透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.129.39.55
  • 期刊

民主行政與網絡治理:“新治理”的理論探討及類型分析

Democratic Administration and Network Governance: Theory and Types of New Governance

摘要


本文主要討論民主行政與網絡治理的關係,以及以分析單位為基礎比較美國、英國、德國與荷蘭等四國,有關網絡治理在內涵與理論層次上的差異。本文認為網絡治理的概念可以媒合公共行政長久以來追求的兩大不甚相容之目標-民主與效率,兼籌並顧。 公共行政官僚、市場、非營利組織與社區公民團體等皆是治理的一環,沒有任何一種制度機制可以完全適用與操控公共治理的領域。市場失靈與官僚失靈突顯網絡平等、協商、資源依賴、信任與自我管理的特質,以及一套問題解決的機制,象徵著政府與公民社會組織的分權與協同治理。

並列摘要


This study intends to explore the relationship between democratic administration and network governance, and to utilize ”units of analysis” to compare and contrast the types of the implications of network governance in four countries including America, Britain, Germany, and the Netherlands. The main argument is that the theory of network governance may serve as a bridge between democracy and efficiency, which the field of public administration is in a dilemma as to pursue the both of goals in the same time. Moreover, reflections on both market failure and bureaucracy failure reveal that network theory, characterized as self-governance, resources interdependent, building trust and consensus, may become a useful conceptual framework of public governance under which government ”co-steer” public policy along with other societal institutions. Nevertheless, as the modes of public governance evolve, each model of bureaucracy, market, and networks is one of institutions available for democratic administration, and none of which could be dominant in the society as a whole.

參考文獻


Agranoff, R.,M. McGuire.(2001).Big Questions in Public Networks Management Research.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.11(3),295-326.
Bardach, E.,C. Lesser.(1996).Accountability in Human Services Collaboratives: For What? and For Whom?.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.6(2),197-224.
Benington, J.,J. Harvey.,The New Management of British Local Governance,G. Stoker(1999).Networking in Europe.New York:St. Martin‵s Press.
Borzel, T.(1997).What so Special about Policy Networks? An Exploration of the Concept and its Useful in Studying European Governance.Mimemo. Florence: European University.
Carlsson, L.(2000).Policy Networks as Collective Action.Policy Studies Journal.28(3),502-22.

被引用紀錄


蘇暐勝(2017)。立法院政策過程之論述網絡分析研究—以2008至2015年產業創新條例修法歷程為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703364
唐韻甯(2016)。臺北市國民小學推動食農教育之制度能力研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201602971
林麗君(2016)。我國區里治理網絡關係探討-以臺北市松山區基層建議案為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201602177
呂佳旻(2013)。性別、勞動及參與治理-比較幼托公共化政策〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.01290
吳佩璇(2012)。建構台灣再生能源之議題網絡圖像:以第六屆至第七屆立法院為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.10336

延伸閱讀