簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: ALESSIA CZEHAK
Czehak, Alessia Christine
論文名稱: 永續消費行為研究-臺灣、德國之比較
Sustainable Consumption Behavior –A Comparison Research of Taiwan and Germany
指導教授: 蔡慧敏
Tsai, Huei-Min
口試委員: 莫家俊
Bayrak, Mucahid Mustafa
李永展
Lee, Yung-Jaan
蔡慧敏
Tsai, Huei-Min
口試日期: 2021/12/23
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 環境教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Environmental Education
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 127
英文關鍵詞: sustainable consumption behavior, collectivism, long-term orientation, man-nature orientation, theory of interpersonal behavior
研究方法: 調查研究比較研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200004
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:93下載:28
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • This master thesis examines the relationship of cultural factors and sustainable consumption behavior in the context of a comparison between Germany and Taiwan. The climate crisis is calling for a systemic and structural paradigm shift, which requires a deeper understanding of how sustainable consumption behavior can be fostered and accelerated. At the same time, current consumption and production patterns are constantly growing, and the impacts on the natural environment and on all living-beings are devastating. In terms of globalization, comparing two culturally different countries can deliver new insights on how cultural aspects impact sustainable consumption behavior. The research conceptualized the Theory of Interpersonal Behavior by Triandis (1971) and integrated collectivism, long-term orientation and man-nature orientation as cultural factors into the framework. The research focused on consumption fields of food, clothing and home. A quantitative research method was applied to collect and analyze the data. The results show that collectivism and long-term orientation do affect sustainable consumption behavior positively. However, other factors have a stronger effect on sustainable consumption. Nevertheless, this thesis argues that cultural factors play an important role within the multidimensional construct of consumption behavior. Though, thy might be minor for of sustainable consumption behavior. Moreover, the results indicate that Taiwanese and German participants’ results differ in terms of social factors, sustainability knowledge, perceived policy economic and economic conditions, habit and attitudes. However, they do not suggest any significant differences across collectivism, long-term orientations and affection.

    Table of Content Acknowledgment ii Abstract iii List of Figures vii List of Tables viii List of Abbreviation ix 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Need for the Study 1 1.2. Structure of Thesis 4 2. Literature Review 5 2.1. Sustainable Consumption Behavior 5 2.2. Relation between Culture and Behavior 7 2.3. Behavior and Culture Research 19 2.3.1. Theory of Interpersonal Behavior 19 2.3.2. Culture 21 2.4. Research Framework 27 2.5 Statement of the Problem 28 2.6 Assumptions 29 3. Methodology 30 3.1. Questionnaire 30 3.2. Sample 39 3.3. Data Collection and Limitations 39 3.4. Data Analysis 41 3.4.1. Reliability 41 3.4.2. Normality, outliers, linearity, homogeneity, multicollinearity 42 4. Results & Discussion 45 4.1. Descriptive Statistics 45 4.1.1. Socio-Demographic Data 45 4.1.2. Culture – Collectivism, LTO, and MNO 49 4.1.3. Intention – Social Factor, Affection and Attitude 49 4.1.4. Facilitating Conditions – Sustainability Knowledge and Perceived Policy and Economic Conditions 50 4.1.5. Habit 51 4.1.6. Sustainable Consumption Behavior 60 4.1.7. Summary of Descriptive Results 63 4.2. Statistical Analyses 67 4.2.1. Multiple Regressions 67 4.2.2. MANOVA 73 4.2.3. Mediation Analysis 75 4.3. Discussion 78 4.3.1. The Role of Culture 79 4.3.2. The fundamental role of Cultural Factors for SCB 80 4.3.3. Sustainable Consumption Behavior – Similarities across Taiwanese and German Consumers 81 4.3.4. Habit as strongest Predictor 83 4.3.5. Sustainability Knowledge as strong Predictor 84 4.3.6. The Role of Social Factors and Affection 84 4.3.7. The Role of Perceived Policy and Economic Conditions 85 4.3.8. Differences between Taiwanese and German Consumers 86 5. Conclusion 87 References 90 Appendix A 97 Appendix B 107 Appendix C 116

    AGEB e.V. (2017). Energieverbrauch in Deutschland im Jahr 2016. AGEB e.V.
