透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.14.142.115
  • 期刊

婚暴防治社工「案主自決」觀點之初探

Preliminary Study on "Client Self-Determination" Perspective of Social Workers of Marital Violence

摘要


本研究的研究目的在了解婚暴社工有關受虐婦女「自決」的觀點、了解落實「案主自決」原則的困境,以回應婚暴防治工作中受虐婦女「高危機、低意願」的實務現況。為了達到上述目的,研究者採質性研究取向,利用「非結構」的個別訪談法,收集10位曾參與「家庭暴力安全防護網」之婚暴防治社工的意見。研究者發現:雖有部份受訪者表示尊重受虐婦女選擇的自由,然而多數受訪者卻認為受虐婦女在長期受虐、有限資源和高危機的狀況下,並沒有「自決」的空間,其並對「案主自決」原則被社工誤解和濫用的情形感到憂心;此外,多數受訪者雖認為應用「案主自決」原則有其前提,然彼此間對「案主自決」原則的應用前提看法並不一致,研究者並在資料歸納的過程中發現,婚暴社工在落實「案主自決」原則時,會受到案主、工作者、組織結構和暴力特性等因素的干擾。因此,研究者建議釐清「案主自決」原則的定義、使用前提,建立原則使用的評估機制,是減輕婚暴社工處遇壓力、解決「案主自決」原則濫用的當務之急。

並列摘要


The study aims to explore the views of ”client self-determination” and its difficulties while implementing to abused women in order to help social workers of marital violence practice with ”high risk and low intention” abused women. Qualitative research approach was conducted in the study. The opinions of ten social workers who have participated in ”security and prevention network of domestic violence” were: gathered by unstructured individual interview. The study finds that most of the participant s express the abused women lack of opportunity of using ”client self-determination” as suffering long -term abuses, limited resources and high risk situation, albeit some participants respect the autonomy of client's self-determination. Moreover, they worry about misunderstanding and abuse of ”client self-de termination” principles in their practice. Additionally, although most of them agree at some prerequisite for applying ”client self-determination” but lack of agreeable opinion, and ”client self-determination” in marital violence prevent ion is influenced by the clients, workers, organization structures as well as violence characteristics. Thus, the researcher suggest that define the principles and prerequisite for using ”client self-determination” clearly, as well as set up evaluative procedure are the critical point of releasing social worker pressure and coping with the abuse of its principles in marital violence.

參考文獻


沈海琍(2011)。我國老人保護工作執行時的倫理挑戰─由安養機構及公部門專業工作者的角度出發(碩士論文)。玄奘大學社會福利學系。
沈慶鴻(2011)。社會工作者跨文化服務經驗之探討─以大陸籍婚姻暴力受虐婦女處遇服務為例。中華心理衛生學刊。24(3),457-484。
內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會(2008)。家庭暴力防治法施行十周年回顧與展望。內政部家庭暴力暨性侵害防治委員會。
方雅麗(1999)。台北市公娼事件中政府社會工作人員的工作困境:一個行動研究的反思(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學社會學研究所。
方雅麗、鄭麗珍(1999)。社會工作專業案主自決之實踐─以台北市公娼事件為例。社區發展季刊。86,208-215。

被引用紀錄


陳予修(2016)。家暴法實踐的性別意涵:分析社工、警察、醫護人員觀點〔碩士論文,高雄醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0011-2706201622075400

延伸閱讀