透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.223.134.29
  • 期刊

「自閉症光譜量表」─Autism-spectrum Quotient中文成人版之預測效度及相關因素分析

Screening Adults for Asperger Syndrome and High-Functioning Autism by Using the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) (Mandarin Version)

摘要


本研究的主要目的在探討成人版「自閉症光譜量表」(Autism-spectrum Quotient,簡稱AQ)篩檢亞斯伯格症及高功能自閉症成人的預測效度,以及相關因素的分析。研究對象包括亞斯伯格症及高功能自閉症組、數理資優生組、一般人組,以及就讀文學院和理學院的大學生組等共5組,以自我評量的方式填寫16歲以上適用的成人版「自閉症光譜量表」後,研究者進行各組間、性別,以及切截分數的區別分析。研究的結果顯示:一、除了一般人組與文學院大學生這兩組彼此沒有顯著差異之外,其餘各組AQ得分皆有顯著差異,其中又以亞斯伯格症及高功能自閉症組得分最高,數理資優生組次之,理學院大學生組再次之。二、各組別中男性與女性的量表得分,僅有理學院大學生組顯示男女性的差異達顯著水準,但解釋力並不大,女性得分高於男性得分。三、研究者建議設定量表的切截分數為30,若得分高於30,且在社會適應上出現困難者可能需要更進一步地尋求諮商。本文並討論研究結果對亞斯伯格症在「障礙」觀點上可能具有的意義,提供學者作為參考。

並列摘要


he purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of the Mandarin version of the Autism-spectrum Quotient (AQ), which is used to screen adults for Asperger Syndrome and high-functioning autism, and to discuss related factors. Five groups of participants were included: (1) adults with Asperger Syndrome and high functioning autism; (2) medical school students who attended accelerated classes in high school, or adults who participated in the International Mathematical Olympiad; (3) randomly selected adults for the control group; (4) students of the College of Humanities of National Kaohsiung Normal University; and (5) students of the College of Science of National Kaohsiung Normal University. The results showed that 83.9% of the participants in group 1 scored 30+, vs. 1% of the control group. Participants in group 2 scored significantly higher than group 5, while participants in group 5 scored significantly higher than group 3 and 4. There were no significant gender differences in the AQ scores, except in group consisting of students in the college of science: in this group the females scored significantly higher than the males. The concept of the autism continuum in relation to Asperger Syndrome is discussed.

參考文獻


Armstrong, T.(1994).Multiple intelligences in the classroom.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Assouline, S. G.,Colangelo, N.,Ihrig, D.,Forstadt, L.(2006).Attributional choices for academic success and failure by intellectually gifted students.Gifted Child Quarterly.50(4),283-294.
Bogdan, R. C.,Biklen, S. K.(2007).Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
Chen, C.,Stevenson, H. W.(1995).Motivation and mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian high school students.Child Development.66,1215-1234.
Chin, C. S.,Harrington, D. M.(2007).Supporting the development of musical talent.Gifted Child Today.30(1),40-47.

被引用紀錄


熊恩筠、簡惠玲、高千惠、彭馨蕾(2022)。比較自閉症成人與一般成人的臉孔和物體區辨能力:以變形典範探討中華心理學刊64(1),33-55。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.202203_64(1).0002
王瑋璘(2013)。不同智力亞斯柏格症國中生之過度激動特質探究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0801201418032878

延伸閱讀