    Alfredsson, E., Bengtsson, M., Szejnwald Brown, H., Isenhour, C., Lorek, S., Stevis, D., Vergragt, P. (2018). Why achieving the Paris Agreement requires reduced overall consumption and production, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 14(1), 1-5, https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2018.1458815
    Bamberg, S., Schmidt, P. (2003) Incentives, Morality, or Habit? Predicting Students’ Car Use for University Routes with the Models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and Behavior, 35(2), 264-285, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502250134
    Bick, R., Halsey, E., Ekenga, C.C. (2018). The global environmental injustice of fast fashion. Environmental Health, 17(92), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0433-7
    BMU, UBA (2019). Umweltbewusstseinsstudie 2018 (1st ed.), Publikationsversand der Bundesregierung
    Bundesregierung (2021). Dünne Plastiktüten künftig verboten. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/dunne-plastiktueten-verboten-1688818 (2021/11/09)
    Briggs, S. R. & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106–148, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x
    Chan, R.Y.K. (2001). Determinants of Chinese Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior,Psychology & Marketing, 18(4), 389-413, https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1013
    Chang, Y.M, Liu, C.C, Hung, C.Y., Hu, A. Chen, S.S. (2008) Change in MSW Characteristics under recent Management strategies in Taiwan. Waste Management, 28(12), 2443–2455, doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.014
    Chen, Y.T. (2017). The Factors Affecting Electricity Consumption and the Consumption Characteristics in the Residential Sector – A Case Example of Taiwan, Sustainability, 9(8), 1484, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081484
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Darton, A. (2008). Reference Report: An Overview of Behaviour Change Models and their Uses. Social Science in Government.
    Environmental Protection Administration R.O.C. (2021). Marine Waste Control Strategies. https://www.epa.gov.tw/ENG/F7AB26007B8FE8DF/b41f61ba-2af9-448e-b31756b9e8d1dfcb (2021/08/23)
    Environmental Protection Administration R.O.C. (2021b). Zero Waste and Resource Recycling Promotion(廢棄物資源循環零廢棄推動情形).
    https://www.epa.gov.tw/eng/D6DCECB911CD0DEB (2021/11/02)
    Escobar, A. (2016). Degrowth, postdevelopment, and transitions: a preliminary conversation. Sustainability Science, 10, 451–462, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0297-5
    Executive Yuan, Repubic of China (Taiwan) (2017). Taiwan’s Voluntary National Review. Implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
    Figueroa-García, E. C., García-Machado, J. J., Pérez-Bustamante Yábar, D. C. (2018). Modeling the Social Factors That Determine Sustainable Consumption Behavior in the Community of Madrid, Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, 10(8), 1-16, DOI:10.3390/SU10082811
    Federal Government of Germany (2021). Einweg-Plastik wird verboten. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/nachhaltigkeitspolitik/einwegplastik wird-verboten-1763390 (2021/08/23)
    Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) (2014). The German Government’s Climate Action Programme 2020. BMUB.

    Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB)/Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection (BMJV)/Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) (2018). National Programme on Sustainable Consumption. From Sustainable Lifestyles towards Social Change, Publikationsversand der Bundesregierung.
    Finch, H. (2005). Comparison of the Performance of Nonparametric and Parametric MANOVA Test Statistics when Assumptions Are Violated. Methodology, 1(1), 27–38. doi:10.1027/1614-1881.1.1.27
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2013). Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock. A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. FAO.
    Fukukawa, K., Ennew, C. (2010). What We Believe Is Not Always What We Do: An Empirical Investigation into Ethically Questionable Behavior in Consumption. J Bus Ethics 91, 49–60 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0567-1
    Garcia, E., Ramos Filho, F.S.V., Mallmann, G.M., Fonseca, F. (2017). Costs, Benefits and Challenges of Sustainable Livestock Intensification in a Major Deforestation Frontier in the Brazilian Amazon. Sustainability 9(1), 158, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010158
    Geiger, S. M, Fischer, D., Schrader, U. (2017). Measuring What Matters in Sustainable Consumption: An Integrative Framework for the Selection of Relevant Behaviors, Sustainable Development, 26, 18– 33. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1688
    Gilg, A., Barr, S., Ford, N. J. (2005). Green Consumption or Sustainable Lifestyles? Identifying the Sustainable Consumer. Futures 37(6), 481-504,
    DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2004.10.016
    Gkargkavouzi, A., Halkos, G., Matsiori, S. (2019). Environmental behavior in privtae-shpere context: Integrating theories of planned behavior and value belief norms, self-identy and habit. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 148, 145-156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.039
    Global Footprint Network (2021). Earth Overshoot Day. https://www.overshootday.org/about/ (2021/06/29)
    Guterres, A. (2020). Foreword. In: United Nations (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals Report.
    Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
    Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalzing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Psychology and Culture, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
    Hofstede Insight (2021a). National Culture. https://hi.hofstede-insights.com/national-culture (2021/08/31)
    Hofstede, G. (2021b). What is culture? https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert jan-hofstede/definition-culture/ (2021/09/06)
    Hsieh, S. C. (2005). Organic farming for sustainable agriculture in Asia with special reference to Taiwan experience. Research Institute of Tropical Agriculture and International Cooperation, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan, 65.
    Huber (1981). Robust Statistics. New York: John Wiley.
    Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657288
    International Money Fund (2019, May 3). Select Country Groups (aggregated data). https://web.archive.org/web/20190503004143/https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/02/weodata/weoselagr.aspx (2021/10/26)
    ISSP Research Group (2019). International Social Survey Programme: Environment III – ISSP 2010. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5500 Data file Version 3.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13271
    Johnson, A., Gibson, A. (2014). Sustainability in Engineering Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-00244-X
    Kostadinova, E. (2016). Sustainable Consumer Behavior: Literature Overview. Economic Alternatives, 224-234.
