透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.135.32
  • 期刊

後冷戰時期日本-東協互動關係之策略轉變:安全與發展之建構主義分析(1990-2010)

The Strategy Transformation of the Japan-ASEAN Relation in the Period of Post-Cold War: An Approach of Constructivism on Development and Security, 1990-2010

摘要


本文研究目的有二,一是檢視日本與東南亞政經關係變遷與政策轉變,究竟是依賴還是互賴關係?是對立衝突還是合作互利關係?二是以建構主義觀點來檢視日本與東協雙邊政經政策之轉變,並透過發展與安全兩層面的分析,來建構日本與東協政經互動模式,以及進而來預測未來的發展趨勢。 進一步以建構主義的研究途徑進行分析,檢視日本與東協互動的三個時期(即權力更迭時期、東南亞金融危機時期、和反恐與經濟整合時期)的互動關係,以及其間的變動方式與趨勢。本文研究結論發現第一階段日本與東協的關係是經濟「依賴」,但政治卻是處於對立立場。第二階段日本與東協的關係在經濟上仍處於是「依賴」,但靠著自立自助的發展,降低對日本依賴程度,反倒對中國拓展更密切的經貿關係。這是因為日本遭受金融危機的衝擊,也降低對東協提供更多的經濟援助。但是政治上卻出現了合作現象,雙邊重視非傳統安全的合作,替代以往傳統安全上的對立關係。第三階段的日本與東協關係,在經濟上轉變成「互賴」,並以經濟合作夥伴關係共同發展,重視建立雙贏關係,但在政治上出現中國威脅論的高漲,以及日本追求政治正常化國家地位,在中國因素介入下,又使得日本與東協關係出現對立不安。

關鍵字

建構主義 東協 日本

並列摘要


This paper have two purposes, first is that view the transformations of political economy relations and policy procedure between Japan and Southeast Asia, whether it is dependent or interdependent relationship? Antagonistic conflict or reciprocity relationship? Second is that using the constructivism perspective to view Japan and ASEAN bilateral political and economic policy changes, and through two levels analysis of development and security to construct the Japan-ASEAN political and economic interaction model, and thus to predict future trends. This paper uses constructivism approach to analyze the three phases of relationship between Japan and ASEAN. The conclusion is that in the first phase the relationship between Japan and ASEAN economic is ”dependency,” but in politic it is the opposite. In the second phase, the relationship between Japan and ASEAN is still ”dependent” in economy, but ASEAN relies on self-help to reduce the affect of Japan, and have actually closer to China to expand trade and economic relations. It is because Japan also suffers from the impact of the financial crisis, and then reduces the economical assistance for ASEAN. But in political cooperation, bilateral of non-traditional security cooperation is instead of traditional antagonism security. In the third phase, the economical relation transfers to ”interdependence,” and develops with economical partnership, but with the threat of China appears, and Japan's pursuit of a normal state so that Japan and ASEAN relation may be into an against anxiety.

並列關鍵字

Constructivism ASEAN Japan

參考文獻


王冠雄、戴宗翰(1991)。由區域合作之觀點探討防制海盜行為。航運季刊。11(4),63-87。
田祖海、高明(2006)。中國─東盟與日本─東盟自由貿易區之差異比較分析。中國海洋大學學報(社會科學版)。2006(3),35-39。
呂璇、緯恩(2003)。亞洲貨幣基金:回顧和展望。中國外匯管理。2003(10),18-19。
李俊久(2009)。協定一體化情境下的日本對東盟新經濟外交。現代國際關係。2009(5),19-24。
林若雩(1999)。由東協九國河內高峰會結論看東協未來合作的前景。經濟情勢暨評論季刊。4(4),1-13。

延伸閱讀