by means of questionnaire survey. “The Questionnaire for Sibling Relationship, Peer Interaction, and Leadership Development” was used as a research tool for this study.
    The participants were the junior high school students in Taipei City in 2015 academic year. Eighty-nine of junior high schools in Taipei were involved in this study. Among the 1100 mailed questionnaires, 1024 were valid. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 descriptive statistic, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, multiple stepwise regression analysis.
    The research obtained conclusions as following:
    1.The sibling relationship of junior high school students in Taipei is more intimate than competitive, peer interaction is more positive than negative, the leadership characteristic is higher than conceptual ability and interpersonal skills.
    2.The youngest child has more intimate sibling relation compared with the eldest child, while the eldest child has more competitive sibling relation than the youngest child.
    3.Junior high school female students in Taipei have higher rate among positive peer interaction, and leadership characteristic, while male students have more negative peer interaction.
    4.Taipei Junior high school students in 7th grade have better peer interaction than students in 8th and 9th grade. The 9-grader has more negative peer interaction compared to 7-grader and 8-grader.
    5.Taipei Junior high school students with siblings have more negative peer interaction than the single child.
    6.Taipei Junior high school students’ sibling interaction and leadership development is modestly correlated.
    7.Taipei Junior high school students’ peer interaction and leadership development is moderately correlated
    8.The positive peer interaction and intimate sibling relation can effectively predict the development of leadership among Taipei Junior high school students.

    According to the findings above, suggestions are offered to educational administrations and future research.

    第一章 緒論....................................1 第一節 研究背景...............................1 第二節 研究動機與目的..........................3 第三節 研究問題與方法..........................5 第四節 名詞釋義...............................8 第五節 研究範圍與限制.........................10 第二章 文獻探討...............................13 第一節 手足關係理論與相關研究..................13 第二節 同儕互動理論與相關研究..................21 第三節 領導才能發展理論與相關研究...............27 第四節 手足關係、同儕互動與領導才能發展相關研究...39 第三章 研究方法................................43 第一節 研究架構...............................43 第二節 研究假設與操作型定義.....................44 第三節 研究對象...............................47 第四節 研究工具...............................52 第五節 研究步驟...............................69 第六節 資料處理...............................70 第四章 研究結果與分析...........................73 第一節 研究對象描述............................73 第二節 手足關係和同儕互動與領導才能發展之現況.....76 第三節 不同背景變項之「手足關係和同儕互動」和 「領導才能發展」之差異分析..................80 第四節 臺北市國中生「手足關係和同儕互動」與 「領導才能發展」之相關分析..................99 第五節 臺北市國中生「手足關係和同儕互動」與 「領導才能發展」之預測情形.................104 第五章 結論與建議..............................113 第一節 結論..................................113 第二節 建議..................................116 參考文獻.......................................119 壹、中文部分...................................119 貳、英文部分...................................125 附錄...........................................132 一、預試問卷...................................132 二、正式問卷...................................136

    壹、中文部分
    王文科編譯(1983)。教育研究法。高雄市:復文。
    王文進(2009)。國中學生之家庭功能、領導技能與同儕關係相關之研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/85253171050674308795
    王釗文(2000)。單親家庭成年子女手足關係之互動情形及其互動意義之建構(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    牛玉珍(1996)。同儕團體的影響過程及同儕壓力之處理。台灣教育,546,43-45。
    行政院內政部(2014)。內政部統計年報:育齡婦女生育率【Office Excel版】。取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm
    李世昌(2000)。同儕對休閒活動影響之研究-以開南工商專科學校為例(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,臺中市。
    李杰禧(2000)。藝術教育治療的實施對國小中年級學童自我概念與同儕關係之影響:一位國小導師的教學行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。
    李敦仁、余民寧(2005)。社經地位、手足數目、家庭教育資源與教育成就結
    構關係模式之驗證:以TEPS資料庫資料為例。台灣教育社會學研究,5
    (2),1-47。
    李貴貞(2008)。小一學生同儕關係發展狀況及其相關因素之研究:以一個台北市國民小學的班級為例(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
    李芸霈(2009)。特殊兒童之年長手足的手足關係與同儕關係之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台南大學,臺南市。
    呂祝義(2001)。青少年次級文化與同儕行為關係之研究-偏遠離島與都市地區青少年之比較,澎技學報,4,33-58。
    吳明隆(2003)。SPSS統計運用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市:知城數位。
    吳治勳(2003)。青少年同儕關係的評估及其特性之探討:以憂鬱傾向與壓力
    歷程特性為指標(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。
    吳昆壽(譯)(2014)。領導才能:理論與實務(原作者:Peter G. Northouse)。臺北市:華騰。(原著出版年:1997)
    吳雅雯(2006)。智能障礙學生國小手足親子互動關係、手足關係、社會支持與同儕互動關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文,台東市。
    何金樺(2003)。治療取向的班級藝術活動對國小學童情緒經驗、同儕關係與師生關係之輔導效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。
    林世欣(2000)。國中學生自我概念與同儕關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。
    林秀治(2010)。國中學生同儕關係與道德判斷之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    林鉦琴、賴鳳儀、邱建璋(2004)。組織內同儕關係類型、形成歷程、及其互動內容之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東科技大學,屏東縣。
    林曉君(2007)。非營利組織領導者領導歷程與轉化學習之研究-以慈濟基金會為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    林芳韻(2008)。中學資優生家人互動壓力與因應策略之研究(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/44579678537411205712
    林雅琪(2011)。探索教育活動方案對國中資優生創造力、領導才能之成效研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/527797230434284347

