本論文之研究目的為解決債券交易前手息之爭議,本文嘗試以製作統計數據圖及排列組合其可能產生之交易類型,作為往後研究與釐清此爭議之參考。 第一章首先說明本文研究之目的及動機,再就本文研究範圍、研究方法及整體架構為簡要之敘述。 第二章針對其市場實務運作情形加以研究介紹債券市場交易之類型。 第三章係針對債券附條件交易課稅問題及法制加以研究,另針對產生債券前手息之交易型態加以類型化,得知產生債券交易前手息之爭議其交易類型有一大特色,即最後之交易類型必為「債券買斷」與「債券附買回」之類型,因此若最後之交易類型為「債券賣斷」與「債券附賣回」之類型則完全無債券前手息之爭議產生。 第四章主要為討論債券附條件交易之性質,從法律關係、稅務處理、 財務會計上加以比較分析,另買賣說與融資說之比較亦為本章之重點。 第五章係以統計抽樣方法來分析利率水準之變動對採「買賣說」與 「融資說」對課稅收入之影響,得知當債券成交利率小於票面利率採「融資說」會使債券附買回之一方課稅所得增加,採『買賣說』會使債券附買回之一方課稅所得減少。債券交易前手息之爭議係為債券附買回交易所產生前手息之規避,因此若債券附條件交易採『買賣說』課稅,依據未來利率的走勢會使債券附買回之一方課稅所得減少。 第六章結論係整合前述五章內容,提出改革意見,希望能對我國法 制建構有所助益。
This research primarily focuses on the re-purchase agreement and re-sales agreement. It analyzes the regulations by comparing the differences between Taiwan and the United States . Issues that involve “re-purchase agreement” and “re-sales agreement” will be further analyzed from tax law domain so as to furnish a proposition for further improvement. The scheme of the discussion is divided into six chapters as follows: Part Ⅰillustrates the motivation , methods ,limitations and realm of the research . PartⅡ analyzes the real time practice of performing “re-purchase agreement” and “re-sales agreement” between Taiwan and the United States. PartⅢ discusses on the tax law of the re-purchase agreement and re-sales agreement in Taiwan, and analyzes the regulatory scheme in the United States. PartⅣ demonstrates issues of the re-purchase agreement and re-sales agreement in Taiwan , such as the tax law, the tax accounting ,the financial accounting . PartⅤ discusses the difference between the United States and Taiwan’s regulations of re-purchase agreement and re-sales agreement in order to have a new view of the current laws. PartⅥ concludes the former discussions in Taiwan’s Regulatory scheme of re-purchase agreement and re-sales agreement .Furthermore, this research establish Taiwan’s regulatory of “re-purchase agreement” and “re-sales agreement”.