國立臺灣師範大學博碩士論文全文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	陳力瑜 Chen, Li-Yu
論文名稱：	以解釋範圍重疊模型探討雙重正價促發物對消費者態度之影響 The Study of Consumer Attitude: An Extension of Dimensional Range Overlap Model on the Context Effect of Dual Positive Primes.
指導教授：	蕭中強 Hsiao, Chung-Chiang
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年：	2016
畢業學年度：	104
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	61
中文關鍵詞：	雙重促發物、推敲可能性模型、促發效果、對比效果、同化效果、解釋範圍重疊模型、相互假設
英文關鍵詞：	Dual Primes, ELM Model, Priming Effect, The Dimensional Range Overlap Model, Reciprocity Hypothesis, Contrast Effect, Assimilation Effect
DOI URL：	https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204435
論文種類：	學術論文
相關次數：	點閱：115 下載：11
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

本研究的目的主要是想了解人們在做決策時是如何受到與目標產品本質無關的其他因素影響，進而改變其對目標產品的評價，並且探討其在不同因素的情況下會有怎樣的改變，另外為了擴大本研究的貢獻性，我們也將範圍擴展至實務上，探討公司將如何利用比較行銷找出其最適定位，而提高消費者對品牌的觀感或評價。
在本研究當中，藉以衡量消費者評價變化的產品我們稱之為目標物；會影響消費者對目標物的評價但與目標物無關的因素我們稱為促發物，當人們在評量目標物時，容易受到先前發生的促發物影響而產生「同化效果」或是「對比效果」，進而改變其對於目標物的評價或態度。在過去有許多研究都致力於解釋因為不同的促發物影響所產生的促發效果將會形成同化效果抑或是對比效果，而本研究不同於以往多數的研究，只有針對目標產品與單一個促發物的比較來進行研究，我們考量到在實務上，往往促發物並非在同一時間內只出現一個，而是以多重樣貌共同出現在人們的生活中，因此我們將單一促發物拓展為雙重促發物，並且考慮到現今廠商使用的行銷手法越趨一致的因素，我們擬將根據雙重正價促發物對目標產品的影響(許舒婷, 2015) 及解釋範圍重疊模型 (Chien et al., 2010)進行延伸，並假設目標物與促發之間會互相影響 (Hsiao, 2002)，探討在雙重正價促發物的情況下，促發物之間是否會相互影響，並且共同對目標物產生何種影響，以更貼近實務的運用。
在實驗結果部分，只有假設3與4的結果是部分顯著，假設1與2皆不顯著。我們認為造成實驗結果不顯著的可能原因有目標物與評量標準對受測者來說太過模糊導致回答標準不一、品牌LOGO的效果不夠強烈、樣本數的不足，因此我們認為未來可再依上述針對問卷的設計做更改，以及收集更多樣本數，來驗證我們的假說。

The main purpose of this study is to find out when people make decisions, how other factors unrelated to the nature of the target product affect them, and then change their assessment of the target product. And explore how they will be changes in the case of different factors. In addition, in order to increase the contribution of our study, we also discuss how the company can use comparative marketing to find the optimum position, and enhance brand perception or evaluation to consumer.
In our research, the one we use to measure the changes in consumer evaluation of products is target, and the one can affect the consumer evaluation of the object, but unrelated to the object is context. When people assess target, they will affected by context, and the assimilation effect or contrast effect will happen, so they will change their attitude towards evaluation or target. There are many research articles in the past dedicated to explain how different context will affect assimilation effect or contrast effect happen. The present study considers the context will not appear just one at the same time in the real life, and the manufacturers use marketing tactics increasingly consistent ,we extend The Context Effect of Dual Positive Primes (Hsu, 2015) and Dimensional Range Overlap Model (Chien, Wegner, Hsiao, & Petty, 2010) and assume that target and context will affect each other (Hsiao, 2002)，discuss in the situation of dual positive primes, Whether the context will affect each other, and what impact they will bring to the target.

目錄
致謝詞............................................II
中文摘要.........................................III
英文摘要......................................... IV
目錄..............................................V
表次............................................    VII
圖次.............................................VIII
第一章 緒論........................................ 1
1.1 研究背景........................................1
1.2 研究動機與目的................................ ..1
第二章 文獻探討......................................4
2.1 推敲可能性模型 (ELM Model).......................4
2.2 促發效果(Priming Effect).........................4
2.3解釋範圍重疊模型 (The Dimensional Range Overlap Model..5
2.4相互假設 (Reciprocity Hypothesis)................ ....6
第三章 研究架構與假設.....................................8
3.1研究架構............................................ .8
3.2研究假設............................................ .9
第四章 研究方法.........................................13
4.1前測............................................ ...13
4.1.1前測實驗一.........................................17
4.1.2前測實驗二........................................23
4.1.3前測實驗三........................................26
4.1.4前測實驗四........................................28
4.1.5前測結果..........................................32
4.2受測者與研究設計.....................................37
4.3 研究流程...........................................38
第五章 實驗結果與討論....................................42
5.1 實驗一.............................................42
5.2實驗二.............................................45
5.2實驗三.............................................48
5.2實驗四.............................................50
第六章 結論.............................................55
6.1 總結...............................................55
6.2 研究限制與建議......................................57
6.3 理論貢獻與實務意涵...................................58
6.4 未來研究............................................59
參考文獻................................................60
                                

許舒婷(2015)。雙重正價促發物的周邊效果：解釋範圍重疊模型之伸。碩士論文。台北：國立台灣師範大學。
Bargh, J.A., & Pietromoncao, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437— 449.
Chien, Y., Wegener, D.T., Hsiao, C., Petty, R.E., (2010). Dimensional Range Overlap and Context Effects in Consumer Judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (October),530—542.
Herr, Paul M. (1989). Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects, Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (June), 67—75.
Herr, Paul M., Sherman, S. J., & Fazio, R. H. (1983). On the consequences of priming:
Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323—340.
Higgins, E. Tory, William S. Rholes, & Carl R. Jones (1977). Category Accessibility and Impression Formation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13 (March), 141—154.
Higgins, E. Tory, Bargh, J. A., & Lombardi, W. J. (1985). Nature of priming effects on Categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 59—69
Hsiao, Chung-Chiang (2002). The Reciprocity Hypothesis as an Explanation of Perception Shifts in Product Judgement, Dissertation, Purdue University.
Meyers- Levy, Joan and Brian Sternthal (1993). A Two – Factor Explanation of Assimilation and Contrast Effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (3), 359-368
Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1981). PersonalInvolvements as a Determinant of Argument- based Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847
Richard E. Petty, John T. Cacioppo & David Schumann(1983). Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (October), 135—144.
Sherman, Steven J., Karin Ahlm, Leonard Berman, and Steven Lynn (1978), "Contrast Effects and Their Relationship to Subsequent Behavior, Journal of Experimental SocialPsychology, 14 (July), 340-350.
Yi (1990). Direct and Indirect Approaches to Advertising Persuasion. Journal of Business Research, 20 (June), 279—290.
Yi, Youjae (1990). Cognitive and Affective Priming Effects of the Context for Print Advertisements Journal of Advertising, 19 (June), 40—48.

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文