CMMI與ASPICE軟體流程改善之比較研究

A Comparative Study of Software Process Improvement between CMMI and ASPICE

林佳璇(Chia-Shuan Lin)

指導教授 ： 廖秀莉

中原大學/商學院/資訊管理研究所/碩士(2016年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201600201

摘要

本論文對於CMMI與ASPICE二個業界廣泛使用的軟體流程改善機制進行比較分析研究，主要是採用文件分析法進行文獻資料的蒐集、整理與分類，依照比較研究法，針對研究對象進行描述與解釋，找出模式、架構、等級、流程領域及評鑑方式的五個比較點，加以並列，進行比較分析，並以汽車電子產業作為個案研究，對於CMMI與ASPICE的具體做法和實際產出做了差異分析，可供未來企業在選擇導入軟體流程改善認證之參考。

關鍵字

流程改善 ； CMMI ； ASPICE

並列摘要

A comparative study between two widely used software process improvement mechanisms, CMMI（Capability Maturity Model Integrated）and ASPICE（Automotive Software Process Improvement and Capability dEtermination）, was described in this paper. The document analysis method was used to collect, manage and classify the reference materials. Based on the comparative research method, 5 points including model, structure, level, process area and evaluation method were juxtaposed and analyzed. Furthermore, the vehicle electronics industry was applied as a case study for the difference analysis of both implementation and output. We hope it can be a reference for the industry companies to employ the certification of software process improvement.

並列關鍵字

Software Process Improvement ； CMMI ； ASPICE

參考文獻

5. Humphrey, W. S. (1988). Characterizing the software process: a maturity framework. Software, IEEE, 5(2), 73-79.

6. Mathiassen, L., Ngwenyama, O. K., & Aaen, I. (2005). Managing change in software process improvement. Software, IEEE, 22(6), 84-91.

8. Lam, W., & Shankararaman, V. (1998, August). Managing change in software development using a process improvement approach. In

9. Lee, E. S., Kim, H. K., & Hwang, S. M. (2007, August). Design Opportunity Tree of Capability Improve for Level-up and Software Process Improvement. InSoftware Engineering Research, Management & Applications, 2007. SERA 2007. 5th ACIS International Conference on (pp. 19-24). IEEE.

14. Niazi, M., Wilson, D., & Zowghi, D. (2006). Critical success factors for software process improvement implementation: an empirical study.