簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 胡兆基
Woo, Siu-Kei
論文名稱: 雙北市家庭親子戶外自然活動與兒童環境教育學習關係之研究
Research on the relationship between Family Parent-child Outdoor Natural Activities and Children's Environmental Education Learning in Taipei and New Taipei Cities
指導教授: 方偉達
Fang, Wei-Ta
口試委員: 吳忠信
Chung-Hsin Wu
張育傑
Chang, Yu-Jie
周睿鈺
Chou, Jui-Yu
林于凱
Lin, Yu-kai
方偉達
Fang, Wei-Ta
口試日期: 2023/05/09
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 環境教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Environmental Education
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 141
中文關鍵詞: 戶外自然活動兒童環境教育家庭自然關聯性
英文關鍵詞: outdoor natural activities, children's environmental education, family, Nature Relatedness
研究方法: 準實驗設計法參與觀察法調查研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300510
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:81下載:40
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 根據國內外文獻,家庭親子戶外自然活動對兒童的環境教育具有高度重要性。因此,本研究的目標係以探索兒童的環境教育內涵,提出戶外自然活動之具體策略,以及探討家庭在其中所扮演之角色。本研究將會從戶外自然活動對環境教育的重要性、親生命性 (Biophilia) 如何支持戶外自然活動、戶外自然活動對兒童的重要性,以及家庭的角色四方面,探討戶外活動、親生命性、以及家庭成員三者在兒童環境教育中所扮演之角色,然後提出藉由自然關聯性 (Nature Relatedness) 之研究方法,說明家庭親子戶外自然活動,對兒童的環境教育具體實踐的有效性。
    本研究以立意抽樣方法取得問卷488份,並已進行克隆巴赫係數檢定以達到適合的信度,問卷亦已進行內容效度專家審查。研究方法配合量化與質性,包括自然關聯性問卷和兒童繪畫分析。有助瞭解不同背景的家庭藉由不同認知模式,教育子女親環境行為,係為學習原生家庭父母的環境素養行為良好方式。本研究透過實證,以提供親子戶外環境教育之具體建議。
    本研究結果表明,雙北市的家庭親子戶外自然活動,與自然關聯性與親生命性理論在國際研究上的結果相呼應:包括高和中強度戶外自然活動比低強度更影響兒童的自然關聯性:高和中強度戶外自然活動與兒童自然關聯性相關有8項指標達到顯著 (*p<0.05),當中7頂更是高度顯著 (**p<0.01) ,而低強度戶外自然活動與兒童自然關聯性則無顯著相關;在兒童繪畫分析中,兒童有明顯的親生命性傾向。研究結果亦發現,家庭造訪戶外頻率和強度對自然關聯性的影響比家長背景變項的影響更高:家庭背景變項中只有一項對自然關連觀有相關,而兒童年齡和自然關聯之間呈負相關:兒童年紀越大自然關聯性越低;此外,父母較高的教育程度,影響家庭參與更高強度的戶外自然活動,而家庭收入愈高則戶外活動強度與頻率愈高。本研究有助了解更多華人社會尤其台灣的家庭親子戶外自然活動與自然關聯性的關係,以引導將來更多這一方面的研究,填補學術上的不足。

    According to the literature, family outdoor natural activities were of high importance to children's environmental education. The objectives of this study were to explore the relationship between children's environmental education, to propose strategies for outdoor natural activities, and to explore the role of family in such activities. The study examined the importance of outdoor nature in environmental education through Biophilia, the importance of outdoor natural activities to children, and the role of the family in these processes. The study also discussed the role of outdoor activities, Biophilia and family in children's environmental education, and the research method of Nature Relatedness illustrated that Family outdoor nature activities are effective in children's environmental education.
    In this study, 488 questionnaires were collected by purposeful sampling, and Cronbach's α tests was carried out to achieve suitable reliability. Questionnaires were conducted after a review of content validity by experts. Research methods combined quantitative and qualitative, included Nature Relatedness questionnaires and children's drawing analysis. The study helped further our understanding that families from different backgrounds can educate their children about environmental behavior through a variety of ways, suggesting children can learn pro-environmental behavior from family. In addition, this study provided suggestions for organizing family outdoor nature activities.
