透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.40.177
  • 期刊

《伊川易傳》對宋代史事派易學之影響

The Discussion on the Influence of "Chen Yi's Aannotated I Ching" on SSI in the Sung Dynasty toward the Study of I Ching (Book of Changes).

摘要


本文論述宋代史事易學之興起與《伊川易傳》之關係,大致從兩大方向立論。其一為釋《易》方式之啟迪。《伊川易傳》遠宗王弼以《十翼》解《易》、近承胡瑗以儒理、史事釋《易》之方式,宋代史事易家亦承此遺風發揚之,光大之。尤於參證史事上,更幾無卦無之,史事易所以為易學一宗,亦胥賴乎是。其二為釋《易》內容之傳承。《伊川易傳》以儒理釋《易》,儒家論事說理,多切人事,更懷抱澄清、淑世濟民之志,故每重君臣之義,嚴君子小人之別,以解說易理,史事易家除繼承《伊川易傳》「體用一源」、「理事一致」之概念,尤重一「用」字,思欲「即用以顯體」,發揮易用之精神,因而於君臣、於君子小人,亦多所著墨,並證以史事,雖不免間有牽合過隘之弊,終無違於聖人立教牖民之旨。至於宋代史事易家於易理解說,脫胎於《伊川易傳》者,每每可見,或逕引其說,或私承其意,或約取其語,似此者不一而足,伊川於宋代史事易家之影響,蓋可想見。 全文共分為四章:第一章前言。第二章釋 《易》方式之啟迪,其中又分為以《十翼》釋《易》、以儒理解《易》、以史事證《易》等。第三章釋《易》內容之傳承,其中又分為體用哲學之闡揚、君子小人之辨明、君臣關係之強調、易理解說之傳承等等。第四章結論。

關鍵字

程頤 伊川易傳 史事易 易經

並列摘要


Regarding the relationship between “Chen Yi’s Annotated I Ching” and the rise of SSI (a sect which interpreted I Ching from historical events and people) in the Sung Dynasty, I would like to discuss it from two directions. Firstly, I talk about how it inspired the ways of interpreting I Ching. Chen Yi’s annotated I Ching inherited the ways of interpreting I Ching from Bi Wang’s “Ten Wings,” and from Yang Hu’s Confucianist thoughts and historical events. SSI in the Sung dynasty followed and spread it. Especially in proving historical events, it is nearly 100 % correct. Secondly, I discuss how the ideas of interpreting I Ching have been passed on. Chen Yi’s Annotated I Ching explained I Ching with Confucianist, perspectives in which it applies more to humanity. The Confucian ists had the aspiration to save the nation and people, so Confucianism focused on the relationship of the monarch with his subjects, and emphasized the difference between a man of integrity and a villain. SSI followed the principle of Chen Yi’s Annotated I Ching that our behavior is completely affected by our nature, It emphasized the word “behavior,” hoping that through our behavior, our nature will be presented and the spirit of I Ching developed. Thus, it discussed more about monarch and his subjects, a man of integrity and a villain, and rated them with historical events. It was quite common that the scholars in the Song Dynasty learned from Chen Yi’s Annotated I Ching in interpreting I Ching. Some quoted directly from it, and others extracted from it. No doubt Chen Yi’s Annotated I Ching had a far-reaching influence on SSI in the Sung Dynasty.

並列關鍵字

Chen Yi's Annotated I Ching SSI I Ching

參考文獻


(1979)。宋元學案。台北:廣文書局。
四部備要。台北:中華書局。
《經義考》卷卅‧葉一,引宋‧吳仁傑《集古義‧自序》
無求備齋易經集成。台北:成文出版社。
程頤〈答張閎中書〉

被引用紀錄


何函栴(2015)。論虛無之理與有物之境──孔穎達《周易正義》道論研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.02681
楊自平(2018)。胡震《周易衍義》的宗程立場析論國文學報(64),29-54。https://doi.org/10.6239/BOC.201812_(64).02
周茹芬(2012)。宋儒王宗傳《易》學研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315293233
陳洸銘(2015)。項安世《易》學研究〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0412201512044960

延伸閱讀