    林妍均(2014)。國中生知覺家庭關係、親師關係、同儕關係與班級生活幸福感之關係(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/91339069949959339514
    林佩蓉(2014)。臺北市國小高年級學童親子互動關係、手足關係與同儕關係之研究(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/07199180762063997952
    周美志(2010)。國中生情緒智力、領導才能與創造力的差異與相關研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/93410723407941905652
    卓旻怡(1999)。青少年運動能力與同儕關係發展之探討。中華體育,13(3),52-59。
    洪光遠(1992)。組織領導。臺北:桂冠。
    柯華葳(1994)。遊玩、遊戲與同儕。發展心理學。臺北市:心理。
    涂筱姍(2006)。「資優生手足」手足關係之研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/72232360029482796553
    徐偉閔(2010)。運動員同儕領導行為測量之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
    馬湘苓(2011)。幼兒手足關係品質、喜愛程度與手足衝突之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
    孫瑞真(2012)。台灣高中職青少年認同發展與親子關係(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/64413709106949311487
    張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北:東華。
    張春興(1993)。現代心理學(二版)。臺北市:東華。
    張嘉倫(2009)。母親對手足衝突的處理策略、手足關係與幼兒同儕互動行為之關係(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。

    張麗鵑(2003)。媒體閱聽、同儕關係與少年偏差行為相關性之研究:以南投地區為例。犯罪學期刊,6(2),217-250。
    張鐘文(2009)。國小資優生與其家長、手足互動關係之研究(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/41827264380833916072
    張凌芳(2011)。台北市青少年領導才能內涵之認知及領導才能發展之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    張華甄(2012)。淺談青少年與家人的親密關係。家庭教育雙月刊,36,6-15。
    陳彰儀(1995)。組織心理學。臺北:心理。
    陳膺宇(1998)。通識教育對軍校政治教育再造之啟思。載於政治作戰學院(主編),軍隊政治教育學術研討會論文集(143-189頁)。臺北市:政戰學院。
    陳厚仁(2004)。國小六年級被同儕忽視學童之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
    陳俐穎(2013)。手足競爭經驗者的人際衝突因應研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/97898865535481910964
    陳律伊(2014)。以教養態度、婚姻衝突與手足關係探討國中生的霸凌行為-以台中市為例(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/89039436345526347972
    郭淑玲(2004)。台灣現行融合教育國中普通生與身心障礙生同儕關係之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。
    教育大辭書編纂委員會(2000)。教育大辭書。臺北市:文景。
    教育部(2011)。中華民國教育報告書:黃金十年、百年樹人。臺北市:作者。
    許秋嬉(2014)。我國海軍艦艇軍官工作適應、家庭關係與工作投入之研究(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/03636044658769374558
    黃朗文(2000)。手足結構與家庭資源。第三屆家庭與社會資源分配學術研討會,中研院中山人文社會科學研究所。
    黃貴連(2011)。中部地區國中學生人格特質與領導技能之相關研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/89954160734421365391
    楊錦雲(2005)。國中學生父母管教態度、同儕關係與解釋風格關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
    臺北市政府教育局(2014)。重要教育統計資訊:各級學校學生數【Adobe Reader 版】。取自http://www.doe.gov.taipei/public/Attachment/512291532811.pdf
    廖清碧、陳珠璋等(2000)。陪伴孩子快活地成長第二冊【Adobe Reader 版】。取自http://health.gov.taipei/Portals/0/%E6%96%87%E5%AE%A3%E5%87%BA%E7%89%88%E5%93%81/%E6%89%8B%E5%86%8A/20058291052212.pdf
    鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000)。家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究,14,3-64。
    鄭聖敏(2006)。中學生領導才能內涵建構及相關因素之研究(博士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/83126428978818554071
    鄭政宗、張君如、曾雅秀 (2008)。青少年同儕關係、知覺風險、水域運動態度及水域運動參與之研究:以澎湖地區為例。朝陽學報,13,175-204。
    鄭珮秀(2013)。青少年的親子關係與父母教養差異對手足關係之影響(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/14011839376107719930
    蔡孟辰(2009)。少子化現象中家庭教養方式對國小低年級教師班級經營之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學,臺東縣。
    蔡紋娟(2013)。國中生幽默感、手足關係與同儕關係之相關研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/36980918463329688262
    蔡嘉偉(2014)。國中學術性向資優生父母教養方式與領導才能關係及其相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/18188327711164823711
    盧靖渝(2008)。國中生領導者角色知覺與領導技能關係之研究-以中部四縣市為例(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/03916836756362835934
    薛家琪(2011)。隔宿露營活動對國中生領導才能影響之研究-以新北市某中學為例(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/41889450789050441851
    顏妙桂(譯)(2002)。休閒活動規劃與管理(原作者:Christopher R. Edginton 等著)。臺北市:桂魯。(原著出版年:2003)
    羅怡華(2007)。獨生子女與非獨生子女分享行為與同儕互動之比較(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,臺中縣。
    蘇秋碧(1999)。國小六年級被同儕拒絕兒童其被同儕拒絕因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺中師範學院,臺中市。

