國中生學習科目神馳經驗與學業成績相關之研究

A Study on the Relationships between Flow Experience and Academic Achievement of Subjects in Junior High School Students

吳怡瑾(Yi-Jin Wu)

指導教授 ： 曾淑惠

國立臺北科技大學/人文與社會科學學院/技術及職業教育研究所/碩士(2011年)

https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2011.00516

摘要

本研究旨在瞭解國中學生對學習科目的神馳經驗感受程度，其次比較不同背景變項的國中學生在各學習科目上神馳經驗感受之差異情形，最後分析各學習科目神馳經驗與學業成績間的相關。本研究採用問卷調查法，以國民中學學生為研究對象，並以「國民中學學生學習科目神馳經驗與學業成績」調查問卷為研究工具，共發出問卷1,140份，回收有效問卷1,024份，問卷有效回收率為89.82%。統計方法採描述性統計、單一本ｔ考驗、獨立樣本ｔ考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關。經資料處理分析後，獲得以下結論：
一、國中學生的國文、英語科目神馳經驗感受程度顯著高於中等符合程度臨界點，數學科目顯著低於中等符合程度。
二、國中學生在國文科目的神馳經驗會因性別、家庭月收入、父親教育程度而有差異。
（一）國中女生的神馳經驗感受程度高於男生。
（二）家庭月收入較高者，其子女會有較高的神馳經驗感受程度。
（三）父親教育程度在「研究所以上」的學生神馳經驗感受高於「國中或以下」程度。
三、國中學生在英語科目的神馳經驗會因性別、家庭月收入、父母教育程度而有差異。
（一）國中女生的神馳經驗感受程度高於男生。
（二）家庭月收入為「50,001∼75,000」的學生神馳經驗感受程度高於「25,000以下」。
（三）父親教育程度在「專科或大學（含技術學院）」的學生神馳經驗感受高於「國中或以下」程度；而「研究所以上」的父親，其學生感受程度高於父親為「高中（職）」與「國中或以下」。
（四）母親教育程度在「研究所以上」及「專科或大學（含技術學院）」的學生神馳經驗感受高於「高中（職）」或「國中或以下」程度。
四、國中學生在數學科目的神馳經驗會因性別、家庭月收入、父母教育程度、學校所在地區而有差異。
（一）國中男生的神馳經驗感受程度高於女生。
（二）家庭月收入在「25,001∼50,000」與「50,001∼75,000」的學生神馳經驗感受程度高於「25,000以下」。
（三）父母教育程度愈高，其子女的神馳經驗感受程度就愈高。
（四）中部學校的神馳經驗感受程度高於北部學校。
五、國中學生學習科目的神馳經驗與學業成績具有正相關。

關鍵字

學習科目 ； 神馳經驗 ； 學業成績

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the junior high school students’ flow experience of subjects. It compares the diverseness of the students among different background variables. Analysis reveals the relationships between flow experience and the academic achievement of subjects.
Junior high school students was the object of this study. The questionnaire of “relationships between flow experience and academic achievement of subjects” was developed as instrument for junior high school students. A total of 1,140 questionnaires were distributed. The usable returned instrument was 1,024 and got 89.92% of return rate. Descriptive statistics, single sampling t test, independent t-test, One-Way ANOVA, and Pearson Product Moment correlation were used to analyze the data.
The important findings were as follows:
1. The junior students’ flow experience in Chinese and English subject were little higher significant than intermediate point, However Mathematic was lower than it.
2. There was difference of the junior students’ flow experience in Chinese subject because of gender, family incomes and father’s education level.
(1) The junior girl students had more flow experience than junior boy students.
(2) Students who was high income families had more flow experience.
(3) Students’ fathers whose had master degrees or above had more flow experience than students whose fathers were at junior or below levels.
3. There was difference of the junior students’ flow experience in English sunject because of gender, family incomes and parents’ education level.
(1) Junior girl students had more flow experiences than junior boy students.
(2) Students from families which incomes between NT$50,001 to NT$75,000 had more flow experience than students from families of less than NT$25,000.
(3) Students’ fathers whose had master degrees or above had more flow experience than students’ fathers whose were at senior, vocational, junior or below levels.
(4) Students’ mothers whose had master degrees or above had more flow experience than students’ mothers whose were at senior, vocational, junior or below levels.
4. There was difference of the junior students’ flow experience in Mathematics because of gender, family incomes, parents’ education level and school locations.
(1) Junior boy students had flow experience than junior girl students.
(2) Students from families which incomes between NT$25,001 to NT$75,000 had more flow experience than students from families of less than NT$25,000.
(3) The students would have more flow experience when their parents had higher education levels.
(4) Students from midland of Taiwan had more flow experience than students from northern part.
5. There was significant positive correlation between flow experience and academic subjects achievement.

並列關鍵字

Subjects ； Flow Experience ； Academic Achievement

參考文獻

王全興（2008a）。九年一貫課程改革之個人慎思歷程。中等教育，59(3)，94-102。

秦夢群（1994）。非紙筆測驗在學校評鑑中的應用：以導師為例。師友，323，24-27。

許德便（2006）。九年一貫課程實施的現場問題－九年一貫課程與一綱多本（國中篇）。台灣教育，642，11-20。

游進年（2007）。國民中小學九年一貫課程實施概況之調查研究。中等教育，58(4)，48-71。

黃富順（1973）。影響國中生學業成就的家庭因素。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，16，384-486。