    The results of the study showed that family outdoor nature activities in Taipei and New Taipei City were similar to those featured in international research on Nature Relatedness and Biophilia: high and moderate intensity outdoor natural activities affected children's Nature Relatedness more than low intensity activities. There were 8 variables of high and moderate intensity outdoor natural activities correlated to Nature Relatedness (*p<0.05), 7 of them were highly correlated (**p<0.01), and there was no correlation in low intensity activities and Nature Relatedness. In the analysis of children's drawing, children exhibited obvious Biophilic tendencies.
    The results also showed that the frequency and intensity of outdoor activities had a higher impact on Nature Relatedness than parental background variables, there was only one variable of parental background correlated to Nature Relatedness. There was an inverse correlation between age and natural association: the older the children the lower the Nature Relatedness; In addition, higher parental education levels affected family participation in higher intensive outdoor natural activities, and higher family income increased the frequency and intensity of outdoor activities. The study assisted our understanding about the relationship between family outdoor nature activities and Nature Relatedness in the Sinophone world, specifically in Taiwan, filled the knowledge gap in this field, and guided future research in this area.

    謝辭................................................................................................................ I 中文摘要....................................................................................................... II Abstract........................................................................................................ IV 目錄............................................................................................................. VI 圖目錄......................................................................................................... IX 表目錄......................................................................................................... XI 第一章、緒論................................................................................................1 第一節、研究緣起與研究問題 第二節、研究目的與重要性 第三節、研究領域 第四節、名詞定義與研究對象 第二章、文獻回顧........................................................................................10 第一節、戶外自然活動與環境教育 第二節、親生命性與戶外自然活動 第三節、家庭在戶外自然環境教育的角色 第四節、自然關聯性 第五節、兒童繪畫分析 第三章:研究方法…....................................................................................25 第一節、自然關聯性量表 第二節、研究方法架構與研究方法流程 第三節、信度與效度 第四節、質性研究方法 一、親子戶外自然活動抽樣地點 二、不同種類的親子戶外自然活動 第四章:結果與討論....................................................................................39 第一節、學者專家訪談討論 第二節、量化研究結果 一、雙北市家庭自然關聯性的分析 二、家長背景與自然關聯性 三、造訪戶外頻率和強度與自然關聯性 四、家長背景變項與造訪戶外頻率 五、家長背景變項與造訪戶外強度 六、兒童背景與自然關聯性 七、兒童背景與戶外活動頻率 八、兒童背景與戶外活動強度  第三節、質性研究結果:兒童繪畫分析與參與式觀察 第五章:結論與建議..................................................................................114 第一節、研究結論 一、高強度戶外自然活動比中和低強度更影響兒童自然關聯性 二、家庭造訪戶外頻率和強度對自然關聯性的影響 三、兒童年齡對自然關聯性的影響 四、父母教育程度與家庭收入對戶外活動強度與頻率的影響 五、從繪畫分析與參與式觀察所見兒童的親生命性傾向 第二節、研究建議 一、實務建議 二、研究限制 三、未來研究建議 參考文獻....................................................................................................124 中文部分 英文部分 附件:自然關聯性問卷.............................................................................138

    參考文獻
    中文部分
    方偉達(2022)。環境教育:理論、實務與案例。五南出版。
    王天佑、黃芳銘(1999)。中大學生環境認知,態度與行為調查研究。
    王順美(2014)。探索環境教育的背景脈絡及其概念。教育論叢(2),1-16。
    吳素援(2004)。家庭教育關聯資本對國小學生數理成就影響模式之研究。碩士論文,國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所,嘉義。
    李輝(1994)。影響國小兒童自我觀念發展之重要因素。
    車參賢、葉國樑(1996)。台北市國中生資源回收知識態度行為相關研究。
    周新富(1999)。國中生家庭背景, 家庭文化資源, 學校經驗與學習結果關係之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄縣。
