透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.156.156
  • 期刊

美國身心障礙學生考試調整策略成效之後設分析

The Effects of Test Accommodation on Students with Disabilities: A Meta-analysis

摘要


本文旨在後設分析美國1999到2008年間,38篇考試調整策略對一般和全體身心障礙學生的成效;接著分析考試調整的效果是否會因學科、策略類型,以及身心障礙學生的障礙特性、教育階段和人數而有差異。結果顯示考試調整對一般學生為些微效果;對身心障礙學生為小效果量,符合「差別增長」和「互動」假設。未接受考試調整之一般學生的測驗成績,高於接受調整之身心障礙學生,二者間呈現「中」效果量的差異,顯示考試調整能維持「公平與權益的平衡」。考試調整對其他學科的效果最佳,其次分別為閱讀和數學。於調整策略上,以延長時間的效果較佳,報讀較差。在考試調整實施的教育階段上,以國中最佳,國小次之,而高中職效果最差。考試調整對100人以下身心障礙學生人數的效果最佳,人數愈多,效果愈差。最後,考試調整對學障學生的效果,優於其他身心障礙學生。

並列摘要


The purposes of this research were to use meta-analysis to examine the overall effects of 38 test accommodation studies conducted in 1999-2008 on the performance of students with and without disabilities, and to analyze whether there were differences on moderator variables of subject area, accommodation strategy, educational level, sample size, and disability status. The findings were as follows: first, test accommodation had a minimal effect on students without disabilities, and a small effect on students with disabilities. The results validated theinteraction effect and differential boost hypotheses, whereby students with disabilities benefited more than students without disabilities. Second, students without disabilities tested on standard formats scored higher than students with disabilities accepting test accommodation, and the differences amounted to a medium effect. The results validated the hypothesis that test accommodation could create a level playing field for all test-takers. Third, the effect of test accommodation on other subject areas was higher than on math and reading. There was a higher effect from ”extended time” strategy than ”reading test items aloud”. Regarding educational level, the effects of test accommodation were ranked as follows, from high to low: junior high school, elementary, and senior high school levels. There was a higher effect on a smaller number of students with disabilities (i.e., below 100), and the effect decreased as the number of students increased. The effect of test accommodation on students with learning disabilities was higher than on students with other disabilities.

參考文獻


吳裕益(2009a):HLM 在整合分析之應用──變異數已知的分析。未出版的手稿,國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系
吳裕益(2009b):後設分析。未出版的手稿,國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系
李佩蓉(2007)。南部三縣市國中小普通班教師對身心障礙學生考試調整方式的看法與實施之調查研究。國立臺南大學特殊教育研究所。
林邦傑(1987)。整合分析的理論及其在國內的應用。教育與心理研究。10,1-38。
林筱汶、陳明聰()。

被引用紀錄


蕭佳純(2019)。國內運用創造力教學模式對學生創造力影響之後設分析特殊教育研究學刊44(3),93-120。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201911_44(3).0004
張瑞娟(2012)。報讀與口述回答之評量調整措施對國中學習障礙學生閱讀理解表現之比較研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315264620

延伸閱讀