公告應回收廢棄物進退場原則及機制之研究

The Principles and Mechanisms of Announcing New Recycling and Countermanding Items

蔡佳倫(Chia-Lun Tsai)

指導教授 ： 張添晉

國立臺北科技大學/工程學院/環境規劃與管理研究所/碩士(2006年)

https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2006.00382

摘要

2004年環保署擬訂一般廢棄物全分類零廢棄計畫，目標在2007年將回收率提升至25%，故除了增加現有公告回收物質之回收數量外，必須新增資源回收項目，以達成未來設定之回收目標。
有鑒於國內資源回收物整體公告流程作業尚未完善，本研究針對國內資源回收進退場管制情形，進行機制之研擬規劃，並探討目前應回收廢棄物項目之作業體系現況，參考過去環保署新增公告資源回收物品之評估原則，考量國內現況，規劃資源回收物之進退場機制及輔導配套措施之管理方式，以利政府推動資源回收制度之健全，達到增進資源回收率目的。
本研究針對規劃之進退場機制進行案例分析，依據進場機制案例分析結果，建議優先公告回收項目以乾衣機為最優先，手提音響、傳真機、吸塵器、電話機、錄放影機、微波爐等次之，其中烤箱、傳真機及滑鼠項目符合民間自辦回收標準，即資源化比例高、有害物質比例低及資源化價值高，故建議先期可採用民間自辦回收方式辦理。退場機制案例分析結果，優先解除列管項目以廢鋁箔包為最優先，廢鐡容器、廢紙盒包及廢鋁容器等次之，其中廢紙盒包之基金餘絀為負值，必須將基金問題處置完畢方可列入解除列管項目。

關鍵字

資源回收 ； 評估機制 ； 進場機制 ； 退場機制

並列摘要

Based on the national policy of the “Complete Recycling for Zero Waste” action plan, a targeted 25% of garbage recycling rate will be achieved by the year 2007. In order to promote recycling rate, one of strategies is to announce new recycling items. This study aims to standardize the mechanisms used to achieve zero waste through recycling.
This study designed the evaluation mechanism for announcing due recyclable material and the set of evaluation mechanism to countermand due recycle waste. Moreover this study aims to assist the administration by doing some feasibility analysis on announcing and countermanding various products to recycling items by considering their recycling value and degree of harm to the environment.
According to a survey which gathered fundamental information from each item, this study analyzes the feasibility of new listed products to be recycled. Through evaluation among the 10 items, the priority to be listed as mandatory recycling items are, waste dryer, waste portable stereo, waste facsimile machine, waste vacuum cleaner, waste telephone set, waste video recorder and waste microwave ovens. Going a step further to choose the most appropriate newly listed products by self-sponsored. This step comprises of three principles: 1) high reuse parts of the entire product. 2) low ratio of toxic substance. 3) high recycling value. According the results of this study, the priority of announcing listed items as self-sponsored are, waste electric ovens, waste facsimile machine and waste mouse were suggested.
In addition, this study evaluates mechanism to countermanding of due recyclable waste. After checking with the principles of processes, this study found that the priority to be countermanded as recycling items are, aluminum foil packing, iron container, paper carton and aluminum container. The profit of funding for paper carton is lost, as a result, paper carton could not be countermanded as recycling items.

並列關鍵字

recycling ； evaluation mechanism ； announcing mechanism ； countermanding mechanism

參考文獻

[31] 行政院環境保護署，94年環境白皮書，台北市：行政院環境保護署，2006，第310頁。

[32] 行政院環境保護署，www.epa.gov.tw.

[37] 行政院環境保護署，中華民國環境保護統計月報，第205期，2006，第66-68頁。

[1] Rolf Widmer, Heidi Oswald-Krapf, Deepali Sinha-Khetriwal, Max Schnellmann and Heinz Bo¨ni, “Global perspectives on e-waste,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 25, no. 5, 2005, pp. 436-458.

[2] Martin Streicher-Portea, Rolf Widmerb, Amit Jainc, Hans-Peter Baderd, Ruth Scheideggere and Susanne Kytzia, “Key drivers of the e-waste recycling system: Assessing and modelling e-waste processing in the informal sector in Delhi,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 25, no 5, 2005, pp. 472-491.