    周儒(2003)。環境教育課程規劃。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    林生復(2001)。引導國小學生環境行為的建構模式探討。國立台北師範學院,臺北市。
    林靜麗(2002)。臺南市國小師生利用四草野生動物保護區進行環境教育教學活動之研究 國立臺中師範學院環境教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市]。
    徐子惠(2014)。登山者自然關聯性之探究:以臺灣大專校院登山社團為例(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    張子超(2002)。九年一貫課程的環境教育理念。環境教育學刊,(1)83-94。
    教育部(2014)。中華民國戶外教育宣言。中華民國政府。
    教育部(2019)。中華民國戶外教育宣言2.0。中華民國政府。
    陳榮輝(2002)。從學童戶外情境偏好與環境議題關切探討環境教育之機會。國立臺中師範學院環境教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    曾鈺琪(2019)。臺灣國中青少年之自然連結量表編製與信效度分析。科學教育學刊,27(4),323-345。
    黃芳銘、楊金寶(2002)。國中生家庭階級影響偏差行為模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,47(2),203-230。
    黃芳銘、楊世安(2006)。家庭因素對國小學童環境行為影響模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,51(1),159-183。
    黃茂在、曾鈺琪(2015)。臺灣戶外教育內涵與課程優質化初探。教育脈動(4),25-43。
    黃毅志(2004)。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估:社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊,49(4)1-31。
    葉國樑(1996)。鹿谷地區國中學生紙張回收行為意圖之研究。衛生教育論文集刊。
    潘慧玲(2003)。緒論:轉變中的教育研究觀點。教育研究的取徑-概念與應用(1-34)。臺北市:高等教育。
    蔡佳伶(1994)。師範學院學生紙張回收行為意圖研究. 國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文,臺北市。
    藍佩嘉(2019)。拚教養: 全球化親職焦慮與不平等童年(1)。春山出版。
    羅啟宏(1992)。台灣省鄉鎮發展類型之研究。台灣經濟月刊,190期,41-67。

    英文部分
    Allen, J. B., & Ferrand, J. L. (1999). Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and proenvironmental behavior: A test of Geller’s actively caring hypothesis. Environment and behavior, 31(3), 338-353.
    Andrews, K., Spaulding, S., & Westra, E. (2021). Introduction to folk psychology: Pluralistic approaches. Synthese, 199, 1685-1700.
    Ardoin, N. M. (2020). Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educational Research Review, 31, 100353.
    Atran, S. (1995). Causal constraints on categories and categorical constraints on biological reasoning across cultures. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate, (pp. 205–233). Clarendon Press/Oxford .
    Ballantyne, R., Connell, S., & Fien, J. (1998a). Students as catalysts of environmental change: A framework for researching intergenerational influence through environmental education. Environmental education research, 4(3), 285-298.
    Ballantyne, R., Connell, S., & Fien, J. (1998b). Factors contributing to intergenerational communication regarding environmental programs: Preliminary research findings. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 1-10.
    Ballantyne, R., Fien, J., & Packer, J. (2001). Program effectiveness in facilitating intergenerational influence in environmental education: Lessons from the field. The journal of environmental education, 32(4), 8-15.
    Bardill, N., & Hutchinson, S. (1997). Animal-assisted therapy with hospitalized adolescents. Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing: official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc, 10(1), 17-24.
    Bell, A. C., & Russell, C. L. (1999). Life ties: Disrupting anthropocentrism in language arts education.International Journal Robertson, Teaching for a tolerant world (pp. 68-89). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Berat, A., & Alisinanoglu, F. (2015). The Evaluation of Pre-service Preschool Teachers’ Knowledge about the Concept of Environment. European Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 57-69.
    Bragg, R., Wood, C., Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2013). Measuring connection to nature in children aged 8-12: A robust methodology for the RSPB. University of Essex.
    Braune, J. (2014). Erich Fromm and Thomas Merton: biophilia, necrophilia, and messianism. In Reclaiming the Sane Society (pp. 137-146). Brill Sense.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental psychology, 22(6), 723.