    Kluckhohn, F. R. & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Row, Peterson.
    Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J. (2002) Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239-260.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
    Livestock, Environment, and Development Initiative (LEAD)/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2006). Livestock’s Long Shadow. Environmental issues und options. FAO.
    McCarty, J.A., Shrum, L.J. (1994). The Recycling of Solid Waste: Personal Values, Value Orientations. Attitudes about Recycling as Antecedents of Recycling Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 39, 53-62, https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)90068-X
    Meyer, H. (2014). Grußwort. In Bertels, U. (2014). Einwanderungsland Deutschland. Wie kann Integration aus ethnologischer Sicht gelingen? Waxmann Verlag,
    Minton, E.A., Spielmann, N., Kahle, L.R., Kim, C.H. (2018). The subjective norms of sustainable consumption: A cross-cultural exploration, Journal of Business Research, 82, 400-408, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.031
    Mottet, A., De Haan, C., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., Opio, C., Gerber, P. (2017). Livestock: On our plated or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Global Food Security, 14, 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001
    Nekmahmud, Md., Fekete-Farkas, M. (2020). Why Not Green Marketing? Determinates of Consumers’ Intention to Green Purchase Decision in a New Developing Nation. Sustainability, 12, 7880, doi:10.3390/su12197880
    O'Rourke, D., & Lollo, N. (2015). Transforming Consumption: From Decoupling, to Behavior Change, to System Changes for Sustainable Consumption. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40(1), 233-259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021224
    Oslo Symposium (1994) Part I – The Imperative of Sustainable Production and Consumption. Retrieved from https://enb.iisd.org/consume/oslo004.html#top (2020/12/05)
    Parker, R. S., Haytko, D L., Herman, C. M. (2009). Individualism and Collectivism:Reconsidering old assumptions, Journal of International Business Research, 8(1)
    Pallant, J. (2005) SPSS Survival Manual. A step by step guide to data analysis usingSPSS for Windows (Version 12), Allan & Unwin.
    Quoquab, F., Mohammad, J. (2017). Managing Sustainable Consumption: Is it a problem or panacea? Sustainable Economic Development, 115-125, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311168685_Managing_Sustainable_Consu ption_Is_It_a_Problem_or_Panacea
    Quoquab, F., Mohammad, J., Sukari, N. N. (2019). A multiple-item scale for measuring “sustainable consumption behavior” construct: Development and psychometric evaluation, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-02-2018-0047
    Raikhan, S., Moldakhmet, M., Ryskeldy, M., Alua, M. (2014). The Interaction of Globalization and Culture in the Mordern World. Procida – Social and Behavioral Science, 122, 8-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1294
    Sreen, N., Purbey, S., Sadarangani, P. (2018). Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 177-189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.12.002
    Spencer-Oatey, H. (2012). What is culture? A compilation of quotations. GlobalPAD Core Concepts. Available at GlobalPAD Open House http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/globalpad/interculturalskills/
    Triandis, H. (1977). Interpersonal Behaviour. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Triandis, H. C. (2004). The many dimensions of culture. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), 88–93, https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.12689599
    Thøgersen, J. (2010). Country Differences in Sustainable Consumption: The Case of Organic Food, Journal of Macromarketing, 30(29), 171-185, DOI: 10.1177/0276146710361926
    Tsay, Y.Y. (2009). The Impacts of Economic Crisis on Green Consumption in Taiwan. PICMET 2009, August 2-6, Portland
    Umweltbundesamt (UBA) (2017). Verrottet Plastik gar nicht oder nur sehr langsam? UBA. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/service/uba-fragen/verrottet-plastik-gar-nicht-nur- sehr-langsam (2021/08/22)
    United Nations Environment Program (2017). Consuming differently, consuming sustainably: behavourial insights for policymaking.
    United Nations Environment Programme (2020). Emissions Gap Report 2020. Nairobi.
    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2021). The Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement (2021/06/29)
    UNESCO (2009). Second Collection of Good Practices. Education for Sustainable Development. UNESCO Associated Schools.
    UNESCO (2021). Sustainable Development. https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development/what-is-esd/sd (2021/11/16)
    Verplanken, B., & Roy, D. (2015). Consumer habits and sustainable consumption. In Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471270.00026
    Wang, S. T. (2014). Consumer characteristics and social influence factors on green purchasing intentions. Marketing, Intelligence & Planning, 32(7), 738-753, DOI 10.1108/MIP-12-2012-0146
    Wang, H. J. (2017). Determinants of consumers’ purchase behaviour towards green brands, The Service Industries Journal, 37(13), 896-918, DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2017.1365140
    Wood, W., Rünger, D. (2016). Psychology of Habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 289–314. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417

    下載圖示
    QR CODE