新產品開發決策之同步SMART^2評價模式

A Concurrent SMART^2 Evaluation Model for Decision-making in New Product Development

張文智(Wen-Chih Chang) ； 衛萬里(Wan-Li Wei)

《設計學報》 11卷2期 (2006/06) Pp. 21-41

https://doi.org/10.6381/JD.200606.0021

摘要

The planning and design (P&D) phase is most critical to project success in new product development (NPD). When selecting an appropriate P&D alternative which involves a variety of considerations such as corporate strategy, finance, marketing, technology, production, customer need, product aesthetics, and so forth, most company's high-level management lack the ability to evaluate the candidates effectively. Substandard NPD project is often a direct result of inadequate decision-maker selection.
In this paper, we propose a concurrent SMART^2 evaluation model of NPD design alternatives using the bi-directional Analytic Network Process (ANP). It is utilized to determine the local weights of these candidates from both planning and design dimensions. Following the above evaluation model, a Gradient Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) is employed to calculate the overall weights and a mathematical Zero-One Goal Programming (ZOGP) is built to incorporate multiple objectives in order to reach an optimum solution. A NPD design case is presented to illustrate the overall decision procedure and to examine the effectiveness of our proposed model. The result shows that the local weights of alternatives in the planning aspect are C (0.365) ＞ B (0.273) ＞ A (0.257) ＞ D (0.105) while those in the design aspect are A (0.299) ＞ C (0.237) ＞ B (0.283) ＞ D (0.181). Furthermore, the priority of alternatives in the largest of the three decision areas (C ＞ A ＞ B ＞ D) identified by GSA is around 66.5% (20.5%-87%). Finally, a 50-50 proportion in planning and design dimensions is applied as a simulation point to demonstrate the final optimal solution-design alternatives A and C.

關鍵字

新產品開發 ； SMART^2評價模式 ； 分析網路程序法 ； 陡坡敏感度分析 ； 0-1目標規劃法

並列摘要

The planning and design (P&D) phase is most critical to project success in new product development (NPD). When selecting an appropriate P&D alternative which involves a variety of considerations such as corporate strategy, finance, marketing, technology, production, customer need, product aesthetics, and so forth, most company's high-level management lack the ability to evaluate the candidates effectively. Substandard NPD project is often a direct result of inadequate decision-maker selection.
In this paper, we propose a concurrent SMART^2 evaluation model of NPD design alternatives using the bi-directional Analytic Network Process (ANP). It is utilized to determine the local weights of these candidates from both planning and design dimensions. Following the above evaluation model, a Gradient Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) is employed to calculate the overall weights and a mathematical Zero-One Goal Programming (ZOGP) is built to incorporate multiple objectives in order to reach an optimum solution. A NPD design case is presented to illustrate the overall decision procedure and to examine the effectiveness of our proposed model. The result shows that the local weights of alternatives in the planning aspect are C (0.365) ＞ B (0.273) ＞ A (0.257) ＞ D (0.105) while those in the design aspect are A (0.299) ＞ C (0.237) ＞ B (0.283) ＞ D (0.181). Furthermore, the priority of alternatives in the largest of the three decision areas (C ＞ A ＞ B ＞ D) identified by GSA is around 66.5% (20.5%-87%). Finally, a 50-50 proportion in planning and design dimensions is applied as a simulation point to demonstrate the final optimal solution-design alternatives A and C.

並列關鍵字

New product development ； SMART^2 evaluation model ； Analytic network process ； Gradient sensitivity analysis ； Zero-one goal programming

參考文獻

衛萬里、張文智(2005)。應用模糊德爾菲與分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之研究。設計學報。10(3)，59-80。

Baxter, Mike(1995).Product Design: A practical guide to systematic methods of new product development.London:Chapman & Hall.

Booz, Allen, Hamilton(1982).New product management in 1980s.New York:Booz, Allen, Hamilton, Inc..

Breemen, J. J.,Slamet, S.(1999).The Role of Shape in Communicating Designers' Aesthetic Intents.Proceeding of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences.(Proceeding of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences).:

Chen, Kuohsiang,Owen, C. L.(1997).Form language and style description.Design Studies.18(3),249-274.