    Burkhart, J. (2016). Singing the Spaces: Artful Approaches to Navigating the Emotional Landscape in Environmental Education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 72-88.
    Carey, S. (1988). Conceptual differences between children and adults. Mind and Language, 3(3), 167-181.
    Chawla, L. (2020). Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. People and Nature, 2(3), 619-642.
    Corsaro, W. A. (2011). The sociology of childhood (3rd ed.). . Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
    Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Edwards, S., Moore, D., & Boyd, W. (2014). Young children's play and environmental education in early childhood education. Springer Science & Business Media.
    Davis, J., & Elliott, S. (2014). Research in early childhood education for sustainability. International perspectives and provocations.
    Davis, J. M. (2015). Young children and the environment. Cambridge University Press.
    Deans, J. (2018). A 21st Century pedagogy approach to environmental education in the early years. International Journal of Research in Environmental Studies, 5, 77-90.
    Donaldson, G. W. (1958). Outdoor education a definition. Journal of Health, Physical Education, Recreation, 29(5), 17-63.
    Elliot, S. (2008). The outdoor playspace naturally for children birth to five years. New-South Wales: Pademelon.
    Elliott, S., & Chancellor, B. (2014). From forest preschool to bush kinder: An inspirational approach to preschool provision in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(4), 45-53.
    Epstein, A. S. (2007). The Intentional Teacher: Choosing the Best Strategies for Young Children’s Learning. Washington, D.C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
    Etz, K. E., & Arroyo, J. A. (2015). Small sample research: Considerations beyond statistical power. Prevention Science, 16, 1033-1036.
    Fang, W.-T., Hassan, A. a., & LePage, B. A. (2022). The Living Environmental Education. Springer. Springer Nature.
    Fang, W. T. (2017). How to write a Journal Article for Publication? . Wunan Publisher.
    Ford, P. (1986). Outdoor Education: Definition and Philosophy. ERIC Publications.
    Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
    Fromm, E. (1964). Creators and destroyers. The Saturday Review, New York (4.1. 1964), pp. 22-25.
    Gannon, S. (2017). Saving squawk? Animal and human entanglement at the edge of the lagoon. Environmental education research, 23(1), 91-110.
    Gardner, H. E. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic books.
    Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
    Gough, S., & Scott, W. (2003). Sustainable development and learning: Framing the issues. Routledge.
    Hart, R. (1979). Children's Experson of Place. New York: Irvington Publishers.
    Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual review of public health, 35, 207-228.
    Higgins, M., Madden, B., & Korteweg, L. (2015). Witnessing (halted) deconstruction: White teachers’‘perfect stranger’position within urban Indigenous education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 18(2), 251-276.
    Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The journal of environmental education, 18(2), 1-8.
    Holl, K. D., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1995). Knowledge and perceptions in Costa Rica regarding environment, population, and biodiversity issues. Conservation Biology, 9(6), 1548-1558.
    Hye‐Eun. (2007). Korean year 3 children’s environmental literacy: A prerequisite for a Korean environmental education curriculum. International journal of science education, 29(6), 731-746.
    Hyun, E. (2005). How is young children’s intellectual culture of perceiving nature different from adults’? Environmental education research, 11(2), 199-214.
    Jensen, S. (2016). Empathy and Imagination in Education for Sustainability. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 89-105.
    Joye, Y. (2011). 'Nature and i are two': A critical examination of the biophilia hypothesis. Environmental Values, 20(2), 189-215.
    Kahn Jr, P. H. (1997). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children's affiliation with nature. Developmental review, 17(1), 1-61.
    Kals, E., & Maes, J. (2002). Sustainable development and emotions. Psychology of sustainable development.Springer, Boston, MA., 97-122.
    Kaplan, R. (1977). Summer outdoor programs: their participants and their effects. USDA Forest Service.
    Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Brown, T. (1989). Environmental preference: A comparison of four domains of predictors. Environment and behavior, 21(5), 509-530.
    Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of environmental psychology, 15(3), 169-182.
    Kaplan, S., & Talbot, J. F. (1983). Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience. Behavior and the natural environment.New York, NY: Plenum Press., 163-203.