    貳、英文部分

    Bagwell, C. L., Newcomb, A. F., and Bukowski, W. M. (1998). Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment. Child Development, 69, 140–153.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press; Collier Macmillan.
    Bass, B. M., and Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112-121.
    Beishline, J. R. (1950). Military Management for National Defense. NY: Prentice-Hall.
    Benjamin, L., and Flynn, F. J. (2006). Leadership style and regulatory mode: Value from fit? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(2), 216-230.
    Bennis, W. G. (2009). On Becoming a Leader. Basic Books.
    Berk, L.E. (1997). Child Development. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Berndt, T. J. (1989). Effect of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the course process on consumer decision processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234-248.
    Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. New York: Jason Aronson.
    Dorfman, P. W. (1996). International and cross-cultural leadership research. In B. J. Punnett & O. Shanker (Eds.), Handbook for International Management Research (pp. 267-349). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    Drath, W. H., and Palus, C. J. (1994). Making Common Sense: Leadership as Meaning-Making in a Community of Practice. NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Emmerich, M. (1983). Training tomorrow's leaders today. Educational Leadership, 40(6), 64-65.
    Erikson, E. H., and Erikson, J. M. (1998). The Life Cycle Completed (extended version). WW Norton & Company.
    Erwin, P. (2003). Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence. Routledge.
    Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., and Levin, S. (1978). The McMaster model of family functioning. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 4, 19-31.
    Feldhusen, J. F., and Kennedy, D. M. (1988). Preparing gifted youth for leadership roles in a rapidly changing society. Roeper Review, 10(4), 226-230.
    Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    Foster, W. (1981). Leadership: a conceptual framework for recognizing and educating. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(1), 17-25.
    Gardner, W. L., and Avolio, B. J. (1998). The charismatic relationship: a dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 32-58.
    Goetting, A. (1986). The developmental tasks of siblingship over the life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48(4), 703-714.
    Gordon, T. (1955). Group-Centered Leadership: A Way of Releasing the Creative Power of Groups. Oxford, England: Houghton, Mifflin Co
    Gray, J. W., & Pfeiffer, A. L. (1987). Skills for Leaders. VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
    Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children. Denver: University of Denver.
    Harter, S. (1999). The Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective. New York: Guilford.
    Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67(1), 1-13.
    Hensel, N., and Franklin, C. (1983). Developing emergent leadership skills in elementary and junior high students. Roeper Review, 5(4), 33-35.
    Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., and Natemeyer, W. E. (1979). Situational leadership, perception, and the impact of power. Group & Organization Management, 4(4), 418-428.
    Houghton, J. D., and Yoho, S. K. (2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: when should self-leadership be encouraged? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 65-83.
    House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership. Faculty of Management Studies, University of Toronto.
    House, R. J., and Mitchell, T. R. (1975). Path-goal Theory of Leadership (No. TR-75-67). Washington University Seattle Department of Psychology.
    House, R. J., Filley, A. C., and Gujarati, D. N. (1971). Leadership style, hierarchical influence, and the satisfaction of subordinate role expectations: a test of Likert's influence proposition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(5), 422-432.
    Kane, J. S., and Lawler, E. E. (1978). Methods of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 85(3), 555-586.
    Karnes, F. A., and D'Ilio, V. R. (1989). Student leaders' and their parents' perceptions of the home environment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(4), 165-168.
    Karnes, F. A., and Meriweather, S. (1989). Developing and implementing a plan for leadership: An integral component for success as a leader. Roeper Review, 11(4), 214-217.

