透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.23.103.87
  • 學位論文

論精神病患強制治療制度之爭議及其合憲性-以我國精神衛生法為中心

The Issues and Constitutionality of Involuntary Treatment Regimes for Mental Illness - Focusing on Taiwan's Mental Health Act

指導教授 : 李建良

摘要


本篇論文係對於我國精神衛生法的精神病患強制治療做一完整的合憲性探討,精神衛生法中相關規定包括有強制住院、強制社區治療等方式。強制住院治療係為保護嚴重病人與維護社會安全必要之治療方式,但是此方式將嚴重干涉到病患之人身自由,而新加入的強制社區治療制度是亞洲第一個國家執行此方式,對於病患所將造成的基本權侵害不得不慎之。 在探討精神衛生法中強制治療制度是否有合乎憲法保障人民之虞,其重點應先了解精神病患是否有需要國家介入使其接受強制治療的必要。先通過此一大前提,才能對強制治療的種種方式進行手段是否合憲的檢視,以及給予修改建議,故本篇論文將循此一脈絡,對我國精神衛生法的強制治療將造成嚴重精神病患的基本權利侵害進行分析,並提出救濟方式與修改建議等結論,希望能對弱勢的精神病患權利有足夠之保障與助益。

並列摘要


This paper aims to conduct a complete constitutional-research on involuntary treatment of mental-disorderly patients regulated by the Mental Health Act. Mental Health Act contains regulations such as Involuntary Hospitalization treatment, Mandatory Community treatment, and so on. Involuntary Hospitalization treatment is an important method that protects both serious patients and the safety of society, but it also poses immense interference to the freedom of patients. On the other hand, Taiwan is the first Asian country to ever practiced Mandatory Community treatment, hence the damage caused by this method on patients’ rights must be concerned. While discussing whether “involuntary treatment” conforms to the civilian rights given by the Constitution, the main point should be focused on if the National interference on imposing involuntary treatment on mental-disabled patients is necessary. Only when this prerequisite is confirmed true, can we examine whether these involuntary treatments conform to the Constitution, and subsequently offer advice. Consequently, this paper will follow this sequence to analyze the damage done to the rights of mental-disorderly patients by the involuntary treatment imposed by Mental Health Act in Taiwan, and hence propose relief plans as well as improvement methods, in hope to secure sufficient rights and welfares for the mental-disabled patients.

參考文獻


高雪琴(2006),《從比例原則論即時強制的界限》,台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
鄧鈞豪(2011),《強制社區治療制度之社會治理機能》,台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
薛瑞元、廖慧娟(2007),<保障病人權益-談精神衛生法修訂重點>,《醫療品質雜誌》,第1期第4卷,頁56-60。
黃昭元(2004),<憲法權利限制的司法審查標準:美國類型化多元標準審查模式的比較分析>,《臺灣大學法學論叢》,第33卷第3期,頁45-148。
林鈺雄(2004),<從基本權體系論身體檢查處分>,《台大法學論叢》,第33卷第3期,頁149-200。

被引用紀錄


蕭孝如(2017)。警察強制護送就醫制度之研究-以精神衛生法第32條為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703770
姚冠汶(2015)。智能障礙性侵害加害人輔導治療困境之調查研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614020650
卓欣怡(2016)。醫療不作為侵權行為研究-以我國醫療實務判決為分析〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1303201714245343

延伸閱讀