    Kellert, S. R. (1998). A National Study of Outdoor Wilderness Experience.
    Kellert, S. R. (2003). Kinship to mastery: Biophilia in human evolution and development. Island Press.
    Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1995). The biophilia hypothesis. Island press.
    Knight, S. (2013). Forest school and outdoor learning in the early years. Forest School and Outdoor Learning in the Early Years, 1-176.
    Ko, H.-R., Lee, E.-A., Chu, H.-E., & Shin, D.-H. (2004). Assessment of Middle School Student's Environmental Literacy and Analysis of Predictors for It. Hwankyungkyoyuk, 17(1), 144-153.
    Kronus, C. L., & Van Es, J. (1976). The practice of environmental quality behavior. The journal of environmental education, 8(1), 19-25.
    Kuo, F. E., & Faber Taylor, A. (2004). A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from a national study. American journal of public health, 94(9), 1580-1586.
    Kuo, M. (2015). How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway. Frontiers in psychology, 1093.
    Kuo, M., Barnes, M., & Jordan, C. (2019). Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship. High-Quality Outdoor Learning, 47-66.
    Leather, M., & Porter, S. (2006). An Outdoor Evolution: changing names, changing contexts, constant values. Shaping the Outdoor Profession Through Higher Education. Penrith: Institute for Outdoor Learning.
    Leduc, T. B. (2016). Renewing awe in the urban experience: Historic changes in land-based education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 21, 163-177.
    Liefländer, A. K., Fröhlich, G., Bogner, F. X., & Schultz, P. W. (2013). Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education. Environmental education research, 19(3), 370-384.
    Liere, K. D. V., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public opinion quarterly, 44(2), 181-197.
    Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin books.
    Lucas, A. M. (1972). Environment and environmental education: Conceptual issues and curriculum implications. The Ohio State University.
    Lumis, G. (1998). Gough, A.(1997).Education and the Environment. Policy, Trends and the Problems of Marginalisation. Melbourne: The Australian Council for Research Ltd, 204 pages. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), 7.
    Luna Scott, C. (2015). The Futures of Learning 3: What kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? Education Research and Foresight Working Papers, United Nations Cultural Organization, 1-2.
    Ma, K., Hills, P., & Hau, C. (2013). Environmental Education in Hong Kong: the role of field-based Environmental Education Programmes: a case study. International Sustainable Development Research Conference (ISDRC).
    MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 26(6), 658-667.
    Malle, B. F. (2011). Time to give up the dogmas of attribution: An alternative theory of behavior explanation (Vol. 44). Elsevier.
    Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(4), 503-515.
    Meeusen, C. (2014). The intergenerational transmission of environmental concern: The influence of parents and communication patterns within the family. The journal of environmental education, 45(2), 77-90.
    Moore, R. (1986). Childhood's domain: Play and place in child development (Vol. 6). UK: Routledge.
    Moors, R. P. a. p. p. (1989). Plants as play props. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 6, 3–6.
    Musser, L. M., & Diamond, K. E. (1999). The children's attitudes toward the environment scale for preschool children. The journal of environmental education, 30(2), 23-30.
    NAAEE. (2000). Guidelines for Excellence Early Childhood Environmental Education Programs. Washington, DC, NAAEE.
    Nabhan, G. P. a. T., S. (1994). The Geography of Childhood: Why Children Need Wild Places. Why Chi de Ned Wild Maces, Boston MA Beacon Press.
    Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 813.
    Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and behavior, 41(5), 715-740.
    Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1978). Psychometric theory mcgraw-hill new york. The role of university in the development of entrepreneurial vocations: a Spanish study, 387-405.
    O'Brien, L. (2009). Learning outdoors: the Forest School approach. Education 3–13, 37(1), 45-60.
    Orr, D. W. (1993). Love it or lose it: The coming biophilia revolution. St. R. Kellert and EO Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis, Washington (Island Press) 1993, pp. 414-440.
    Oskamp, S., Harrington, M. J., Edwards, T. C., Sherwood, D. L., Okuda, S. M., & Swanson, D. C. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and behavior, 23(4), 494-519.
    Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 47, 88-94.
    Palmer, J. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century: Theory, practice, progress and promise. Routledge.
    Palmer, J. A. (1993). Development of concern for the environment and formative experiences of educators. The journal of environmental education, 24(3), 26-30.
    Payne, P. G. (2005). Families, homes and environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 81-95.
    Perkins, H. E. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(4), 455-463.
    Piaget, J. (1968). Le point de vue de Piaget. International Journal of Psychology, 3(4), 281-299.
    Restall, B., & Conrad, E. (2015). A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of environmental management, 159, 264-278.
    Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental education research, 7(3), 207-320.
    Ritchhart, R., Church M. & Morrison K. (2011). Making thinking visible. How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Robinson, K. (2020). Types of Power in Intertextuality: Sir Ken Robinson's Ted Talk 'do Schools Kill Creativity?' As A Sample. Journal of Duhok University, 23(2), 576-590.
    Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. ERIC Publications.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
    Salazar, G., Kunkle, K., & Monroe, M. C. (2020). Practitioner guide to assessing connection to nature. North American Association for Environmental Education: Washington, DC, USA.
    Samuelsson, I. P., & Kaga, Y. (2008). The contribution of early childhood education to a sustainable society. Unesco Paris.
    Schlageter, J. N. (1980). Student cognition, attitudes, and action-orientation and teacher attitudes toward environmental education concepts at the seventh grade level. University of Rochester.
    Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. Psychology of sustainable development, 61-78.
    Sebba, R. (1991). The landscapes of childhood: The reflection of childhood's environment in adult memories and in children's attitudes. Environment and behavior, 23(4), 395-422.
    Sobel, D. (1996). Beyond ecophobia: Reclaiming the heart in nature education (Vol. 1). Orion Society Great Barrington, MA.
    Sobel, D. (2002). Children's special places: Exploring the role of forts, dens, and bush houses in middle childhood. Wayne State University Press.
    Stanger, N. R. G. (2016). When despair grows in US: Emotional learning in (trans) formative places. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 21, 145-162.
    Steele, A., & Scott, J. (2016). Emotionality and learning stories: Documenting how we learn what we feel. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 21, 106-124.
    Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48, 1273-1296.
    Tarr, P. (2011). Reflections and Shadows: Ethical Issues in Pedagogical Documentation. Canadian Children, 36(2).
    Taylor, A. F., & Kuo, F. E. (2006). Is contact with nature important for healthy child development? State of the evidence. Children and their environments: Learning, using and designing spaces, 124.
    Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment and behavior, 33(1), 54-77.
    Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2002). Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of environmental psychology, 22(1-2), 49-63.
    Titman, W. (1994). Special Places; Special People: The Hidden Curriculum of School Grounds. ERIC.
    Tovey, H. (2007). Playing Outdoors: Spaces and Places, Risk and Challenge. Berkshire. England, McGraw-Hill, Open University Press.
    Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. The Biophilia Hypothesis, Washington, Island Press, 7, 73-137.
    Vaughan, C., Gack, J., Solorazano, H., & Ray, R. (2003). The effect of environmental education on schoolchildren, their parents, and community members: A study of intergenerational and intercommunity learning. The journal of environmental education, 34(3), 12-21.
    Vining, J. (1987). Environmental decisions: The interaction of emotions, information, and decision context. Journal of environmental psychology, 7(1), 13-30.
    Warden, C. (2010). Children as Designers of their Own Spaces. Wonder: Newsletter of the Nature Action Collaborative For Children (NACC).
    Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and behavior, 32(6), 775-795.
    Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and behavior, 35(3), 311-330.
    Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. In Biophilia. Harvard University Press.
    Wilson, R. A. (1994). Environmental Education at the Early Childhood Level. Washington, DC, NAAEE.
    Wright, S. (2007a). Young Children's Meaning-Making through Drawing and ‘Telling’ Analogies to Filmic Textual Features. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 32(4), 37-48.
    Wright, S. (2007b). Graphic-Narrative Play: Young Children's Authoring through Drawing and Telling. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 8(8), 1-28.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE