“相關”與“模糊”在資訊檢索領域中關係驗證與分析

Verification and Analysis of the Notions of "Relevant" and "Fuzzy" in Information Retrieval

李煜基(Yu-Ji Li) ； 洪一梅(I-Mei Hung)

《圖書與資訊學刊》 60期 (2007/02) Pp. 28-48

https://doi.org/10.6575/JoLIS.2007.60.03

摘要

在資訊檢索中，「相關理論」是重要的基礎概念；而在資訊檢索的技術發展中，「模糊理論」亦是重要的議題。本文除針對此二種理論進行深入介紹與概念內涵比較解析外，並以文獻計量方法驗證二者的應用核心領域，及進行二者的關聯研究。文末嘗試依據上述結果，推測「相關」及「模糊」在「資訊檢索」領域中可能的應用發展趨勢。

關鍵字

書目計量 ； 相關理論 ； 模糊理論 ； 資訊檢索

並列摘要

The ”Relevant Theory” and the ”Fuzzy Theory” are two important topics in Information Retrieval (IR). In addition to thoroughly explicating the two theories, this paper adopts the method of bibliometrics to verify and analyze the respective core fields of applications and the connection between the two notions of ”relevant” and ”fuzzy.” Furthermore, this study also suggests probable extensive applications of the two theories in the future trends of information retrieval.

並列關鍵字

Bibliometrics ； Relevant theory ； Fuzzy theory ； Information retrieval

參考文獻

Bateman, J.,American Society for Information Science (Ed.)(1998).Changes in relevance criteria: A longitudinal study.Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science.(Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science).:

Brooks, T. A.,American Society for Information Science (Ed.)(1998).The semantic distance model of relevance assessment.Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science.(Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science).:

Jacquette, D.(2002).A companion to philosophical logic.Malden, Mass.:Blackwell.

MacCall, S. L.,American Society for Information Science (Ed.)(1998).Relevance reliability in cyberspace: Toward measurement theory for internet information retrieval.Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science.(Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science).:

Mares, D.(2004).Relevant logic: A philosophical interpretation.Cambridge:The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.