    Ladd, G. W. (1989). Children’s social competence and social supports: Precursors of early school adjustment? In B. Schneider, G. Attili, J. Nadel, & R. Weissberg (Eds.), Social Competence in Developmental Perspective (pp. 277-292). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
    Lair, J. (1984). Change induction groups, group psychotherapy, integrity groups, peer counseling. Encyclopedia of Psychology, 1(2), 493-494.
    Leatt, D. J. (1987). Developing student leaders: exemplary school activity programs. OSSC Bulletin, 31(4), 1-38.
    Markus, H. R. and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
    Newman, P. R. (1982). The peer group. In B.B. Wolman (Ed), Handbook of Developmental Psychology (pp. 526-537). Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
    Northouse, P. G. (2015). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage publications.
    Ogurlu, Ü., and Emir, S. (2014). Effects of a leadership development program on gifted and non-gifted students’ leadership skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 223-242.
    Parker, J. G., and Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611–621.
    Rauch, C.F., and Behling, O. (1984). Functionalism: basis for an alternate approach to the study of leadership. In J.G. Hunt, D.M. Hosking, C.A. Schriesheim, & R. Stewart (Eds.), Leaders and Managers: International Perspectives on Managerial Behavior and Leadership (pp. 45-62). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press
    Redding, S. G. (1990). The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. Walter de Gruyter.

    Richards, D., and Engle, S. (1986). After the vision: suggestions to corporate visionaries and vision champions. In J. Adams (Ed.), Transforming Leadership: From Vision to Results (pp.199- 214). Alexandria, VA: Miles River Press.
    Robbins, S. P., and Judge, T. (2007). Essentials of Organizational Behavior. N.Y.: Prentice Hall.
    Rubin, K., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (pp. 621-700).New York: Wiley.
    Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational Leadership and Culture. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
    Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and Values: The Organization of Large-Scale Taiwanese Enterprises. Harvard University Asia Center.
    Smith, A. L., Balaguer, and Duda, J. L., (2006). Goal orientation profile differences on perceived motivational climate, perceived peer relationships, and motivation-related responses of youth athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 1315-1327.
    Stiles, D. A. (1986). Leadership training for high school girls: An intervention at one school. Journal of Counseling & Development, 65(4), 211-212.
    Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: a survey of the literature. The Journal of psychology, 25(1), 35-71.
    Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of the Literature. NY: Free Press.

    Ullrich-French, S., and Smith, A. L. (2006). Perceptions of relationship with parents and peers in youth sport: Independent and combined prediction of motivational outcomes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 193-214.
    Ullrich-French, S., and Smith, A. L. (2009). Social and motivational predictors of continued youth sport participation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 87-95.
    Van Fleet, D. D., and Yuki, G. A. (1986). A Century of leadership research. In Academy of Management Proceedings (pp. 12-23). Academy of Management.
    Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: a review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 825-856.
    Vardiman, P. D., Houghton, J. D., and Jinkerson, D. L. (2006). Environmental leadership development: Toward a contextual model of leader selection and effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(2), 93-105.
    Washburn, J. M., and Hammond, J. M. (1982). Student leadership camp for improving school climate. Educational Leadership, 39(7), 518-20.
    Weiss, H. M., and Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: a theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 1-74.
    Weiss, M. R., and Smith, A. L. (1999). Quality of youth sport friendship: measurement development and validation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 21, 145-166.
    Weiss, M. R., and Duncan, S. C. (1992). The relationship between physical competence and peer acceptance in the context of children’s sport participation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 14, 177-191.
    Westwood, R. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: the cultural basis for paternalistic headship' among the overseas Chinese. Organization studies, 18(3), 445-480.
    Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in Organizations. Upper Saddle Creek, N.J.7 Prentice-Hall.
    Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait-based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 6-16.
    Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., and Marks, M. A. (2002). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 451-483.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE