本研究目的旨在探討不同熱身運動方式介入對測功儀划船表現的影響。受試者為12名具有兩年以上訓練經驗的高中划船隊男性選手(年齡16.66 ± 0.65歲;身高176.90 ± 3.31公分;體重69.91 ± 2.55公斤)。實驗採動態熱身組(慢跑)、靜態熱身組(主動伸展)、專項熱身組(測功儀),受試者以平衡次序分為三組分別接受以上三種不同熱身運動方式進行10分鐘熱身,然後休息3分鐘,再使用測功儀來測驗划船表現。以運動時間、平均槳頻、平均功率、平均消耗熱量進行重複量數單因子變異數分析。結果:在運動時間(動態熱身組優於專項熱身組、專項熱身組優於靜態熱身組)、平均功率(動態熱身優於靜態熱身組、專項熱身組和動態熱身組之間未達顯著差異)、平均消耗熱量(動態熱身組優於專項熱身組、專項熱身組優於靜態熱身組)等變項上均達顯著差異(p< .05),而在平均槳頻則未達顯著差異。結論:動態熱身、專項熱身介入後的划船表現皆優於靜態熱身,在此建議不要在賽前或測驗前實施靜態熱身,似乎會影響划船表現的發揮。
This study aimed at exploring a single different warm-up exercises intervention on effect of dynamometer 2000 meter rowing performance. The Subjects being researched were 12 male players with two years experiences in training high school rowing teams for more than two years(age 16.66 ± 0.65 years; height 176.90 ± 3.31 cm; weight 69.91 ± 2.55 kg). There were three different groups in this experiment, which were dynamic warm-up Group (slow runs), static warm-up Group (active stretch), in this experiment, and special warm-up Group (measuring Gong instrument), Three different kinds warm-up way were intervened separately. After that, measuring Gong instrument was used (model: Concept2 - Malli E) to test 2000 meters rowing performance. To compare the three different ways, the statistics is composed of sport time, average oar frequency, average power, and average consumption heat. The results indicate that: The interventions of three different warm-up exercises intervention on 2000 meter rowing performance were not the same. In sport time, average power and average consumption of calories were significantly different, but at an average rate of stroke they were not. The dynamic warm-up was better than the special warm up regarding to the performance of intervening in rowing, and these two warm ups were better than static to warm up. According to the results, we consider the static warm-up a possible factor that influences the performance of rowing, and suggest that it should not be applied before rowing.