透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.143.9.115
  • 期刊

去邊緣的學術思考:非主流團體在休閒場域中的重新呈現

De-Marginalization: The Re-Presentation of Alternative Groups in Leisure-Related Study

摘要


在複雜的社會體系之中,一元化與單一價值觀的思考邏輯依舊扮演著支配的角色,透過社會階級、性別、年齡、種族、族群、性向等概念為基礎,在社會場域中呈現出持久不平等的分配現象。然而,基於後現代社會所形成的概念變遷,學術上也對休閒本身的概念提出了批判,認為在社會變化的狀態中,目前的休閒領域應傾向以更寬廣的視角來擴大休閒與社會體系的研究領域,社會研究者必須因應時代來進行研究調查,重新著眼於之前研究命題所忽視的人與物。在研究方向上也更應順應後現代社會的型式,拋開過去一元化的論調及擁護主流的思維,擁抱多元化的觀點、注重邊緣文化與個人能動性的貢獻與探討。基於此一脈絡,研究者藉由國、內外在休閒與運動領域中具代表性的期刊,以資料分析的方式採取內容分析法,針對每篇研究之主題與研究對象做出深層比對與歸納整理。並將所得之文獻所探討的研究對象與議題進行分類比對,以了解目前學者如何呈現並詮釋後現代脈絡中的休閒意義,並希望透過分析了解目前學者所關切的研究議題,使休閒發展的新型本質得以再現。

並列摘要


In a complex social system, many of the fields still use unified and single value of logic to discuss a dominant role. In the social field, base on the social class, gender, age, race, ethnicity and sexual group, it shows the distribution phenomenon of perspective inequality. Base on the view of thinking leisure, it must recognize the concept of traditional sport and leisure meaning and cannot explain every individual in the modern society. This research employed the index of both the domestic and international researches in representative journals in the field of leisure and sport, and took content analysis as major method to compare subject and object for each study in-depth. From deducting and reviewing of the subjects and issues classification, in order to understand the how the scholars present and interpret the significance of leisure in the modern context. Also by analyzing the concerning issues in this field, in order to understand the meaning of new leisure as well as how it can be development and reproduce in the future.

參考文獻


陳渝苓、徐譽桓 (2008) 。「當身體成為權力的戰場」從身體的學術觀點探討運動場域中父權與賦權概念之具象化與衝突。大專體育學刊,10 (3) ,1-13。
Allan, J. (1999). Actively seeking inclusion: pupils with special needs in mainstream schools. London: Falmer.
Blackshaw, T. (2010). Leisure. New York: Routledge.
Coakley, J. J. (2007). Sports in society: issues and controversies. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Collins, M., & Kay, T. (2003). Sport and social exclusion. London: Routledge.

延伸閱讀