透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.227.239.9
  • 學位論文

資訊公平揭露與終結內線交易 ―試論美國證券交易法公平揭露規則新制

Fair Disclosure v. Insider Trading ―Study on the SEC Regulation FD

指導教授 : 謝易宏
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本論文之研究主題為「資訊公平揭露與終結內線交易」,透過比較法之方式,解析美國證券管理委員會於二000年十月開始實施之「公平揭露規則」,探究資訊揭露與防制內線交易間之關連,同時檢討我國證券管理機關對於資訊揭露之現況,俾供未來制度調整之參考。 本論文之架構分為六章。 第一章說明本論文研究之動機、方法、限制與範圍。 第二章自經濟之觀點,探究內線交易之成因,包括資訊不對稱、效率市場臆說等,並就現行內線交易規範之基礎理論作一整理及介紹。 第三章自法律之觀點,說明美國法上企業所負之揭露義務與美國法院對於內線交易案件歷來之見解及其修正。經由此一觀察得知,美國證管會似乎有意藉由公平揭露規則之實施,將美國法院對於內線交易之界定標準重新導回「資訊平等原則」。 第四章以美國證券交易法「公平揭露規則」新制為中心,就其立法背景、規範內容、配套措施及影響與因應予以分析。由於公平揭露規則影響深遠,自草案研擬以來,便持續受到各界的關注。對於「重大性」之判斷缺乏明確標準,更使得企業人人自危,引發「寒蟬效應」。對此,美國證券管理機關如何化解企業疑慮、企業應如何自處,均於本章加以說明。 第五章則反觀我國現行之資訊揭露相關規定,包括繼續公開之定期揭露、重大事項之即時揭露與財務預測之品質與更新作一檢討,並比較其與公平揭露規則之異同。 第六章結論,整合前述五章之內容,提出三點結論,期能對我國未來法制建構有所裨益。

並列摘要


This research primarily focuses on issues regarding fair disclosure of information and curbing the rampant insider trading in Taiwan, by adopting the comparative legal study method to introduce the US’ SEC newly promulgated Regulation FD. As issues with respect to information disclosure and insider trading reveal problems of securities supervisory authorities everywhere, this research examines the regulation itself, the correlation amongst fair disclosure, prevention of insider trading, and the present disclosure system in Taiwan, so as to furnish a tentative proposition for further improvement. The scheme of the research comprises six parts as follows: Part I illustrates the motives, methods, limitations and realm of this paper. Part II bases its interpretation on Economics methodology, by which to explore the causes of insider trading, such as information asymmetry and efficient capital market hypothesis. This part also reviews and comments on the rationale behinds the regulation of insider trading. Part III focuses on the court opinion and development of insider trading regulation in the United States. This research indicates that US’ SEC dedicated itself to reviving the “parity of information” theory, which was previously overruled by the US Supreme Court. Part IV analyzes the Regulation FD, including the background of legislation, content, impact and corporate compliances. Lacking of clear criteria for “materiality”, the market responded the new regulation with so called the “chilling effect”, and the SEC tried to balance between the turmoil and efficacy of the regulation. Part V depicts current disclosure rules, including the routine filing with the SEC, prompt disclosure of material information, and the stipulation of “earning projections” in Taiwan. Furthermore, compares the differences between Regulation FD and the similar rules in Taiwan. Part VI itemizes issues as well as propositions pertaining to shaping a conclusion of this research. Meanwhile, this part tentatively contours prospects of establishing the regulatory scheme of information disclosure in Taiwan.

並列關鍵字

selective disclosure insider trading Reg. FD

參考文獻


劉志豪,「網際網路證券交易詐欺之研究」,私立中原大學財經法律研究所碩士論文,民國八十九年。
財政部證券暨期貨管理委員會網站http://www.sfc.gov.tw.
曾宛如著,「英國公司法上投資人資訊取權之分析」,二十八卷二期,台灣大學法學論叢,民國八十八年一月。
李怡宗著,「管制公司內部人交易之政策與股市資訊效率」,二十七期,會計評論,民八十二年四月。
In re Raymond L. Dirks, 21 S.E.C. Docket 1401 (1981).

被引用紀錄


吳奐廷(2014)。內線交易的灰色外延 ── 財務經濟觀點下的知情交易〔碩士論文,國立交通大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6842%2fNCTU.2014.00809
蔡麗文(2014)。重大訊息缺失揭露及其缺失特性之市場反應〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu201400463
陳慧智(2013)。重大訊息揭露缺失與投資人反應之研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu201300245
高毓謙(2009)。證券詐欺罪構成要件之詮釋與適用-兼論司法刑事判決〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu200900029
楊晴翔(2008)。證券詐欺與資訊不實損害賠償之研究-以責任要件及計算方法為中心〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu200800247

延伸閱讀