透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.204.208
  • 期刊

數學後設認知量表之發展與信效度考驗

An Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of the Mathematical Metacognition Scale

摘要


本研究旨在發展適用中小學生的數學後設認知量表(Mathematical Metacognition Scale, MMS),本研究分預試與正式施測兩階段,兩階段皆採立意取樣的叢集抽樣方式,各抽取中小學生457人與861人。預試資料進行探索性與驗證性因素分析,驗證性因素分析結果獲得三個因素:後設認知知識、計劃與監控、評估,其內部一致性Cronbach's α係數分別為.87、.87、.72,12題的總量表Cronbach's α係數為.90,顯示本量表具有良好的信度。正式施測資料,進行測量恆等性考驗,考驗結果發現不同性別具測量恆等性,顯示本研究發展的數學後設認知量表,具有良好的建構效度。

並列摘要


The main purpose of this study was to develop the Mathematical Metacognition Scale (MMS) on 5th-8th graders in elementary and junior high schools. The present study included two phases: pretest and test. By adopting purposeful sampling and cluster sampling in both phases, 457 and 861 students were selected for the pretest and the test, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted with the pretest data. The confirmatory factor analysis resulted in three factors including metacognitive knowledge, planning and monitoring, and evaluation. The Cronbach's alphas of the MMS subscales were .87, .87, .72, and .90 for the total score, which indicated good reliability. Measurement invariance was conducted to the test and indicated gender invariance. Therefore, it showed that the MMS has good construct validity.

參考文獻


蘇宜芬、林清山(1992):後設認知訓練課程對國小低閱讀能力學生的閱讀理解能力與後設認知能力之影響。教育心理學報,25,245-267。[Su, Y. F., & Lin, C. S. (1992). Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 25, 245-267.]
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
Bathgate, M. E., Sims-Knight, J. E., & Schunn, C. D. (2012). Thoughts on thinking:Engaging novice music students in metacognition. Applied CognitivePsychology, 26, 403-409.
Benton, C. W. (2013). Promoting metacognition in music classes. Music Educators Journal, 100, 52-59.
Carr, M., Alexander, J., & Folds-Bennett, T. (1994). Metacognition and mathematics strategy use. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 583-595.

被引用紀錄


陳英豪(2016)。公立高中數理資優男女生數學學習歷程與成就之差異性探討資優教育季刊(141),11-19。https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.2016.141.11-19
柯華葳(2019)。以學與教為經為緯的教育心理學中華心理學刊61(4),417-438。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.201912_61(4).0008

延伸閱讀