透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.144.197
  • 期刊

Developing a Quantitative Model to Evaluate and Compare the Performance of Hospital Medical Technologies in Taiwan

發展一量化模型去評估與比較台灣醫院醫療科技績效

摘要


在本研究中,我們發展一個系統性步驟去確認決策基準/績效指標,及建構一個量化模型去評估與比較台灣醫院醫療科技設備績效。多準則決策分析與資料包絡分析兩種方法,在本研究中被整合互補使用。發展這樣一個模型方法之目的是想要去幫助台灣醫院實務管理者用於醫療科技設備之(1)“事前評估”:協助新投資的規劃與選擇;及(2)“事後評估”:監控及改善現有設備使用績效。一個實證案例,已在本研究中被建構去探索及檢驗此模型之可行性與可應用性。

並列摘要


In this research, we developed a systematic procedure to identify decision-making criteria/performance indicators and a quantitative model to evaluate and compare the performance of medical technologies in Taiwan hospitals. Accordingly, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) were used complementarily. The aim of developing such a modeling approach is intended to help hospital executives (1) evaluate and choose new medical technologies (ex-ante evaluation), and (2) monitor and improve the performance of existing technologies (ex-post evaluation). An empirical application has been conducted to explore and test the feasibility and applicability of the model.

參考文獻


Bana e Costa, C. A.(1996).Les Problematiques de l`Aide a la Decision: vers l`Enrichisement de la Trilogie Choix-tri-Rangement.Recherche Operationelle/Operations Research.30(2),191-216.
Bana e Costa, C. A.,L. Ensslin,E. C. Correa,J. C. Vansnick(1999).Decision Support System in Action: Integrated Application in a Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Process.European Journal of Operational Research.11(3),315-335.
Banker, R.,A. Charnes,W. W. Cooper,J. Swart,D. A. Thomas(1989).An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis with Some of It`s Models And Their Uses.Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting.5,125-163.
Banta, H. J.,S. B. Thacker(1990).The Case for Reassessment of Health Care Technology.JAMA.264,235-240.
Bautz, J.,J. Schectman,L. G. Pawlson(1992).Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Diffusion of Technology in an Ambulatory Setting.International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.8(2),301-308.

延伸閱讀