頓悟與漸修－謝靈運〈辨宗論〉重探

Sudden Enlightenment and Gradual Learning: A Re-examination of Xie Lingyun's ＂Bianzong Lun＂

周大興(Ta-Hsing Chow)

《漢學研究》 32卷3期 (2014/09) Pp. 95-128

摘要

本文處理謝靈運〈辨宗論〉中有關孔、釋二家「頓悟」與「漸修」的折中問題，以彰顯「頓」、「漸」問題在中國佛學與哲學思想史上的重要意義。謝靈運的〈辨宗論〉主要闡述道生的頓悟義，對於道生新論的詮釋，實為中國中古哲學思想史上的重要論文。依據謝氏的理解，道生的頓悟說法，主張「寂鑒微妙，不容階級；積學無限，何為自絕？」此說綜合了儒佛二家的主張，「今去釋氏之漸悟，而取其能至；去孔氏之殆庶，而取其一極。」作者認為，謝靈運的〈辨宗論〉折中孔、釋，一方面主張「頓漸有別」，一方面強調「頓悟不廢漸修」，可說充分展現了道生頓悟新論的完整立場。

關鍵字

謝靈運 ； 道生 ； 頓悟 ； 漸修 ； 辨宗論

並列摘要

The relationship between sudden enlightenment and gradual leaming in early Chinese Buddhism was first .treated as a philosophical issue in Xie Lingyun's 謝靈運essay ＂Bianzong lun＂ (辨宗論On Discerning the Ultimate Truth). This debate over sudden vs. gradual enlightenment and its attendant thinking played an important role in Chinese Buddhism and influenced the philosophical tradition that followed. Xie Lingyun understands Dao Sheng's 道生new theory of sudden enlightenment as having two aspects: it rejects Buddhism's graduated path while adopting its idea that enlightenment is achievable, and rejects the Confucian idea that it is only possible to approach the achievement of the Sage while adopting Confucianism's single ultimate goal of cultivation. Xie's essay reaches a compromise between Confucian and Buddhist approaches, on one hand distinguishing enlightened goal and leaming practice, while on the other emphasizing sudden enlightenment without discarding gradualleaming. This can be viewed as a reiteration of Dao Sheng's complete position.

並列關鍵字

Xie Lingyun ； Dao Sheng ； sudden enlightenment ； gradualleaming ； ＂Bianzong lun＂

參考文獻

(1989)。十三經注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。

三國魏王弼、樓宇烈校釋(2009)。王弼集校釋。北京:中華書局。

(1993)。卍續藏經。臺北:新文豐出版公司。

(1983)。大正新修大藏經。臺北:新文豐出版公司。

(1983)。大正新修大藏經。臺北:新文豐出版公司。